HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

搜尋新聞庫

探索英文及繁體中文新聞報道。

本頁結果 JSON

Statistics

1matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
0
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
0
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
0
Apr 23
0
May 23
0
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
0
Aug 23
0
Sep 23
0
Oct 23
0
Nov 23
0
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
0
Feb 24
1
Mar 24
0
Apr 24
0
May 24
0
Jun 24
0
Jul 24
0
Aug 24
0
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
0
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
0
Oct 25
0
Nov 25
0
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

結果 1

政府動態Facebook清除全部
顯示第 1-1 項,共 1 項紀錄中文
6 Mar 2024獨媒#3112

【23條立法】彭博報導香港擬禁用Telegram 林定國:絕無此事

【Article 23 Legislation】Bloomberg Reports Hong Kong Plans to Ban Telegram; Paul Lam: Absolutely No Such Thing

當局列出市民在23條諮詢期間提出的「其他意見」,包括將Facebook、YouTube 等網站撤出香港市場、禁止使用Telegram等加密通訊軟件,被彭博社引述意見報導。在立法會聯席會議上,新民黨葉劉淑儀批評報導引起「優才」恐慌。律政司司長林定國澄清絕無意圖禁制任何社交媒體,只針對「利用、濫用、誤用」工具散播危害國安的行為,他極有理由質疑有人「唯恐天下不亂」阻止立法,「反駁隊」隊長鄧炳強指有人在諮詢期間故意挑選一兩句誤導市民。

Among the “other views” submitted by members of the public during the Article 23 consultation, the authorities listed suggestions including withdrawing websites such as Facebook and YouTube from the Hong Kong market and banning encrypted communications software such as Telegram. Bloomberg cited these views in a report. At a Legislative Council joint meeting, New People’s Party lawmaker Regina Ip criticised the report for causing panic among “talents”. Secretary for Justice Paul Lam clarified that there was absolutely no intention to ban any social media, and that the target was only conduct involving the “use, abuse or misuse” of tools to disseminate acts endangering national security. He said he had strong reason to suspect that someone was “afraid that the world would not be in chaos” and was trying to obstruct the legislation. The captain of “the Response and Rebuttal Team”, Chris Tang, said someone had deliberately selected one or two sentences during the consultation to mislead the public.

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.