8 Nov 2025獨媒#7509
周梓樂逝世六年 警方阻記者拍攝悼念市民 警告勿違國安
Today marks the sixth anniversary of the death of HKUST student Chow Tsz-lok. As in previous years, some members of the public brought white flowers to Sheung Tak Car Park to pay tribute, but were promptly stopped and searched by plain-clothes police officers. While journalists were filming, police, citing obstruction of police officers in the execution of their duties, demanded that they stop filming and warned them: “Don’t do anything that violates national security.” The member of the public later stood silently outside the car park to pay tribute, saying that, if able, they would continue to make every effort to come: “If we forget, it would be as if it never happened. At the very least, don’t let other people say, ‘It wasn’t like that back then; actually, it was this and that.’ I hope to remind myself that I can remember.”
今日是科大學生周梓樂逝世六周年，有市民一如以往攜同白花前來尚德停車場悼念，不過旋即被便衣警員制止及搜查。在記者拍攝期間，警方以阻差辦公為由要求停止拍攝，更警告現場記者「唔好做犯違反國安嘅事」。該市民之後改到停車場外默站悼念，並指如能力許可都會盡力前來：「忘記嘅話就等於無發生過，起碼唔好俾其他人話『個陣時唔係咁，其實係點點點』，希望提醒返自己可以記住。」
4 Nov 2025集誌社#7487
港台再下架｜「下架令」期滿 八大學圖書館逾萬館藏節目下架
Kap Zi Se reported in the middle of last month that Radio Television Hong Kong had asked universities to remove television programmes from their library holdings. The Education University of Hong Kong issued a notice to staff and students saying that RTHK programmes had to be “fully removed” by 5 November. The “removal order” expired today (4 November). Reporters examined and compared library catalogue search records from mid-October and today, finding that several publicly funded universities had originally held nearly 10,000 video items, most of which have now been removed. Only about 50 to 180 video holdings remain at each institution, most of them programmes sponsored by government departments or public bodies.
Kap Zi Se contacted several institutions for comment. The Chinese University of Hong Kong replied on the 5th that it “would not comment on matters relating to individual library holdings”; the other institutions had yet to respond.
《集誌社》上月中曾報道，香港電台要求各大學下架圖書館館藏電視節目，其中教育大學向師生發通告，指須於 11 月 5 日前「全面下架」港台節目。「下架令」今日（4日）期滿，記者翻查和比對，各大學圖書館於 10 月中和今日的館藏搜尋紀錄，發現多間受資助大學原有近一萬項影像館藏，現大多數已下架，僅餘下約 50 至 180 項不等的影像館藏，當中大多數為獲政府部門或公營機構贊助的節目。
《集誌社》向多間院校查詢，中大 5 日回覆「不會對圖書館個別館藏相關事宜作出評論」，其餘院校仍候回覆。
17 Oct 2025集誌社#7435
新聞自由指數｜從歷史低位輕微回升 記協：仍處極低位，傳媒自我審查嚴重
The Hong Kong Journalists Association today (17th) released its 2024 Press Freedom Index. The industry’s score rose slightly from its historic low in 2023 to 28.9, ending a five-year consecutive decline. “Media self-censorship” received the lowest score, reflecting news practitioners’ view that the phenomenon is very widespread and causes the greatest harm to press freedom. The association stressed that the figure remains extremely low and does not indicate any substantive improvement in the current state of press freedom, but only that it has not deteriorated significantly in recent times. It estimated that the rise was related to news practitioners becoming accustomed to working in the current news environment and finding ways to respond to the challenges.
香港記者協會今（17日）公布 2024 年新聞自由指數，業界評分從 2023 年歷史低位，輕微回升至 28.9 分，終止連續五年跌勢，其中「傳媒自我審查」得分最低，反映新聞從業員認為現象相當普遍、對新聞自由構成最大損害。記協強調，數字仍處極低位，不反映新聞自由現況有實質改善，只是近來未顯著惡化，估計回升原因與新聞從業員習慣了在當前新聞環境工作、及尋找方法應對挑戰有關。
14 Oct 2025集誌社#7426
港台再下架｜教大發「下架通告」、浸大未能收看、港大館藏「消失」 港台：現沒為機構提供版權豁免
Two years ago, The Collective reported that RTHK’s Podcast One website had removed some programmes, including Headliner and Police Magazine, and had selectively taken down content relating to June 4 and police enforcement. Two years later, the removal campaign has spread further to the holdings of several university libraries. The Education University of Hong Kong recently issued a notice to staff and students stating that, at RTHK’s request, RTHK television programmes in its holdings would be progressively removed and would be “completely removed” by 5 November. The small number of programmes searchable at Hong Kong Baptist University can no longer be viewed, while all the media images in the University of Hong Kong’s digital collections have “disappeared”.
Hong Kong Baptist University said in response to enquiries that its holdings were provided under licences from copyright holders and that, “when the licensing agreement is terminated”, the materials must be removed in accordance with the agreement. It suggested that reporters contact the “relevant copyright holder” for details. In its reply, RTHK did not deny asking universities to remove programmes from their holdings. It also said that its current policy provides programmes from the past 12 months for public catch-up viewing and that it is “currently not providing any institution with a copyright exemption”.
《集誌社》兩年前曾報道，香港電台 Podcast One 網頁下架部分節目如《頭條新聞》、《警訊》等，並選擇性下架部分涉六四、警方執法等節目內容。兩年後，下架潮進一步蔓延至多間大學圖書館的館藏。教育大學日前向師生發通告，指根據港台要求，館藏港台電視節目將逐步下架、須於 11 月 5 日前「全面下架」；浸會大學能搜尋到的少量節目現已未能觀看，至於香港大學數碼典藏的傳媒影像則全數「消失」。
浸大回覆查詢指館藏由版權持有者授權提供，「當授權協議終止」須按協議將資料移除，建議記者向「相關版權持有者」了解。港台回覆時未有否認要求大學下架館藏節目，又指現行政策提供過往 12 個月節目供市民重溫，「現時沒有為任何機構提供版權豁免」。
9 Oct 2025大紀元#7405
國家級黑客圖入侵多名遭通緝流亡港人Google帳戶
Hong Kong fugitives wanted by the Hong Kong government—former Legislative Council member Ted Hui, former district councillor Carmen Lau and Chloe Cheung Hei Ching—received warnings from Google yesterday (the 8th) saying that Government-backed attackers had attempted to steal their account passwords.
Ted Hui, who is in Australia, wrote on social media, citing Google as saying that such incidents occur to fewer than 0.1% of Google users, and urged people to strengthen their online security measures.
Hui wrote: “I receive this kind of warning from time to time throughout the year. Which rising power in the world, which cowardly regime, would support hackers and resort to illegal means to target people striving for democracy and freedom?”
ReNews reported that Carmen Lau, a former district councillor in the United Kingdom and senior international advocacy officer at the Hong Kong Democracy Council, received the same warning from Google on the same day. She also received a large number of phishing emails, while multiple fake accounts impersonating her appeared on Facebook. More than 10 people involved in Hong Kong advocacy work, including people who are not public figures, have also recently received the same warning. It is believed that the actions were organised. Lau said she had received similar warnings from Google in the past.
被港府通緝的流亡海外人士許智峯、劉珈汶和張晞晴，昨（8日）收到Google發出的警告，稱有國家級黑客（Government-backed attackers）試圖偷取他們的帳號密碼。
在澳洲的前立法會議員許智峯在社交網站發文，引述Google指這情況只會發生在少於0.1%的 Google 用戶身上，呼籲他們加強網上保安措施。
許智峯在帖文中表示，「這種警告，我一年到晚間中都會收到．究竟是世界上哪個崛起的強國，哪個怯懦的政權，會支持黑客，不惜以非法手段去對付爭取民主自由的人士？」
另外，網媒ReNews報道，在英國的前區議員、香港民主委員會高級國際倡議幹事劉珈汶亦在同一日，收到來自Google的同樣警告，同時她收到大量釣魚電郵，Facebook亦出現多個假冒她的帳戶，另外有逾10名參與香港倡議工作的人，包括並非公眾人物的人，近期亦收到同樣的警告，相信上述行動背後有組織。她透露過去也曾收過Google的同類警告。
9 Oct 2025獨媒#7406
中大反修例民意報告連結失效 稱「技術問題、現正修復」
Six years after the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement, the Independent Police Complaints Council commissioned CUHK’s Centre for Communication and Public Opinion Survey to conduct an opinion poll. The centre published a research report, “Public Opinion in the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement”, in May 2020. However, the relevant website link is no longer accessible, preventing the public from downloading or viewing the report; only its cover image is displayed. Independent Media separately contacted CUHK and the council on Monday (October 6). CUHK replied on Wednesday evening that “due to technical issues, the link became invalid after the website was updated, and we are currently repairing the link.”
反修例運動事隔六年，監警會曾委託中大傳播與民意調查中心進行民調，並於2020年5月發布「反修例運動中的民意狀況」研究報告。惟相關網站連結失效，公眾無法下載或閱覽報告內容，僅顯示報告的封面圖片。《獨媒》周一（10月6日）分別向中大及監警會查詢，中大在周三晚回覆稱「因技術問題，連結在網站更新後失效，我們現正修復連結」。
9 Oct 2025明報#7408
下架風波後首開記者會 申訴專員公署拒再回應稱與記者會主題無關
This newspaper previously reported that the Office of the Ombudsman had removed investigation materials, press releases and annual reports from before 2023 from its website, and refused to disclose complaints concerning the Code on Access to Information and the number involved. Following the “removal controversy” in May this year, the Office today (the 9th) held its first press conference to release a direct investigation report. During the question-and-answer session, this newspaper’s reporter asked why the two previous direct investigation reports had only been announced through press releases, and why the Office’s 2024/25 annual report had removed the standalone “Access to Information” chapter. A representative of the Office said the questions were unrelated to the topic of the press conference and that the reporter would be contacted later through the External Affairs Unit.
本報早前報道申訴專員公署從網站移除2023年前的調查資料、新聞稿及年報，並拒披露涉《公開資料守則》的投訴及宗數。自今年5月的「下架風波」後，公署今（9日）首度以新聞發布會形式公布主動調查行動報告。本報記者於提問環節詢問為何早前兩份主動調查行動報告僅以新聞稿公布，亦問及公署2024/25年報刪除「公開資料」獨立章節的原因。公署代表回應指，有關問題與記者會主題無關，稍後會透過外務組聯絡記者。
6 Oct 2025明報#7397
電檢修例後 「因國安」50片須改13禁映 之前5年無不准上映 電影報刊辦：不能一概而論
The 2021 amendment to the Film Censorship Ordinance requires film censors, when examining and classifying films, to consider whether their screening would be prejudicial to national security. The Office for Film, Newspaper and Article Administration said that, “on national security grounds,” 50 films had been required to modify their content and 13 had not been approved for screening since the amendment took effect. More than 39,000 films had been submitted for examination since 2021, but the authorities did not provide a list of films that were not approved for screening (see separate report). No film had been refused approval for screening in the five years before the amendment took effect.
Existing legislation and guidelines stipulate a 14-day deadline for film censorship decisions. Where national security is involved, the Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development may approve a 28-day extension for the examination. However, more than two months after director Chow Kwun-wai submitted his latest film, 《Suicide Notice》, for examination, no decision had been made. The Commerce and Economic Development Bureau said that details of the implementation of the provision constituted information concerning the HKSAR’s national security work and would not be disclosed. Ma Fung-kwok, a Legislative Council Election Committee constituency member, said approval should generally be completed as soon as possible.
2021年修訂的《電影檢查條例》要求檢查員審查及分級影片時須考慮上映「是否會不利於國家安全」。電影報刊辦回覆，「因國家安全考慮」，條例生效至今50齣影片須修改內容，13齣不核准上映。2021年至今送審影片逾3.9萬齣，當局未有提供不獲准放映電影名單（見另稿）。條例生效前5年未有電影不核准上映情况。
明報記者 葉希雯、廖俊升
另外，現行法例及指引訂明電檢決定期限14天，倘涉國安，商經局長可准延期28天審批，不過導演周冠威新作《自殺通告》送檢逾兩個月仍沒結果。商經局表示，條文具體執行情况屬特區維護國家安全工作信息，不公開。立法會選委界別議員馬逢國認為，在一般情况下應盡快完成審批。
原文網址：https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%E8%A6%81%E8%81%9E/article/20251006/s00001/1759687756488
21 Sept 2025集誌社#7344
網上帖文指積金局將港人資料「送中」 「積金易」公司指不實誤導
Online rumours claim that the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority outsourced a large amount of MPF data to Foshan for “data integration”, saying this would improve efficiency and “in effect send Hong Kong people’s personal data to China”, while an internal notice was “vague”. The Collective asked the MPFA whether the claims were true and how it would ensure data security. A spokesperson for eMPF Platform Company Limited said it was regrettable that people were maliciously disseminating false and misleading information online.
網上有傳言指，積金局將大量強積金資料外判到佛山做「資料整合」，說提升效率，「變相將香港人嘅個人資料送中」，內部通告「含糊其辭」。《集誌社》向「積金局」查詢情況是否屬實？「積金局」如何確保資料安全等。「積金易平台有限公司」發言人回應指，「對於有人在網上惡意發放不實及誤導性資訊表示遺憾」。
9 Sept 2025RTHK#7279
黃國興去信反駁New York Post評論文章惡意誹謗
Commissioner of Correctional Services Wong Kwok-hing wrote to the New York Post expressing strong opposition to and refuting a commentary article published by the newspaper on September 7. He said the allegations concerning the operation of the Correctional Services Department were entirely false, baseless and maliciously defamatory. He said the department was committed to ensuring a safe, humane and healthy custodial environment and providing appropriate rehabilitation programmes to help persons in custody reform. The article’s allegations that abuse, medical negligence or poor living conditions were widespread in correctional institutions were entirely unfounded.
Wong said the department attached great importance to discipline and professionalism in all correctional institutions. There were no so-called “political prisoners” in Hong Kong, and all persons in custody were treated equally, without discrimination based on their backgrounds, political views or the nature of their offences. The department strictly observed the principles of fairness and professionalism in all its operations. Any unlawful conduct by persons in custody or departmental staff would be dealt with seriously and, under established mechanisms, referred to the relevant law enforcement agencies for investigation.
懲教署署長黃國興去信New York Post，表示強烈反對及駁斥該傳媒於9月7日的一篇評論文章，對懲教署運作的指控完全是虛假及毫無根據及惡意誹謗。他表示，懲教署致力於確保一個安全、人道及健康的羈押環境，並為在囚人士提供合適的更生計劃，幫助他們改過自新。文章所指，有關懲教機構普遍存在虐待、醫療疏忽或生活條件惡劣的指控，完全是毫無根據的。
黃國興說，懲教署高度重視所有懲教機構的紀律和專業，香港根本沒有所謂的「政治犯」，所有在押人員均一視同仁，不會因其背景、政治觀點或罪行性質而受到歧視。懲教署在所有運作中嚴格遵守公正和專業的原則，任何在押人員或懲教署人員的違法行為均會受到嚴肅處理，並會根據既定機制轉介相關執法機構進行調查。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
