HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

Search the archive

Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.

Results JSON

Statistics

2matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
0
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
0
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
0
Apr 23
0
May 23
0
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
0
Aug 23
0
Sep 23
0
Oct 23
0
Nov 23
0
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
0
Feb 24
0
Mar 24
0
Apr 24
1
May 24
0
Jun 24
0
Jul 24
0
Aug 24
0
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
0
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
0
Oct 25
1
Nov 25
0
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

Results 2

subtopic-3-5中史Clear all
Showing 1-2 of 2 recordsEN
11 Nov 2025明報#7521

Chinese History exam asks about effects of Great Leap Forward and communes; HKEAA says most missed positive aspects

中史考大躍進、公社效果 考評局:多未答正面作用 教師料盼訓練多角度思考 非為「洗白」

This year’s Chinese History and History papers in the Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education Examination (DSE) both included questions on China before reform and opening-up. One Chinese History question required candidates to analyse the “effects” of the Great Leap Forward and the People’s Commune Movement. The Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority said in the Question Compilation published yesterday that most candidates had failed to grasp what the question was asking. In line with the question requirements, candidates had to analyse both the positive and negative aspects, but many failed to identify the positive effects of the two movements. A Chinese History teacher said that, based on the historical facts, the Great Leap Forward did indeed have more negative effects, so it was understandable that candidates focused on the negative aspects. The teacher believed the HKEAA was seeking to use the question to train students to think from multiple perspectives, rather than to “whitewash” the Great Leap Forward.

今年中學文憑試(DSE)中史科及歷史科均有題目考問中國改革開放前情况,其中中史科有題目要求考生分析「大躍進」和「人民公社化」運動的「效果」。考評局昨日出版《試題專輯》指出,大部分考生未能掌握該題所問,按題旨,考生須從正負兩邊分析,惟不少考生未能寫出兩場運動的正面效果。有中史科教師認為,按史實「大躍進」的負面影響確實較多,考生側重寫負面可以理解,料考評局盼以該題訓練學生「多角度思考」,不認為是為大躍進「洗白」。

3 May 2024Channel C#3482

DSE | Education Bureau announces senior secondary Chinese History enhancement plan; candidates from 2025/26 may sit only Paper 1, with maximum Level 5

DSE|教育局公布「高中中史科優化方案」 25/26年起考生可只考卷一 最高獲第5級成績

The Education Bureau issued a circular to all secondary schools yesterday (2nd) announcing the enhancement plan for senior secondary Chinese History. In the 2025/26 Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (HKDSE) Chinese History examination, candidates may sit only Paper 1, the compulsory “Development through the Ages” component worth 70% of the total marks. Paper 2, “Historical Topics”, which previously accounted for 30% of the marks, will become an elective component. Candidates who sit only Paper 1 can attain a maximum of Level 5. Candidates will not have to indicate which paper they intend to sit when registering, and their transcripts and certificates will list only their final results, without showing which paper they sat. The Education Bureau said such candidates would not be labelled as “second-tier candidates”.

教育局昨日(2日)向全港中學發通函,公布「高中中國歷史科優化方案」,2025/26學年的香港中學文憑試(HKDSE)中史科考生,可只應考總分佔70%的卷一「歷代發展」必修部分,原佔30%分數的卷二「歷史專題」改為選修部分,只應考卷一的考生最高可考獲第5級成績。而考生報考時毋須表明應考的卷別,成績單和證書只列出最終成績,不會顯示應考的卷別,教育局指有關考生不會被標籤為「次一等的考生」。

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.