HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

Search the archive

Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.

Results JSON

Statistics

1matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
0
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
0
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
0
Apr 23
0
May 23
0
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
0
Aug 23
0
Sep 23
0
Oct 23
0
Nov 23
0
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
0
Feb 24
0
Mar 24
0
Apr 24
0
May 24
0
Jun 24
0
Jul 24
0
Aug 24
0
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
0
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
1
Oct 25
0
Nov 25
0
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

Results 1

topic-2拒遷Clear all
Showing 1-1 of 1 recordsEN
23 Oct 2025法庭線#7446

Hong Kong Settlers Housing Corporation wins first case against Tai Hang Sai Estate residents who refused to move out; all five lose

平屋控大坑西邨未遷出居民 首案5居民全部敗訴 居民哽咽「呢條路行得好崎嶇」

Tai Hang Sai Estate in Shek Kip Mei is to be demolished and redeveloped. Hong Kong Settlers Housing Corporation brought civil proceedings against several residents who refused to move out, with two cases consolidated for hearing. In the first case, involving five residents, District Court judge Kam Tsuen Chan ruled on Thursday (the 23rd) after trial that the Corporation had won in full, ordering the residents to surrender their units and pay the legal costs. However, the costs claimed by the Corporation’s barrister were limited to those of one barrister with 12 years’ seniority. The residents disputed whether the wording of the contracts and agreements concerning the former Kwong Man Village, the predecessor of Tai Hang Sai Estate, referred to “rent-purchase” or “sale”. The judge rejected the argument, saying that ordinary contracts for the sale and purchase of land and buildings would specify the bungalow lot, whereas the “subject matter of purchase” in the contracts concerned was only the “house”. This showed that the contracts concerned only the rental or purchase of the “house”; once the house was demolished, “the related rights would correspondingly disappear at the same time”. Hong Kong Settlers Housing Corporation said it welcomed the judgment and called on the residents to return their units so that the works could proceed in full. A resident in his 60s, Peter Wai Kwan Kin, choked back tears as he said, “This road has been very arduous.” He also said he could not afford market rents and would consider appealing.

石硤尾大坑西邨將清拆重建,「平民屋宇」民事控告多名拒遷出居民,合併兩案處理。其中涉 5 人的首案經審訊後,區院法官陳錦泉周四(23 日)裁定「平屋」全部勝訴,下令居民交出單位兼付訟費,但將「平屋」代表大狀的費用限於一名年資 12 年的大狀。 就居民一方爭議大坑西邨前身光民村的合約、協議字眼是「租購」或「銷售」,官反駁指,一般土地樓房買賣合約會列明平房地段,惟涉事合約「購買主體」僅為「房舍」,可見合約僅涉租用或購買「房舍」,有關房舍一旦被拆卸,「相關權益相應地同時消失」。 「平屋」指歡迎裁決,呼籲交回單位讓工程全面展開。六旬居民關偉建哽咽指「呢條路行得好崎嶇」,又稱無法負擔市場租金,稱會考慮上訴。

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.