16 Sept 2025集誌社#7318
香港議會案｜國安警懸紅 $20 萬通緝侯中宇 母親被助查
In the Hong Kong Parliament case, a relative of another person wanted by national security police was taken away to assist an investigation. Thirty-one-year-old Hau Chung-yu is accused of allegedly committing the offence of “subversion of state power”. A HK$200,000 reward was offered for his arrest in July, and he was later listed as a “specified absconder”. His mother was taken away by national security police today to assist an investigation and left Tsuen Wan Police Station in the afternoon.
香港議會案，再有一名被國安警通緝者的親友，被國安警帶走助查。31 歲的侯中宇，被指涉嫌「顛覆國家政權罪」，七月被懸紅 20 萬元通緝，及後被列為「指明潛逃者」，其母今日被國安警帶走助查，下午離開荃灣警署。
16 Sept 2025集誌社#7319
履職監察｜元朗區議員施駿興否認非禮、「衰11」罪名 民政：不評論，待裁決後跟進
Former vice-chairman of Young DAB and Yuen Long District Councillor Chun Hing Sei was accused of indecently assaulting an 11-year-old girl in a park in 2008 and having unlawful sexual intercourse in 2011 with a girl who was then 13. He was charged with indecent assault and unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 16, commonly known as “sex with an 11-year-old” (“衰十一”). The trial began yesterday (15th) in the District Court, and Chun Hing Sei denied the charges. In response to an inquiry from The Collective, the Home Affairs Department said the judicial proceedings were ongoing and it would not comment, adding that it would follow up appropriately after the court’s verdict.
前青年民建聯副主席、元朗區議員施駿興，被指於 2008 年在公園非禮 11 歲女童，及於 2011 年與時為 13 歲的女童性交，被控非禮及俗稱「衰十一」的與 16 歲以下女童非法性交罪。案件昨（15日）起在區域法院開審，施駿興否認控罪。民政事務總署回覆《集誌社》查詢指，案件司法程序仍在進行，不會作任何評論，會在法庭裁決後適當跟進。
15 Sept 2025法庭線#7308
3男涉煽惑殺警罪成囚22月、提上訴遭駁回 上訴庭指即使沒人被煽惑亦不減刑責
Three men were accused of threatening to kill police officers and their family members in a WhatsApp group in October 2019. After trial, they were convicted on two counts of inciting others to wound with intent and sentenced to 22 months’ imprisonment. All three appealed against their sentences, while one also appealed against his conviction. After hearing the case in May this year, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals on the same day and issued its reasons for judgment on Monday (15th).
On the conviction appeal, the Court of Appeal said the messages could not be considered without taking their context and the interactions with other members into account, as doing so would amount to “dealing with the messages in isolation”. After analysing a number of messages, it found that the appellant and his co-defendants had “echoed one another”, “believed that all police officers deserved to die and hoped others would agree with their views”. It agreed with the trial judge that “he was not merely seeking to attract attention, vent his emotions or even add fuel to the fire”, and dismissed the appeal.
As to the sentence appeals, the Court of Appeal said that the fact that no one had been incited to commit the relevant acts did not lessen the inciters’ criminal liability; however, if someone had been incited and committed the relevant acts, that would aggravate the inciters’ culpability. The court also said that the doxxing of the three men involved, at most, telephone harassment and people knocking on their doors, and did not amount to an extreme situation warranting an additional reduction in sentence. It likewise dismissed the appeals.
3 名男子被指 2019 年 10 月，在 WhatsApp 群組揚言殺害警員及其家屬，經審訊後被裁定兩項「煽惑有意圖而傷人」罪成，判監 22 個月。3 人不服刑罰上訴，當中 1 人同時提定罪上訴，案件今年 5 月聆訊後，即日被上訴庭駁回，周一（15 日）頒判案理由書。
就定罪上訴，上訴庭指涉事訊息若不循上文下理、與其他成員互動一併考慮，「等同把訊息抽離處理」，並分析多段訊息，裁定上訴人與同案被告「一唱一和」，「認定所有警員都死不足惜，並希望其他人認同其觀點」，認同原審指「他不只是吸引他人眼球、宣洩情緒、甚至是火上加油那麼簡單」，遂駁回上訴。
至於刑罰上訴，上訴庭表示，沒人被煽惑作出有關行為，並不會減輕煽惑者的刑責，但若有人受到煽惑而作出有關行為，則會加重煽惑者的罪責。上訴庭又指，三人被起底充其量只是涉及電話滋擾、上門拍門，並不屬於可獲額外減刑的極端情況，同樣駁回上訴。
11 Sept 2025集誌社#7292
香港議會案｜吳文君父被國安警帶走助查
Wenjun (1966) Wu, who is wanted by national security police with a HK$200,000 bounty and is alleged to have participated in the “Hong Kong Parliament” election and committed the offence of subversion of state power, had their father taken away by national security police this morning (11th) to assist with an investigation. He left the police station at noon. Wenjun (1966) Wu’s father, wearing a blue shirt and black trousers, walked out of Sheung Shui Police Station at around 12 noon. He did not respond to media questions and immediately left in the direction of the cycle path.
被國安警懸紅 20 萬元通緝，被指涉嫌參與「香港議會」選舉，涉干犯「顛覆國家政權罪」的吳文君，其父今（11日）早被國安警帶走助查，中午離開警署。吳文君的父親身穿藍衫黑長褲，於中午 12 時許，步出上水警署，他未有回應傳媒提問，隨即沿單車徑方向離開。
11 Sept 2025明報#7295
學者：倘未提適合框架 或續違人權法
In 2023, the Court of Final Appeal ruled in the Sham Tsz-kit case that the government had a positive obligation under Article 14 of the Bill of Rights Ordinance to establish an alternative framework recognising same-sex partnerships, and stayed enforcement of the ruling for two years. Simon Ngai Man Young, a professor at the University of Hong Kong’s Faculty of Law, said that unless the government proposed a suitable alternative framework, it would continue to breach its obligations under Article 14 and might also violate the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights at the international level. However, he said the Court of Final Appeal’s order did not compel either party to the proceedings to do anything, and that after the stay expires next month, the government might not be directly in breach of the court order.
終審法院2023年就岑子杰案頒令，裁定政府違反《人權法案條例》14條下設立承認同性伴侶替代框架的積極義務，並暫緩兩年執行。港大法律學院教授楊艾文說，除非政府提出適合替代框架，否則政府會持續違反14條責任，在國際層面上也可能違反《公民權利和政治權利國際公約》。不過，他形容終院頒令無強制與訟雙方要做什麼，今次暫緩限期下月屆滿後，政府未必有直接違反法庭命令。
10 Sept 2025法庭線#7285
蘇浚鋒煽惑投白票案 向終院申上訴許可 排期10.17聆訊
Former Chinese University student union president So Tsun-fung was prosecuted by the ICAC for reposting online in 2021 a post by former Legislative Council member Hui Chi-fung advocating that people cast blank ballots in elections. After the trial magistrate ruled that the charge was constitutional, Su changed his plea to guilty and was sentenced to two months’ imprisonment, suspended for 18 months. He appealed by way of case stated, but the High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to issue him a certificate to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.
So Tsun-fung applied directly to the Court of Final Appeal for leave to appeal. The court’s website shows that the case is scheduled to be heard on Oct. 17. The application for leave to appeal will be handled by three permanent judges of the Court of Final Appeal: Li Yi, Fok Siu-kong and Lam Man-hon.
前中大學生會會長蘇浚鋒，指 2021 年在網上轉載前立法會議員許智峯倡選舉投白票帖文，被廉署起訴。蘇在原審裁判官裁定控罪合憲後，改為認罪，被判囚兩個月、緩刑 18 個月。他以案件呈述方式提上訴，被高院駁回及拒向他發出上訴至終院證明書。
蘇浚鋒直接向終院申請上訴許可。終院網頁顯示，案件排期 10 月 17 日聆訊，將由 3 名終院常任法官李義、霍兆剛及林文瀚處理其上訴許可申請
9 Sept 2025法庭線#7275
香港獨立黨案被告認罪未獲全數減刑 申終極上訴許可 終院要求提出不應駁回原因
The Portuguese national Wong Kin Chung, alleged to be chairman of the “Hong Kong Independence Party”, was arrested while entering Hong Kong in 2022. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to incite secession under the National Security Law and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He appealed after not receiving the full sentence reduction for pleading guilty because of the minimum sentence under the National Security Law. The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal in April this year, and last week also refused to issue a certificate granting leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.
Wong Kin Chung then directly applied to the Court of Final Appeal for leave to appeal. The Registrar of the Court of Final Appeal said on Monday (the 8th) that there was no reasonable arguable point in the case, and required the applicant to provide by 6 October reasons why the application should not be dismissed.
被指為「香港獨立黨」主席的葡籍男子黃煡聰，2022 年入境時被捕，他承認《國安法》下「串謀煽動分裂國家」罪，被判囚 5 年。因《國安法》刑期下限，他未獲全數認罪減刑，就此提出上訴。上訴庭今年 4 月拒批上訴許可，上周並拒批上訴至終審法院許可證明書。
黃煡聰亦直接向終院申請上訴許可，終院司法常務官周一（8 日）指案件沒有合理可供爭辯之處，限申請方在 10 月 6 日前，提出不應駁回其申請的原因。
9 Sept 2025法庭線#7282
涉參與台灣成立的「港獨」組織 25歲男被控串謀分裂國家 高院申保釋被拒
The National Security Department earlier arrested four men, alleging that they were members of the Hong Kong Democratic Nation-Building Alliance, an organisation established in Taiwan to promote “Hong Kong independence”. Three of the men were charged with one count of conspiracy to commit secession under the National Security Law, and the cases will be transferred to the District Court. One of the men, aged 25, applied for bail in the High Court on Tuesday (the 9th). After hearing the man’s submissions in person, Judge Li Wan-tung refused bail. He will remain remanded in custody, and the case was adjourned to 22 September for a further hearing.
警方國安處早前拘捕 4 名男子，指他們為「香港民主建國聯盟」成員，參與在台灣成立旨在推動「港獨」的組織。其中 3 男被起訴一項《國安法》下的「串謀分裂國家」罪，案件將轉交區院處理。其中一名 25 歲男子周二（9 日）於高等法院申請保釋，法官李運騰聽畢男子親自陳詞，拒絕其保釋。他須繼續還押，案件押後至 9 月 22 日再訊。
5 Sept 2025法庭線#7261
黃之鋒被控《國安法》串謀勾結罪 11.21進行交付高院程序
Joshua Wong, the former secretary-general of Demosisto who is serving a sentence in the case involving 47 people over the pro-democracy primary, was arrested at Stanley Prison in early June this year. He was charged under the National Security Law with conspiracy to collude with a foreign country or external forces to endanger national security, and appeared for a mention at the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts on Friday (the 5th). National Security Law designated judge and Chief Magistrate Victor So Wai-tak adjourned the case to Nov 21 for committal proceedings to the High Court. Wong did not apply for bail, and the hearing lasted three minutes. After the hearing, Wong waved to the public gallery and made a salute gesture. People in the gallery shouted: “Hang in there,” “Take care, Joshua,” and “Don’t worry, we’re here with you.”
正就民主派初選 47 人案服刑的前香港眾志秘書長黃之鋒，今年 6 月初在赤柱監獄被捕，被控《國安法》「串謀勾結外國或者境外勢力危害國家安全」罪，周五（5 日）在西九龍裁判法院作提訊日。
《國安法》指定法官、總裁判官蘇惠德押至 11 月 21 日進行交付高院程序，黃沒有保釋申請，聆訊歷時 3 分鐘。散庭後，黃向旁聽席揮手、作敬禮手勢，旁聽人士高呼「撐住呀」、「保重呀之鋒」、「放心呀有我哋陪住你」。
5 Sept 2025法庭線#7263
理大衝突｜服刑完畢鄭錦滿暴動上訴得直 上訴庭指原審准控方加控暴動屬犯錯
During the PolyU clashes in November 2019, eight people were accused of assisting protesters in escaping PolyU through drainage channels and leaving in “parent cars” sent to pick them up. Five of them pleaded not guilty and stood trial. Former Civic Passion member Cheng Kam-mun was convicted of rioting and sentenced to three years and eight months in prison, while the other four were convicted of intending to obstruct the course of justice and sentenced to between 12 and 13 months’ imprisonment. The five convicted defendants appealed against their convictions. The Court of Appeal of the High Court handed down its judgment on Friday (the 5th), allowing Cheng Kam-mun’s riot appeal and quashing his conviction and sentence.
2019 年 11 月理大衝突，8 人被指協助爬渠逃出理大的示威者離開，並駕「家長車」接應，當中 5 人不認罪受審；前熱血公民成員鄭錦滿被裁定暴動罪成，判囚 3 年 8 個月；另外 4 人則被裁定意圖妨礙司法公正罪成，判監 12 至 13 個月。5 名罪成被告不服定罪提上訴，高等法院上訴庭周五（5 日）頒判詞，當中裁定鄭錦滿暴動上訴得直，撤銷定罪及判刑。
判詞提到，原審區院暫委法官鄭念慈容許控方對鄭在意圖妨礙司法公正之外再加控暴動屬犯錯，形容是一個「遲來得可以的舉動」，使鄭被「兩面包抄」，又指控方修訂後的，是「全方位無死角」的控罪書。
鄭錦滿已刑滿出獄。據《法庭線》統計，鄭為反修例相關案件中，第二名被指為示威者，而就暴動罪上訴得直的被告。至於其餘 4 人意圖妨礙司法公正罪的上訴則被駁回，維持原判。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
