HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

Search the archive

Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.

Results JSON

Statistics

12matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
2
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
1
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
1
Apr 23
0
May 23
1
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
1
Aug 23
0
Sep 23
1
Oct 23
2
Nov 23
1
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
1
Feb 24
0
Mar 24
0
Apr 24
0
May 24
0
Jun 24
0
Jul 24
0
Aug 24
0
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
1
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
0
Oct 25
0
Nov 25
0
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

Results 12

subtopic-1-1中大Clear all
Showing 1-10 of 12 recordsEN
20 Feb 2025集誌社#4541

Why the Silence? Campus Screening Cancelled After Film Censorship Office Receives Complaint and Issues Warning; Student Union Regrets Sudden Notice

何以鴉雀無聲|校園放映取消 電檢處昨收投訴、「隨即調查」發警告 學生會:遺憾突然通知

The New Asia College Student Union of The Chinese University of Hong Kong had scheduled a screening last night (19th) of *Why the Silence?*, a film about Myanmar workers’ protests, followed by a discussion with Professor Li Lap-fung on social movements, civil society and related issues. About an hour before the screening, the union announced that it was cancelled and that only the discussion would proceed. It later said in a statement that it had received an email from the Office for Film, Newspaper and Article Administration warning that the film had not been issued a Certificate of Approval or Certificate of Exemption, and that continuing the screening could violate the Film Censorship Ordinance, with conviction carrying a fine or even imprisonment. The union said it ultimately cancelled the screening because it could not clarify the legal definitions within the short time available, and expressed regret over the office’s sudden notice. It also disputed the suggestion that the event was public, saying participation was limited to registered and invited CUHK members, and that the film had previously passed film censorship for screening and therefore did not require another certificate application. The office said today (20th) that it received a complaint yesterday and, after “immediately investigating”, confirmed that no application had been made for the film to be examined. It therefore immediately emailed the organisers to “remind” them to observe the requirements of the ordinance. It added that it had previously issued approval for the film to the Asian Film Festival Association, but that approval was limited to screenings at a specified location on specified dates.

中文大學新亞書院學生會,原定昨晚(19 日)放映以緬甸工人抗爭為主題的《何以鴉雀無聲》,並邀請教授李立峯討論社會運動、公民社會等議題。學生會放映前約一小時宣布取消放映會、僅保留討論環節,其後發聲明指活動前收到電檢處電郵,警告電影未獲發「核准證明書或豁免證明書」,繼續放映或違電檢條例,經定罪可處罰款甚至監禁。 學生會指,礙於短時間內未能釐清法律定義,最終取消放映,對電檢處突然通知「好遺憾」;又反駁指活動限已登記及受邀中大人士參與,並非公開活動,而電影曾通過電檢作放映,不需再次申請證明書。 電檢處今(20日)回覆指,是在昨日接獲投訴,「隨即調查」後確認未有相關影片檢片申請,故即時發電郵「提醒」主辦方留意條例規定;又指曾就電影向亞洲電影節協會發出核准,但該核准只限於指定日子在特定地點上映。

22 Feb 2024獨媒#3018

CUHK Faculty of Medicine “Absolutely Supports” Article 23 Legislation, Says It Can Continue Developing with National Security Strengthened

中大醫學院:「絕對支持」23條立法 在完備國家安全下能繼續發展

The public consultation on legislation under Article 23 of the Basic Law will end next week. Dean of the CUHK Faculty of Medicine Philip Wai Yan Chiu said the faculty “absolutely supports” the legislation, and believes social stability supports the development of medical technology, services and education. Philip Wai Yan Chiu also said the faculty is still able to cooperate with overseas teams for the time being and has not been affected by geopolitics. The faculty will not submit a written opinion to the government as the Hospital Authority did. Focusing on research and talent training, it believes it can continue to develop under the government’s leadership and with national security fully safeguarded.

《基本法》23條立法公眾諮詢將於下周結束,中大醫學院院長趙偉仁表示,學院「絕對支持」23條立法,認為社會的穩定對醫療科技、服務及教育發展有支持作用,又指學院暫時仍然能夠與外國團隊合作,未有受到地緣政治影響。他指,不會如醫管局向政府提交意見書,學院著重科研及人才培訓,相信在政府領導及完備國家安全下,學院能繼續發展。

2 Dec 2023獨媒#8740

Audit criticised for ‘targeting’ CUHK; Nelson Chi Yuen Lam: All institutions will be examined

審計中大被批評「玩針對」 林智遠:所有機構都會睇

The Audit Commission’s latest report said that 29 of the 33 restaurants on the Chinese University of Hong Kong campus received walk-in customers, contrary to legal requirements. The report could leave people other than teaching staff and students with “no food to eat” on campus, while some also viewed it as targeting CUHK. Legislative Council member Kong Yuk-fun said it had “gone too far” and was out of touch. The Audit Commission issued a media advisory yesterday, inviting the media to cover a visit to elderly people and activities promoting the District Council elections. As expected, its director, Nelson Chi Yuen Lam, responded to the matter proactively, reiterating that the Commission’s principle was to cover all institutions using public funds, and that when auditing an institution as if giving it a health check, “we will look at both major and minor matters.”

審計署最新一份報告,指中大校園33間餐廳有29間接待「街客」,不符法例規定。報告除了或致校園除教職員及學生外「冇飯食」外,亦有聲音認為是針對中大,立法會議員江玉歡亦則指「管過了頭」、離地。審計署昨日發採訪通知,借探訪長者及宣傳區選活動邀傳媒採訪。一如預料,署長林智遠主動回應事件,重申署方的原則是覆蓋所有使用政府公帑的機構,審計如為機構驗身「大事小事我哋都會睇」。

29 Nov 2023集誌社#8718

National security audit | CUHK criticised over inadequate national security guidelines for outsourced bookstores, restaurants and other facilities; training bodies advised to establish complaint mechanisms

國安審計|批中大外判書店、食肆等缺護國安指引 建議培訓機構訂投訴機制

The Audit Commission published a new audit report today (29th). Three of its eight chapters mentioned the safeguarding of national security. The report found deficiencies in national security measures under the Innovation and Technology Commission’s Re-industrialisation and Technology Training Programme, as well as in the Chinese University of Hong Kong’s arrangements for facilities managed by external organisations. It recommended that institutions strengthen their measures, including requiring funded training bodies to sign confirmation letters or declarations, establishing complaint mechanisms, and adding clauses allowing contracts to be terminated at any time. The report said the Innovation and Technology Commission and the Vice-Chancellor of the Chinese University of Hong Kong both agreed with the Audit Commission’s recommendations. The report also disclosed that the Recycling Fund under the Environmental Protection Department had added national security clauses in September 2022. These clauses include allowing the Government to disqualify applicants on grounds such as their having participated in activities that could lead to national security offences, or to terminate agreements. A review of Audit Commission reports published since the National Security Law came into effect found that national security review content first appeared in October 2022. Including the reports published in March this year and today, three reports covered 24 audited projects or organisations. At least one-third of them—eight funds, non-profit organisations, statutory bodies, libraries, universities and others—were advised by the Audit Commission to strengthen their national security guidelines and measures.

審計署今(29日)發表新一份審計報告,在八個章節中,有三章都提及維護國家安全的內容。報告指出創新科技署的再工業化及科技培訓計劃、以及中文大學對由外間機構管理校園設施,在維護國安措施上有不足。報告建議機構加強措施,包括要求獲資助培訓機構簽確認書或聲明,設投訴機制,及加入可隨時終止合約條款等等。報告引述創科署和中文大學校長,均同意審計署建議。 報告也披露,環保署轄下的回收基金自 2022 年 9 月已增維護國安條款,包括政府能以申請機構曾參與可導致危害國安罪行的活動為由等,剔除申請資格,或可終止協議等。 翻查自國安法實施以來的審計署報告,有關「國安」審查內容始自 2022 年 10 月,計及今年3月份以及今日發表的報告,三份報告涉 24 個被審查的項目或機構中,最少三分一、共 8 個被審計的基金、非牟利機構、法定機構、圖書館、大學等,被署方建議須加強維護國安指引和措施。

29 Nov 2023獨媒#8719

Audit report criticises CUHK restaurants for serving walk-in customers; tender documents lacked national security clauses

審計報告批中大餐廳接待街客 招標文件未有維護國安條款

The Audit Commission published a report saying that the Chinese University of Hong Kong had not properly handled the tendering and monitoring of some campus facilities operated by outside organisations. None of the 33 restaurants on campus had obtained food business licences. After inspections, Audit Commission staff found that 29 of them served “walk-in customers”—people who were not CUHK students or staff—and that three provided food delivery services to locations outside the campus through third-party food delivery platforms. The tender documents and contracts also contained no clauses on safeguarding national security. The commission recommended that CUHK add clauses to its contracts allowing it to disqualify bidders and terminate contracts on national security grounds. CUHK said it agreed with the report’s contents.

審計署發表報告,指中文大學部分外間機構營運的校園設施未有做好招標及監管工作,校園內33間餐廳均沒有領取食物業牌照。署方人員視察後更發現,當中29間均有招待「街客」,即非中大學生或教職員,3間更通過第三方外送食物平台,為校園範圍外的地點提供外送食物服務。而招標文件、合約亦未有維護國家安全的條款,署方建議中大在合約中加入條款,容許以國家安全為由,取消投標者的資格和終止合約,中大表示同意報告內容。

28 Oct 2023獨媒#8558

June Fourth scholar loses CUHK history post after Immigration Department rejects work visa renewal

入境處拒續批工作簽證 研六四學者失中大歷史系教席

Canadian Chinese historian Ho Hiu-ching, who taught a June Fourth course at Harvard University and wrote *Tiananmen Exiles: The Voice of China’s Democracy Movement*, had been an associate professor at The Chinese University of Hong Kong since 2019. After waiting more than a year for a decision, her application to extend her work visa was formally rejected by the Immigration Department this month, immediately costing her the post. In an interview with Independent Media, Ho said she was a “very moderate” person who only wanted to conduct research and teach, but that “such a humble request as being a scholar and a teacher ultimately still comes at such a great cost,” leaving her feeling helpless about the decision. She said it was difficult to state definitively why her visa had been rejected, but believed it was related to her research and teaching. Describing it as a very typical case of “killing the chicken to scare the monkeys,” she said it would have a chilling effect on colleagues and students working on China-related issues and affect academic freedom. Ho said she had researched the subject of “exile,” only to become one of those in exile herself.

曾於哈佛大學開設六四課程、著有《天安門流亡者:中國民主抗爭的呼聲》一書,自2019年起於香港中文大學任副教授的加拿大籍華裔歷史學者何曉清,等待審批逾一年後,工作簽證延期申請於本月正式被入境處拒絕,即時失去教席。何曉清接受《獨媒》訪問,表示自己是「好溫和」的人,只想做研究和教書,惟「咁卑微作為一個學者、一個老師嘅要求,最後都要承受一個咁大嘅代價」,對決定感到無奈。她難以定言簽證被拒的原因,但估計與其研究和教學有關,形容是很典型的「殺雞儆猴」,對研究中國議題的同行和學生造成寒蟬效應,影響學術自由。何嘆自己研究「流亡」的議題,最後反而成了其中一分子。

14 Aug 2023獨媒#8192

ICAC discloses corruption investigation at CUHK; former chief investigator says treatment of Rocky Tuan and his wife was “not ideal and unfair”

廉署披露查中大涉貪 前總調查主任指對段崇智夫婦「不理想不公平」

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) recently issued a rare statement during the investigation stage of a case, confirming that it was investigating allegations of corruption and misappropriation of public funds involving a medical centre under The Chinese University of Hong Kong. It also obtained a warrant to search CUHK for evidence. Information was subsequently circulated suggesting that the case involved CUHK’s Centre for Cardiovascular Genomics and Medicine, which is headed by CUHK President Rocky Tuan’s wife, Lo Man-nga. Former ICAC Executive Department Chief Investigator Stephen Shik Ngor Char said on a radio programme this morning that the ICAC had a responsibility to protect the rights of people under investigation. He said its handling of the matter was “not ideal”, particularly as Rocky Tuan had recently been in the “hot kitchen”; the information released by the ICAC would inevitably lead people to make associations and was considerably unfair to those involved.

廉政公署日前罕有在案件調查階段發聲明,確認調查香港中文大學轄下一所醫學中心,有人涉嫌貪污及挪用公款等指控,更持手令到中大搜證,更有「消息」流出案件涉及中大心血管基因組醫學中心,而中心由中大校長段崇智妻子羅聞亞主理。前廉政公署執行處總調查主任查錫我今早在電台節目表示,廉署有責任保障受查人的權利,今次做法「唔係太理想」,尤其段崇智近來身處「熱廚房」,廉署公布的消息「難免令人有聯想」,對當事人相當不公平。

21 Jun 2023獨媒#7844

Three CUHK Council Members’ Open Letter Condemns Arrogance

三中大校董發公開信斥目中無人

Tommy Cheung of the Liberal Party, Lau Kwok-fan of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, and Tang Ka-piu of the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions, who are also members of The Chinese University of Hong Kong Council, introduced a private bill in the Legislative Council to amend the Chinese University of Hong Kong Ordinance and restructure the Council, substantially reducing the proportion of members from within the university. Cheung also wrote to CUHK demanding payment of more than 750,000 in costs arising from the proposed amendment. Three CUHK Council members elected by the Alumni Senate issued an open letter today, accusing Cheung of “bringing a culture of abuse into the Council” and of showing contempt for others. They also said his proposed amendments disregarded the task force’s report. When contacted by HK01, Cheung said only: “I haven’t read the letter and am not particularly interested.”

身兼中大校董的自由黨張宇人、民建聯劉國勳及工聯會鄧家彪,向立法會提出私人條例草案修訂《香港中文大學條例》,改組校董會,大減校內成員比例。張宇人並去信中大,要求支付逾75萬修例衍生的費用。三名中大校友評議會選任校董今日發公開信,斥張宇人「將謾罵文化帶進校董會」、目中無人,其修例建議亦漠視專責小組的報告。《獨媒》向張宇人查詢,他只稱「我冇睇過封信,冇乜興趣。」

18 Apr 2023獨媒#6329

CUHK council members advocate 40% cut; external members to form majority

中大校董倡大減四成 校外委員改佔多數

Since 2019, the pro-establishment camp has consistently expressed dissatisfaction with the governance of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, including the reappointment of President Rocky Tuan. Three Legislative Council members unilaterally proposed amendments to the Chinese University of Hong Kong Ordinance, reducing the number of council members from 54 to 34 and changing the ratio of internal to external members from 1:1 to 1:2. The CUHK Council established a task force to follow up on the restructuring. In a report submitted on Monday (April 17), the task force recommended reducing the number of members to between 25 and 34, with the ratio of internal to external members ranging from 1:1.64 to 1:2.13—in other words, external members would form a majority. The task force also recommended changing the appointment of the president to require approval by two-thirds or 75%.

自2019年後,建制派一直對中大管治表示不滿,包括校長段崇智獲續任。三名立法會議員逕自提出修訂《香港中文大學條例》,將校董數目由54人減至34人,並將校內及校外校董數目由1:1改為1:2。中大校董會成立專責小組跟進改組事宜,周一(4月17日)提交的報告中,建議人數大減至25至34人,校內校外委員比例則為1:1.64至1:2.13之間,換言之將由校外委員佔多數。小組亦建議將校長任命改為須三分之二或75%通過。

26 Jan 2021獨立媒體#1201

Police Speak as ‘CUHK Alumni’, Describe Students as ‘Thugs’ and Student Organisation as ‘Shameless’

警「中大校友」身份發言 形容學生是「兇徒」、學生組織「無恥」

Police briefed the public on their investigation into crowd-control barriers being pushed over and security personnel being sprayed with powder at the CUHK MTR station the previous day. Police said all four people involved were CUHK students; one was arrested that day and another is currently wanted. They were suspected of unlawful assembly and assault with intent to cause another person to do or omit to do an act. Before the case had been formally charged and heard, a police spokesperson criticised the students involved as “thugs” while speaking as a CUHK alumnus.

警方就早一日調查中大港鐡站鐵馬被推倒及保安被灑撥粉末一事,交代案情。警方指,涉案4人均為中大學生,其中1人在當日被捕,目前正通緝另1人。他們被指涉嫌非法集結和襲擊他人意圖導致不作出某些行為。在案件未正式起訴及審理情況下,有警方發言人以中大校友身份批評涉案學生為「兇徒」。

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.