20 Jun 2025獨媒#6930
「US8964」車主運輸署檔案被鎖致買賣需approval：唔係我認識嘅香港
The former owner of the “US8964” licence plate, Anthony Chiu, told HK01 on the eve of this year’s June 4 that the vehicle which had borne the plate had been arranged to be transported out of Hong Kong and would no longer be driven in the city. He is moving overseas and recently bought another vehicle, which he plans to transport overseas for use there, while the “US8964” licence plate is being transferred to another person. When Anthony Chiu went to the Transport Department the day before yesterday to complete the procedures, he was told that his personal file had been “locked” by the Hong Kong Police Force and that permission was required before the procedures could proceed. He returned to the Transport Department yesterday and took nearly three hours to complete the procedures. Anthony Chiu told HK01 that he still had not processed what had happened, saying it had overturned his understanding of Hong Kong and declaring: “It’s not the Hong Kong I know.”
On June 4 in each of the past three years, police stopped and searched the Porsche sports car bearing the “US8964” licence plate when it was being driven on the roads; in the previous two years, they also towed it away for detention. This year, on June 4, the owner, Anthony Chiu, had stated beforehand that he would no longer drive the vehicle and had arranged for it to be transported away. He also told HK01 that he and his family had been subjected to harassment over the years.
原「US8964」車牌車主招先生，在今年六四前夕向《獨媒》表示，原掛上該車牌的車輛已安排運離香港，不會再在港行駛。他將移居外地，日前購入另一部車輛，打算運往外地使用，原「US8964」的車牌則轉讓予他人。前日招先生到運輸署辦理手續，獲告知其個人檔案遭警務處「Lock 住」，需獲許可才能進行手續。他昨日再到運輸署，耗時近三小時才完成手續。招先生向《獨媒》表示，至今仍未消化事件，認為顛覆了他對香港的認知，直指「唔係我認識嘅香港」。
過去三年6月4日，警方皆截查當日在馬路上行走、車牌為「US8964」的保時捷跑車，前年及去年更拖走扣查。今年六四，車主招先生則在當日前明言不會再駕駛該車輛，並已安排運走。他亦向《獨媒》表示，過去一直他及家人一直受到滋擾。
4 Jun 2025集誌社#6868
六四 36｜消防、警員、海關巡黃店 陳劍琴「同香會」被海關放蛇檢走貨物
On the eve of the 36th anniversary of June 4, several law enforcement departments, including the Fire Services Department, uniformed police officers and Customs, separately visited several “yellow shops” for “inspections” or “enforcement”. The incense-selling stall “Tung Heung Wui”, run by Kim Kam Chan, who was arrested over Article 23, was visited by Customs on the evening of the 3rd, when officers made an undercover purchase of incense sticks. Customs subsequently seized some of the goods, alleging that the stall had contravened the Consumer Goods Safety Ordinance. The Customs operation lasted more than four hours, with officers leaving close to midnight. During the operation, several plain-clothes men remained nearby and spoke with Customs officers. When a reporter approached to ask questions, one of them photographed the reporter and claimed to be a passer-by who was a “member of the public”.
The Customs operation continued for more than four hours until close to midnight. A plain-clothes man who had left returned, and after Kim Kam Chan repeatedly questioned him, he said: “Actually, you know too; everyone knows ... we all know each other’s identities.” He confirmed that he was a plain-clothes police officer. The five Customs officers did not leave until 11:40 p.m.
六四 36 周年前夕，多個執法部門，包括消防處、軍裝警以及海關，分別到幾間黃店「巡查」或「執法」。其中 23 條被捕者陳劍琴的賣香小檔「同香會」，在 3 日晚上被海關「放蛇」買線香，之後被指涉嫌違反《消費品安全條例》下檢走部分貨物。海關人員執法行動逾四小時，接近午夜才離開；期間一直有數名便裝男士在旁徘徊，又與海關對話，記者上前查詢時，其中一人拍下記者相片，自稱為路過「市民」。
海關執法逾四小時直至近午夜，一度離開的便裝男子再出現，陳劍琴再三追問下，對方稱「其實你都知，大家心知…大家咩身分啦」，確認自己是便衣警員。五名海關職員直至晚上 11 時 40 分才離開。
14 Jun 2024獨媒#3692
【六四35】US8964「獲釋」 車主：咁樣執法真係無問題？
On June 4 this year, the Porsche sports car “US8964” was again detained by police, as it was last year. The car owner Anthony Chiu told HK01 that he had retrieved the vehicle on Wednesday. He questioned why the vehicle had been detained for two consecutive years on similar grounds, asking whether “this kind of law enforcement is really acceptable”.
The owner of “US8964”, Anthony Chiu, suspected that he had been followed from the afternoon of June 4 this year. After driving through the Eastern Harbour Crossing, he was stopped and searched by police on the Island Eastern Corridor, and the vehicle was detained.
In response to an enquiry from HK01, Anthony Chiu said he retrieved the vehicle on Wednesday (June 12). Police said the vehicle’s brake component was cracked, its exhaust was excessively loud, and its tyres were worn—reasons similar to those given when it was detained last year. When he collected the vehicle, police did not allow him to drive it away directly. It had to be towed to a garage for repairs and then undergo another inspection before it could be driven on the road again.
今年6月4日，保時捷跑車「US8964」一如去年再被警方扣查。車主招先生向《獨媒》表示，周三已取回車輛。他質疑連續兩年被扣查車輛，理由相近，認為「咁樣執法真係無問題？」
「US8964」車主招先生，今年6月4日下午起，已懷疑被跟蹤，在駛過東區海底隧道後，於東區走廊被警方截查，車輛被扣查。
招先生回覆《獨媒》查詢，指已於周三（6月12日）取回車輛，警方指他的車輛杯士有裂痕、死氣喉聲音過大，以及車呔有磨損，理由與去年被扣查時近似。他取車時警方不容許直接駛走，需召拖車拖往車房維修後，再次驗車先准重新在路面行駛。
26 Apr 2024獨媒#3435
康文署：接獲兩團體申請維園辦橫跨六四、七一活動
Victoria Park will again host activities on June 4, 2024 and July 1, 2024. In response to an enquiry from InMediaHK, the Leisure and Cultural Services Department confirmed that it had received applications from two groups to hold activities at Victoria Park during the periods spanning June 4 and July 1 respectively. The first group applied for May 30 to June 7 to hold a “public event”, while the second applied for June 23 to July 5 to hold an “activity celebrating the 27th anniversary of the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region”. The applications are being processed.
2024年6月4日及7月1日，維園將再有活動。康文署回覆《獨媒》查詢時確認，分別接獲兩個團體申請在橫跨六四及七一期間，在維園舉行活動。前者申請的日期由5月30日至6月7日，後者則申請由6月23日至7月5日，分別舉辦「公眾活動」及「慶祝香港特區成立27周年活動」，申請正在處理中。
10 Jun 2023集誌社#7791
集誌社就六四34週年當日被警方帶走人士作整合
On the day of June 4, police stopped and searched people during a road closure in Causeway Bay, taking 23 people away on suspicion of “disturbing public peace” and arresting one woman. The Collective reviewed the police’s interception of passers-by and reconstructed the experiences of 20 of those taken away. It found that six were not wearing clothing with political slogans, and that no petitioning or commemorative activities were seen at the scene; among them was a reporter accused of being “uncooperative”. Of the other 14 people taken away, some social activists wore black clothing printed with slogans, as reported by Wen Wei Po in 1989, but took no specific action. Others wore black clothing, held electronic candles, or possessed papers bearing the word “conscience”.
The Collective asked police about the guidelines for the operation that day. Police replied that they had acted in accordance with the law based on the actual circumstances and risk assessments. A barrister said that if the atmosphere at the scene was calm, members of the public were merely holding candles or wearing June 4-related clothing, and no one reacted violently to those acts, this would not constitute “disturbing public peace”. If police took members of the public away on that basis, it would be unreasonable.
六四當日，警方在銅鑼灣封路截查，以涉嫌「破壞社會安寧」為由帶走 23 人，拘捕一女子。究竟，他們當晚做了什麼，要被帶返警署？《集誌社》整理了警察截查途人的經過，重組到其中 20 名，被警方帶走人士的經歷，發現有六人的衣服上無政治口號，在現場也未見有請願、悼念行為，當中包括有記者被指「不合作」。其餘被帶走的 14 人中，有穿印有標語黑衣，如八九年《文匯報》報道、但無作出具體行動的社運人士、也有人穿黑衣，手持電子蠟燭，或持有「良知」紙張。
《集誌社》向警方查詢，當日行動準則為何，警方回覆指按實際情況、風險評估依法處理。有大律師認為，如現場氣氛平靜，市民只是舉燭光、穿六四衣物，沒有人就相關行為有激烈反應，就不屬「破壞社會安寧」；若警方以此為由帶走市民，並不合理。
10 Jun 2023集誌社#7795
六四當日，警方在銅鑼灣封路截查，以涉嫌「破壞社會安寧」為由帶走 23 人，拘捕一女子。大律師：若只舉燭光，遭帶走不合理
The Collective asked the police about the criteria for the operation that day. The police replied that they acted in accordance with the actual circumstances and risk assessments, and in compliance with the law. A barrister said that if the atmosphere at the scene was peaceful, and members of the public were merely holding candles or wearing June 4-related clothing, with no one reacting aggressively to those actions, this would not constitute “breaching the peace”. The barrister said it was unreasonable for police to take people away on that basis.
《集誌社》向警方查詢，當日行動準則為何，警方回覆指按實際情況、風險評估依法處理。有大律師認為，如現場氣氛平靜，市民只是舉燭光、穿六四衣物，沒有人就相關行為有激烈反應，就不屬「破壞社會安寧」；若警方以此為由帶走市民，並不合理。
5 Jun 2023光傳媒#6552
警方六四帶走23人涉「破壞社會安寧」 聯合國：感到震驚
Police took a total of 23 people to police stations for questioning yesterday, June 4, alleging that they were “suspected of breaching the peace”, and arrested one other person. Former Hong Kong Journalists Association chairperson Mak Yin-ting was also among those described as “suspected of breaching the peace”. At the police station, she encountered people who had been taken in, including some who had gone shopping, some who had finished eating at a buffet, and online media reporters. She said bluntly that “a large proportion were innocent”. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights expressed shock over the incident on Twitter today and urged the Hong Kong government to fully fulfil its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The Police Public Relations Branch told Light Media that from noon to 11pm on June 4, police found people allegedly breaching the peace in public places in the Wan Chai and North Point areas of Hong Kong Island. Police arrested a 53-year-old woman surnamed Au near the fountain in Victoria Park, alleging that she refused to cooperate and refused to show officers proof of identity, and was suspected of obstructing police officers in the execution of their duties.
警方昨日六四一共帶走23人去警署調查，指他們「涉嫌破壞社會安寧」，另外拘捕1人。前記協主席麥燕庭亦成為「涉嫌破壞社會安寧」人士之一。她在警署接觸被帶走的人，有些是去購物、有些吃完自助餐、亦有網媒記者，直言「比例好大是無辜」。聯合國人權事務高級專員辦事處今日在Twitter對事件表示震驚，呼籲港府完全履行《公民權利和政治權利國際公約》規定的義務。
警務處公共關係部回覆《光傳媒》指，6月4日中午至晚上11時，警方發現有人於港島灣仔區及北角區一帶的公眾地方涉嫌破壞社會安寧，在維園近噴水池拘捕了一名53歲姓區女子，指該名女子拒絕合作並拒絕向人員出示身份證明文件，涉嫌「妨礙警務人員執行職務」。
5 Jun 2023獨媒#6556
門外蠟燭掛畫被警收走 「西多」陳嘉琳：香港變成一個點樣嘅地方
Yesterday marked the 34th anniversary of the June Fourth incident. In the early hours of today (5 June), a black-background artwork depicting candles appeared outside the Sai Kung store Sai Kung Store, which was opened by former Sai Kung District Councillor Chan Ka-lam and others. Police removed and took it away this morning. Chan told The Independent Media she was surprised, saying police had taken away private property on private premises without notification: “What kind of place has Hong Kong become now?” She said the notice posted by police outside the gate did not explain the reason for the seizure, stating only that enquiries could be made by telephone. “So what does that mean? Do I have to call back to find out what happened? I completely don’t understand the logic behind the enforcement.”
昨日是六四事件34週年，由前西貢區議員陳嘉琳等開辦的西貢士多「西多」，今（5日）凌晨其門外出現黑色底的蠟燭掛畫，早上被警方拆除收走。陳嘉琳向《獨媒》表示對此感到驚訝，稱警方在沒有通知的情況下，在私人地方收走私人物品，「香港宜家到底變成咗一個點樣嘅地方？」她指，警方貼在閘外的告示沒有說明沒收原因，僅稱可以致電查詢，「咁即係點呀？要我打返電話去了解發生咩事？我完全唔明個執法logic 」。
30 May 2023獨媒#6515
自發悼念六四可以？李家超：須符合香港法律
Chief Executive John Lee met the press before an Executive Council meeting. His media session, which generally begins at 9:40 a.m., was delayed until 10 a.m. this morning because he and several officials watched a live broadcast of the launch of the country’s Shenzhou-16 spacecraft. Asked about Sunday’s 34th anniversary of the June 4 incident and whether individuals were permitted to commemorate it, he only said that any public activity or individual action must comply with Hong Kong law; otherwise, the police would enforce the law decisively.
行政長官李家超舉行行政會議前見記者，李家超見記者的環節一般於早上9時40分開始，惟今早延至早上10時才出現，原因為他與多名官員觀看國家神舟16號升空直播。被問到周日的六四事件34周年，個人作出悼念行為是否被容許。他只稱任何公眾活動或個人行為皆需符合香港法律，否則警方會果斷執法。
30 May 2023光傳媒#6520
反修例後特首態度轉變 只在乎六四悼念是否違法
Chief Executive John Lee met the press before this morning’s Executive Council meeting. Asked whether he could publicly commemorate June 4 and whether people lighting candles in Victoria Park would be driven away, he did not answer directly. He said only that all public activities and individual conduct must comply with Hong Kong law, and that everyone must be responsible for their own actions. “If the police find that someone’s conduct does not comply with Hong Kong law, they will enforce the law decisively.” Light Media compared comments on the June 4 incident made by successive chief executives while in office, finding that since the anti-extradition bill movement, the two chief executives have focused only on whether June 4 commemorative activities are lawful and have no longer expressed personal views on the incident.
特首李家超在今早出席行會前會見記者，被問及個人可否公開悼念六四以及於維園點蠟燭會否被驅趕時，並未正面回應，只表示任何公眾活動或個人行為都要符合香港法律，每個人都要為自己的行為負責，「如果警方發現某人的行為不符合香港法律，他們會果斷執法」。《光傳媒》比較歷屆特首在任時對六四事件的評論，自反修例運動後，兩任特首只着眼在六四紀念活動是否合法，未再就事件表達個人立場。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
