13 Apr 2021立場新聞#1322
被指涉擾去年立會委員會主席選舉 黃碧雲尹兆堅被控藐視罪 押後至 10 月再訊
Andrew Wan and Helena Wong were charged with contempt over alleged disruption of chair elections at meetings of two Legislative Council committees in October 2020. The case alleges that at the Panel on Development Affairs, Wong and Ted Hui competed to speak into the microphone, slowing the proceedings. At the Panel on Environmental Affairs, Wong was accused of passing Wan a ballot paper of the same colour but with different content, while Wan put both ballot papers into the ballot box, delaying the meeting by five minutes. The case was adjourned to 4 October for mention, and Wong was granted bail.
尹兆堅及黃碧雲被指於2020年10月立法會兩個委員會的會議上擾亂主席選舉，被控藐視罪。案情指黃於立法會發展事務委員會，與許智峯「搶咪講嘢」，導致程序緩慢。而在環境事務委員會上，黃被指控將一張顏色相同但內容不同的選票傳給尹，而尹將2張選票皆放入投票箱，導致會議拖延了5分鐘。案件押後至10月4日再訊，黃獲准保釋。
9 Apr 2021NowTV#1316
尹兆堅及黃碧雲被控藐視罪 涉立法會委員會主席選舉
Andrew Wan and Helena Wong, who are respectively being remanded in custody and released on bail over the primary election case, have been charged with contempt in connection with last year’s election of the chair of a Legislative Council panel. The case will be mentioned in court on April 13.
因初選案而分別正還押及獲保釋的尹兆堅和黃碧雲，被起訴藐視罪，案情涉及去年立法會事務委員會主席選舉。案件4月13日提堂。
7 Apr 2021眾新聞#1311
831參與未經批准集結案 黎智英李卓人楊森認罪 李、楊：「認罪但不認錯」
Jimmy Lai, Lee Cheuk-yan and Yeung Sum were charged with participating in an unauthorised assembly on 31 August 2019. The case began, and all three pleaded guilty. They were granted bail, with sentencing scheduled for 16 April.
黎智英、李卓人及楊森被控2019年8月31日參與未經批准集結，案件開審。三人認罪，獲批保釋，案件4月16日判刑。
1 Apr 2021立場新聞#1309
【8.18 維園案】李柱銘吳靄儀等 7 人罪成 暫准保釋 4.16 判刑 面臨最高 5 年監禁
Martin Lee, Jimmy Lai, Audrey Eu and four others were found guilty of organising and participating in an unauthorised assembly in connection with the “flowing assembly” organised by the Civil Human Rights Front on August 18, 2019. Mitigation and sentencing for the seven were adjourned until April 16. Au Nok-hin and Leung Yiu-chung, who had earlier pleaded guilty in the same case, have already made their mitigation submissions and will also be sentenced on April 16.
李柱銘、黎智英、吳靄儀等7人，就2019年8月18日民陣發起的「流水式集會」，被裁定組織及參與未經批准集結罪成。7 人的求情及判刑押後至4月16日處理。同案的區諾軒及梁耀忠早前已認罪，法官亦已聽取求情，同樣將於4月16日判刑。
26 Mar 2021立場新聞#1291
【12 港人】李宇軒拒見律師下落未明 妹妹：人間蒸發如同內地 家書曾表明盼家屬安排律師
Li Yuxuan’s sister said in an interview that a letter he sent to his family from Shenzhen stated that he hoped to contact his family to report that he was safe after returning to Hong Kong, and that he hoped his family would arrange a lawyer in Hong Kong. However, when a lawyer appointed by the family met Li Yuxuan earlier, he said he did not need a lawyer. No defence lawyer appeared in court when he was brought before the court, and it remains unknown whether he has legal representation.
李宇軒妹妹受訪時透露，李在深圳寄予家屬的信件表明希望回港後向家人報平安，及希望家屬在香港安排律師。但早前家屬委派律師與李宇軒見面時，李卻表示不需要律師，提堂時亦無辯方律師出庭，至今仍不知道他是否有代表律師。
25 Mar 2021眾新聞#1285
【蔡玉玲案】辯方質疑運輸署無權力規限查冊目的 控方指若接受任何申請機制會被濫用
Choy Yuk Ling, Bao, a producer of RTHK’s 《鏗鏘集》, was charged with two counts of making false statements, contrary to the Road Traffic Ordinance, after conducting vehicle registration searches last year for a feature report on 7.21. The case opened today (24th) at the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts. The defence and prosecution completed their closing submissions. Chief Magistrate Joyce Xu Kei-wai adjourned the verdict to April 22, and Choy Yuk Ling, Bao was granted bail on the original conditions.
港台《鏗鏘集》編導蔡玉玲因去年製作7.21專題報道而進行車牌查冊，被控兩項作出虛假陳述罪，違反《道路交通條例》，案件今日（24日）在西九龍裁判法院開審。控辯雙方完成結案陳詞，主任裁判官徐綺薇宣佈押後裁決至4月22日，蔡玉玲獲准以原有條件保釋。
15 Mar 2021立場新聞#1275
【不斷更新】47 人案 高院指定法官處理 4 人保釋覆核
High Court designated judge To Lai-ping to handle the Department of Justice’s bail reviews for the remaining four defendants. Ho Kai-ming, Si Tak-lai and Yue Shun Lee were granted bail, while Ho Sum Cheung remained remanded in custody.
高等法院指定法官杜麗冰處理律政司對餘下4名被告的保釋覆核，何啟明、施德來及李予信獲准保釋，張可森繼續還押。
5 Mar 2021獨媒#1261
被指為「SUCK Channel」管理員 26歲男遭加控至25罪 包括串謀煽惑暴動
The administrator of the SUCK Channel was further charged with multiple offences: one count each of conspiracy to incite others to commit criminal damage, conspiracy to incite others to commit arson, conspiracy to incite others to commit public nuisance, conspiracy to incite others to make explosives, conspiracy to incite others to cause grievous bodily harm with intent, conspiracy to incite others to riot, and conspiracy to incite others to administer poison or other destructive, noxious or harmful substances with intent to cause grievous bodily harm. He was also charged with a total of 18 alternative counts, comprising two counts of inciting others to commit criminal damage, five counts of inciting others to commit arson, and nine counts of inciting others to commit public nuisance, as well as two further counts of inciting others to commit public nuisance.
SUCK Channel頻道管理員再被加控多項罪名，被控各一項「串謀煽惑他人犯刑事損壞」、「串謀煽惑他人犯縱火」、「串謀煽惑他人犯公眾妨擾」、「串謀煽惑他人製造炸藥」、「串謀煽惑他人有意圖而導致身體受嚴重傷害」、「串謀煽惑他人犯暴動」、「串謀煽惑他人施用毒藥或其他殘害性物品或有害物品，為使他人身體受嚴重傷害」罪。他另被控合共18項交替控罪，包括2項「煽惑他人犯刑事損壞」、5項「煽惑他人犯縱火」、9項「煽惑他人犯公眾妨擾」及2項「煽惑他人犯公眾妨擾」罪。
26 Feb 2021立場新聞#1245
警方申強制壹傳媒提供電子資料密碼 法官拒絕：國安法、普通法均不可強迫提供密碼
Police arrested Next Digital founder Jimmy Lai Chee-ying and several senior executives last August, and entered the Next Digital building to seize a large quantity of documents. Next Digital subsequently filed proceedings in the High Court, claiming that the documents seized by police might be covered by legal professional privilege (LPP) or constitute journalistic material. The court had earlier ordered both sides to jointly review the relevant data to determine whether it fell into either category. The Department of Justice, representing the police, applied to vary the court order to compel the plaintiffs to provide passwords to unlock the electronic data seized by police. The judge rejected the application, stressing that under Hong Kong law, the Hong Kong National Security Law and the common law, police could not compel the provision of security information such as passwords.
警方去年 8 月拘捕壹傳媒創辦人黎智英及多名高層，進入壹傳媒大樓檢走大量文件。壹傳媒一方其後入稟高院，指警方撿走文件或涉「法律專業保密特權」（LPP）及屬「新聞材料」，法庭早前下令，雙方須共同檢視相關資料，以決定屬否上述類別。代表警方的律政司申請更改法庭命令，強制要求原告提供密碼，以解鎖警方檢取的電子資料。法官拒絕申請，強調無論於本港法律、港區國安法及普通法之下，警方均不能強迫提供保安資料例如密碼等。
17 Feb 2021立場新聞#1232
【8.18 維園集會案】辯方申呈監警會前專家報告 法官胡雅文以不相關為由拒絕
After hearing submissions from both sides, the judge rejected the defence application to adduce a report on crowd management written by Clifford Stott, a former member of the Independent Police Complaints Council’s international expert panel. She agreed with the prosecution that the defence had failed to make the application as soon as reasonably practicable, and also considered the report irrelevant to the case.
法官聽取雙方陳詞後，拒絕辯方申請呈遞由監警會前國際專家組成員Clifford Stott撰寫、有關人群管理的報告。她認同控方所指，辯方未能於切實可行情況下提出申請，又認為報告內容與案件並不相關。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
