15 Jul 2025中央社CAN#7041
中國駐港公署罕見點名外媒 批BBC日經新聞抹黑香港國安法
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs Office of the Commissioner in Hong Kong issued a statement today naming and criticising foreign media including BBC Chinese and Japan’s Nikkei, accusing them of “deliberately smearing the Hong Kong National Security Law” and urging the media concerned “not to fabricate lies”. It also expressed strong condemnation.
The office unusually named BBC Chinese and Nikkei, accusing them of “clinging to ideological prejudice” and, around the fifth anniversary of the promulgation and implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law, publishing “distorted” reports, commentaries or editorials that “deliberately smear the Hong Kong National Security Law and vilify the successful implementation of ‘one country, two systems’ in Hong Kong”.
The office’s spokesperson also urged the media concerned to “respect the facts and not fabricate lies”, “adhere to fairness and not apply double standards”, and “uphold professional ethics and not mislead public opinion”.
中國外交部駐香港特派員公署今天發文點名批評英國BBC中文網和日本經濟新聞等外媒，「蓄意抹黑香港國安法」，並敦促有關媒體「不要捏造謊言」，同時表示強烈譴責。
駐港公署在文中罕見點名BBC中文網和日本經濟新聞，指它們「固守意識形態偏見」，在香港國安法公布實施5週年之際，發表「歪曲性」報導、評論或社論，「蓄意抹黑香港國安法，詆毀『一國兩制』在港成功實踐」。
透過 Google News
追蹤中央社
駐港公署發言人還稱，敦促有關媒體：「要尊重事實，不要捏造謊言」；「要恪守公正，不要雙重標準」；「要秉持操守，不要誤導輿論」。
24 Aug 2024Channel C#3942
《紐約時報》稱國安展覽如操縱歷史 港府反駁斥內容偏頗顛倒是非 強調參觀者絡繹不絕
The New York Times published a report yesterday (23rd) describing the Hong Kong Museum of History’s latest national security exhibition as “Remake Hong Kong”. It said the exhibition made no mention of the force used by police during the 2019 anti-extradition bill protests, and quoted scholars as describing it as “History Manipulation”. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government issued a statement last night criticising the report as untrue, misleading and biased, and expressing strong dissatisfaction. It described the New York Times report as a typical example of hypocrisy and double standards, putting the cart before the horse and reversing right and wrong. It also said the exhibition was suitable for people of all ages, visitors were flocking to it, and attempts by external forces to smear it would never succeed.
美國《紐約時報》昨日（23日）發表報道，形容香港歷史博物館的最新國安展覽是「重塑香港」（Remake Hong Kong），稱其沒提及警方在2019年反修例示威中使用的武力，並引述學者形容展覽屬「歷史操縱」（History Manipulation）。特區政府昨晚發稿，批評報道不實、誤導、內容偏頗，表示強烈不滿，形容《紐約時報》的報道屬典型的虛偽雙標、本末倒置、顛倒是非，並稱展覽老少皆宜，參觀者絡繹不絕，任何外部勢力試圖詆毀都絕不會得逞。
4 May 2024Channel C#3489
世界新聞自由日｜港府強烈譴責無國界記者 指其發表的世界新聞自由指數及聲明為不實和偏頗言論
Reporters Without Borders released its 2024 World Press Freedom Index today (the 3rd), ranking Hong Kong 135th among 180 countries and regions, with its score falling to 43.06. It also said that the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law had caused Hong Kong journalists to face “unprecedented” setbacks. In a reply to this station, the Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau said it strongly condemned the false and biased remarks made by the organisation in publishing the index and statement, and said that journalists, like everyone else, have an obligation to comply with all laws.
無國界記者今日（3日）公佈2024年世界新聞自由指數，香港在180個國家及地區中排第135位，評分亦下跌至43.06分，又稱《港區國安法》實施後令香港記者要面對「前所未有」挫折。政制及內地事務局回覆本台表示，強烈譴責相關組織發表有關指數及聲明時所作出的不實和偏頗言論，並指新聞從業員與其他人一樣都有義務遵守所有法律。
28 Mar 2024明報#3275
鄧炳強致函《紐時》 譴責評論文章誤導
Secretary for Security Chris Tang wrote yesterday to the US newspaper The New York Times, strongly opposing and condemning an opinion article published by the paper the day before (26th), written by Maya Wang, acting director of Human Rights Watch’s China division. The article mentioned Hong Kong residents’ concerns that keeping Apple Daily after legislation under Article 23 of the Basic Law might be illegal, and that some were considering whether to shred Apple Daily or send it overseas. Tang criticised the article as extremely misleading and urged The New York Times to “ensure that its reporting on Hong Kong is fair and balanced, and stop publishing alarmist remarks.”
保安局長鄧炳強昨致函美國《紐約時報》，強烈反對及譴責該報前日（26日）刊出由人權觀察中國部代主任王松蓮（Maya Wang）撰寫的評論文章，提及港人憂慮《基本法》23條立法下保留《蘋果日報》或會犯法，有人考慮是否碎掉或將《蘋果日報》寄到海外，鄧炳強批評文章極度誤導，促《紐時》「確保關於香港的報導公正、持平，及停止發表危言聳聽的言論」。
12 Mar 2024yahoo#3161
23 條・反駁隊｜港府一周內譴責 3 間外媒 彭博、FT 今再發評論批評立法
The Article 23 legislation currently being examined by the Legislative Council has drawn international media attention. The Hong Kong government has recently been actively rebutting outside commentary, condemning reports or commentaries by three international media outlets within just one week, including Bloomberg, The Washington Post and The Times. Meanwhile, Bloomberg and the Financial Times each published another commentary article today, criticising the Article 23 provisions as vague and saying that foreign companies are at a loss over how to respond. It is not yet known whether the Hong Kong government will issue another rebuttal.
立法會正在審議的 23 條立法，引起國際媒體關注。香港政府近日積極「反駁」外界輿論，僅僅一周內已經譴責了三間國際媒體的報道或評論，包括是彭博社、《華盛頓郵報》及《泰晤士報》。另一邊廂，彭博社及 《金融時報》今日分別再發表評論文章，批評 23 條立法條文空泛，外國企業無所適從等，暫未知港府會否再反駁
6 Mar 2024明報#3111
23條立法｜政府譴責彭博誤報禁Telegram及Signal 彭博承認出錯並修正
A Bloomberg spokesperson told this newspaper tonight that the company had published two headlines today that mistakenly presented members of the public’s views as proposals by the Hong Kong government on Article 23 of the Basic Law. The spokesperson said the headlines were incorrectly published and had been corrected within 10 minutes of their initial publication.
The HKSAR Government submitted details of the results of the consultation on legislation under Article 23 of the Basic Law to the Legislative Council. The document listed a number of “other views” received during the consultation, including suggestions that “websites such as Facebook and YouTube be withdrawn from the Hong Kong market”, as well as a proposal to ban the messaging applications Telegram and Signal from operating in Hong Kong. Bloomberg at one point used the headline “Hong Kong Article 23 legislation proposals advocate banning Telegram”. The Government issued a press release in the evening expressing strong dissatisfaction with and condemning Bloomberg, and solemnly stated that it had not proposed banning any social media, video-sharing or streaming platform from operating in Hong Kong.
《彭博》發言人今晚回應本報，指公司今日刊出兩則標題，誤將公眾的意見當作港府就《基本法》23條的建議，指有關標題是錯誤發布，已在首次發布後10分鐘內更正。
特區政府向立法會提交《基本法》23條立法的諮詢結果詳情，載列不少諮詢期間收到的「其他意見」，例如有人建議「將Facebook、YouTube等網站撤出香港市場」，亦有人提出禁止通訊軟件Telegram及Signal在港運作。彭博一度以「香港23條立法建議倡禁Telegram」為報道標題。政府傍晚發新聞稿，向彭博表達強烈不滿和譴責，並嚴正聲明特區政府並無建議禁止任何社交媒體、影片分享平台或串流平台在香港運作。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
