Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.
五十多名初選案被捕人士中，47人按要求提早報到時被正式落案起訴「串謀顛覆國家政權罪」，不准保釋，翌日直接上庭提堂。未被起訴人士需於5月再次報到。
Of the more than 50 people arrested in the primary election case, 47 were formally charged with conspiracy to subvert state power when they reported early as required. They were denied bail and brought before the court the following day. Those who were not charged must report again in May.
【初選大搜捕】落案起訴？ 警方要求被捕人 提早 2.28 到警署報到
Most of the more than 50 pro-democracy primary election candidates and co-organisers arrested on 6 January on suspicion of subversion of state power received police notices today asking them to report to police stations this Sunday, more than a month earlier than the originally scheduled reporting date of 8 April.
1月6日被以涉嫌顛覆國家政權拘捕的五十多名民主派初選參選人及協辦人士，大部分今日收到警方通知，要求提早至本周日到警署報到，比原定報到日子4月8日提早逾一個月。
黎智英提取消住所上網限訪客 指定法官仍拒保釋 指無充足理由相信不會危害國安
The judge issued reasons for dismissing Jimmy Lai’s bail application, revealing that Lai’s side had proposed additional bail conditions, including cancelling internet service at his residence and restricting the frequency and duration of visitors’ visits. The court nevertheless found that there were insufficient grounds to believe Lai would not continue to commit acts endangering national security, and therefore refused bail. At an earlier hearing, the judge cited section 9P of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance to restrict media reporting of the proceedings, allowing only the bail result to be reported. In the reasons issued today, the judge said that, after assessment, he considered that allowing the media to report the contents of the reasons would not cause unfairness to the applicant or affect the trial.
法官頒布駁回黎智英保釋申請的判詞，透露黎智英一方提出的新增保釋條件，包括取消其住所的互聯網服務及限制訪客探訪的次數及時間，但法庭仍認為沒有充足理由相信黎智英不會繼續實施危害國家安全行為，故拒絕其保釋。案件早前聆訊時，法官引用《刑事訴訟程序條例》第 9P 條，限制傳媒報道庭上內容，只可報道保釋結果。法官今於判詞指，經評估後認為不會對申請人造成不公或影響審訊，批准傳媒報道判詞內容。
高院拒黎智英保釋 終院國安法判詞後第三例
After the Department of Justice successfully appealed to have Jimmy Lai’s bail revoked, he again applied for bail in the High Court but was refused. As reporting on the bail hearing is prohibited under the procedure, the judge is expected to issue a written ruling later.
黎智英遭律政司上訴撤銷保釋後，再次向高等法院申請保釋被拒。由於根據程序禁止報道保釋聆訊，預計法官稍後將頒布書面裁決。
【國安法第五案】29歲律師助理被控勾結外國勢力及協助罪犯 涉安排眾籌、外國遊說工作
Solicitor’s assistant Chan Tsz-wah was arrested at his home on February 15, the fourth day of the Lunar New Year. The Police National Security Department charged him with allegedly helping Andy Li, one of the 12 Hong Kong residents, flee to Taiwan, and carrying out crowdfunding and international lobbying work with Jimmy Lai and his personal assistant Mark Simon. He was charged with conspiracy to collude with a foreign country or external elements to endanger national security and conspiracy to assist offenders. He was the fifth person charged with violating the National Security Law. National Security Law-designated judges adjourned the case until April 14 for a further hearing and denied the defendant bail.
律師助理陳梓華2月15號大年初四被登門拘捕，警務處國安處落案起訴指他涉嫌協助12港人之一的李宇軒潛逃台灣，連同黎智英及其私人助理Mark Simon等人進行眾籌及國際遊說等工作，被控「串謀勾結外國或者境外勢力危害國家安全」及「串謀協助罪犯」兩罪，亦是被控違反國安法的第五人。國安法指定法官將案件押後至4月14日再訊，拒絶被告保釋申請。
被指與「攬炒巴」勾結外國勢力、協助 12 港人離境 黎智英赤柱監獄內再被捕
Stand News, citing sources, reported that the Police National Security Department arrested Jimmy Lai again at the prison in the evening. He was suspected of assisting Andy Li in the case involving 12 Hong Kong people leaving the city, and of conducting international lobbying with the “laam caau” team. He was suspected of “conspiracy to assist offenders” and “conspiracy to collude with a foreign country or with external elements to endanger national security”.
《立場新聞》引述消息指，警方國安處晚上於監獄再次拘捕黎智英，指他涉嫌協助12港人案李宇軒離港，以及與「攬炒團隊」進行國際游說，涉嫌「串謀協助罪犯」及「串謀勾結外國或者境外勢力危害國家安全」。
國安法案可閉門審訊 消息：唐英傑案律政司未提出閉門申請
Stand News, citing sources, reported that the Department of Justice decided that the first case under the Hong Kong National Security Law, the Tong Ying-kit case, would not have a jury on the grounds of protecting jurors’ safety. Ming Pao, also citing sources, reported that the Department of Justice was still considering whether the trial should be held in public. In response to an inquiry from Stand News, the Department of Justice said that, as judicial proceedings were still ongoing, it was inappropriate for anyone to comment on the case.
《立場新聞》引述消息，指律政司以保障陪審團安全為由，決定首宗《港區國安法》案件「唐英傑案」不設陪審團。《明報》則引消息指，律政司仍考慮是否公開審訊。律政司回覆《立場》查詢，指由於司法程序尚在進行，任何人均不適宜評論案件。
被指主持節目引他人蔑視中港政府 「傑斯」被控 4 項作煽動行為罪須還押候訊
Jas, a host on D100 internet radio, was accused of inciting others to hate and hold the Chinese and Hong Kong governments in contempt during his programmes. He was charged with four counts of doing acts with seditious intent. The prosecution said that although the case did not involve offences under the National Security Law, the charges also constituted acts endangering national security and the Court of Final Appeal’s judgment in the bail case of Lai Chee-ying could be cited. National Security Law-designated judge Su Wai-tak denied bail to the defendant, and the case was adjourned until 10 May for further mention.
D100網台主持人傑斯被指在節目引起他人憎恨、蔑視中港政府，被控 4 項「作出具煽動意圖的行為」罪。控方指案件縱非涉及《港區國安法》下的罪行，但相關控罪亦是危害國家安全行為，可以引用終審法院就黎智英保釋一案頒下的判詞。國安法指定法官蘇惠德拒絕被告保釋，案件押至5月10日再訊。
終院五官一致裁定律政司上訴得直 黎智英被撤原保釋須續還押 將再向高院申保釋
The Court of Final Appeal unanimously ruled that the Department of Justice had won its appeal, revoking Jimmy Lai’s bail and ordering that he remain in custody. The court said the bail threshold under Article 42(2) of the National Security Law was far stricter than that under Section 9G of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance: bail must not be granted unless the judge has “sufficient grounds for believing that the criminal suspect or accused person will not continue to commit acts endangering national security”. It also said the High Court judge in the original proceedings had misinterpreted Article 42(2) when dealing with the Tong Ying-kit case. The court therefore allowed the Department of Justice’s appeal and set aside the decision granting Lai bail.
終審法院宣判，一致裁定律政司上訴成功，黎智英被撤銷保釋，繼續還押。終院指國安法第42（2）條的保釋門檻比一般《刑事訴訟程序條例》第9G條嚴格得多，除非法官有「充足理由相信犯罪嫌疑人或被控人不會繼續實施危害國家安全行為」，否則不得准予保釋，又指原審高院法官於處理唐英傑一案時，錯誤詮釋了42（2）條，故裁定律政司一方上訴得直，並擱置其批准黎智英保釋的裁決。
首宗國安法案件將不設陪審團 律政司指為保障陪審員人身安全 設陪審團或礙司法公義
It is reported that the Department of Justice will invoke Article 46 of the National Security Law to refuse the use of a jury in the first National Security Law case, the Tong Ying-kit case, and is considering invoking Article 41 for a closed-door trial.
有傳律政司將引用國安法第46條，拒絕在首宗國安法案件（唐英傑案）使用陪審團，並考慮引用第41條不公開審訊。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.