探索英文及繁體中文新聞報道。
Rapid Deterioration of Human Rights in Hong Kong after Passage of National Security Law
US-CECC issues an analysis on rights violations under HKNSL.
US-CECC issues an analysis of rights violations under the HKNSL.
Kowloon City District Team Says It Will Cultivate Patriotic Sports Talent; Pro-Democracy Camp Warns Funding May Be Withheld
九龍城區議會地區足球隊工作小組下午開會，九龍城區體育會向區議會申請28萬元，為地區足球隊報名參與2020至21年度的足總乙組賽事。民主派曾健超質疑，九龍城區體育會在網頁的簡介中，主旨竟開宗明義為「培養愛國愛港之體育人材」，「點解咁努力將政治帶入足球？」民主派區議員則警告，如果九龍城區體育會不謹守政治中立，或會在來年扣起撥款。
The Kowloon City District Council’s District Football Team Working Group met in the afternoon. The Kowloon City District Sports Association applied to the council for HK$280,000 to enter the district football team in the Football Association’s Division Two competition for the 2020–21 season. Pro-democracy camp member Tsang Kin-chiu questioned why the association’s website introduction stated at the outset that its purpose was to “cultivate patriotic and Hong Kong-loving sports talent”, asking, “Why work so hard to bring politics into football?” Pro-democracy district councillors warned that funding might be withheld next year if the association failed to maintain political neutrality.
CityU Broadcast: University Revises Student Disciplinary Code, Bans Derivative Works of School Song and Emblem, Likened to CityU Versions of School Song and Emblem Laws
城市大學生媒體《城市廣播》今日報道，城市大學早前通過修訂學生紀律守則，修訂內容無公開，但據了解修訂主要是為即將面世的校歌「護航」，新增條款禁止破壞大學品牌及形象的行為，包括未授權使用、修改、損毀及進行二次創作等等，而所謂「大學品牌及形象」，包括校歌、校徽或任何其他可以代表大學身份的元素，報道形容修訂是城大版的「校歌法」和「校徽法」。
Student media outlet CityU Broadcast reported today that City University had earlier approved revisions to its student disciplinary code. The details of the revisions have not been made public, but it is understood that they are mainly intended to safeguard the university’s forthcoming school song. The new provisions prohibit acts that damage the university’s brand and image, including unauthorised use, alteration, damage and derivative works. The university’s “brand and image” is understood to include its school song, emblem and any other elements that can represent its identity. The report described the revisions as CityU versions of a “School Song Law” and an “Emblem Law”.
Tai Koo residents book out screening of *Ten Years*; director feels heartache on rewatching it
由太古街坊組成的社區組織「太古同怒人」，今日於香港藝術中心包場，播放 《十年》、《地厚天高》和《理大圍城》三套電影，並邀請電影監製和導演到場分享。《十年》導演之一周冠威一度眼紅，指自己最初創作時很絕望，但經歷反送中後再看《十年》，感到心痛又亢奮：「呢班前線、呢班手足、呢班勇武，你哋確實畀咗好大嘅亢奮我。我只係拍電影，我只係想像出嚟；我做嘅微不足道，但你哋用身體做出嚟。」
The community organisation “Tai Koo Tung Nou Yan”, formed by Tai Koo residents, today booked out the Hong Kong Arts Centre to screen *Ten Years*, *The Great Learning* and *Inside the Red Brick Wall*, and invited the films’ producers and directors to share their experiences. Chow Kwun-wai, one of the directors of *Ten Years*, became visibly emotional at one point. He said he had felt desperate when he first created the film, but after experiencing the anti-extradition movement, he felt heartbroken yet exhilarated when watching *Ten Years* again: “You frontliners, you fellow protesters, you militant ones—you really gave me a great sense of exhilaration. I only make films; I only imagined it. What I did was insignificant, but you enacted it with your bodies.”
HKU Students’ Union Stays Outside Council Venue, Urges Max Zuojun Shen to Personally Respond on Communist Party Committee Status
港大校務委員會今日召開會議，審議任命內地學者申作軍與宮鵬為副校長。學生會於會前在鈕魯詩樓外，向教務長遞交聯署聲明，包括要求延後任命直接完成調查候選人背景、公開遴選委員會名單及準則，以及要求申作軍須以書面形式向學生和公眾作政治申報。港大學生會會長葉芷琳表示，學生會會靜坐至會議結束，又要求申作軍現身解釋自己是否黨委，以釋除大眾疑慮。
The University of Hong Kong’s Council met today to consider appointing mainland scholars Max Zuojun Shen and Peng Gong as vice-presidents. Before the meeting, the Students’ Union submitted a joint statement to the provost outside Knowles Building, including demands to postpone the appointments until a background investigation of the candidates was completed, and to disclose the membership and criteria of the selection committee. It also demanded that Max Zuojun Shen make a written political declaration to students and the public. HKU Students’ Union president Edy Tsz Lam Jeh said the union would hold a sit-in until the meeting ended, and demanded that Max Zuojun Shen appear in person to explain whether he was a Communist Party committee member, in order to dispel public concerns.
HKJA concerned over alleged self-censorship by NowTV, affecting press freedom
據媒體報道，NowTV 新聞主管陳鐵彪疑以「個人認為不適合」為由，下令把立法會教育界議員葉建源就香港大學其中一名副校長受推薦人是否有黨員背景的質詢片段下架。由於下架做法罕見，令人擔心報道因觸及被指黨員身份而作自我審查，記協對事件表示關注，促請陳鐵彪先生進一步向員工及公眾詳細解釋今次的處理手法，以釋疑慮。
According to media reports, NowTV news chief Chan Tit-piu allegedly ordered the removal of a clip of Legislative Council education sector lawmaker Ip Kin-yuen questioning whether one of the recommended candidates for a vice-president position at the University of Hong Kong had a party-member background, on the grounds that he "personally considered it unsuitable." As such removals are rare, concerns have been raised that the report was self-censored because it touched on the alleged party-member identity. The Hong Kong Journalists Association expressed concern over the incident and urged Mr Chan Tit-piu to provide staff and the public with a further detailed explanation of how the matter was handled, in order to dispel concerns.
Now Deletes Clip of Ip Kin-yuen Commenting on Suspected CCP Member as HKU Vice-President Candidate; Says Changes Were Made on Grounds of Prudence; Staff: Criteria Cannot Be Explained
《Now 新聞》發出聲明，解釋早前下架教育界立法會議員葉建源，評論中共黨委申作軍傳出任港大副校長的片段。聲明指，決定是基於「審慎原則、作出若干編輯改動」。不過有《Now 新聞》員工向《立場》指，聲明仍然無法解釋下架的準則，直指主管陳鐵彪上任後「三番四次新聞部出事」，是「責無旁貸」。
Now News issued a statement explaining its earlier removal of a clip in which education-sector Legislative Council member Ip Kin-yuen commented on reports that CCP party committee Max Zuojun Shen would become HKU vice-president. The statement said the decision was based on the “principle of prudence” and that “several editorial changes” had been made. However, a Now News employee told Stand News that the statement still failed to explain the criteria for removing the clip, saying that since supervisor Chan Tit-piu took office, “the news department has run into trouble time and again” and that he was “unable to shirk responsibility.”
Chu Hai College journalism department cuts Stand News reporter’s mention of “police brutality” from promotional video; sources say professor Peter Wai Kwan made decision
珠海學院新聞及傳播學系今年 7 月初在 Facebook 發布的宣傳片，邀請了多位舊生分別拍攝短片作學系宣傳之用。不過《立場新聞》得知，原本有份拍攝的《立場》記者 Sam Choy，其片段在內部試播後，遭新傳系專業應用教授兼文學院副院長關偉下令抽起，據悉是由於記者曾在片段中提及警暴內容。另外關偉曾在 9 月時公開支持記者發牌制，言論引起部分舊生不滿，有人要求將自己的宣傳片段下架，惟校方未有理會。
A promotional video published by Chu Hai College’s Department of Journalism and Communication on Facebook in early July this year featured several alumni filming short clips for departmental publicity. Stand News learned that a clip by Sam Choy, a Stand News reporter who had originally taken part in the filming, was removed after an internal preview. It was reportedly ordered removed by Peter Wai Kwan, a professor of professional applications in the department and associate dean of the Faculty of Arts, because the reporter had mentioned police brutality in the clip. In addition, Peter Wai Kwan publicly supported a journalist licensing system in September, prompting dissatisfaction among some alumni. Some asked for their promotional clips to be taken down, but the college did not act on the requests.
HKU’s “Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement Artefact Exhibition”: Object Narratives—Using the Last Freedom
名為「格物」的「反修例運動文物展」，由10月19日至31日在香港大學學生會大樓舉行。「物敍」發起人Stary表示，叫「物敍」的原因是想「以物敍事」——在反修例運動中，我們有不少相片、文字的紀錄，所以她希望以物件做紀錄的載體，讓參觀者從中體會真實和現場感。
The “Gewu” Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement artefact exhibition will be held at the University of Hong Kong Students’ Union Building from October 19 to 31. Stary, the initiator of “Object Narratives”, said the name reflected the wish to “tell stories through objects”. There are many photographic and written records of the movement, and she therefore hoped to use objects as a medium for documenting it, allowing visitors to experience its authenticity and sense of being there.
Hospital Authority Moves Against Striking Staff; Employees Alliance Submits Replies from 5,800 Members: Action Was Lawful, Urges End to Suppression
醫管局人事部於10月9日向2月參與罷工的員工發信，要求解釋「缺勤」原因。發起罷工的醫管局員工陣線今日（10月23日）遞交逾5,800名會員的集體回覆，重申罷工是合法行動，要求局方停止打壓，立即與工會展開集體談判。
The Hospital Authority’s personnel department wrote to employees who took part in the strike in February on 9 October, asking them to explain the reasons for their “absence”. The Hospital Authority Employees Alliance, which organised the strike, today (23 October) submitted a collective response from more than 5,800 members, reiterating that the strike was lawful and urging the authority to stop suppressive actions and immediately begin collective negotiations with the union.
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.