19 Nov 2025法庭線#7551
認貪玩撕毀選舉海報 24歲男被控刑事損壞罪 准自簽2000元守行為兩年
A 24-year-old man was accused of tearing up two Legislative Council election posters in Chai Wan in November this year. He was charged with one count of criminal damage and appeared for the first time at Eastern Magistrates’ Courts on Wednesday (19th). He was allowed to enter into a HK$2,000 recognizance to be of good behaviour for two years, bringing the case to an end, and the charge was withdrawn. The case stated that a passer-by discovered that election posters at the scene had been damaged. Police arrested the defendant after an investigation, and he admitted under caution that he had committed the offence for fun.
24 歲男子被指今年 11 月，在柴灣撕毀兩張立法會換屆選舉海報，被控一項刑事損壞罪，案件周三（19 日）在東區裁判法院首次提堂。被告獲准自簽 2000 元、守行為兩年結案，控罪獲撤銷。案情指，有途人發現案發地點有選舉海報損毀，警方調查後拘捕被告，他在警誡下承認因貪玩犯案。
19 Nov 2025法庭線#7554
死因庭裁陳輝旺非法被殺 警員林偉榮再申覆核挑戰 官押明年訊、拒禁檢控
Taxi driver Chan Fai-wong argued with a passenger and was placed in a “chokehold” by a police officer while being arrested. Chan Fai-wong subsequently died while receiving hospital treatment. A coroner’s jury ruled for the second time this year that Chan Fai-wong was unlawfully killed. Police officer Lam Wai-wing again applied for judicial review to overturn the verdict and sought a temporary ban on the Department of Justice taking prosecution action. The High Court dealt with his application for an interim injunction on Wednesday (19th).
的士司機陳輝旺與乘客爭執，被警員拘捕時遭「箍頸」，其後在留醫期間死亡。死因庭陪審團今年第二次裁定陳「非法被殺」。警員林偉榮再次申司法覆核要求推翻裁決，並要求暫時禁止律政司採取檢控行動，高院周三（19 日）處理臨時禁制令申請。
林警指正申請法律支援，盼押後臨時禁制令及司法覆核申請，「希望法官大人畀個機會，同埋畀少少時間我，令到我喺有律師代表嘅情況下作供」。法官即日駁回其申請，強調除非情況非常特殊，否則法庭不會介入律政司檢控。
官又指，林似乎純粹是因為不滿裁決而提出覆核，其入稟狀亦不符合法定要求，但其挑戰的事宜具有重大重要性，故將許可聆訊押後至明年一月底。
14 Nov 2025法庭線#7533
何俊仁被吊銷公證人執業資格7年 4宗反修例集會案罪成 審裁組指有損聲譽
Albert Ho Chun-yan, who is currently remanded in custody over the case in which the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China is accused of inciting subversion, was convicted of multiple offences, including inciting people knowingly to participate in unauthorised assemblies. The Government Gazette published on Friday (14th) said that in October this year, the Notaries Public Disciplinary Tribunal found that he had breached the Legal Practitioners Ordinance and that he had harmed the reputation of notaries public, and disqualified him from practising as a notary for seven years. Ho was also ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.
The offences arose from four anti-extradition bill assembly cases. In May this year, Ho was also found guilty of professional misconduct by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal in relation to his convictions in three of those cases, and was disqualified from practising as a solicitor for three months.
現就「支聯會被指煽動顛覆案」還押的何俊仁，政府憲報周五（14 日）公布，他因「煽惑明知而參與未經批准集結」等多罪成立，今年 10 月被公證人紀律審裁組裁定違反《法律執業者條例》，又指他有損公證人聲譽，吊銷其執業資格 7 年。何另須付相關事務費。
翻查資料，罪名來自 4 宗反修例集會案。何俊仁今年 5 月亦就其中 3 案的定罪，被律師紀律審裁組裁定違紀罪成，吊銷其律師資格 3 個月。
14 Nov 2025法庭線#7534
黎智英控《大公報》誹謗申修訂指控 援引101篇文章證惡意中傷 官拒申請
In 2020, Next Digital founder Jimmy Lai filed a defamation lawsuit against Ta Kung Pao over an article headlined “Chaos-in-Hong Kong ringleader’s plan to flee exposed; HK$1 million fee”, which alleged that Lai intended to abandon bail and abscond. Lai’s side applied for leave to amend the writ of summons, citing 101 articles to prove that Ta Kung Pao had maliciously smeared him. Judge Ko King-shiu rejected the application on Friday (the 14th).<br><br>The judgment said the proposed amendments were “confusing and embarrassing”. Lai’s side had specifically identified the contents of only three of the articles, without explaining the remaining 98 or pointing out what was untrue in them. The judge quoted Ta Kung Pao’s side as saying that granting the application would leave Ta Kung Pao “ambushed” and “forced to engage in an empty debate”, while also wasting the court’s time in ascertaining the facts.
壹傳媒創辦人黎智英於 2020 年入稟控告《大公報》誹謗（法律 101 文章）、發布題為〈亂港頭目謀『著草』路線曝光 收費100萬〉的文章，指黎欲棄保潛逃。黎一方申請許可修訂傳訊令狀，援引 101 篇文章證明《大公報》惡意中傷黎智英，法官高勁修周五（14 日）拒絕申請。
判詞指，黎一方欲修訂的內容「令人困惑、尷尬」，僅具體指出其中 3 篇文章內容，沒就餘下 98 篇文章解釋，亦沒指出文章不實之處。官引述《大公報》一方指，如法庭批准黎一方的申請，會令《大公報》如被「偷襲」、「被逼進行空洞的辯論」，亦虛耗法庭時間查明事實。
12 Nov 2025法庭線#7524
TVB App「出Push」刑毀罪成 青年提定罪上訴 指或以為獲授權
In 2022, a young man logged into a link mistakenly issued by a 《無綫》 staff member and sent multiple push notifications through the “無綫新聞” mobile app, including “比家超见记者”. He was convicted of criminal damage and sentenced to a community service order. He appealed against the conviction. The case was heard in the High Court on Wednesday (12th), and Acting Judge Chun Man (OIAP) Li will deliver the judgment within three months.
The appeal argued that the TVB system automatically authorised public access, and that the appellant might have believed he was authorised. The Department of Justice argued that there was no evidence that TVB had authorised access to the system, and that the appellant had computer knowledge and should have suspected that the system was malfunctioning, meaning he would not have mistakenly believed that he had authorisation.
青年 2022 年登入《無綫》職員錯誤發出的連結，在「無綫新聞」手機程式發出「比家超见记者」等多條推送通知（App push），被裁定刑事損壞罪成，判社會服務令。他不服定罪提上訴，案件周三（12 日）於高院處理，暫委法官李俊文將於 3 個月內頒判詞。
上訴方指出， TVB 的系統自動授權予公眾進入，上訴人或認為自己獲授權。律政司一方則指，沒證供指出 TVB 授權進入系統，而上訴人具備電腦知識，理應懷疑系統出錯，不會誤會自己獲得授權。
12 Nov 2025法庭線#7525
張達明被指洩律師會內部資料 質疑投訴處理程序不公申覆核敗訴 官：成立獨立小組恰當
Eric Tat Ming Cheung, a principal lecturer at the University of Hong Kong’s Faculty of Law, was accused of twice disclosing internal Law Society matters while serving as a member of the Law Society Council in 2020. The allegations included prematurely disclosing a letter from the president to former Civic Party Legislative Council member Kwok Wing-hang, and disclosing on Facebook a statement issued by the Law Society that had been approved by the Council by a “large majority”, while also saying that some members held different views.
The Law Society passed a no-confidence motion that year and referred the complaint to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. Cheung Chun sought judicial review, challenging the Council’s bypassing of normal procedures when referring the complaint, and arguing that the Council had simultaneously acted as the decision-maker, complainant and purported victim, creating a conflict of roles.
Mr Justice Ko Ho-man dismissed the application on Wednesday (the 12th), saying the Council had recognised the sensitivity of the case and had therefore referred it to an independent panel comprising three former presidents. This showed that the Council had been trying to handle the matter in a fair and appropriate manner, and the arrangement had also sufficiently offset the risk of possible bias by the Council against the person concerned.
港大法律學院首席講師張達明，2020 年出任律師會理事會成員期間，被指兩度洩露內部事宜，包括向前公民黨立法會議員郭榮鏗提前披露會長信件，及在 FB 披露律師會發出的聲明，獲理事會「大比數通過」，又指當中有人持不同意見。
律師會同年通過不信任動議，轉介投訴至律師紀律審裁組。張循司法覆核，挑戰理事會轉介投訴時繞過正常程序，又批評理事會同時是決策者、投訴人及所謂的受害方，角色有衡突。
法官高浩文周三（12 日）駁回申請，指理事會意識到案件敏感，因而交由 3 名前會長組成的獨立小組跟進，反映理事會一直嘗試以公平、恰當方式處理，做法亦充分抵銷理事會可能對當事人偏頗的風險。
12 Nov 2025法庭線#7526
反恐第二案｜判囚16年8個月 張家俊、李嘉濱提定罪及刑罰上訴
In the second case under the Anti-terrorism Ordinance, the jury found Ho Cheuk Wai, Christopher Ka Tsun Cheung and Lee Ka-ban guilty of the alternative charge of conspiracy to cause an explosion likely to endanger life. Christopher Ka Tsun Cheung and Lee Ka-ban, who were sentenced to 16 years and 8 months in prison, appealed against their convictions and sentences on Monday (10th). The case has not yet been scheduled for hearing.
反恐條例第二案，陪審團裁定何卓為、張家俊及李嘉濱的「串謀導致相當可能危害生命的爆炸罪」交替控罪成立。當中，被判囚 16 年 8 個月的張家俊及李嘉濱，周一（10 日）提出定罪及刑罰上訴，案件暫未排期聆訊。
11 Nov 2025法庭線#7520
被指助「健仔」等人潛逃 兩人認妨礙司法公正 判囚13及17個月
The two defendants were accused of helping four young people involved in anti-extradition bill cases, including Tsang Chi-kin and Tsang Chi Kin, flee. They pleaded guilty to perverting the course of justice at the District Court on Tuesday (11th) and were sentenced to 17 months and 13 months in prison respectively. The judge said that if the four had successfully escaped trial, it would have caused a major impact on and insult to the rule of law, and therefore deterrent sentences were necessary. The defendants remained calm when sentenced, while relatives and friends wept.
The court heard that the two defendants and others rented premises for Tsang Chi Kin and the others to hide in, and also helped take care of their food and daily needs. In mitigation, the defence said the two were inexperienced and had been deeply influenced by the social atmosphere, and “felt that what they were doing was just”. They had since expressed remorse.
兩人被指協助「健仔」曾志健等 4 名涉反修例案青年潛逃，周二（11 日）於區院承認「妨礙司法公正」罪，分別被判囚 17 個月及 13 個月。法官指，若該 4 人成功逃離審判，將對法治造成莫大的衝擊和侮辱，故需判處阻嚇性刑期。被告聞判時冷靜，有親友飲泣。
案情指，兩人與其他人租用地方供「健仔」等人匿藏，亦協助照顧飲食以及日常生活所需。辯方求情指，兩人入世未深，深受社會氛圍影響，「覺得自己行為係公義」，已感後悔。
10 Nov 2025法庭線#7516
兩警及退休漢涉冒充國安警詐騙 官應控辯聯合申請 將永久擱置聆訊轉非公開
Two male police officers and a retired man were accused of impersonating personnel of the Police National Security Department to defraud money. The case was scheduled to go to trial on Monday (10th), and two defendants applied for a permanent stay of proceedings. The prosecution and defence jointly applied for the hearing to be held in camera, saying its contents might involve national security. The prosecution stressed that once the matter had been dealt with, “there would be no problem for the judge to return it to an open hearing at any time.”
Acting District Court judge Pang Leung-ting questioned the legal basis, including whether the contents had to be examined when deciding whether to hold the hearing in camera. The judge ultimately agreed that a cautious and precautionary approach should be adopted and ordered that the matter be dealt with in camera. Whether future hearings would continue to be held in camera would depend on further directions.
兩男警及一退休漢被指冒認警方國安處人員騙款，案件原定周一（10 日）開審，兩被告申請「永久擱置聆訊」，而控辯稱基於內容或涉國安，聯合申請將聆訊改為閉門。控方強調，待事情處理好，「法官隨時轉返做公開都係無問題嘅」。
區院暫委法官彭亮廷追問法理基礎，包括判斷是否轉非公開時，需否考究內容等，官最終同意應採取謹慎和預防性的態度，下令以非公開形式處理，至於未來聆訊會否繼續非公開，則有待其進一步指示。
10 Nov 2025法庭線#7517
吳子樂被指2019年計劃製武器供他人襲警 被控串謀煽惑暴動等 高院申保釋被拒
Tsz Lok Ng and another man were arrested by the police’s National Security Department last month. They were accused of planning to make weapons and other items for protesters to attack police during the 2019 anti-extradition bill movement. The two men were charged with two offences, including conspiracy to incite participation in riots. Wu applied for bail at the High Court on Monday (the 10th). Wearing a grey shirt and with stubble, he appeared in court and looked in good spirits, greeting those in the public gallery before the hearing began.
After hearing submissions from both the prosecution and the defence, judge William Yiu Ho Tam refused Wu’s bail application. The case will return to court on 15 December.
吳子樂與另一男子上月被警方國安處拘捕，兩人被指與在 2019 年反修例運動時，計劃自製武器等，供示威者襲警。兩人被控串謀煽惑參與暴動等兩罪。吳周一（10 日）在高等法院申請保釋。他身穿灰色襯衣到庭應訊、留有鬚渣，精神不俗，開庭前向旁聽席打招呼。
法官譚耀豪聽罷控辯雙方陳詞後，拒絕吳的保釋申請。案件將於 12 月 15 日再訊。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
