HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

Search the archive

Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.

Results JSON

Statistics

2matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
0
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
0
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
0
Apr 23
0
May 23
0
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
0
Aug 23
0
Sep 23
0
Oct 23
0
Nov 23
0
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
0
Feb 24
0
Mar 24
0
Apr 24
0
May 24
0
Jun 24
0
Jul 24
0
Aug 24
1
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
0
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
0
Oct 25
1
Nov 25
0
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

Results 2

topic-3宣傳Clear all
Showing 1-2 of 2 recordsEN
17 Nov 2025科大編委#7538

Election Publicity on Electronic Boards May Breach Rules; University Says It Has a Responsibility to Urge Staff and Students to Exercise Their Civic Rights

電子板現投票宣傳疑違規 校方:有責任呼籲師生行使公民權利

With the 2025 Hong Kong Legislative Council election approaching, publicity urging people to vote in the Legislative Council election has recently appeared at multiple locations on the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology campus, including the L-shaped and horizontal electronic noticeboards in the Jockey Club Atrium, eight vertical electronic noticeboards at the Entrance Piazza, and even the screen of a smart recycling bin beside the LG1 restaurant. No election leaflets have been seen on the physical noticeboards. According to the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Campus Management Office’s noticeboard rules, Article 7 states that political propaganda, unlawful materials, unauthorised posts and expired posts are not permitted on any campus noticeboard. The webpage introducing the electronic noticeboards also states that the same rules apply to them. The election publicity displayed on the electronic noticeboards may therefore breach the relevant prohibition on political propaganda. The university says it has a responsibility to call on faculty members and students to vote and exercise their civic rights.

2025香港立法會換屆選舉舉行在即,近日科大校園多處出現呼籲參與立法會選舉投票的宣傳,包含在賽馬會大堂(Atrium) L型電子告示板及水平電子告示板、入口廣場8塊直立電子告示板等,甚至出現在LG1餐廳旁智能回收箱的屏幕上。而實體告示版則未見有任何選舉宣傳單張。 //電子板現政治宣傳涉違規 校方: 大學有責任呼籲師生投票 根據科大校園管理處 (Campus Management Office) 的告示板規則,第七條指明政治宣傳、非法、未授權及過期的海報不被允許在任何校園告示板出現 (Propaganda and unlawful materials, unauthorized posts and expired posts) 電子告示板介紹網頁亦列明,同一套規則同樣適用於電子告示板,因此電子告示版上出現投票宣傳可能違反「禁止政治宣傳」的相關規定。

19 Sept 2024光傳媒#4058

In Depth | Media outlet “joins forces” with police on poll and reports; veteran media worker fears damage to media credibility, scholar questions lack of transparency

深度|傳媒機構「聯同」警方做民調、出報道 資深傳媒工作者憂削媒體公信力 學者質疑合作模式欠透明度

Sing Tao Daily ran a front-page report on the 16th headlined “Hong Kong faces ambushes on all sides: Nine in 10 respondents have encountered scams”. The newspaper collaborated with the police on a “Hong Kong People’s Anti-Scam Awareness Questionnaire Survey” and published follow-up reports. In addition to the main report on the survey findings, there were two accompanying stories: one interviewing a police clinical psychologist about scammers’ “devious tactics”, and another reporting that the police’s anti-scam app had been downloaded 570,000 times. A media worker who previously worked for the newspaper told Light Media that the collaboration model created a poor impression and conflicted with the media’s role. Li Lap-fung, a professor at the School of Journalism and Communication at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, said the collaboration model lacked transparency: the content relied entirely on information provided by the police, with no interviews presenting other perspectives, raising questions about the media’s independence.

《星島日報》日前(16日)頭條報道「港十面埋『伏』九成受訪市民曾遇『騙』」,該報聯同警方進行「港人防騙意識問卷調查」,並進行跟進報道,除關於調查結果的主稿,另有兩篇配稿,包括訪問警察臨床心理學家解釋騙徒「蠱惑招數」以及警方「防騙APP」57萬次下載量的報道。曾任職該報的傳媒工作者向《光傳媒》表示,這種合作模式令外界觀感不好,跟傳媒角色存在衝突。中文大學新聞與傳播學院教授李立峯分析,報道的合作模式欠缺透明度,內容完全依照警方提供資料、沒有其他角度的訪問,媒體的獨立性受質疑。

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.