26 Sept 2025Yahoo#7362
樺加沙打風｜ 十號風球下涉在屯門黃金泳灘游水 54歲男子遭票控
A 54-year-old man was suspected of swimming at Tuen Mun’s Golden Beach on Wednesday (24th) while the No. 10 Hurricane Signal was in force, and was prosecuted for allegedly violating the Beaches Regulation.
It is understood that during Super Typhoon Ragasa’s impact on Hong Kong, a man swam at the closed Golden Beach in Tuen Mun on Wednesday. Police applied to the court for a summons today (26th) to prosecute the 54-year-old man for allegedly violating the Beaches Regulation.
Police have taken enforcement action for two consecutive days against alleged storm-chasing activities during Ragasa’s impact on Hong Kong. Police arrested two women yesterday afternoon after they allegedly took children to watch the waves at South Horizons, on suspicion of neglecting children.
一名54歲男子涉嫌於周三（24 日）十號颶風信號下，在屯門黃金泳灘游水，違《泳灘規例》遭檢控。
據了解，超強颱風「樺加沙」襲港期間，一名男子周三在已封閉的屯門黃金泳灘游泳，警方今日（26日）向法庭申請傳票，檢控該名54歲男子，涉嫌違反《泳灘規例》。
警方連續兩日針對樺加沙襲港期間涉追風行為執法，警方昨日下午拘捕兩名女子，她們被指帶小童到海怡半島觀浪，涉嫌疏忽照顧兒童。
25 Sept 2025法庭線#7354
涉TG煽惑破壞檢測中心、提「隨機殺狗」等 患自閉症男子罪成 官判囚15月、拒判醫院令
During the fifth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in February 2022, a 28-year-old man with autism was alleged to have posted messages including “bomb nucleic acid testing stations” and “randomly killing dogs” in a Telegram group. After trial, he was convicted on all three charges, including inciting common assault and criminal damage, and was sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment on Thursday (25th). The defence repeatedly urged the court to impose a hospital order. Deputy District Judge Tsui Mei-ha rejected the submission, noting that the defendant had seen more than 10 doctors throughout his life, “from childhood to adulthood”, yet “in 31 years, no one had proposed a hospital order or admission to a psychiatric hospital”. She also noted that the defendant had worked in the community for many years and had a post-secondary education, asking whether “confining him in a psychiatric hospital would really be the most beneficial option for his rehabilitation”.
The judge said she did not accept that the offences had been committed under the influence of mental illness. She said that encouraging the indiscriminate taking of police officers’ lives represented violence of the most serious kind. She also criticised the defendant for posting messages that incited, encouraged and offered rewards to others to bomb testing stations at a time when the government and healthcare institutions were making every effort to prevent the spread of the virus. Had anyone acted on the incitement, she said, the resulting casualties could have been severe. Even though the defendant was a first-time offender, a custodial sentence was appropriate.
2022 年 2 月第五波新冠疫情期間，28 歲患自閉症男子被指在 TG 群組，發布「炸核酸站」、「隨機殺狗」等訊息，他經審訊後被裁定煽惑普通襲擊、刑事損壞等 3 罪全數罪成，周四（25 日）被判監 15 個月。
辯方再三陳詞要求法庭判處醫院令。區院暫委法官崔美霞拒絕，指被告一生中見過 10 多個醫生、「由細睇到大」，惟「31 年嚟，無人提出要醫療令或者住精神病院」，又指被告在社會工作多年、有大專學歷，反問「法庭將佢困喺精神病患院入面，係咪對佢復康最有用呢？」
法官指，不接受被告受精神病影響犯案，指鼓勵隨機奪取警員生命，暴力程度屬最嚴重，又批評他在政府、醫療機構盡一切努力阻止病毒蔓延時，發布煽惑鼓勵及獎賞他人炸毀檢測站的留言。如有人受煽惑而實踐，將會傷亡慘重，即使是初犯，監禁式刑罰亦合適。
23 Sept 2025法庭線#7351
挑戰中學髮禁｜校董會一方擬呈中大教授報告證校服儀容有常規 官批准
Two secondary school graduates filed a claim in the District Court, saying they had gender dysphoria and special educational needs but that the schools had failed to address them. They said that, after they refused to cut their hair short, they were required either to be publicly singled out at school or to switch to online classes, causing them severe emotional distress. They asked the court to declare that the schools had breached the Sex Discrimination Ordinance and Disability Discrimination Ordinance, and sought compensation and an apology.
Both sides separately applied to submit expert reports. District Court Chief Judge Ko King-shiu handed down a judgment on Tuesday (23rd), approving the schools’ application to submit an expert report by a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong to demonstrate that there are conventions in Hong Kong regarding school uniforms and grooming. The students questioned how the expert’s research methods could establish such conventions, and argued that, even if they existed, they involved gender stereotypes.
The judge held that the schools’ expert was professionally qualified to give evidence and that the research methods could be challenged at trial. The judge therefore approved the inclusion of the report at this stage.
兩名中學畢業生入稟區院，指自己有性別不安及特殊學習需要，但校方完全沒處理，更因他們拒絕剪短頭髮，被要求在校內示眾或改上網課，令他們承受沉重精神壓力，要求法庭宣告校方違反性別和殘疾歧視條例、作賠償及道歉。
雙方各自申請呈交專家報告。區院首席法官高勁修周二（23 日）頒判詞，批准校方的申請，讓其呈交中大教授的專家報告，以證明香港在校服和儀容上有常規；學生一方則質疑專家的研究方法如何證明常規，而就算有，亦涉性別刻板印象。
官認為，校方的專家有專業資格提供證據，而其研究方法可在審訊中挑戰，故現階段批准加入報告。
22 Sept 2025法庭線#7348
涉參與台灣成立的「港獨」組織 3男被控串謀分裂國家 轉介區院10.8再訊
The Police National Security Department earlier arrested four men, alleging that they were members of the Hong Kong Democratic Independence Alliance, an organisation founded in Taiwan to promote Hong Kong independence. Three of the men were charged under the National Security Law with conspiracy to commit secession, while the remaining man was released on bail pending further investigation. The case came up for mention again at West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts on Monday (22nd).
警方國安處早前拘捕 4 名男子，指他們為「香港民主建國聯盟」成員，參與在台灣成立旨在推動「港獨」的組織。其中 3 男被起訴《國安法》下的「串謀分裂國家」罪，餘下一人暫准保釋候查。案件周一（22 日）於西九龍裁判法院再訊。
《國安法》指定法官、總裁判官蘇惠德應控方申請，將案件轉介區域法院，押後至 10 月 8 日再訊。3 被告均沒有保釋申請。散庭前，有旁聽人士向犯人欄揮手。
22 Sept 2025法庭#7349
平屋控大坑西邨未遷出居民 官指居民理據「基本上已經輸咗」 關注承諾書限制索償
Tai Hang Sai Estate in Shek Kip Mei is to be demolished and redeveloped. The Hong Kong Settlers Housing Corporation Limited, which built and manages the estate, has brought civil proceedings against several residents who refused to move out. Thirteen residents have not reached settlements, and the cases are being handled as two consolidated actions. In one consolidated action, one resident reached a settlement before the trial, while the remaining six began trial at the District Court on Monday (22nd).
石硤尾大坑西邨將清拆重建，興建與管理該邨的「平民屋宇有限公司」，民事控告多名拒絕遷出的居民，其中 13 人未達成和解，合併兩案處理。在其中一宗合併案，一居民開審前達和解，餘下 6 人周一（22 日）在區域法院開審。
「平屋」指於 60 年代幫助光民村居民回遷至大坑西邨，僅安排租住，並非給予業權。居民一方爭議租約條款，官強調業主有權收樓，居民相關理據「基本上已經輸咗」，但關注「平屋」在承諾書限制居民索償，或令居民感覺「冇揸拿」，稱條款「加啲減啲，可能會達到一個公正嘅平衡」。
18 Sept 2025法庭線#7331
六四沙田黑漆噴「6436」、蠟燭圖案 曾建峯認罪 判感化一年
Former Civic Party member ‘Baa Hei Gor’ Tsang Kin-fung was accused of using black spray paint to write “6436” and draw candle designs on Fo Tan Road and a notice board this year on June 4. He was charged with criminal damage and changed his plea to guilty before the trial began. He was sentenced to a 12-month conditional probation order at Sha Tin Magistrates’ Courts on Thursday (18th).
前公民黨成員「霸氣哥」曾建峯，被指今年六四在火炭馬路及告示欄，以黑色噴漆噴上「6436」、蠟燭圖案，被控刑事損壞。他至開審前改為認罪，周四（18 日）在沙田裁判法院被判處 12 個月有條件感化令。
暫委裁判官江美儀指，被告醉酒不是求情理由，其行為可能令人受煽惑，造成不可收拾的局面，又指其行為自私，不能姑息，但接納感化報告指他已意識問題，認為感化令可防止重犯，「聽從感化專業意見未嘗不可」。
判罰後，曾建峯在法院外表示承擔了自己的責任，希望當權者亦可以勇於承擔責任，又稱「6436」的字句是否煽惑破壞安寧，留待大眾判斷。
17 Sept 2025光傳媒#7320
2019年反修例事件判囚青年出獄 部分無法復學求助《信報》引述議會大黨中人慨嘆：相信佢哋已經洗心革面，但都幫唔到佢哋
As Hong Kong focuses on revitalising the economy and making every effort to attract talent, a legislator has disclosed receiving a number of requests for help from young people released after serving prison sentences for cases related to the 2019 anti-extradition bill events. They reportedly wanted to return to school after their release but were unable to do so, even with assistance from legislators. One legislator lamented: “I believe they have turned over a new leaf, but I still can’t help them.”
The Hong Kong Economic Journal’s current-affairs column reported today (the 17th) that a pro-establishment party and individual legislators are concerned about young people released after serving sentences for their involvement in anti-extradition bill cases, and want to help them reintegrate into society. Citing legislators, the column said some of the young people were still students before they were arrested but were “kicked out of school” because they were involved in anti-extradition bill cases. A source from the major party in the Legislative Council said that after their release, legislators were still unable to help them return to school despite going to considerable lengths and experiencing considerable difficulty, lamenting: “I believe they have turned over a new leaf, but I still can’t help them.”
香港全力拼經濟，招攬人才不遺餘力。有議員向傳媒披露，陸續收到2019年反修例事件判囚青年出獄後的求助個案，坦言獲釋欲重返校園無果，連議員出面協助也無法復學。有議員慨嘆，「相信佢哋已經洗心革面，但都幫唔到佢哋」。
《信報》時事專欄今（17日）報道，有建制派政黨和個別議員關注因反修例事件入獄後刑滿獲釋的青年，想協助他們重投社會。專欄引述議員消息指出，部分青年被捕前仍是學生，但因涉及反修例案件而遭「踢出校」，該議會大黨中人透露，他們出獄後，議員就算大費周章、經歷一番折騰後，仍然無法讓他們重回校園，感慨「相信佢哋已經洗心革面，但都幫唔到佢哋」。
17 Sept 2025集誌社#7324
稱不服兵役侵烏克蘭或遭迫害 白俄男模提免遣返聲請被拒申司法覆核
A 25-year-old Belarusian male model came to Hong Kong on a work visa in 2022. He subsequently filed a non-refoulement claim, saying he was “driven by conscience” and unwilling to undergo military service and join the Russian army to attack Ukraine. He feared facing serious risks if returned to Belarus. The Immigration Department and the Torture Claims Appeal Board rejected his application in turn this year.
The model filed an application for judicial review in the High Court on Monday (15th), alleging that the appeal board selectively assessed the information, including by finding that “Belarusian soldiers would not be drawn into the Russia-Ukraine war”, which amounted to procedural impropriety. The application also cited publicly available information, including United Nations human rights reports, as showing that Belarus supported Russia in confronting Ukraine. He asked the court to rule that the board’s decision was unreasonable and unlawful.
Separately, the model was earlier charged with one count of breaching a condition of stay. He appeared at the Eastern Magistrates’ Courts on Wednesday (17th), and the case was adjourned until December 10 for mention pending the outcome of his application for leave to seek judicial review. He was continued on bail.
一名 25 歲白俄羅斯籍男模特兒，2022 年以工作簽證來港。他其後提出免遣返聲請，指「受良心驅使」不願接受兵役，加入俄羅斯軍隊攻打烏克蘭，擔心被遣返回國後，面臨嚴重風險，入境處和酷刑聲請上訴委員會今年先後拒絕申請。
男模周一（15 日）入稟高等法院提司法覆核，指上訴委員會選擇性審視資料，例如認為「白俄士兵不會被捲入俄烏戰爭」，屬程序不當。入稟狀另引聯合國人權報告等公開資料，指可顯示白俄支持俄羅斯對抗烏克蘭，要求法庭裁定委員會決定不合理和不合法。
另外，男模早前被控一項違反逗留條件罪，周三（17 日）在東區裁判法院提堂，案件押至 12 月 10 日再訊，待司法覆核申請許可結果，他續准保釋。
17 Sept 2025獨媒#7325
【初選47人案】上周確認未獲扣減刑期 快必稱「預咗㗎啦」
Forty-seven people were charged with conspiracy to subvert state power over organising and participating in the pro-democracy primary election. Forty-five convicted defendants were sentenced last November, including People Power former vice-chairman Tam Tak-chi (Fast Beat), who was sentenced to four years and five months in prison. In a post on his social media account yesterday, Fast Beat said that after an earlier assessment, he received a “report card” last week confirming that he would not receive a sentence reduction. He said of the result, “Expected that,” and added, “It doesn’t matter,” because he had many books in prison that he had not yet read. Fast Beat said he still hoped to be released as soon as possible to meet his friends.
Tam is currently serving his sentence at Shek Pik Prison, with 20 months remaining. In a post yesterday, his social media account said several of his secondary-school classmates visited him before the end of last weekend. Two of them had not seen Fast Beat for nearly a year and felt that he had become considerably thinner, while his complexion looked ruddy. Fast Beat joked that his face was red because he had just finished exercising, then lifted his shirt to show his muscles to his classmates, who applauded him.
47涉組織及參與民主派初選，被控「串謀顛覆國家政權罪」，45名罪成被告去年11月判刑人民力量前副主席譚得志（快必）被判囚4年5個月。快必的社交媒站昨日發文，指早前經評估後，在上周收到「成績表」獲確認未獲扣減刑期。快必對結果表示「預咗㗎啦」，又稱「唔緊要」，因在獄中有很多書未看。快必最後稱，仍希望盡快出獄與朋友相聚。
譚得志目前在石壁監獄服刑，刑期尚餘20個月。他的社交媒站昨日發文，指數名中學同學在上周末前往探望，其中二人已近一年沒有見過快必，在見到他後感覺其瘦了不少，而且面色紅潤。快必就笑言，因為剛剛做完運動，所以面色紅紅地，並揭高上衣向中同展示肌肉，獲中同拍手讚好。
16 Sept 2025法庭線#7316
施駿興否認與女童非法性交 辯方引事主反國教聯署、男友反修例帖文 質疑報案原因
Yuen Long district councillor Chun Hing Sei, formerly vice-chairman of Young DAB, is accused of indecently assaulting an 11-year-old girl in a park in 2008 and having sexual intercourse with her three years later when she was 13. Chun Hing Sei denies indecent assault and unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 16. The trial entered its second day at the District Court on Tuesday (the 16th). The complainant continued to testify, saying she first had sexual intercourse with Shi when she was in Form Two, after which it occurred about one to three times a month. Shi later proposed ending the relationship. Two years ago, after noticing that the defendant was running for district council, the experience was brought back to her mind. She said that, as a district councillor, he “should not do anything contrary to morality”; because she “did not want anyone else to be victimised” and felt at the time that she could handle the matter maturely, she eventually decided to report it to the police. During cross-examination, the defence referred to the complainant’s 2012 Facebook petition opposing national education and her boyfriend’s 2019 posts opposing the proposed extradition law, questioning whether she reported the matter because she opposed the defendant’s political stance. She denied this.
曾任青年民建聯副主席的元朗區議員施駿興，被指於 2008 年在公園非禮 11 歲女童，又於 3 年後與 13 歲的她性交。施否認非禮及與 16 歲以下女童非法性交罪，案件周二（16 日）在區院進入第二日審訊。
事主續作供，指中二時與施首次性交，其後每月仍有約 1 至 3 次，施及後提出分手。她前年留意到被告參選區議員，勾起記憶，認為作為區議員是「唔應該有違背道德嘅事」，因「唔想有其他人受害」，且當時自覺可成熟處理事件，最後決定報警。
辯方盤問時引事主 2012 年在 Facebook 的「反國教」聯署、其男友在 2019 年的反修例帖文，質疑事主是因反對被告的政治立場而報案。事主否認。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
