9 Oct 2025獨媒#7406
中大反修例民意報告連結失效 稱「技術問題、現正修復」
Six years after the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement, the Independent Police Complaints Council commissioned CUHK’s Centre for Communication and Public Opinion Survey to conduct an opinion poll. The centre published a research report, “Public Opinion in the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement”, in May 2020. However, the relevant website link is no longer accessible, preventing the public from downloading or viewing the report; only its cover image is displayed. Independent Media separately contacted CUHK and the council on Monday (October 6). CUHK replied on Wednesday evening that “due to technical issues, the link became invalid after the website was updated, and we are currently repairing the link.”
反修例運動事隔六年，監警會曾委託中大傳播與民意調查中心進行民調，並於2020年5月發布「反修例運動中的民意狀況」研究報告。惟相關網站連結失效，公眾無法下載或閱覽報告內容，僅顯示報告的封面圖片。《獨媒》周一（10月6日）分別向中大及監警會查詢，中大在周三晚回覆稱「因技術問題，連結在網站更新後失效，我們現正修復連結」。
8 Jan 2025光傳媒#4399
「警察勁揪」群組發起聯署投訴《大學線》報道 稱指導老師及該系教授「煽動學生反政府」
A recent report by Varsity, the student media outlet of The Chinese University of Hong Kong’s School of Journalism and Communication, about the Care Teams has sparked heated discussion. An official said the report “painted with a broad brush”. Less than a week after the controversy began, a pro-establishment group today (the 8th) launched a joint petition to complain to CUHK, alleging that the report’s adviser, Shum Wan-wah, and professor Li Lap-fung of the school had committed “professional misconduct”, “incited students against the government” and “poisoned the minds of the younger generation with false information”.
Someone launched the petition in the social media group “Police Are Awesome, the Brave Fear Nothing”. Letters were sent to former CUHK president Rocky S. Tuan, CUHK president Dennis Lo Yuk-ming and the dean of the School of Journalism and Communication, Anthony Ying Him Fung, complaining about CUHK part-time lecturer Shum Wan-wah, who supervised Varsity’s report “It’s None of Our ‘Care’ Business”, and School of Journalism and Communication professor Li Lap-fung. The petition alleged that the two had committed “professional misconduct”, called them “Hong Kong independence lecturers”, and accused them of unfairly blaming the government over the effectiveness of the Care Teams.
中文大學新聞與傳播學院學生媒體《大學線》近日一則有關「關愛隊」的報道引起熱議，有官員指報道「以偏概全」，事件發酵不足一周，今（8日）有建制群組發起聯署向中大投訴，指該報道的指導老師岑蘊華及該系教授李立峯「專業失德」，「煽動學生反政府」、「以虛假信息荼毒年輕一代嘅思想」。
有人在社交媒體群組「警察勁揪，勇者無懼」發起聯署，向中文大學校長段崇智（按：應為前校長）、中文大學校長盧煜明、新聞與傳播學院院長馮應謙（按：應為社會科學院院長）致函，投訴指導《大學線》「事不『關』己」報道的中大兼任講師岑蘊華，以及新傳學院教授李立峯「專業失德」，指二人為「港獨講師」，「老屈政府關受（按：愛）隊成效」。
6 Jan 2025獨媒#4393
《大學線》追訪關愛隊引熱議 中大新傳講師：傳媒係應該做呢啲工作
A report by CUHK student media The University Line following up on the Care Teams has become a hot topic in recent days. Some internet users praised the students’ work, while some officials criticised the report, saying it “may generalise from a partial view.” Shum Wan-wah, an adjunct lecturer at CUHK’s School of Journalism and Communication and a veteran media professional, said the students’ interviews were reasoned and evidence-based, and that she did not consider the subject of the report sensitive. Although some internet users commented, “Are these things reportable?”, she said, “The media should be doing this kind of work.”
中大新傳學生媒體《大學線》追訪關愛隊的報道是近日熱話，有網民讚賞學生做得好，但亦有官員批評報道「可能有些以偏概全」。中大新傳學院兼任講師、資深傳媒人岑蘊華認為，學生進行訪問時有理有據，自己亦不覺得報道題材敏感，雖然有網民留言「呢啲報唔報得㗎」，但「傳媒係應該做呢啲工作」。
5 Jan 2025獨媒#4388
《大學線》揭關愛隊邀市民穿背心充撐場面 梁宏正：報道有些以偏概全
A report by “University Line”, a student media outlet run by CUHK journalism and communication students, about the Care Teams has recently sparked discussion online. The report revealed that some Care Team members distributed vests for participants to wear before taking group photos at activities to “pad out the scene”. It also said that the outlet had repeatedly applied to the District Offices for Care Team work reports but was refused. Clarence Wang Ching Leung, Under Secretary for Home and Youth Affairs, said that Care Team services required the help of volunteers, and that the report “may have painted with too broad a brush, or may not have been comprehensive”. Clarence Wang Ching Leung also said: “If anyone has any enquiries, they are welcome to contact the Home Affairs Department directly; we can provide the relevant information.”
中大新傳學生媒體《大學線》一則關於關愛隊的報道近日在網上引起迴響。報道中，記者揭發有關愛隊成員在拍攝活動大合照前，派發背心予參加者穿上「充撐場面」，又多番向民政處申請索取關愛隊工作報告，但被拒絕。民青局副局長梁宏正回應指，關愛隊的服務是需要找義工幫忙，報道「可能有些以偏概全，或者未必是全面」，又指「如有任何查詢，歡迎大家直接找民政總署，我們可以提供有關資料」。
26 Mar 2024獨媒#3250
收走《大學社區報》 中大：刊物未得大學認可、有責任維護安全校園
All newspaper racks for University Community News, formerly known as the CUHK Student Press, on the Chinese University of Hong Kong campus last Tuesday (19th), along with copies already placed on them, were removed by the university without prior notice. Members of the publication unsuccessfully attempted to obstruct the removal. In a statement issued this afternoon (26th), University Community News said the university had received a complaint that the publication’s content was “not entirely truthful” and that it had placed copies on campus without authorisation. The university did not give specific reasons for the allegation that the content was “not entirely truthful”. The university has now returned the copies, while the newspaper racks are temporarily being held by the United College Student Union.
In response to an inquiry from Independent Media, CUHK said University Community News was not a CUHK publication, had not been recognised by the university, and had not received any funding or support from it. The university added that it had a responsibility to maintain a good and safe campus environment, and that it would immediately take measures if it found any unauthorised items or publications within the campus.
前身為《中大學生報》的《大學社區報》上周二（19 日）在中大校園內的所有報架，以及已上架刊物在未被通知情況下被校方收走，該報成員即時阻撓不果。《社區報》今午（26日）發文，指校方接獲有人投訴該報刊物內容「不盡不實」，且未經授權在校園擺放刊物，惟校方並未就「不盡不實」的指控說明具體理由。目前校方已交還被收走的刊物，報架則暫由聯書院學生會代為保管。
中大回覆《獨媒》查詢時表示，《社區報》不屬於中大的刊物，沒有得到大學的認可，也沒有獲得大學的任何資助或支持。校方續稱，有責任維護良好且安全的校園環境，如果發現在校園範圍存在任何未經許可的物品或刊物，校方將立即採取措施處理。
22 Mar 2024明報#3228
《社區報》報架移除紙本停派 中大：非認可刊物
The Chinese University of Hong Kong student publication The Chinese University Student Press, founded in 1969, was renamed University Community Press two years ago following the dissolution of the Student Union. On Tuesday (19th), it announced on Instagram that the supply of all physical publications would be suspended until further notice. An accompanying image showed the racks for publications on campus had been removed. CUHK said yesterday that University Community Press was not a CUHK publication and had not been recognised, funded or supported by the university. It said placing items or publications on campus without permission violated university regulations, and that it would take immediate action regarding all unauthorised items or publications.
CUHK also stressed that it had a responsibility to maintain a good and safe campus environment. The university did not respond when asked whether the removal of the publication was a risk-management measure following the passage by the Legislative Council days earlier of the legislation under Article 23 of the Basic Law.
【明報專訊】1969年創辦的中大校園媒體《中大學生報》，因學生會解散，前年改名《大學社區報》，周二（19日）在Instagram宣布暫停供應所有實體刊物至另行通知，附圖顯示校內擺放刊物的報架被移除。中大昨日回覆，《大學社區報》不屬中大刊物，無獲大學認可、資助或支持，在校園範圍內未經許可地擺放物品或刊物屬違反校規，所有未經授權的物品或刊物，校方將立即採取措施處理。
中大又強調，校方有責任維護良好安全的校園環境。至於本報查詢立法會日前通過《基本法》23條立法、校方移除刊物是否立法後的風險管理措施，校方無回覆。
19 Aug 2023獨媒#8218
廉署披露查中大 過往發稿鮮有提調查 查錫我：未點名受查對象 不犯《防賄條例》
Without making any arrests, the ICAC issued a statement last Friday announcing an investigation into CUHK Medical Centre, prompting public questions over whether it had departed from its usual principle of keeping investigations confidential. The Witness’s review of the ICAC’s past press releases found that, of 278 releases issued over the past year, 88% concerned arrests, prosecutions, convictions and sentencing. Most of the remainder comprised miscellaneous information about ICAC activities and the Commissioner’s itinerary. The release concerning CUHK was the only one issued as a statement to “confirm” media enquiries. Did the ICAC’s proactive disclosure of an institution under investigation breach the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance? Former ICAC chief investigator Stephen Shik Ngor Char said it did not constitute an offence, although the ICAC’s approach had “slightly crossed the line” and should be avoided where possible. He reiterated that the ICAC’s approach was not ideal and was unfair to Duan Chongzhi’s wife, Lo Man-nga. Independent legal researcher Edward Wong Kai-yeung i said the ICAC might have “lawful authority”, constituting a reasonable excuse under the Ordinance. Conversely, if Lo Man-nga ultimately became a “person under investigation”, media reports could potentially constitute the offence of “disclosing a person under investigation”.
廉署在未有任何拘捕行動下，上周五透過發聲明，公布正在調查中大醫學中心，被坊間質疑偏離一貫調查保密原則。《獨媒》透過翻查廉署過去新聞稿，發現過去一年278篇新聞稿當中，88%是關於拘捕、起訴、定罪及判刑；其餘絕大部分關於廉署活動和專員行程的雜項資訊，關於中大的新聞稿是唯一以聲明方式「證實」傳媒查詢的資訊。廉署主動披露受查機構有沒有觸犯 《防止賄賂條例》？前廉署總調查主任查錫我認為無犯法，不過廉署做法「有少少砸界」，應可避則避，他重申廉署的做法不太理想，對段崇智太太羅聞亞不公平。獨立法律研究員黃啟晹認為廉署或有「合法權限」，構成條例下的合理辯解，反而若果羅聞亞最終成為「受查對象」，傳媒報導反而有機會觸犯「披露受查人」罪行。
19 Aug 2023獨媒#8219
廉署13年來僅兩次未結案先公開受查對象 強調因「公眾利益」披露
Confidentiality in investigations has always been a cardinal principle of the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC). The identities of persons under investigation—and even the fact that they are being investigated—are subject to restrictions under Section 30 of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance and may not be disclosed. A review by InMedia of ICAC press releases from 2010 to the present found that the ICAC had proactively disclosed an investigation before any arrests on only two occasions over the years. One involved then-ICAC Commissioner Timothy Tong being accused of corruption; the other involved then-Legislative Council member Leung Kwok-hung revealing that someone had offered him “HK$100 million” to vote in favour of the 2015 constitutional reform. On both occasions, the ICAC stressed that it had departed from its usual practice of “not commenting” because it was in the “public interest”.
調查保密一向是廉政公署的金科玉律，對受查人的身份、甚至是「受查」本身事實，都受《防止賄賂條例》第30條限制而禁止披露。《獨媒》翻查2010年至今的廉署新聞稿，發現多來年廉署僅兩次主動在未有任何拘捕行動前，主動披露調查行動，一次是廉政專員湯顯明被指貪污，另一次是時任立法會議員梁國雄爆料有人以「1億元」賄賂他在2015年政改投支持票。兩次主動披露，廉署都強調偏離以往「不評論」做法的原因，是出於「公眾利益」。
20 Nov 2020獨媒#941
攝影師稱採訪間被推跌 中大保安惡人先告狀、出手阻人離開
Yesterday, a CUHK graduate chanted Hong Kong independence slogans and displayed related publicity materials during a procession on campus. The university reported the matter to the police, and it was taken over by the Police National Security Department. Officers from the department entered multiple areas of CUHK in groups this afternoon (20th) to investigate, leaving after gathering evidence for more than an hour. During the operation, photographer Siu Wan said he was pushed down by a security guard wearing a reflective vest. The guard subsequently claimed instead that Siu Wan had pushed him down. The two argued, and the guard at one point reached out and grabbed Siu Wan to stop him from leaving. Both were taken by police officers to the CUHK Security Office for investigation. Siu Wan was ultimately not charged and left without incident.
昨日中大有畢業生於校內遊行時叫港獨口號及展示相關文宣，校方報警處理，事件由警務處國家安全處接手處理。警方國安處今日（20日）下午分批進入中大多處調查，蒐證一個多小時後離開。期間，攝影師蕭雲稱被身穿反光衣的保安推跌，惟保安隨後反指是蕭雲將他推跌，雙方起爭執，保安一度伸手捉住蕭雲，阻止他離開。兩人被警員帶到中大保安處進行調查，蕭雲終未被起訴、順利離開。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
