6 Jun 2025香港人權資訊中心#6874
譴責香港政府以國安法檢控黃之鋒
The Hong Kong Human Rights Information Centre strongly condemned the Hong Kong Government for once again abusing the Hong Kong National Security Law to bring strategic prosecutions against pro-democracy political leaders. Today (June 6), nearly five years later, the authorities suddenly brought new charges against Joshua Wong. This was clearly a deliberate arrangement of the timing of the prosecution to avoid the possibility of concurrent sentences being imposed by the court, thereby extending Wong’s imprisonment. Wong had been expected to complete his sentence in the 47 democrats’ primary election case in early 2027. However, the new charge he now faces, the offence of “collusion with a foreign country or with external elements” under Article 29 of the Hong Kong National Security Law, is bound to substantially extend his imprisonment and could even result in a life sentence. The Centre considers that the Hong Kong authorities’ actions clearly violate judicial fairness, using legal procedures to serve political ends and attempting to legitimise the authorities’ arbitrary detention of dissidents.
香港人權資訊中心強烈譴責香港政府再次濫用《香港國安法》，針對民主派政治領袖進行策略性檢控。今日(6月6日)，當局在相隔近五年後，突然對黃之鋒提出新的檢控，明顯是刻意安排檢控時間，以避免法庭判處同期執行刑期的可能性，從而延長對黃之鋒的監禁。黃之鋒原預計在2027年初可完成他因民主派47人初選案的刑期，惟現時他所面對的新控罪，《香港國安法》第29條「勾結外國勢力罪」，勢將大幅延長對他的監禁，甚至可被判處終身監禁。本中心認為，香港當局的行動明顯違反司法公正，利用法律程序為政治目的服務，企圖合理化當局任意拘押異議人士的行為。
6 Jun 2025法庭線#6876
黃之鋒監獄被捕 被控《國安法》串謀勾結罪 控罪指與羅冠聰及其他人請求制裁
Joshua Wong, the former secretary-general of Demosisto who is serving a sentence in the case involving 47 people over the pro-democracy primary, was arrested at Stanley Prison on Friday (the 6th) morning and taken to West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts in the afternoon for his hearing. He was charged under the National Security Law with conspiracy to collude with a foreign country or external forces to endanger national security. The charge alleges that, between July and November 2020, he requested sanctions together with Nathan Law and other unidentified people.
The prosecution applied for Wong not to be required to enter a plea for the time being, pending further police investigation. Chief Magistrate So Wai-tak adjourned the case until 8 August for a further hearing. Wong did not apply for bail.
The hearing lasted less than three minutes. Wong appeared in a dark-coloured shirt and looked in good spirits, nodding from time to time as correctional officers brought him into court. After the court clerk read out the charge, Wong said, “Understood.” After the hearing, he also waved to the public gallery.
正就民主派初選 47 人案服刑的前香港眾志秘書長黃之鋒，周五（6 日）早上在赤柱監獄被捕，下午被押往西九龍裁判法院提堂。他被控《國安法》串謀勾結外國或者境外勢力危害國家安全罪，控罪指他 2020 年 7 月至 11 月，與羅冠聰及身分不詳的其他人請求制裁。
控方申請黃暫時毋需答辯，以待警方進一步調查。主任裁判官蘇惠德遂將案押後至 8 月 8 日再訊，以待警方進一步調查 。黃沒有保釋申請。
案件開庭不足 3 分鐘，黃之鋒身穿深色恤衫應訊，精神不俗，被懲教人員帶上法庭期間不時點頭。法庭書記朗讀控罪後，黃表示「明白。」散庭後，黃亦向公眾席揮手。
6 Jun 2025法庭線#6877
反恐第二案｜首被告供稱被捕後遭警員打胸口、踩下體 控方指細節與醫療報告不符
In early 2020, explosives were found at Caritas Medical Centre and in a Lo Wu MTR train carriage. The Telegram channel “九十二籤” subsequently claimed responsibility. Seven people were charged with offences under the Anti-Terrorism Ordinance, while the remaining person was charged with “attempting to manufacture explosives”. All eight pleaded not guilty. The trial at the High Court entered its 111th day on Friday (the 6th).
The first defendant Ho Cheuk Wai earlier testified that police officers used force against him inside a police station after his arrest. During cross-examination, the prosecution pointed out that after Ho was taken to hospital that day, he told a doctor that he had been assaulted by four to six police officers, but testified in court that only two officers had used force. The prosecution said his accounts in the medical report and in his testimony were fabricated and exaggerated. Ho disagreed.
The prosecution also said Ho had never told the doctor that police officers had stamped on his genitals, and questioned whether it had “never happened”. Ho explained that when he saw the doctor, his headache was troubling him more, and “(so) I forgot to tell the doctor about (the stamping on my genitals).” The case continues next Monday.
2020 年初，明愛醫院、羅湖港鐵車廂被發現有爆炸品，Telegram 頻道「九十二籤」事後承認責任。7 人被控《反恐條例》罪名，餘下 1 人被控以「企圖製造炸藥」罪。8 人不認罪，周五（6 日）於高院踏入第 111 天審訊。
首被告何卓為早前供稱，他被捕後在警署內遭警員以武力對待。控方盤問時指出，當日何送院後，向醫生表示遭 4 至 6 名警員襲擊，惟於庭上卻供稱只有兩名警員動手，指他於醫療報告和庭上的證供均是虛構和誇大。何不同意。
控方亦指，何從未向醫生提及遭警員踩下體一事，質疑是「從來冇發生」。何則解釋見醫生時他感到比較辛苦的是頭痛，「（所以）忘記咗同醫生講（踩下體）呢件事。」案件下周一續。
5 Jun 2025集誌社#6871
嶺大學生會｜警拘四人 兩幹事被指涉嫌挪用$ 90 萬會費還個人卡數等 重案組入大學校園搜證
Four current and former Lingnan University Student Union office-bearers were arrested by the crime unit yesterday (the 4th) on suspicion of theft and conspiracy to commit theft. Police said two current office-bearers allegedly deposited about $900,000 in Student Union funds into their personal accounts to pay personal credit-card bills for entertainment, dining, air tickets and other expenses. Crime unit officers entered student dormitories on the Lingnan University campus today (the 5th) to search for evidence. Lingnan University said it was looking into the matter and would cooperate with the police investigation.
嶺南大學學生會四現任及前任幹事，昨（4日）被重案組拘捕，四人被指涉嫌盜竊及串謀盜竊。警方指兩名現任幹事，涉嫌將學生會約 90 萬元款項，存入自己的戶口，用作償還個人娛樂、飲食、機票等卡數。重案組探員今（5）日進入嶺大校園的學生宿舍搜證。嶺大表示正了解事件，會配合警方調查。
4 Jun 2025集誌社#6866
六四 36｜盤點過去五年 最少 67人涉悼六四被捕 涉煽動意圖、行為不檢等
This year marks the 36th anniversary of June 4, and Victoria Park has gone six consecutive years without a candlelight vigil organised by the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China. Chief Executive John Lee said yesterday (3 June) that any unlawful acts would be dealt with decisively and strictly in accordance with the law, and that legal responsibility for acts endangering national security would be pursued to the fullest extent. The Collective Memory reviewed the number of arrests and prosecutions related to June 4 over the past five years. At least 67 people were arrested or charged in connection with June 4-related activities, involving inciting and participating in an unauthorised assembly, sedition and obstructing police officers in the execution of their duty. More than 30 people were also taken away over alleged breaches of the peace.
What conduct constitutes a criminal offence? A performance artist commemorating June 4 was arrested for disorderly conduct in a public place; another person was arrested on a sedition charge for silently displaying words of commemoration. A mainland student who planned to display a vertical banner of the “Pillar of Shame” on June 4 was convicted of attempted sedition, deported after serving the sentence and lost contact with family and friends. In addition, seven members of the Hong Kong Alliance were charged with failing to provide information and inciting subversion of state power. Chow Hang-tung, Lee Cheuk-yan and Albert Ho have to date been deprived of their freedom for more than 1,360 days and 1,150 days.
今年是六四 36 年，維園連續第六年沒有支聯會的燭光集會。特首李家超昨（3日）表示，對任何違法行為，會果斷嚴格依法處理，對危害國家安全行為會追究法律責任到底。《集誌社》盤點過去五年六四的拘控數字，針對六四相關活動，至少有 67 人被捕或被控，涉及煽惑及參與未經批准集結、煽動、阻差辦公等，也有逾 30 人被指涉破壞社會安寧被帶走。
什麼行為會構成罪行？有悼念六四的行為藝術家，被警方以公眾地方行為不檢拘捕；有人靜默展示悼念字句，被以煽動罪拘捕；也有內地生擬在六四展示「國殤之柱」直幡，被控企圖煽動罪成，刑滿後遭遣返、與親友失聯。此外，支聯會七人被控拒交資料及煽動顛覆國家政權，鄒幸彤、李卓人、何俊仁至今已失自由逾 1,360 日及 1,150 日。
4 Jun 2025法庭線#6869
7.1立會暴動案｜王宗堯、孫曉嵐等9人提上訴 排期12.16聆訊
In the July 1 Legislative Council riot case, four people, including Wong Chung-yiu, were convicted of rioting after trial, while eight others in the same case pleaded guilty before the trial began. The 12 defendants were sentenced to between four years and seven months and six years and 10 months in prison. Wong Chung-yiu, former president of the HKU Students’ Union Hiu Laam Suen and seven others subsequently filed appeals.
七一立法會暴動案，王宗堯等 4 人審訊後被裁定暴動罪成，同案 8 人則於開審前承認暴動罪，12 人分別判囚 4 年 7 個月至 6 年 10 個月。王宗堯、港大學生會前會長孫曉嵐等 9 人先後提上訴。
司法機構網頁顯示，上訴庭將於 12 月 16 日開庭處理定罪和刑罰上訴許可申請，預料需時兩天。
4 Jun 2025法庭線#6870
涉訛稱於中央駐港機構等地放炸彈 35歲男被控4項炸彈嚇詐行為罪 還押候訊
The Police National Security Department arrested one man and four women on Monday (2 June) on suspicion of conspiracy to commit terrorist activities under the National Security Law. They were accused of repeatedly sending false information to police by telephone, email and instant messaging between late April and mid-May this year, claiming that bombs would be detonated at central government offices in Hong Kong and Kai Tak Sports Park, and disseminating messages advocating “Taiwan independence” and “Hong Kong independence”. The four women were released on bail pending investigation, while the 35-year-old man was charged with four counts of bomb hoax under the Public Order Ordinance.
The case was brought before Kwun Tong Magistrates’ Courts on Wednesday (4 June). The defendant was not required to enter a plea at this stage. The case was adjourned to 29 July at West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts pending further police investigation, including whether the statements involved other offences. Acting Chief Magistrate LEUNG Ka-kie refused the defendant’s bail application. The defendant will undergo a bail review on 12 June.
警方國安處周一（2 日）以國安法下「串謀恐怖活動」罪拘捕 1 男 4 女，指他們今年 4 月底至 5 月中，多次經電話、電郵和即時通訊軟件向警方發放虛假訊息，聲稱會引爆在中央駐港機構和啟德體育園內的炸彈，並發放宣揚「台灣獨立」和「香港獨立」的訊息。被捕 4 名女子獲准保釋候查，35 歲男子則被控 4 項《公安條例》下「炸彈嚇詐行為」罪。
案件周三（4 日）於觀塘裁判法院提堂。被告暫毋須答辯，案件押後 7 月 29 日於西九龍裁判法院再訊，待警方進一步調查，包括是否有涉及其他控罪的言論。署理主任裁判官梁嘉琪拒絕被告保釋申請，被告將於 6 月 12 日進行保釋覆核。
3 Jun 2025法庭線#6860
反恐第二案｜首被告否認知悉單位被用作製爆炸品 不同意將軍澳爆炸案準備就緒
In early 2020, explosives were found at Caritas Medical Centre and in an MTR train carriage at Lo Wu. The Telegram channel “92 Fortune Sticks” later claimed responsibility. Seven people were charged with offences under the Anti-terrorism Ordinance, while the remaining person was charged with “attempting to manufacture explosives”. All eight pleaded not guilty, and the trial at the High Court entered its 110th day on Tuesday (the 3rd).
The first defendant Ho Cheuk Wai continued giving evidence. The prosecution presented CCTV footage from Wang Cheong Fang and Telegram group chats showing that, after the second defendant left Room 503, he asked in the group where “black powder” could be found. The prosecution said that all the group members, as well as the seventh defendant who was not in the group, knew that the unit was a place for storing, manufacturing and test-detonating explosives. Ho disagreed.
The prosecution also presented a plan for the Tseung Kwan O bombing, saying that preparations were then “ready”: group members had bought disguises and a suitcase for transporting the bomb, and had also prepared false number plates and circuit boards. The bombing location was Sheung Tak car park. The prosecution said that if police had not arrested the seven defendants on March 7, the bombing would have taken place. Ho disagreed. The trial will continue on Friday.
2020 年初，明愛醫院、羅湖港鐵車廂被發現有爆炸品，Telegram 頻道「九十二籤」事後承認責任。7 人被控《反恐條例》罪名，餘下 1 人被控以「企圖製造炸藥」罪。8 人不認罪，周二（3 日）於高院踏入第 110 天審訊。
首被告何卓為繼續作供。控方展示宏創方閉路電視片段、TG 群組對話，顯示次被告離開 503 室後，在群組問及哪裡有「黑火藥」，控方指，所有群組成員及不在其中的第七被告，均知道該單位「係儲存、製造、試爆爆炸品嘅地方」。何不同意。
控方亦展示將軍澳爆炸案的計劃圖，指當時已「準備就緒」，群組成員已購買變裝用品、運送炸彈的行李箱，又準備了假車牌、電路板，爆炸地點則為尚德停車場，若警方沒在 3 月 7 日拘捕 7 名被告，爆炸案就會發生。何不同意。審訊周五續。
2 Jun 2025法庭線#6854
反恐第二案｜首被告TG稱「一發定勝負」 庭上指僅放汽油彈、「嚇吓鬼」不願傷人
In early 2020, explosives were found at Caritas Medical Centre and in an MTR carriage at Lo Wu. The Telegram channel “Ninety-Two Lots” later claimed responsibility. Seven people were charged with offences under the Anti-Terrorism Ordinance, while one other person was charged with “attempting to manufacture explosives”. All eight pleaded not guilty, and the trial at the High Court entered its 109th day on Monday (the 2nd).
The prosecution referred to a Google Maps location in Tseung Kwan O sent by the first defendant, Ho Cheuk Wai, in a group, along with messages saying “one shot decides victory or defeat” and “but it will be very heavy stuff”. It said this showed that Ho had clearly indicated the location where the bomb was to be placed. Ho denied this, saying he had only intended to throw petrol bombs and had not planned to hit police officers.
The prosecution also said that someone in another group had written: “Since the guys below like capturing halos so much, I prefer to set the (bomb) over there,” showing complete disregard for whether anyone else would be injured. Ho explained that he understood the others had intended to throw petrol bombs at people seeking publicity, so that there would be “fire in the background” and “something to show”. He stressed, however, that everyone had already agreed not to hurt anyone else, and that it was purely “just to scare people, so to speak”.
2020 年初，明愛醫院、羅湖港鐵車廂被發現有爆炸品，Telegram 頻道「九十二籤」事後承認責任。7 人被控《反恐條例》罪名，餘下 1 人被控以「企圖製造炸藥」罪。8 人不認罪，周一（2 日）於高院踏入第 109 天審訊。
控方引述首被告何卓為曾在群組內發出的將軍澳 Google Map 位置，並有內容指「決定一發定勝負」、「但會好重料」，可見當時何已清楚指出放炸彈位置。何否認，並稱當時只是打算投汽油彈，但沒有計劃要擊中警察。
控方亦指，當時有人在另一群組稱「下面班友既然咁鍾意 cap 光環，我 prefer set（炸彈）個邊」，完全漠視會否傷及他人。何解釋，當時理解眾人打算將汽油彈投向博取知名度的人，令到「背景有火」、「有畫面」，惟強調眾人早有共識，沒有打算傷及其他人，純粹「嚇吓鬼咁嘅意思」。
30 May 2025法庭線#6842
47人案｜第二批被告出獄 岑子杰「落區」、偕友飲茶 李嘉達、王百羽清減
The second batch of four defendants in the 47-case—岑子杰, Roy Hoi Pong Tam, 王百羽 and 李嘉達—were released from prison on Friday (the 30th). They were driven away early in the morning in nine vehicles, all with their curtains drawn, while the police presence outside the prison was lighter than last time. Police officers stood guard near the defendants’ residences, with one officer reminding reporters not to enter private areas of the buildings.
The media filmed 岑子杰 and 李嘉達 returning home, with both going upstairs alone. 岑 smiled when he got out of the car and told reporters, “Let me spend some time with my family.” About three hours later, he went out again and was interviewed downstairs. He said he had no plans to leave Hong Kong for the time being and that he had felt warmth from outside the prison walls during his imprisonment. He subsequently went to Lai Yuen, the district where he had previously been elected district councillor, to meet residents and have tea with members of the League of Social Democrats.
李嘉達 was noticeably slimmer. He wore a mask when returning home and replied “Thank you for your hard work” to reporters’ questions. 王百羽 uploaded a recent photograph to Facebook in the morning, showing that he was well-built and noticeably slimmer. As for Roy Hoi Pong Tam, he was also reportedly released and had returned to his family.
47 人案第二批 4 名被告岑子杰、譚凱邦、王百羽、李嘉達周五（30 日）出獄。他們清晨由車接載離開，共有 9 輛車，全部拉上窗簾，不過監獄外的警力較上次少。被告的住所附近有警員戒備，有警員提醒記者不要進入大廈私人地方。
傳媒拍到岑子杰、李嘉達回家的畫面，二人獨自上樓。岑下車時面露笑容，向記者稱「等我陪一陪我啲屋企人」，約 3 小時後再出門，在樓下受訪，稱暫時無意離港，繫獄時感受到牆外的溫暖。他隨後往曾當選區議員的選區瀝源，見街坊及與社民連成員飲茶。
李嘉達身型清瘦不少，回家時戴上口罩，對記者提問答「辛苦晒」。王百羽則在早上，在 Facebook 上載近照，身型健壯、清減不少。至於譚凱邦，據悉他亦已經出獄，回到家人身邊。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
