3 Jun 2025獨媒#6861
【六四36】獵人書店拍賣六四書刊：只是商品、不擔心犯法
With June 4 approaching, many bookstores previously sold books and publications on the subject, but such materials have become increasingly hard to find in recent years. Independent bookstore Hunter Bookstore in Sham Shui Po has recently auctioned several out-of-print June 4-related books and publications, including Wen Wei Po’s *A Record of the Bloodbath in Beijing*, Ming Pao’s special publication *The Tragic Democracy Movement*, and the Hong Kong Journalists Association’s *I Am a Reporter—Imprints of June 4*.
Store manager Wong Man-huen told InMedia that this year the police had neither stationed officers outside as they did last year nor copied down the identity cards of people entering and leaving the store, and that the bookstore had not received any “提示”. Wong said the publications were merely merchandise, and that it was “entirely reasonable” for a bookstore to sell merchandise. She was not worried about breaking the law or facing the risk of arrest.
六四將至，過往不少書店會出售相關題材書刊，但近年買少見少。位於深水埗的獨立書店獵人書店，近日在店內拍賣多本已經絕版的六四書藉及刊物，包括文匯報出版的《血洗京華實錄》、明報特刊《悲壯的民運》、記協出版的《我是記者——六四印記》等。
店長黃文萱向《獨媒》表示，今年警方未有如去年一樣駐守門外及抄下出入人士身份證，亦沒有收到任何「提示」。黃指有關書刊只是商品，書店銷售商品是「十分合理」，不擔心會觸犯法例及有被捕風險。
6 Jun 2024集誌社#3656
六四 35｜陳朗昇採訪受阻 記協警方互譴責 重組事發經過
Chan Long-sing, multimedia production director at Channel C and chairperson of the Hong Kong Journalists Association, was told by an on-site police officer on the night of June 4 that he was “charging the police cordon”. The HKJA issued a statement “strongly condemning” the police for “issuing an unreasonable warning and obstructing reporting”, saying that a police superintendent had invited Chan into the cordon. The police issued a statement “strongly condemning” the HKJA statement for making “unreasonable accusations” and containing “false content”, saying officers had asked him to enter the operational area so that they could issue him a stern warning.
《集誌社》reviewed footage filmed that night and reconstructed the sequence of events. The footage shows a white-shirted police officer beckoning Chan into the area inside the orange tape and patting him on the arm. Another “officer with a loudhailer” subsequently rebuked Chan: “First warning, do not charge the police cordon again.” The “beckoning officer” who had earlier patted Chan’s shoulder then gestured as if pushing Chan Long-sing away and said: “Don’t push me again!”
《Channel C》多媒體製作主任、香港記者協會主席陳朗昇在六四當晚，被現場警員指「衝擊警方防線」。記協發聲明「嚴正譴責」警方「無理警告、阻礙採訪」，指當時有警司邀陳入防線。警方出稿「強烈譴責」記協聲明「無理指控、內容失實」，說警員要求他進入行動範圍內，以向他作出嚴正警告。
《集誌社》翻看當晚拍攝的片段，重組事發經過。片段顯示當晚，陳被一名白衣警遞手請進橙帶內，拍陳膊頭。陳其後另一名「嗌咪警」斥：「第一次警告，不要再衝擊警方防線」。之前拍膊頭的「遞手警」作勢推開陳朗昇稱「你唔好再推我啦！」
5 Jun 2024光傳媒#3647
瑞士籍攝影師拍攝六四被帶上警車 曾因拍攝反修例賠50萬訟費
Yesterday (June 4) marked the 35th anniversary of June 4, and foreign nationals still attended to observe. Swiss photographer Marc Progin, 79, went in person to photograph the scene in Causeway Bay. At 8:40 p.m. yesterday, police took him aside and then onto a police vehicle. Records show that Progin photographed the anti-extradition bill movement in 2019 and was charged with one count of “aiding and abetting the commission of an act tending and intended to cause a breach of the peace”. After he was acquitted, the Department of Justice sought a review of the case. After that review failed, it applied to the High Court for a review of the legal costs. Progin was ultimately ordered to pay about HK$500,000 in legal costs.
昨（4日）是六四35周年，仍有外國人到場關注。79歲瑞士籍攝影師包士哲（Marc Progin）親身到銅鑼灣現場拍攝，昨晚8時40分被警方帶到一旁，再被帶上警車。翻查資料，包士哲在2019年拍攝反修例運動，曾被控一項「協助及教唆作出擾亂公眾秩序行為罪」，他被判無罪後，律政司就案件提出覆核，覆核失敗後再向高院申請覆核訟費，最終包士哲被判支付約50萬元訟費。
4 Jun 2024光傳媒#3633
六四35〡今日報章僅5篇文提及六四 2019年以來最少
Candlelight vigils commemorating June Fourth continued in Hong Kong for more than 30 years, but “June Fourth” has now become a “sensitive date” in officials’ parlance. Guang Media counted the number of reports, editorials and columns related to June Fourth published by Hong Kong newspapers on June 4 each year since 2019. It found that the number of relevant articles had fallen year by year, from as many as 60 on June 4, 2019, to just five today—the first time in recent years that the number has fallen to single digits. The articles appeared in only three newspapers, including Ming Pao, Hong Kong Economic Journal and Oriental Daily News, a 70% decrease from the 10 newspapers recorded five years ago.
悼念六四的燭光曾在香港延續30多年，現在「六四」卻成為官員口中的「敏感日子」。《光傳媒》統計2019年起，香港報章在6月4日當天有關「六四」的報道、社評和專欄數目，發現相關文章數目逐年下跌，在2019年6月4日曾多達60篇，今日提及六四的文章只有5篇，是近年首次跌至個位數；涉及的報刊只有3份，包括《明報》、《信報》和《東方日報》，較5年前的10份大跌七成。
3 Jun 2024獨媒#3624
【六四35】警嚴六四前夕密布防東角道 阻記者直播稱或洩部署
Tomorrow marks the 35th anniversary of June 4. On the eve of June 4 in previous years, performance artists would go outside East Point Road in Causeway Bay to commemorate it through performance art. Since the afternoon, police have been on high alert, with plainclothes officers wearing single-ear earpieces stationed at every corner, leaving almost no blind spots.
明日是六四35周年，過去六四前夕均會有行為藝術家到銅鑼灣東角道外，以行為藝術作悼念。自下午起，警方已嚴陣以待，每個角落處都有戴單邊耳機的便衣警員戒備，幾乎沒有死角。
1 Jun 2024HK01#3618
六四｜ 基督教刊物《時代論壇》頭版開天窗 社評：歷史化作空格
On the eve of the 35th anniversary of the June Fourth Incident, Christian media outlet Christian Times, which for many years published a commemorative prayer before June Fourth, left the front page of its latest issue blank. The editorial department wrote a brief statement: “The front-page feature in this issue has been unable to appear due to circumstances. We hope readers will understand.” Its editorial, titled “Praying on the Shoulders of Historical Memory”, said that “the turn from spring to summer that year” was the collective memory of a generation of Hong Kong people, as well as an enlightenment in and standard for political ethics. As a media organisation, it said, it must not fail history or its readers, and “can only turn paragraph after paragraph into blank spaces and a field of white, in response to the current situation.”
六四事件35周年前夕，多年來會在六四前刊登紀念禱文的基督教媒體《時代論壇》，在最新一期期刊頭版開天窗，當中編輯部寫下簡短聲明，指「今期頭版專題因事未能刊出，還望讀者見諒。」其刊物的社評以《站在歷史記憶的肩膀上禱告》為題，指「那年的春夏之交」是一代港人的集體記憶、政治倫理的啟蒙與定規，而作為傳媒，要毋負歷史、毋負讀者，「惟有將段段文字化作空格子與一片白，以應對當前局勢。」
6 Jun 2023獨媒#6561
民研取消發布「六四週年調查報告」 指因應政府部門經過風險評估後建議
The Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute had been scheduled to release its “June 4 Anniversary Survey Report” online today, but announced this afternoon that it had decided to cancel the release in response to advice from relevant government departments following a risk assessment.
This year marks the 34th anniversary of June 4, 1989. Hong Kong PORI had originally planned to release the report online today (6 June), but decided to cancel the release in response to the advice. It did not provide further details, but said it would hold a press conference next Thursday (15 June) as planned to announce the latest popularity figures for the government and some officials.
香港民意研究所原定今日在網上發布「六四週年調查報告」，但今午宣布因應相關政府部門經過風險評估後的建議，決定取消發布。
今年是八九六四34周年，香港民研原定今日（6日）在網上發布「六四週年調查報告」，但因應相關政府部門經過風險評估後的建議，決定取消發布。民研未有進一步交代詳情，但表示會按照計劃在下周四（15日）舉行新聞發布會，公布政府和部份官員的最新民望數字。
5 Jun 2023光傳媒#6550
大報清零 傳媒噤聲？ 「六四」報道五年大減逾半
This year marks the 34th anniversary of June 4. For the fourth consecutive year, Victoria Park has seen no candlelight vigil, while coverage of June 4-related news in traditional print media has also fallen sharply. A search by Guang Media using “June 4” as the keyword found that Hong Kong newspapers published only 28 June 4 news reports on June 5 this year, fewer than half the number published four years ago. Of the 28 reports, 80% came from Ming Pao and the Hong Kong Economic Journal. A review of coverage over the past five years found that Sing Tao published no June 4 news this year for the first time.
今年是六四34周年，維多利亞公園連續第四年不見燭光，傳統紙媒對「六四」相關新聞的報道亦大幅減少。《光傳媒》以「六四」為關鍵字搜尋，今年6月5日全港報刊只有28篇「六四」新聞報道，篇數不及四年前的一半。在28篇報道中，8成來自《明報》和《信報》。翻查過去5年報道，《星島》今年更首次「清零」六四新聞。
19 May 2023光傳媒#6464
《明報》踏入64周年 報慶廣告六四用字全消失
Ming Pao is about to mark the 64th anniversary of its founding, and businesses traditionally place advertisements to celebrate the occasion. However, the newspaper’s anniversary advertisements today, spanning more than 30 pages, make no mention of the 64th anniversary, uniformly using “heading towards the 65th anniversary” instead. By contrast, the advertisements for its 54th anniversary ten years ago used “54th anniversary of its founding” rather than “heading towards the 55th anniversary”. Former Standing Committee member of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China Yan Loy Chiu lamented on social media: “What exactly is the problem with June 4? What exactly happened on June 4? It seems that everyone has not forgotten!” Light Media contacted Ming Pao executive editor-in-chief Lau Chung-yeung via WhatsApp and is awaiting a reply.
《明報》即將踏入創刊64周年，每年商界都願意「落廣告」慶賀。但《明報》今日逾30版的報慶廣告，隻字不提是64周年，統一用「邁向65周年」，而十年前54周年的報慶廣告，則採用「創刊54周年」，而非邁向55周年。前支聯會常委趙恩來於社交媒體上慨嘆，「究竟六四有甚麼問題？六四，究竟發生過甚麼事？大家似乎都沒有忘記！」《光傳媒》透過WhatsApp向《明報》執行總編輯劉頌陽查詢，正等待回覆。
15 May 2023明報#6438
涉六四12影片近全下架 10港台製作 前編導：盼知原因
Public library withdrawals cover materials in various categories, including holdings related to June 4. A search of library materials related to the June 4 incident found that a considerable number were still available around 2021, but the number gradually declined. By last weekend, nearly all holdings related to the incident had been removed. At least 12 video items were involved, 10 of them produced by Radio Television Hong Kong (RTHK). Five were episodes of Hong Kong Connection, including the two-part “Chinese Lawyers Dancing in Shackles”, which won the Grand Prize in the 12th Human Rights Press Awards and the Grand Prize in the Special Feature category (electronic media) at the fourth CUHK News Awards. Poon Tat-pui, the former director of the programme, said in response to enquiries from this newspaper that he had questions about the programme’s removal and hoped to understand the reasons behind it.
公共圖書館下架書刊資料涉及不同種類範疇，包括涉「六四」館藏。查看圖書館內涉「六四事件」的搜尋，約2021年仍有為數不少的資料，其後數量漸減，至上周末與六四事件相關館藏幾已全數下架。其中有至少12項錄影資料，當中有10項由香港電台製作，有5項為《鏗鏘集》節目，包括曾奪第十二屆人權新聞獎大獎、第四屆「中大新聞獎」專題組（電子傳媒）大獎的〈扣著腳鐐跳舞的中國律師〉上、下集。負責該節目的前編導潘達培回應本報查詢時，對節目下架有疑問，希望可掌握背後原因。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
