4 Jun 2025集誌社#6866
六四 36｜盤點過去五年 最少 67人涉悼六四被捕 涉煽動意圖、行為不檢等
This year marks the 36th anniversary of June 4, and Victoria Park has gone six consecutive years without a candlelight vigil organised by the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China. Chief Executive John Lee said yesterday (3 June) that any unlawful acts would be dealt with decisively and strictly in accordance with the law, and that legal responsibility for acts endangering national security would be pursued to the fullest extent. The Collective Memory reviewed the number of arrests and prosecutions related to June 4 over the past five years. At least 67 people were arrested or charged in connection with June 4-related activities, involving inciting and participating in an unauthorised assembly, sedition and obstructing police officers in the execution of their duty. More than 30 people were also taken away over alleged breaches of the peace.
What conduct constitutes a criminal offence? A performance artist commemorating June 4 was arrested for disorderly conduct in a public place; another person was arrested on a sedition charge for silently displaying words of commemoration. A mainland student who planned to display a vertical banner of the “Pillar of Shame” on June 4 was convicted of attempted sedition, deported after serving the sentence and lost contact with family and friends. In addition, seven members of the Hong Kong Alliance were charged with failing to provide information and inciting subversion of state power. Chow Hang-tung, Lee Cheuk-yan and Albert Ho have to date been deprived of their freedom for more than 1,360 days and 1,150 days.
今年是六四 36 年，維園連續第六年沒有支聯會的燭光集會。特首李家超昨（3日）表示，對任何違法行為，會果斷嚴格依法處理，對危害國家安全行為會追究法律責任到底。《集誌社》盤點過去五年六四的拘控數字，針對六四相關活動，至少有 67 人被捕或被控，涉及煽惑及參與未經批准集結、煽動、阻差辦公等，也有逾 30 人被指涉破壞社會安寧被帶走。
什麼行為會構成罪行？有悼念六四的行為藝術家，被警方以公眾地方行為不檢拘捕；有人靜默展示悼念字句，被以煽動罪拘捕；也有內地生擬在六四展示「國殤之柱」直幡，被控企圖煽動罪成，刑滿後遭遣返、與親友失聯。此外，支聯會七人被控拒交資料及煽動顛覆國家政權，鄒幸彤、李卓人、何俊仁至今已失自由逾 1,360 日及 1,150 日。
3 Jun 2024法庭線#3627
鄒幸彤等7人被指違新煽動罪 警再拘一名62歲男子 據悉為鄒的舅父
The Police National Security Department arrested another 62-year-old man in Sha Tin on Monday (the 3rd) in connection with the case involving Chow Hang-tung and others allegedly contravening the new sedition offence. The man, reportedly Chow’s maternal uncle, was arrested on Monday morning.
Police also said that “if any arrested person is found to have breached any provision or condition of a ‘movement restriction order’”, a conviction may result in imprisonment for one year. The Witness asked police whether ‘movement restriction orders’ had been issued to all those arrested, whether they had been approved by a court, and what the orders contained. Police replied that they had nothing to add.
A review of the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance shows that a magistrate may, upon a unilateral application by police, grant a ‘movement restriction order’ directing a person released on bail to comply with specified requirements or conditions, such as not entering a specified area or place, or contacting a specified person, during a specified period. The order is valid for three months.
警方國安處周一（3 日），再就鄒幸彤等人涉違新煽動罪一案，在沙田拘捕一名 62 歲男子，指他涉嫌違反新煽動罪。據悉，該男子為鄒幸彤的舅父，於周一早上被捕。
警方又指，「如任何被捕人被發現違反『行動限制令』的任何規定或條件」，經定罪可判監禁一年。《法庭線》向警方查詢，是否向所有被捕人發出「行動限制令」、是否經法庭批准，以及限制令的內容；警方回覆指沒有補充。
翻查《維護國安條例》，裁判官可應警方單方面申請，批出「行動限制令」，指示獲保釋人須遵從指明規定或條件，例如不得在指明期間內，進入特定地區或地方，或與指明人士聯繫等，有效期為 3 個月。
12 Oct 2023獨媒#8477
圖掛六四直幡內地博士生刑滿 保安局：已遣返
Tsang Yu-suen, a 23-year-old mainland female doctoral student in law, was accused of contacting 1989 pro-democracy movement figure Zhou Fengsuo to obtain a vertical banner bearing the words “Pillar of Shame”, which she planned to display in Causeway Bay on June 4 this year. She was convicted last month of “attempting to do or making preparations to do one or more acts with a seditious intention” and sentenced to six months’ imprisonment. The Security Bureau said today in response to media enquiries that Tsang had completed her sentence and been released, and was deported from Hong Kong under section 19(1)(a) of the Immigration Ordinance (Cap. 115).
23歲內地女法律博士學生曾雨璇涉與八九民運人士周鋒鎖聯絡，取得印有「國殤之柱」的直幡，計劃在今年六四時於銅鑼灣展示，上月「企圖作出或準備作出一項或多項具煽動意圖的作為」罪成，判囚6個月。保安局今指回應傳媒查詢指，曾雨璇已刑滿獲釋，並根據《入境條例》（第115章）第19(1)(a)條被遣送離境。
12 Sept 2023法庭線#8359
23歲法律博士內地生認企圖煽動 判囚6月 官指行動屬國際性、接納沒鼓吹暴力
A 23-year-old Mainland student pursuing a PhD in law at CUHK, who was accused of planning to display vertical banners in Causeway Bay this year on June 4 bearing images of the “June 4 massacre” and the “Pillar of Shame”, pleaded guilty on Monday to attempting to incite subversion. Lo Tak-chuen, a National Security Law-designated judge and Chief Magistrate, sentenced the defendant to six months’ imprisonment at West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts on Tuesday (the 12th).
In sentencing, Lo said Ko Chi-wut and Zhou Fengsuo had promoted the matter online and provided the vertical banner, and that the operation was “international” in nature. He said the banner’s content was “sharp”, and that its intended audience—people who resonated with the message and were like-minded—could easily have their emotions stirred. The defendant had not acted impulsively but had made a comprehensive plan, and committed the offence while on police bail.
However, Lo accepted that the banner did not advocate violence or incite others to take further unlawful action. Its content centred on the June 4 incident, and the defendant had not added anything to it. The “Pillar of Shame” involved had also been publicly displayed for many years. Even if the banner had been displayed again, the potential risk of suddenly provoking others’ emotions would not have been particularly great.
23 歲就讀中大法律博士的內地生，被指打算於今年六四於銅鑼灣展示印有「六四屠殺」及「國殤之柱」圖像的直幡，周一承認企圖煽動罪。《國安法》指定法官、主任裁判官羅德泉周二（12 日）於西九龍裁判法院判被告監禁 6 個月。
羅判刑時指，高志活、周鋒鎖網上宣傳、提供直幡，行動屬「國際性」，而直幡內容具「尖銳性」，目標對象均對訊息內容有共鳴，是志同道合的人，他們容易被挑起情緒。被告並非衝動行事，有全盤計劃，於警方保釋期間犯案。
但羅接納，直幡沒有鼓吹暴力，沒有煽動他人作進一步非法行動。直幡內容圍繞六四事件，被告沒有加添內容，而涉案「國殤之柱」亦曾公開展示多年。即使再展示直幡，突然刺激他人情緒的潛在危機亦不太大。
6 Jun 2023獨媒#6560
【六四34】警方：蠟燭掛畫涉「煽動意圖」、根據「移走煽動刊物」移除
The candle hanging artwork displayed outside Sai Kung Store, operated by former Sai Kung District Councillor Chan Ka-lam and others, was taken away by police officers yesterday (June 5). Later that evening, officers went to her home and asked her to assist with the investigation. In response to inquiries from InMedia, police said the banner’s content was suspected of constituting the offence of “seditious intention” under Chapter 200 of the Laws of Hong Kong, the Crimes Ordinance. The case is being followed up by the First Team of the Serious Crime Unit of Wong Tai Sin Police District. Sai Kung Store
由前西貢區議員陳嘉琳等開辦的西貢士多「西多」，昨日（6月5日）其懸掛於門外的蠟燭掛畫被警方派員收走，她傍晚則被警員登門要求協助調查。警方回覆《獨媒》查詢時指， 橫額內容涉嫌干犯香港法例第200章《刑事罪行條例》下的「煽動意圖」罪，案件由黃大仙警區重案組第一隊跟進。
5 Jun 2023獨媒#6557
【六四34】六三被捕4人皆獲准保釋 包括劉家儀及三木
Police arrested four people in Causeway Bay on June 3, the eve of June 4, including former Hong Kong Alliance volunteer Kwan Chun-bong, Hong Kong Tiananmen Mothers member Ka Yee (1980) Lau, and performance artist Sam Muk (Chan Sik-sum). They were suspected of “doing an act with seditious intent” and “disorderly conduct in a public place”. All four were granted bail today pending investigation and must report to police in early July.
警方在六四前夕的6月3日，在銅鑼灣拘捕4人，包括前支聯會義工關振邦、香港天安門母親成員劉家儀，以及行為藝術家三木（陳式森），涉「作出具煽動意圖的作為」及「在公眾地方行為不檢」，4人於今日皆獲准保釋候查，須於七月上旬向警方報到。
4 Jun 2023獨媒#6549
【六四34】鄒幸彤獄中絕食34小時：哪裡有燭光哪裡是維園
The page “Siu Tung Kwan Chau Wui”, set up by supporters of former Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China vice-chair Chow Hang-tung, who is remanded in custody over the case involving subversion of state power, said yesterday that Chow would fast for 34 hours in prison. The accompanying image said: “Where there is candlelight, there is Victoria Park.”
因涉支聯會顛覆國家政權案還柙的前支聯會副主席鄒幸彤，其支持者設立的專頁「小彤群抽會」昨日表示，鄒幸彤將於獄中絕食34小時，附上的圖片寫有「哪裡有燭光，哪裡就是維園」。
19 Jan 2023法庭線#5968
前年六四煽惑集結案鄒幸彤上訴得直 律政司申上訴至終院 高院批出證明書
At the 2021 June 4 memorial assembly in Victoria Park, police opposed the event on public health grounds. Chow Hang-tung, then vice-chairwoman of the Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, was accused of urging members of the public on social media and in newspaper articles to attend the assembly. She was convicted of incitement to unlawful assembly after trial and sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment. Chow appealed against her conviction and sentence. At the end of 2022, High Court judge Esther T. L. Cheung allowed the appeal and quashed the conviction and sentence.
The Department of Justice, dissatisfied with the ruling, applied to the High Court on Thursday (19th) for a certificate for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. Judge Esther T. L. Cheung agreed with the Department of Justice that the case involved a “point of law of great and general importance” and granted the certificate.
2021 年六四維園悼念集會，警方以防疫為由反對進行。時任支聯會副主席鄒幸彤被指在社交媒體及報章發文呼籲市民參與集會，經審訊後被裁定煽惑集結罪成，判囚 15 個月。鄒不服定罪及刑期上訴，高院法官張慧玲 2022 年底裁定鄒上訴得直，撤銷定罪及判刑。
律政司一方不服裁決，周四（19 日）向高院申請終院上訴許可之證明書。法官張慧玲同意律政司一方指，本案有「重大及廣泛重要的法律論點」，故批出證明書。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
