29 Aug 2025法庭線#7228
男子葵涌廣場與警爭執 被控擾亂秩序、襲警 准保釋10月再訊
A Pakistani man recently had a dispute with police officers at Kwai Chung Plaza. He was charged with disorderly conduct in a public place and assaulting a police officer. The case was first heard at West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts on Friday (29th). Magistrate Gary Man Hon Chu adjourned the case until 24 October for mention, and the man was granted $2,000 bail.
一名巴基斯坦籍男子近日在葵涌廣場與警員爭執。他被控在公眾地方擾亂秩序、襲警兩罪，案件周五（29 日）在西九龍裁判法院首提堂。裁判官朱文瀚押後至 10 月 24 日再訊，男子獲准以 2,000 元保釋。
24 Aug 2025法庭線#7205
陳輝旺死因陪審團倡警車內裝鏡頭 家屬促認真考慮：若果當年有，可否水落石出？
The Coroner’s Court ruled in July this year that taxi driver Chan Fai-wong was unlawfully killed. The jury recommended that police vehicles be fitted with video cameras capable of recording sound to safeguard the safety of arrested people. Chan Fai-wong’s daughter told The Witness that the recommendation was “very specific and clear”, and urged the authorities to respond to and consider it seriously.
The daughter said her father became paralysed from the neck down after a police officer restrained his neck. Fortunately, cameras at the Western Harbour Crossing recorded what happened at the time; otherwise, the cause of his paralysis would have remained unknown. However, he also had more than 20 non-fatal bruises. He said before his death that police officers had beaten him with batons, but there were no cameras in the police vehicle. “The reason my father was covered in bruises remains a mystery.”
She continued: “What exactly happened during those 20 minutes in that confined space after my father’s hands had been handcuffed behind his back and he had been put into the police vehicle? If there had been a camera in the police vehicle then, could what happened during those 20 minutes have come to light?”
She also said members of the public were very concerned about privacy issues arising from the use of cameras. Her father had been refused access to the Western Harbour Crossing footage and was ultimately able to view the footage from that night only after applying through the Coroner’s Court. This showed that, as long as rigorous procedures were established, privacy could be protected while helping society uphold justice and uncover the truth.
死因庭今年 7 月裁定的士司機陳輝旺「非法被殺」，陪審團向警方建議在警車安裝可收音的錄像鏡頭，保障被捕人的安全。陳輝旺的女兒回覆《法庭線》指，建議「非常具體及明確」，促請當局認真回應及考慮。
女兒提及，爸爸因警員箍頸致全身癱瘓，幸好西隧的錄影鏡頭拍攝了當刻情況，否則箍頸致癱的原因只會石沉大海，但爸爸身上亦有 20 多處非致命的瘀傷，他生前指遭警員用警棍毆打，但可惜警車上沒有錄影鏡頭，「我爸滿身瘀傷的原因依然成謎」。
女兒續問，「到底我爸雙手被反鎖、被箍上警車後，在那狹小空間的 20 分鐘裡，發生甚麼事？若果當年警車有錄影鏡頭，這 20 分鐘所發生的事情可否水落石出？」
她又指，作為市民亦非常關注錄影鏡頭衍生的私隱問題，爸爸曾申請西隧片段被拒絕，最後經由死因庭申請才能查看當晚片段，反映只要設立嚴謹程序就能保障私隱，同時有助社會維護公義與揭露真相。
13 Jun 2025集誌社#6907
駐港國安公署首出動 要求港國安警配合約談六人 被指涉嫌勾結外國勢力
The Office for Safeguarding National Security of the Central People’s Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region took action in Hong Kong for the first time, requesting assistance and cooperation from the Hong Kong Police Force’s National Security Department. Hong Kong national security police today arranged “interviews” on behalf of the office with six people suspected of committing “colluding with foreign or external forces to endanger national security”, and searched their homes and an office in Kwai Chung.
駐港國安公署首次在港展開行動，要求香港警方國安處協助、配合，港國安警今日為公署對六名被指涉嫌干犯「勾結外國或者境外勢力危害國家安全」的人士，安排「約談」，及搜查六人住所和葵涌的辦公室。
7 Mar 2023法庭線#6131
3在囚者入稟向警方索償 稱在警署遭警員毆打 3人與「口岸爆炸品案」被告同名
Three people who said they were detained at Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre filed a handwritten civil personal-injury claim against the Commissioner of Police on Monday (the 6th), seeking compensation from the Commissioner for physical and psychological injuries allegedly caused by the conduct of individual police officers. In their filings, the three claimed that they were assaulted by police officers at Old Ngau Tau Kok, Tsing Yi and Tsing Shan police stations respectively between 7 and 8 March 2020. One alleged that officers assaulted them to obtain evidence.
A review of records found that the names of the three claimants were the same as those of three defendants in the “port explosives” case. According to information from a police press conference, police arrested a total of 20 people in connection with three explosives cases on 7 and 8 March 2020. The case is scheduled to go to trial in August 2024. Eight people have been charged, seven of whom face an additional charge under the United Nations (Anti-Terrorism Measures) Ordinance of the offence of prohibiting the bombing of prescribed targets, which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment upon conviction.
3 名報稱在囚於荔枝角收押所的市民，周一（6 日）以手寫入稟狀向警務處長提出民事傷亡訴訟，要求處長就個別警員行為，造成他們的身體及精神傷害賠償。3 人於入稟狀中報稱，在 2020 年 3 月 7 至 8 日期間，分別在舊牛頭角、青衣、青山警署遭警員毆打，其中一人報稱警員為索取證據而毆打。
翻查資料，3 名入稟者的姓名與「口岸爆炸品」案當中 3 名被告相同；據警方記者會資料，於 2020 年 3 月 7 日及 8 日，警方共就三宗爆炸品案拘捕 20 人。案件將於 2024 年 8 月開審，共 8 人被落案起訴，其中 7 人被加控《聯合國（反恐怖主義措施）條例》中的「對訂明標的的爆炸的禁制罪」，一旦罪成可判囚終身。
29 Dec 2022獨媒#5883
警方不再公開滙報反修例投訴跟進 累計37宗指控屬實僅兩人遭警告
The 2019 anti-extradition bill movement generated a large number of complaints against police officers. Since the last meeting of the Independent Police Complaints Council (IPCC) in November, two more complaints have been substantiated. One involved a reporter being pepper-sprayed by a police officer while covering news at Yuen Long MTR station; an unidentified officer in the crowd was also alleged to have made “impolite, inappropriate” remarks. The officers on duty were admonished. A police representative said at the meeting that the IPCC had approved 95% of the cases. Of the remaining 29 cases for which reports had not been submitted to the IPCC, 26 were subject to ongoing legal proceedings and three were being reinvestigated. As the figures were unlikely to change significantly in future, the police would no longer report on them at open joint meetings, an arrangement agreed to by the IPCC.
2019年反修例運動衍生大量警員被投訴案件，自上次11月監警會會議後，再多兩宗投訴獲證明屬實個案，其中一宗涉及有記者在元朗港鐵站採訪時，遭警員噴射胡椒噴霧，一位不知名警員在人群中說出「不禮貌、不恰當」說話，當值警員均被訓諭。警方代表在會上指，監警會已通過95%個案，剩下29宗未向監警會交報告的案件，有26宗有案在審，3宗重新調查，因為數字在未來變化不大，今後不再在公開聯席會議匯報，監警會同意安排。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
