1 Aug 2023獨媒#8119
中大校董會未就改組方案表決 主席查逸超：有咩需要
Three Legislative Council members who also serve on the CUHK Council introduced private bills to amend the method of composing the Council, without prior approval by the Council. Kelvin Yu Ming Yeung, chairman of the CUHK Convocation, earlier launched a petition opposing the proposal and advocating a “multi-party win-win solution”, which received more than 1,000 responses. However, the situation reversed around last Friday’s Bills Committee meeting after reports emerged that the CUHK Council had split into two camps and that Council Chairman Johnny Yat Chiu Chai had been sidelined. The CUHK Council held a meeting today (August 1). After the meeting, Johnny Yat Chiu Chai told reporters that he welcomed the three lawmakers continuing to promote reform of the CUHK Council. Asked whether a vote had been held at the meeting, Johnny Yat Chiu Chai said the Council’s position had never changed: “What was there to vote on?” According to sources, Kelvin Yu Ming Yeung and Shu Fai Heung, who helped launch the petition, requested a vote at the meeting, but no one seconded the motion.
三名身兼中大校董的立法會議員提出私人草案，修改校董會的組成方法，事前未經校董會通過。中大校友評議會主席楊于銘早前發起聯署，反建議「多方共贏方案」，獲逾千人響應。不過上周五法案委員會會議前後，爆出中大校董會分裂成兩派，校董會主席查逸超被架空等事後，形勢逆轉。中大今日（8月1日）舉行校董會，會後查逸超見記者稱歡迎三位議員繼續推動中大校董會改革。至於校董會上曾否進行表決，查逸超指校董會立場從未改變，「咁有啲咩嘢需要表決？」據了解，有份發起聯署的楊于銘及香樹輝曾在會上要求表決，惟無人和議。
29 Jul 2023Channel C#8108
網傳中大（深圳）與香港中文 微信發「聯合通告」 兩校共享世界排名 爭取「共享學位證」
A screenshot titled “The Chinese University of Hong Kong and CUHK-Shenzhen Issue a ‘Joint Notice’” has circulated online. It said the two universities were considering combining academic data and proposing “joint rankings”, prompting discussion of “shared international rankings”, “shared assessment systems” and “training standards”, as well as “shared degree certificates”. The claim sparked heated discussion among local and mainland students at CUHK, with some concerned about the impact on international rankings and the recognition of the programmes. The notice has since been deleted from the platform, and CUHK has not yet responded.
網上流傳一張題為「香港中文大學與中大（深圳）分校發出『聯合通告』」的截圖，內容指兩校正考慮合併學術數據並提出「聯合排名」，亦因而引起「共享國際排名」、「共享評分體系」與「培養標準」、「共享學位證」等的議題。消息流出後，引起中大本地及內地生熱烈討論，有擔心影響國際排名及課程認受性。惟該通告現已在平台被刪除，中大暫未有回應。
28 Jul 2023港大校園電視#8104
校方要求校園電視清拆大學街兩部電視 港大保安一度質疑幹事偷電視
Earlier, on 20 July, the University of Hong Kong’s Centre of Development and Resources for Students (CEDARS) emailed the HKU Students’ Union Campus TV asking it to remove televisions located on the lower level of University Street on the Centennial Campus and outside Chung Yeung Building. During the removal, the officer was questioned by HKU security three times and was at one point accused of taking HKU property without authorisation. The officer identified themself to security and said the removal had been requested by the university. Security said it was unaware of CEDARS’ arrangements, and added that if the televisions belonged to the university, removing them would constitute theft and the police would have to be notified.
早前（7月20日）香港大學學生學生發展及資源中心（CEDARS）發電郵要求香港大學學生會校園電視清拆位於百週年校園的大學街下層以及周亦卿樓外的電視。清拆期間，幹事三次遭港大保安查問，更一度被指擅自偷取港大財產。幹事向保安表明身份，告知清拆行動屬校方要求。保安表示不清楚CEDARS有關安排，續指如這些電視為校方擁有，清拆電視的行為便是偷竊，須報警處理。
28 Jul 2023獨媒#8107
前學生會成員參選校友評議會再被DQ 斥主席楊于銘「想中大人支持又拒年青校友於門外」
The CUHK Alumni Council, which faced controversies earlier this year over disqualifying candidates and barring alumni from proposing motions, will hold its annual general meeting on 19 August. Anthony Suen, a former chair of the CUHK Students’ Union Representatives Council who was previously disqualified, and Tse Wai-lok, former president of the Shaw College Students’ Union, announced yesterday (27th) that they would run again. This afternoon, however, they said they had been disqualified again, criticising the Standing Committee for exceeding its authority without explaining the grounds and for violating procedural justice. Anthony Suen told InMedia that the Standing Committee chair Kelvin Yu Ming Yeung wanted alumni to unite in support of his joint petition opposing the CUHK amendment proposal, but “shut young alumni out”, saying he was unworthy of being a CUHK person.
年初出現取消候選人資格、禁止校友提出議案等爭議的中大校友評議會，將於8月19日舉行周年會員大會，其中曾被DQ的前中大學生會代表會主席孫昊賢，及前中大逸夫書院學生會會長謝煒洛昨（27日）宣布再次參選，惟今午稱已再被DQ，批評常委會無交待理據下越權、違反程序公義。孫昊賢向《獨媒》表示，常委會主席楊于銘想校友團結支持他反對中大修例方案的聯署，卻「拒年青校友於門外」，斥其枉為中大人。
27 Jul 2023明報#8088
中大校友1270人聯署 鄭國漢批議員繞校董會
The bill to reorganise the Chinese University of Hong Kong’s governing council has sparked discussion in recent days. CUHK Alumni Consultative Council chairman and council member Kelvin Yu Ming Yeung, together with alumni Ooi Hong Lim and Shu Fai Heung, launched an online petition for a “multi-party win-win proposal”. By 8pm last night, it had received at least 1,270 signatures. Today’s newspapers also carried a full-page advertisement on page A5 titled “Statement on the Joint Petition Supporting the Multi-party Win-win Proposal for Reorganising CUHK’s Governing Council”, urging Legislative Council members and council members Tommy Cheung, Vincent Lau and Bill Tang, who introduced the private bill, to amend the bill already submitted, basing it on the 2016 plan for reorganising the governing council, which the council considers still suitable.
改組中大校董會的條例草連日掀起各界討論，中大校友評議會主席兼校董楊于銘，與校友林偉雄、香樹輝發起「多方共贏方案」網上聯署，截至昨晚8時，已獲至少1270人簽署，今日的報章亦見題為「支持重組中大校董會的多方共贏方案聯署聲明」的全版廣告（刊A5），促請提出私人草案的立法會議員校董張宇人、劉國勳及鄧家彪，修訂已提交的條例草案，「以校董會認為仍然合適的2016年重組校董會方案為基礎」。
22 Jul 2023獨媒#8062
小紅書泄DSE評卷參考 本地中學男教師被捕
Earlier, a person claiming to be a marker for this year’s Diploma of Secondary Education Examination uploaded to the social media platform Xiaohongshu the cover of a Chinese Language marking reference document bearing the word “Confidential”. After the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority reported the incident to police, officers yesterday arrested a 38-year-old full-time teacher at a local secondary school. Senior Inspector Chan King-lok, officer in charge of Team 1 of the Wan Chai district crime squad, said the arrested man was not a marker for the authority. Police suspected that he wanted to use the document to attract students to enrol in private tutorial classes and profit from it.
早前有自稱應屆文憑試閱卷員的人士，在社交平台「小紅書」，上載一份印有「機密」字眼的文憑試中文科評卷參考封面。考評局就事件報警後，警方昨日拘捕一名38歲本地中學全職教師。灣仔警區重案組第一隊主管高級督察陳敬樂稱，被捕人並非考評局閱卷員，懷疑他想透過文件吸引學生報讀私人補習班，並從中圖利。
19 Jul 2023獨媒#8019
平機會去信挑戰髮禁學生 指正式中止調查
A current Diploma of Secondary Education Examination candidate and student at TWGHs Wong Fut Nam College, athan Lam Chak Chun, complained to the Equal Opportunities Commission last year that the school’s hair regulations allegedly violated the Sex Discrimination Ordinance. After a complaint process lasting a year, the commission formally terminated its investigation, citing reasons including that “the existing information was unable to show that the school had violated the law” and that “the incident had not caused Student Lin any actual loss,” and refused to provide legal assistance.
應屆文憑試考生、東華三院黃笏南中學學生林澤駿去年向平機會投訴髮禁校規涉違《性別歧視條例》，經過長達一年申訴過程後，平機會以「現有資料未能顯示學校涉及違法」、「事件並未對林同學招致實際損失」等理由，正式終止調查，並拒絕提供司法援助。
18 Jul 2023獨媒#8011
浸大前幹事公開會面錄音 遭校方調查
Hong Kong Baptist University sanctioned the student union, which had just taken office in April, on the grounds that it had received complaints and that descriptions of past events in the union’s platform were “inconsistent with society’s standards and values”. All members of the executive committee, Cangming, subsequently resigned, and an appeal also failed. During the process, former officials publicly released an audio recording of a meeting with the university, in which a senior HKBU official was heard telling students: “If you punch me, I will definitely kick you back.” An Instagram account linked to the former officials said today that the university was seriously handling the release of the recording and had asked the four former officials involved to write “self-statements”.
浸大校方以收到投訴、以及政綱對過去事件的描述「不符合社會的標準和價值觀」為由，處分今年四月剛上任的學生會。幹事會「滄溟」及後全體請辭，上訴亦告失敗。期間前幹事曾公開與校方會面的錄音，有浸大高層當時向同學稱「你打我一拳，我一定踢返你一腳。」前幹事相關的IG今日表示，指校方正嚴正處理公開錄音一事，要求四名涉事前幹事撰寫「自我陳述」。
18 Jul 2023Channel C#8012
浸大前學生會成員發聲明 因公開錄音再遭校方調查 稱心力交瘁退「浸大黐線佬」
The former Hong Kong Baptist University student union “Tsoeng Ming” previously released a recording of a meeting with senior university officials, saying they had been verbally threatened by the officials. Four former student union members subsequently formed “HKBU Crazy Guys”. In a statement posted on social media today (the 18th), they said that on the same day (the 6th) they learned that their “final appeal” had been rejected, they received an email from the university saying it would deal seriously with the release of the recording. The four members said they were exhausted after months of dealing with the university and had decided to formally leave “HKBU Crazy Guys” for personal reasons and in consideration of the platform’s future.
香港浸會大學前學生會「滄溟」早前公開與校方高層的會議錄音，稱受到高層出言恐嚇，4名前學生會成員其後組成「浸大黐線佬」。今日（18日），他們在社交媒體上發聲明指，在得知「終極上訴」被駁回的同日（6日），收到校方電郵，稱會嚴正處理公開錄音一事。4名成員表示，經多月與校方周旋已心力交瘁，基於個人考慮及平台未來，決定正式退出「浸大黐線佬」。
18 Jul 2023集誌社#8014
中大四院會師｜校方憂 2019 年情況禁復辦 七學生組織發聲明 轟蹂躪員生共治精神
CUHK’s traditional Four Colleges Joint Gathering, an orientation activity held at the start of the academic year, was suspended for the past three years because of the pandemic. With a return to normality this year, its continued suspension means the event has been unable to take place for four consecutive years. The students’ unions of the four colleges, together with orientation-camp organising committees and other groups—seven student organisations in total—issued a joint statement on the 17th, saying the university had banned the event over concerns that it would “repeat the situation in 2019”. They accused the university of “self-censorship” and of “trampling on the meaning of orientation camps and the spirit of staff-student co-governance”. In response to an enquiry from The Collective, CUHK confirmed that the Four Colleges Joint Gathering would not be held this year, but did not give specific reasons.
中大傳統、開學迎新活動「四院會師」，過去三年都以疫情為由停辦。今年復常後，「四院會師」要繼續停辦，是中大連續四年未能舉行。四個書院的學生會及迎新營籌委會等，共七個學生組織，昨（ 17日）發聯合聲明，稱校方憂慮「四院會師」將「重蹈 2019 年情況」 而禁止，批評校方「自我審查」、「蹂躪迎新營的意義及員生共治精神」。中大回覆《集誌社》查詢時確認，今年不舉辦「四院會師」，惟未有交代具體原因。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
