7 Sept 2022法庭線#2427
照顧者慘劇近 10 年至少 8 案 3 被告曾稱盼有「安樂死」
The 58-year-old male electrician Kwok Wai-yin burned charcoal in a bedroom two years ago, killing his wife of nearly 30 years, who had terminal lung cancer. He earlier admitted one count of manslaughter and, after being remanded for more than two years, was sentenced to 12 months’ probation on Wednesday (the 7th). The case revealed that, before her death, the defendant’s wife had told family members that she was in extreme pain and hoped Hong Kong would have euthanasia.
現年 58 歲男電工郭偉賢前年在睡房燒炭，殺死已婚近 30 年、患末期肺癌的妻子。他早前承認一項誤殺罪，還押逾 2 年後，周三（7 日）被判感化 12 個月。案情透露，被告太太臨終前曾向家人稱感到極度痛苦，希望香港有「安樂死」。
7 Sept 2022法庭線#2428
11.19 理大衝突｜5 人尖沙咀暴動判囚 37 至 48 月
On 19 November 2019, police cordoned off the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, while large numbers of members of the public rallied in support of protesters trapped inside the campus. Three men and two women were arrested on Hau Fook Street in Tsim Sha Tsui and charged with rioting. One pleaded guilty before the trial, while the remaining four had earlier been found guilty. Judge Anthony Kai On Kwok sentenced the five to between 37 and 48 months’ imprisonment on Wednesday (7th).
2019 年 11 月 19 日，警方圍堵理工大學，大批巿民聲援被困校內的示威者。3 男 2 女在尖沙咀厚福街被捕，被控暴動罪，當中一人於開審前認罪，餘下 4 人早前被裁定罪名成立。法官郭啟安周三（7 日）判 5 人監禁 37 至 48 個月。
7 Sept 2022法庭線#2429
警據《國安法》申手令查新聞材料 黎智英司法覆核敗訴再提上訴
In July 2022, police obtained a new search warrant under the implementation rules of the National Security Law, allowing them to search more than 8,000 items of “journalistic material” obtained from Jimmy Lai’s mobile phone in 2020. Lai challenged the warrant by judicial review, but his challenge was dismissed on August 30. The judge granted a stay order, barring police from unlocking the materials before September 6 pending Lai’s application for leave to appeal and a stay of execution of the warrant.
The latest Judiciary records show that Lai filed an appeal the day after losing the case, on August 31. The hearing is scheduled for September 28 and is expected to last 180 minutes.
警方 2022 年 7 月據《國安法》「實施細則」獲得新搜查令，容許搜查 2020 年從黎智英手機取得、約 8000 多項的「新聞材料」。黎提司法覆核挑戰，8 月 30 日被駁回，法官批准暫緩命令，警方在 9 月 6 日前不得解封材料，以候黎申請上訴和暫緩執行手令。
司法機構資料最新顯示，黎在敗訴翌日即 8 月 31 日已提出上訴，案件排期 9 月 28 日聆訊，預計需時 180 分鐘。
6 Sept 2022獨媒#2419
警拘4人涉無牌藏有槍械或彈藥 疑3D打印槍械部件
Police arrested four people suspected of offences including unlicensed possession of firearms or ammunition, conspiracy to possess firearms or ammunition without a licence, and possession of offensive weapons. Police said those involved were suspected of using a 3D printer to produce firearm parts. The motive for using the firearms remains under investigation, but police said prosecutions would be brought.
警方拘捕4人，涉嫌干犯無牌藏有槍械或彈藥、串謀無牌藏有槍械或彈藥，及藏有攻擊性武器。警方指出，涉案人士疑使用3D打印機打印槍械部件。至於槍械的使用動機，警方則表示有待調查，但表明將作出檢控。
5 Sept 2022獨媒#2411
警拘元朗診所醫生 涉濫發「免針紙」干犯偽造文書罪
Police arrested a 64-year-old woman this afternoon on suspicion of making false documents. The woman is a clinic doctor Choi Suk Mui, Annie. Police said the doctor was suspected of over-issuing vaccine exemption certificates. More than 6,000 people are initially estimated to have visited the clinic last month, while the actual number of certificates issued remains under investigation.
警方今日下午拘捕一名64歲女子，涉嫌干犯製造虛假文書罪，該名女子是診所醫生蔡淑梅。警方表示，該名醫生疑濫發免針紙，初步估計已有逾6,000人在上月到過該診所，而實際已發出的「免針紙」數目，則有待調查。
2 Sept 2022法庭線#2405
10.13 觀塘｜中六生認 APM 外刀割警員右頸 警入稟區院索償
A Form Six student allegedly used a utility knife to stab a police officer in the neck outside Kwun Tong MTR Station three years ago. He pleaded guilty at the High Court in January to wounding with intent and was sentenced to 7 years and 9 months’ imprisonment. The injured officer filed a claim against the defendant in the District Court yesterday (the 1st), but the writ did not specify the amount sought.
中六生涉於三年前在觀塘港鐵站外，被指用鎅刀刺向一名警員的頸部。他今年一月在高等法院承認有意圖而傷人罪，遭判囚 7 年 9 個月。涉案受傷警員昨（1 日）入稟區域法院向被告索償，惟入稟狀未有列明所索金額。
2 Sept 2022法庭線#2406
運輸工被指太子站襲警無罪 入稟稱被捕後遭警施襲 向警務處處長索償
On 1 October 2019, clashes broke out in multiple districts across Hong Kong. A 42-year-old transport worker was charged with assaulting police outside Prince Edward station and was acquitted after trial. Three years later, on Thursday (1st), he filed a claim in the District Court, alleging that police officers assaulted him while he was in police custody, and seeking civil damages from the police.
2019 年 10 月 1 日，全港多區爆發衝突，42 歲運輸工被控於太子站外襲警，經審訊後獲判無罪。事隔三年，他周四（1 日）入稟區域法院，稱在警員制服及看管期間遭警員施襲，向警務處傷民事索償。
2 Sept 2022法庭線#2407
中大撒粉案｜一中大生認非法集結判囚 6 周
In January last year, the Chinese University of Hong Kong set up a checkpoint at the campus entrance to check people entering the campus. About 10 people dressed in black called on students at University Station not to show their student identity cards, then knocked down barriers and threw flour at security guards. Four CUHK students, including former president of the CU Student Union Owen Au Cheuk-hei, were charged with unlawful assembly.
One of them pleaded guilty last month at Sha Tin Magistrates’ Courts. Acting Chief Magistrate Chi Wai (1965) Cheung sentenced the defendant to six weeks’ imprisonment today (the 2nd). The magistrate said that although the incident was brief and the level of violence was low, someone was injured in the case, making a suspended sentence unsuitable. Immediate imprisonment was the only option.
去年 1 月，中文大學於校門設管制站檢查進入校園的人士，約 10 名穿黑衣人士在大學站呼籲學生不要出示學生證，又推倒屏障向保安員撒生粉，4 名中大生，包括中大學生會前會長區倬僖被控非法集結罪。
其中一人上月於沙田裁判法院認罪，署理主任裁判官張志偉今（2 日）判被告監禁 6 星期。裁判官指，案件歷時短、暴力程度低，但案中有人受傷，不適合判處緩刑，即時監禁是唯一選擇。
1 Sept 2022法庭線#2404
831 事件後太子向警喊「良心去咗邊？」 男生遭制服受傷 入稟指遭警傷害索償
On 2 September 2019, members of the public held a flower-laying event at Prince Edward station in response to the 831 Prince Edward station incident, which escalated into clashes between police and protesters. Nearly three years later, a man filed a claim in the District Court on Wednesday (31), alleging that he was injured by police in Prince Edward that day and seeking damages from the government. The claim did not specify an amount.
2019 年 9 月 2 日，市民因應 831 太子站事件，發起太子站獻花活動，演變成警民衝突。事隔近 3 年，一名市民周三（31 日）入稟區域法院，指當日在太子遭警員傷害，向政府索償，惟入稟狀未列明金額。
31 Aug 2022法庭線#2402
暴動罪成 24 歲男稱任急救員 申上訴許可被駁回 上訴庭：救人不等如中立
The applicant argued that the trial court had erred in finding that the only reasonable inference was that the young man had participated in the riot. The Court of Appeal rejected the argument, holding that serving as a first-aider during a riot was not a valid defence. “Saving lives does not mean neutrality.” Even if he identified himself as a first-aider, as long as his conduct met the elements of the offence of rioting, he had participated in the riot. The court ruled that the trial court had made no error.
申請方質疑，原審錯誤裁定青年參與暴動是唯一合理推論。上訴庭反駁，在暴動中擔任急救員並非有效辯護理由，「救人不等如中立」，即使他自我定位為急救員，但只要其行為符合暴動罪元素，則屬參與暴動，裁定原審並無犯錯。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
