HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

Search the archive

Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.

Results JSON

Statistics

1matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
0
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
0
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
0
Apr 23
0
May 23
0
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
0
Aug 23
0
Sep 23
0
Oct 23
0
Nov 23
0
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
0
Feb 24
0
Mar 24
0
Apr 24
1
May 24
0
Jun 24
0
Jul 24
0
Aug 24
0
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
0
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
0
Oct 25
0
Nov 25
0
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

Results 1

subtopic-2-3維園Clear all
Showing 1-1 of 1 recordsEN
7 May 2024法庭線#3497

Man in his 80s sentenced to one-month hospital order after allegedly obstructing police outside Victoria Park on June 4 anniversary

被指六四維園外遇截查時不合作 八旬翁被控阻差判一個月醫院令

On June 4, 2022, the 33rd anniversary of the June 4 incident, a man in his 80s was accused of holding an item bearing slogans about the “five demands” and the pursuit of universal suffrage outside Victoria Park. He allegedly refused to cooperate when stopped by police and was charged with obstructing a police officer in the due execution of his duty. The case was heard at Eastern Magistrates’ Courts on Tuesday (the 7th). The defendant, who had earlier failed to attend court and had a warrant issued for his arrest, was brought to court by police on Tuesday. He was not legally represented and was provided with a Putonghua interpreter. At the start of the hearing, the prosecution said two psychiatric reports previously requested by the court showed that the defendant was unfit to plead. It recommended that he be dealt with under section 45 of the Mental Health Ordinance and be given a one-month hospital order. The prosecution called four police officers to testify. The defendant did not testify and called no witnesses. After considering the evidence, Acting Magistrate Yip Shing-lam found that the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant had committed the offence of obstructing a police officer in the execution of duty. The defendant was sentenced to a one-month hospital order and remanded at Siu Lam Psychiatric Centre.

2022 年 6 月 4 日「六四事件」33 周年,八旬翁被指在維園外手持寫有「五大訴求」、爭取普選標語的物品,遇警截查時拒合作,被控一項「阻撓在正當執行職務的警務人員」罪。案件周二(7 日)在東區裁判法院審訊。 早前因沒有應訊、被發拘捕令的被告,周二由警方押送到庭。被告沒有律師代表,獲安排普通話翻譯。控方代表開庭表示,法庭早前索取的兩份精神科報告顯示,被告不適合答辯,建議按《精神健康條例》第 45 條,判處 1 個月醫院令處理。 控方傳召 4 名警員作供,被告不作供,沒有傳召證人。暫委裁判官葉成林考慮證供後,裁定控方在毫無合理疑點下證明被告干犯阻差辦公控罪,判被告 1 個月醫院令,還押小欖精神病治療中心。

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.