22 Jun 2025獨媒#6932
生態旅遊論壇突被中大取消借場稱「緊急維修」今早未見工人動工
Greenpeace had planned to hold Hong Kong’s first civil society forum on ecotourism, “Storm Approaching: Civil Society Forum on Ecotourism”, at The Chinese University of Hong Kong today (June 22). A total of 13 speakers and discussion guests, including Hong Kong Countryside Conservation Fund chairman Lam Chiu-ying and Liber Research Community member Chan Kim-king, were due to attend, and the event was open for public registration. However, Greenpeace announced yesterday (June 21) that it had been informed by CUHK that the venue could not be provided as scheduled because it suddenly required urgent repairs, and that the forum would instead be held online via Zoom.
環保團體綠色和平原定今日（6月22日）於中大舉行全港首個生態旅遊民間論壇「山雨欲來：生態旅遊民間論壇」，合共13位講者及討論嘉賓出席，包括香港鄉郊保育基金主席林超英、本土研究社成員陳劍青等，開放公眾報名參加。不過，綠色和平昨（21日）突然公佈，指接獲中大通知，因場地突發需要緊急維修，未能如期提供，需改以 Zoom 線上形式進行。
20 Jun 2025獨媒#6928
赴台後首辦「影意志獨立短片獎」 崔允信：讓更多人看到非主流香港電影
After film distributor Shadow Works, which had released several documentaries about social movements, announced its dissolution last year, its artistic director Vincent Chui moved to Taiwan, re-established a platform under the same name and held the inaugural “Independent Short Film Awards”. Eleven shortlisted films were screened on tour in the US, Canada, Taiwan and the UK. In an interview with InMedia, Vincent Chui admitted that when non-mainstream Hong Kong independent films are screened overseas, audience interest is consistently lower than for screenings in Hong Kong, but still hoped the event could continue: “To let everyone know that there are still people in Hong Kong making this kind of work, and in future help them get seen by more people.” Chui also noted that ideals were one thing, but in reality there might not be sufficient resources to do so: “Unless someone is genuinely very willing to help.”
曾發行多部社運題材紀錄片的電影發行商「影意志」去年宣布解散後，藝術總監崔允信移居台灣，重組同名平台並舉辦首屆「獨立短片獎」，在美、加、台、英巡迴放映11套入圍作品。崔允信接受《獨媒》訪問時坦言，在外地放映非主流的香港獨立電影時，關注人數始終不及在香港放映，仍希望能持續舉辦：「俾大家知道香港仲有人拍呢啲嘢，將來幫到佢哋俾多人睇到。」但崔亦提到理想歸理想，現實上未必有足夠資源做到：「除非真係有人好願意幫忙。」
20 Jun 2025RFA#6929
港人組織於美國西岸紀念反送中6周年展覽會
The Beijing and Hong Kong governments are preparing a series of activities for the fifth anniversary of the implementation of the National Security Law. Overseas, a number of Hong Kong organisations are also holding activities to mark the sixth anniversary of the anti-extradition movement. In Fremont in California’s Bay Area, a Hong Kong organisation held the “Tears of Freedom” exhibition on the 2019 Hong Kong people’s protest movement. The exhibition recreated the turbulent course of Hong Kong’s social movements since 2019 and demonstrated the solidarity and perseverance of the overseas Hong Kong community.
The organiser, the Hong Kong People’s Association of America, prepared free Hong Kong-style milk tea and pineapple buns for every visitor. Among the exhibits, the most notable was the National Security Law arrest document issued when Tony Chung was arrested in Hong Kong. The organiser also specially set up display panels showing a timeline of Hong Kong’s 2019 protest movement, presenting important events and iconic scenes in sequence.
北京和香港政府正在準備國安法實施五周年一系列活動。在海外，不少港組織亦正在舉行反送中運動六周年紀念活動，在美國加州灣區Fremont，有港人組織舉行「自由之淚」2019香港人抗爭運動展覽。現場不單止重現了2019年以來香港社會運動的風雨歷程，更加體現了海外港人社群的團結與堅持。
主辦方《美國香港人會館》為每位參觀者準備免費港式奶茶和菠蘿包。展品方面，最矚目的是鍾翰林在港被捕時的國安法逮捕文件，主辦方亦特別設置2019年香港抗爭運動時間線展板，將重要事件、標誌性場面依次呈現。
19 Jun 2025獨媒#6927
邨內吉舖眾多 收回膳心小館有何用途？房屋署未回應
The social enterprise “Agape Garden” announced earlier this month, on 7 June, that its branch on the ground floor of Mei Kwai House in Shek Kip Mei would close in early July because the Housing Department would not renew its tenancy and needed to reclaim the shop for other uses. According to available information, 20 groups of shop units in Shek Kip Mei Estate are being put out to tender or will soon be put out to tender. An on-site inspection found that there were even more vacant shops. InMedia asked the Housing Department what the reclaimed shop formerly occupied by “Agape Garden” would be used for, but did not receive a direct response; the department also did not provide details about the tendering of the other shop units.
社企「膳心小館」於本月初（6月7日）宣布，位於石硤尾美葵樓地下的分店，因房屋署不再續租，將於7月初結業，原因為須收回舖位作其他用途。翻查資料，石峽尾邨有20組舖位正在招標或即將招標，記者實地視察所見，吉舖數目更多。《獨媒》向房屋署查詢收回「膳心小館」後的舖位用途為何，未獲正面回應，亦未交代其他舖位招標情況。
18 Jun 2025明報#6925
記者法院外遭警員查問及扣起證件 警方：在場助查 司法機構：傳媒可在法院大樓外拍攝
Two inquests are being heard at West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts. A journalist was questioned by police outside the court this Monday (16th) while filming a witness, and one journalist’s identification documents were held by an officer, who asked her to contact other journalists to return and provide their details. Police said yesterday that a woman showed an identity card and that she was “assisting with the inquiry”; the documents were later retrieved from inside the court. The Judiciary said today (18th) that journalists may film outside the court building and in designated press areas inside it, and declined to comment on the police action.
The inquests into the 2012 Lamma ferry disaster and the alleged choking of a taxi driver by a police officer are being heard at West Kowloon Courts. At about 1pm on Monday, witnesses from the Lamma ferry crew union walked out of the court, followed by several journalists filming them. A uniformed police officer approached and asked which media organisations they represented. One journalist’s identification documents were subsequently held by the officer, who asked her to contact the other journalists to return so that the officer could record their details.
In response to an inquiry, police said officers had seen several women filming outside the court’s vehicle entrance and approached to make inquiries. One woman showed the officer a press card and identity card, while the others said their documents had been left inside the court. Police said the woman who was able to show proof of identity was “assisting with the inquiry”. Someone later retrieved the documents from inside the court and showed them to the officers. Police reminded the people concerned to carry identification documents with them.
The Judiciary said that under the Court (Remote Hearing) Ordinance, anyone who records, publishes or broadcasts legal proceedings conducted as physical or remote hearings without authorisation may, upon conviction, be sentenced to up to five years’ imprisonment and fined $100,000. Under the Magistrates Ordinance, anyone who, without lawful authority, deliberately makes a visual or audio recording of court premises or any person in court premises may, upon conviction, be sentenced to up to one year’s imprisonment and fined $50,000.
西九龍裁判法院正審理兩宗死因研訊，有記者本周一（16日）在法院門外拍攝證人，遭警員查問。其中一名記者遭警員扣起證件，要求聯絡其他記者折返登記資料。警方昨回覆查詢稱，一名女子能出示身份證明文件及「在場助查」，其後有人從法院內取回證件。司法機構今（18日）回覆稱，記者可在法院大樓範圍外及法院大樓內指定的記者區拍攝，司法機構不評論警方行動。
2012年南丫海難及的士司機疑遭警員箍頸的死因研訊，正在西九龍法院審理。本周一下午近1時，南丫海難的船員工會證人步出法院門外，多名記者跟隨拍攝，軍裝警員上前查問所屬媒體。其後有一名記者遭警員扣起證件，警員要求她聯絡其他記者折返，供警員記錄資料。
警方回覆查詢稱，警員當時發現數名女子於法院車閘外拍攝，並上前了解，其中一人向警員出示記者證及身份證，其餘人士則指證件遺留法院內。警方指，該名能出示身份證明文件的人「在場助查」，其後有人從法院內取回證件，並向警員出示。警方提醒有關人士應隨身攜帶身份證明文件。
本報向司法機構查詢記者在法庭外拍攝的法律界線。司法機構回覆指，根據《法院（遙距聆訊）條例》，任何人未經授權而記錄、發布和廣播以實體聆訊和遙距聆訊進行的法律程序，一經定罪最高監禁5年及罰款10萬元。另根據《簡易程序治罪條例》，任何人無合法權限而故意對法院處所及在法院處所內的任何人作出影像或語音紀錄，一經定罪最高可被監禁1年及罰款5萬元。
17 Jun 2025RFA#6920
國際報告顯示香港「任意拘禁」惡化 公民政治權利分數「迫近」中國
The latest annual report by the Human Rights Measurement Initiative (HRMI) shows that Hong Kong’s performance in “political freedom” and “physical integrity” has continued to deteriorate, indicating major problems remain in the authorities’ respect for fundamental human rights. Its “civil and political rights” score is only 0.5 points higher than that of China, which ranks lowest. HRMI said the Hong Kong government had further tightened control in the name of national security by passing provisions under Article 23 of the Basic Law, while continuing to arrest people in cases related to national security and allegations such as collusion with foreign forces, seeking to create a chilling effect.
The New Zealand-based Human Rights Measurement Initiative surveyed 38 countries and regions, assessing multiple human rights standards and observing changes in human rights conditions in different places.
For Hong Kong, the report assessed the government’s respect for “physical integrity rights” across “freedom-from rights,” “arbitrary detention,” “enforced disappearance,” “the death penalty,” “extrajudicial execution” and “torture.” Hong Kong’s overall score was 7.4 out of 10, indicating that most people’s “physical integrity” had been violated in one or more ways. “Arbitrary detention” was the poorest-performing area, scoring only 4.5 points, down 0.2 points from last year’s 4.7.
根據「人權評量倡議組織」（Human Rights Measurement Initiative，簡稱HRMI）今年度的最新報告顯示，香港在「政治自由」及「人身完整性」方面的表現持續惡化，顯示當局對基本人權的尊重仍存在重大問題；而「公民與政治權利」評分僅比排名最低的中國高0.5分。HRMI指，港府以國安為由進一步加強控制，通過基本法23條的條款，又繼續拘捕與國安和動輒聲稱勾結外國勢力等相關個案，企圖造成寒蟬效應。
設在紐西蘭的人權評量倡議組織（Human Rights Measurement Initiative）針對38個國家地區進行調查，衡量多項人權標準，觀察不同地方的人權狀況的變化。
在香港方面，報告將「人身完整性權利」分為「免遭權」、「任意拘禁」、「強迫失蹤」、「死刑」、「法外處決」及「酷刑」來評定港府在尊重各項權利的情況如何，結果香港總得分是7.4分（滿分為10分），反映⼤部分⼈的「⼈⾝完整性」受到⼀種或多種侵害。其中「任意拘禁」表現最差，只有4.5分，比起去年的4.7分還要低0.2分。
16 Jun 2025光傳媒#6918
香港監察報告｜67%受美制裁中國企業股票可在港交所交易 投資者恐違美制裁令
Hong Kong Watch published a report last Wednesday (11th) on the risks of investors trading shares in Chinese companies on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. It found that 79 of 117 Chinese companies sanctioned by the US government had shares that could be traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, 19 of which were directly listed on the Main Board. Hong Kong Watch warned that investors purchasing shares on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange could inadvertently gain exposure to Chinese companies involved in human rights abuses and might even breach US government sanctions.
Hong Kong Watch published a report titled “Risky Business: how sanctioned entities access capital via Hong Kong”, analysing recent policy changes in Hong Kong and China aimed at encouraging Chinese companies to list in Hong Kong rather than in other “offshore” jurisdictions with stricter due diligence requirements. The report highlighted the risks and due diligence challenges posed to foreign investors by Hong Kong’s national security legislation, and provided investors with guidance on human rights due diligence.
The report was written by Thomas Benson, Hong Kong Watch’s senior research and policy adviser. He said the report revealed the ethical and legal risks that Hong Kong’s stock market posed to overseas institutional investors. “It explains why and how Hong Kong’s stock market is strategically important to the Beijing government, and how Chinese companies involved in human rights abuses use Hong Kong to access international capital markets and attract overseas investors.”
香港監察上周三（11日）發布有關投資者在香港交易所買賣中國企業股票的風險報告，發現117間被美國政府制裁的中國企業，有79間的股票可以在港交所交易，當中有19間更是直接在主板上市。香港監察警告，投資者在港交所購買股票時，可能在無意間接觸到涉及侵犯人權的中國企業，甚至可能違反美國政府的制裁禁令。
香港監察（Hong Kong Watch）發布題為《Risky Business: how sanctioned entities access capital via Hong Kong》報告，分析香港和中國近期的政策變動，而這些變動旨在推動中國企業在香港上市，而非在其他有更嚴格盡職審查（due diligence）要求的「離岸」地區上市。報告指出，香港國安法例對外國投資者帶來的風險和盡職審查挑戰，並向投資者提供人權盡職審查的指引。
報告由香港監察資深研究及政策顧問湯柏森（Thomas Benson）撰寫，他表示，報告揭示香港股市對海外機構投資者帶來的道德及法律風險。「當中闡釋了香港股市為何、如何對北京政府具有重要策略意義，以及牽涉侵犯人權行為的中國企業如何利用香港進入國際資本市場並招攬海外投資者」。
15 Jun 2025獨媒#6917
梁凌杰逝世六週年 市民太古廣場外悼念
Today marks the sixth anniversary of Leung Ling-kit’s death. Many members of the public went to mourn outside Pacific Place in Admiralty, where he died. Police presence increased noticeably after nightfall, with about 20 officers on standby at the scene. Officers also filmed the area, and several members of the public who came to mourn were taken inside the cordon for searches and identity-card details to be recorded.
A reporter from InMediaHK arrived in the afternoon. A bouquet of white chrysanthemums and a yellow egg-shaped toy had been placed in the flower bed outside Pacific Place. At around 4pm, about five plain-clothes officers arrived and recorded the identity-card and press-card details of the many reporters present. The InMediaHK reporter’s address was also copied down, and reporters were subsequently asked to wear identification badges.
今日是梁凌杰逝世六週年，不少市民到其身亡的地點金鐘太古廣場外悼念。入夜後警力明顯增強，現場約20名警員在場戒備，並有警員攝錄現場情況，不少前來悼念的市民被拉入封鎖線內搜身及記錄身份證。
《獨媒》記者在下午到場，太古廣場門外花圃放置了一束白色菊花及黃色雞蛋公仔，近下午4時，約5名便衣警員到場，向在場大批記者登記身份證及記者證，《獨媒》記者亦被抄錄住址，及後要求記者帶上證件識別。
14 Jun 2025Yahoo#6916
記協換屆選出新任主席 4 執委 名單不公開 與會者封口
The Hong Kong Journalists Association held its 2025 annual general meeting and Executive Committee election this morning (14th). There had been reports that the list of newly elected Executive Committee members would not be made public, while the association notified the media the previous evening that the meeting would not include an interview session. It is understood that the vote elected a new chair and four Executive Committee members.
香港記者協會今日（14日）早上舉行 2025 年周年會員大會暨執行委員會換屆選舉。日前已有消息指新執委擬不公開當選名單，而記協亦在大會前一晚通知傳媒大會不設採訪環節。據了解是次投票選出新一任主席及四名執委。
13 Jun 2025集誌社#6908
六四 36｜重組最少 37 人被捕、帶署、送走、截查經過 社運人憶被警認出「即捕即解」
Last week marked the 36th anniversary of June 4. Police said they took 10 people away that day on suspicion of “breaching public peace” and arrested two. Why were these people taken to police stations that night? The Collective compiled accounts of police stopping and questioning people that day and revisited some of those questioned. People dressed in black, as well as a girl in a school uniform holding a bouquet of white flowers, were taken away. Some people who had previously been arrested or stopped and questioned were taken away immediately upon arriving in Causeway Bay or the area around Victoria Park. Artist Chan Mei-tung was stopped by police and taken into a police vehicle while reporters pursued her for an interview as she headed to Victoria Park to swim. The Social Democratic Party’s vice-chairman for internal affairs, Yu Wai-pan, was also taken back to a police station after officers recognised him as he walked along East Point Road. He recalled an officer saying, “You’re too famous. There may be a lot of reporters gathering around, which could breach public peace.”
In addition, at least six people were “escorted” by police onto vehicles to leave this year, including wealthy businessman Lau Kung-chi and "Gau wu" group, known as “Uncle Ng”. The Collective asked police about the grounds and criteria for “escorting” and taking people away, as well as the specific actions by those taken away that constituted a breach of public peace. Police did not respond.
上周是六四 36 周年，警方指當日以「涉嫌破壞社會安寧」帶走十人，拘捕兩人。當晚這些市民為何要被帶返警署？《集誌社》整理警方當日截查市民的經過，及重訪部分被查人士，有人穿黑衣、有女生穿校服持白色花束均被帶走；部分過往曾被捕或被截查的人士，甫到達銅鑼灣或維園一帶，也即被帶走，如藝術家陳美彤前往維園游泳途中被記者追訪，即遭警截查帶上警車，社民連內務副主席余煒彬行經東角道，被警員認出後亦被帶返警署。他憶述警員稱「你太出名，可能好多記者圍埋嚟，會破壞社會安寧」。
此外，今年也有至少六人被警方「護送」搭車離開，包括富商劉公子、鳩嗚團「吳伯」等。《集誌社》向警方查詢，「護送」和帶走市民的理據和準則、被帶走人士具體破壞社會安寧的行為等，警方均沒有回應。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
