HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

Search the archive

Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.

Results JSON

Statistics

1matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
0
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
0
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
0
Apr 23
0
May 23
0
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
0
Aug 23
0
Sep 23
0
Oct 23
0
Nov 23
0
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
1
Feb 24
0
Mar 24
0
Apr 24
0
May 24
0
Jun 24
0
Jul 24
0
Aug 24
0
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
0
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
0
Oct 25
0
Nov 25
0
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

Results 1

topic-1信報Clear all
Showing 1-1 of 1 recordsEN
21 Feb 2024獨媒#3012

Lam So-wai’s LegCo question accused of plagiarising Paul Tse: “It’s mine, and I will take responsibility”

林素蔚立法會質詢涉抄襲謝偉俊:條嘢喺我嘅會承擔責任

A column in the Hong Kong Economic Journal today said a “senior legislator” had claimed that a newcomer’s oral question involved plagiarism, with 203 of its 225 words matching a question from seven years ago. The column did not name the legislator. A review of records, however, showed that the legislator accused of plagiarism was Lam So-wai, elected for the first time after the electoral system was “improved”, while the question allegedly copied was a written question submitted by Paul Tse in 2016 on preventing diabetes and introducing a sugar tax. The Independent Media asked Lam So-wai about the matter. She said she had always been concerned about a sugar tax, and that some of the content differed from Tse’s question seven years ago, describing it as helping the other party follow up on the issue. Asked whether she had discussed the matter with her legislative assistant, Lam said: “This question is mine, and I will take responsibility. Whatever my colleagues have done, I’m the boss, right? I can’t shirk responsibility.”

《信報》今日專欄指有「資深議員」稱新手的口頭質詢涉抄襲,提問的225字中有203字與七年的質詢相同,專欄未有開名。不過翻查資料,被指抄襲的議員為「完善」後首次當選的林素蔚,被抄襲的則為謝偉俊在2016年的書面質詢,議題為預防糖尿病及開徵糖稅。《獨媒》就此向林素蔚查詢,她指一直關注糖稅,部分內容亦與謝在七年前的提問不同,形容是「幫助」對方跟進。被問到是否曾否與議員助理商討,林素蔚指「呢條嘢喺我嘅,我都承擔責任嘅,同事做成點,我係老闆呀嘛,我唔能夠推卸責任」。

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.