Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.
網台主持「傑斯」再被國安處拘捕 被指涉嫌「作出具煽動意圖作為」
D100 online radio host Jace was arrested again by the police’s National Security Department, allegedly on suspicion of “doing an act with seditious intent”.
D100網台主持傑斯再次被警方國安處拘捕，被指涉嫌「作出具煽動意圖的作為」。
警國安署低調拘 3 人 消息：警指控收傑斯數萬元 有被捕人無律師陪同下落口供
On January 29, the Police National Security Department quietly arrested three people suspected of money laundering and providing money or other property to another person to support secession, in connection with the Jace case. Police only issued a statement about the case after media enquiries on February 2. It is understood that police searched one person’s home when no lawyer was present. Another person was detained and gave a statement at a police station without a lawyer accompanying them.
警方國安處1月29日以涉嫌洗黑錢及以金錢或者其他財物資助他人分裂國家，低調拘捕與傑斯案有關的3人。事件直至傳媒2月2日查詢，警方才發稿交代案件。據知有當事人在無代表律師在場下，被警方搜屋；有當事人在警署扣查及錄口供期間，亦無律師陪同進行。
黎智英保釋上訴過百人取籌旁聽 有通宵等候人士：不知誰受審 取籌後轉身即走
The Department of Justice appealed to the Court of Final Appeal against the decision to grant Lai Chee-ying bail. Before the hearing began, more than 100 members of the public were already queuing outside the court to collect numbered tickets, with some at the front of the queue having waited overnight. A man told The Stand News that he did not know who was on trial that day and had never heard of Lai Chee-ying, but denied being paid to queue. It was reported that staff from at least two foreign consulates were unable to enter to observe the hearing because of the long queue.
律政司就黎智英獲准保釋的決定上訴至終審法院，案件開審前法院外已有過百名市民排隊等候取籌，而排在隊伍前列部分人士更是通宵等候。一名男子向《眾新聞》記者表示，不知道今日誰受審，也無聽過黎智英，但否認收錢排隊。據指至少兩間外國領事館人員因大排長龍而未能入內旁聽。
【黎智英保釋案】律政司力銷國安法重要性 23條未立已適用 終院圍攻律政司演繹等同無保釋
The Court of Final Appeal began hearing the Secretary for Justice’s appeal against Lai Chee-ying being granted bail, concerning the interpretation and threshold for bail under Article 42(2) of the National Security Law. The Department of Justice said the High Court judge in the Tong Ying-kit case had misinterpreted the National Security Law’s bail provisions: unless a judge has “sufficient grounds” to believe that the defendant will not continue to commit acts endangering national security, bail must not be granted. The judge must also consider whether the defendant will continue to commit “acts endangering national security”, not only acts covered by the National Security Law or existing laws of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
終審法院開庭審理律政司就黎智英獲准保釋提出的上訴，處理國安法第42(2)條下保釋的詮釋及門檻。律政司指高院法官在唐英傑案錯誤理解國安法保釋規定，即除非法官有「充足理由」相信被告不會繼續實施危害國家安全行為的，不得準予保釋，法官亦需要考慮被告會否繼續干犯「危害國家安全行為」，並不限於國安法或香港特區現有法律。
黎智英案聆訊前四日 林鄭與終院張舉能單獨會面
Citizen News reported that then-Chief Executive Carrie Lam met privately with Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal Andrew Cheung four days before the Court of Final Appeal handled Jimmy Lai’s bail hearing over alleged violations of the National Security Law, and one day after the Judiciary announced the list of presiding judges. In response to media enquiries, the Judiciary did not deny that the two had met, but stressed that, based on the principle of judicial independence, they would not discuss individual cases due to be heard in court.
《眾新聞》指特首林鄭月娥在終審法院處理黎智英違國安法保釋聆訊4天前、司法機構公布主審法官名單1天後，與終審法院首席法官兼黎智英保釋聆訊法官之一張舉能單獨會面。司法機構回覆傳媒查詢時未有否認二人會面，但強調基於司法獨立原則，二人不會討論個別要在法庭審理的案件。
黎智英涉國安法保釋案 罕有地無海外非常任法官參與
Jimmy Lai is charged with colluding with foreign forces in violation of the National Security Law. The Court of Final Appeal announced only five days before the hearing that five local judges would hear the Secretary for Justice’s substantive appeal on February 1, meaning that the first substantive hearing under the National Security Law would proceed without the participation of an overseas non-permanent judge. During the February 1 hearing, the Court of Final Appeal will address the proper interpretation of Section 42(2) of the National Security Law in granting bail. Depending on the outcome of the substantive appeal, it is expected to decide whether the High Court will reopen the hearing of Jimmy Lai’s bail application.
黎智英被控勾結外國勢力違反國安法，終審法院直至審訊前五日才公布2月1日由5名本地法官處理律政司正審上訴，亦即國安法首次正審便無海外非常任法官參與。終審法院在2月1日的聆訊期間，將處理《國安法》第42(2)條批出保釋的正確詮釋，並預計視乎正審決定，高等法院是否重新開庭處理黎智英的保釋申請。
【初選大搜捕】鄒家成、劉頴匡指被警擅取銀行紀錄 路透：至少涉 6 被捕人 匯豐、花旗、渣打等銀行
Reuters, citing senior banking sources, reported that police had asked banks to provide financial records over the past six-plus months. According to the report, at least six people arrested over the pro-democracy primary election said police obtained some of their bank transaction records without their consent, involving banks including Citibank, HSBC and Hang Seng Bank. One of those arrested, Owen Chow, confirmed that on the day of his arrest, police produced a bundle of records and asked about the source of each amount.
《路透社》引述銀行高層消息，指警方過去大半年要求銀行提供財務紀錄。據報道，至少6名因民主派初選被捕人士表示，警方在未得到他們同意下取得他們部分銀行交易紀錄，當中涉及花旗、匯豐、恆生等銀行。被捕人士之一鄒家成證實，被捕當日警方取出一疊紀錄，詢問每筆金額來源。
「學生動源」4人去年涉國安法被捕 其中3人今獲警主動交還護照
Former Student Politicism members Ho Yan Lok, Chan Wai Yin and Ho Nok Hang were arrested separately by the Police National Security Department last year, subsequently released on bail and required to surrender their passports. The three were unconditionally released by police today, who proactively returned their passports, but their mobile phones, computers and other property remain seized for examination.
前學生動員前成員何忻諾、陳渭賢及何諾恆，去年先後被警方國安處拘捕後獲准保釋及需交出護照。三人今日獲警方無條件釋放，主動交還護照，但手機、電腦等財仍被扣查。
未有交出旅遊證件違保釋條件 胡志偉還押候訊
Former Democratic Party chairman Wu Chi-wai was arrested the day before yesterday on suspicion of violating the Hong Kong National Security Law. Police found that he allegedly breached the bail conditions in another case by failing to surrender all his travel documents as required.
民主黨前主席胡志偉涉嫌違反《香港國安法》前日被捕，警方發現他涉嫌違反另一宗案件的保釋條件，沒有按要求交出所有旅遊證件。
鍾劍華到警總協助調查民主派初選 期間無提供相關資料
Chung Kim-wah, deputy chief executive of the Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute, went to Police Headquarters at the police’s request to assist an investigation into allegations that the pro-democracy primary violated the National Security Law. Chung said police asked him to provide information relating to the primary, but he had no information to provide and did not give police any information.
香港民意研究所副行政總裁鍾劍華應警方要求前往警總，就民主派初選被指涉嫌違反《港區國安法》一事協助調查。鍾指警方要求他提供民主派初選的相關資料，但他沒有資料可以提供，亦未有向警方提供任何資料。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.