19 Apr 2021立場新聞#1336
譚得志申終止聆訊 指煽動罪違憲條文籠統 官：有旁聽者舉政治手勢 法庭非遊樂場
Tam Tak-chi faces 14 charges, including publishing seditious writings. The court earlier ruled that the District Court has jurisdiction over his case. The defence said it would not seek a review of the jurisdiction issue, but would continue to apply to stay proceedings on eight charges of publishing seditious writings and conspiracy to publish seditious writings.
譚得志被控發表煽動文字等14項控罪，法庭早前裁定區域法律對其案件有司法管轄權。辯方指不會就司法管轄權問題提請覆核，但將繼續就8項發表煽動文字及串謀發表煽動文字罪，申請終止聆訊。
9 Apr 2021立場新聞#1317
譚得志申終止聆訊 指按本地法區院無權審 法官：國安法凌駕本地法 駁回申請
Tam Tak-chi earlier applied through his lawyers to stay the proceedings and disputed whether the District Court had jurisdiction to hear the case. National Security Law designated judge and District Court Judge Chan Kwong-chi ruled that where the National Security Law conflicts with local law, the National Security Law prevails over local law. As the National Security Law provides that cases involving offences endangering national security may be tried by courts at all levels in Hong Kong, the District Court has jurisdiction to hear Tam’s case. Defence lawyers said they needed time to study the judgment and would consider whether to seek a review of the jurisdiction ruling. The case was adjourned until 19 April for a further hearing.
譚得志早前透過律師申請終止聆訊，並就區域法院是否有司法管轄權審理此案提出爭議。國安法指定法官、區域法院法官陳廣池裁決，若國安法與本地法不符，則國安法凌駕本地法律，而由於國安法訂明所有涉及危害國家安全罪行的案件，可以香港各級法院審理，故區域法律有權審理譚的案件。辯方律師指需時研究判詞，會考慮是否就司法管轄權的裁決提出覆核。案件押至4月19日再訊。
8 Apr 2021立場新聞#1314
【首宗國安法案】唐英傑就審訊不設陪審團提司法覆核 指律政司錯誤理解國安法
The Department of Justice earlier cited provisions of the National Security Law in deciding that Tong Ying-kit's case would be heard without a jury. Tong Ying-kit's side has applied for judicial review of the Department of Justice's decision.
律政司早前引用國安法條文，審理唐英傑案將不設陪審團。唐英傑一方就律政司決定提出司法覆核。
31 Mar 2021立場新聞#1304
代表譚得志申終止聆訊 戴啟思指國安法非由香港草擬 官：不接受政治陳述
Tam Tak-chi applied through his lawyer to terminate the proceedings, which were handled by designated National Security Law judge Chen Kwok-chi. The prosecution and defence first made submissions on whether the District Court had jurisdiction to hear the case. The judge adjourned the matter until 9 April to rule on jurisdiction. During the defence lawyer’s submissions, he at one point mentioned that the National Security Law was not drafted by Hong Kong, prompting the judge to say that he would not accept any political submissions.
譚得志透過律師申請終止聆訊，由國安法治定法官陳廣池處理。控辯雙方先就區域法院是否有司法管轄權審理此案作陳詞，法官押後至4月9日就司法管轄權作出裁決。辯方律師陳詞時，一度提到國安法並非由香港草擬，法官隨即表示不接受任何政治陳述。
31 Mar 2021立場新聞#1305
李宇軒案件提堂 大狀羅達雄代表 李宇軒胞妹：非家屬安排律師 看報道「先知呢個人」
When Li Yiu-hin’s case involving charges of violating the National Security Law was mentioned in court again today, Li did not appear because he was still required to undergo quarantine. He was represented by barrister Lawrence Tat Hung Law, who declined to disclose Li’s whereabouts. Li’s sister told Stand News that Lawrence Tat Hung Law was not the lawyer arranged by the family, saying she had “only learned there was this person” from reports.
李宇軒被控違反國安法的案件今日再在法庭提堂時，李因仍須檢疫未有出庭，他由一名大律師羅達雄代表，羅達雄拒透露李的下落。李軒宇胞妹回覆《立場》查詢指出，羅達雄並非家屬安排的代表律師，更指看報道「先知有呢個人」。
31 Mar 2021立場新聞#1306
【12 港人】李宇軒國安案今再訊 還押地點繼續成疑 律師僅稱「見過佢」
Li Yu-hin, one of the 12 Hong Kong residents and a member of “Hong Kong Story”, was sentenced in the mainland and deported back to Hong Kong last Monday. More than a week later, his whereabouts remain unknown, prompting widespread speculation. He was earlier formally charged with three offences: conspiracy to collude with a foreign country or external forces, conspiracy to assist offenders, and possession of ammunition without a licence. The case was heard again this morning (31st) at the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts. As Li’s quarantine order has not yet ended, the magistrate adjourned the case to 7 April, during which he will remain in the custody of the Correctional Services Department. Li’s barrister, Lawrence Tat Hung Law, said on leaving that he could not disclose Li’s detention location or other details, only saying that he had “seen him”.
12 港人之一、「香港故事」成員李宇軒上週一在內地刑滿被遣返回港，至今逾一星期仍下落不明，惹來坊間眾多揣測。他早前被正式落案起訴串謀勾結外國或境外勢力、串謀協助罪犯及無牌管有彈藥共 3 罪，案件今早（ 31 日）在西九龍裁判法院再訊。由於李的隔離令仍未結束，裁判官遂將本案押後至 4 月 7 日，其間李交由懲教署看管。代表李的大律師羅達雄離開時表示，不便透露李的還押地點及其他詳情，僅稱「見過佢」。
30 Mar 2021立場新聞#1299
TG 頻道管理員認串謀煽惑縱火等兩罪 還押下月 20 日判刑
A 25-year-old woman alleged to be one of the administrators of the Telegram channel “Son Looking for Dad and Mum” was charged over messages on the channel inciting others to use petrol bombs and remarks insulting the police. The defendant admitted two charges: conspiracy to incite others to commit arson and conspiracy to commit acts with seditious intent.
被指是Telegram頻道「阿囝搵老豆老母」管理員之一的一名25歲女子，因頻道曾發出煽動他人使用汽油彈的訊息及侮辱警方的言論而被控。被告承認串謀煽惑他人縱火、串謀作出具煽動意圖作為兩罪。
30 Mar 2021明報#1300
港區國安法｜唐英傑申押後擬覆核不設陪審團決定被拒 控方擬傳嶺大學者解釋「光復香港，時代革命」 (11:55)
The first case under the Hong Kong National Security Law was originally scheduled to go to trial at the High Court on 23 June. During a case management hearing, the defence applied to vacate the trial date and set a new hearing date, revealing that Tong Ying-kit had been granted legal aid to apply for judicial review of the arrangement for the case to be tried without a jury. The court ultimately refused to adjourn the trial further. The trial is provisionally to be conducted in English, and the two sides are scheduled to attend a hearing on the scope of the expert evidence on the 8th of next month.
《港區國安法》首宗案件原定6月23日在高等法院開審。辯方在案件管理聆訊時，向法庭申請撤銷上述審期，要求再擇聆訊日期，透露唐英傑已獲法援批准，就本案不設陪審團的安排申請司法覆核。法庭最終拒絕進一步押後審期，審訊暫定以英文進行，同時安排雙方在下月8日，就專家證供的範圍進行聆訊。
25 Mar 2021立場新聞#1286
首宗國安法案下周二高院聆訊 再多一名指定法官身份曝光
The Judiciary’s website shows that the three judges handling hearings in the first National Security Law case, the Tong Ying-kit case, are Pang Po-kam, To Lai-ping and Chan Ka-shun. However, the website has not yet indicated whether the June trial will also be heard by the same three judges. In other words, Chan Ka-shun is the fifth High Court designated judge under the National Security Law, following Anderson Ka Ming Chow, Lee Wan-tang, Pang Po-kam and To Lai-ping.
司法機構網頁顯示，處理國安法首宗案件「唐英傑案」聆訊的三名法官分別為彭寶琴、杜麗冰及陳嘉信，惟網頁暫未顯示 6 月審訊是否亦由該三名法官審理。換言之，陳嘉信是繼周家明、李運騰、彭寶琴及杜麗冰之後，高院第五名國安法指定法官。
25 Mar 2021獨媒#1287
網台主持「傑斯」高院申保釋被拒 女兒不捨 欄前十指緊扣
D100 Radio host ‘Giggs’ Yin Yiu-sing was denied bail by Esther Toh, a High Court designated judge under the National Security Law, and must remain in custody.
網台D100 Radio主持「傑斯」尹耀昇，高等法院國安法指定法官杜麗冰拒絕其保釋申請，他須繼續還柙。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
