26 Sept 2025HK01#7358
皇仁書院學生會選舉爆風波 學生收匿名恐嚇電郵 校方報警及停選
Students at Queen’s College have continued to receive anonymous threatening emails, prompting the termination of the student union election originally scheduled for this month and leaving the executive committee of the new student union vacant. It is understood that some of the emails concerned the student union election, while some content targeted teaching staff. The school has reported the matter to the police and decided to terminate the election. Police confirmed in response to enquiries that Wan Chai Police Station received a report from a school staff member on 19 September, stating that they had received an email suspected to contain threatening content. The case is being followed up as criminal intimidation, and no arrests have been made so far.
皇仁書院持續有學生收到匿名恐嚇電郵，令原定今個月舉行的學生會選舉被終止，新一屆學生會執委會出缺。據了解，部份電郵涉及學生會選舉事宜，更有內容針對教職員，校方已就事件報案，並決定終止選舉。警方回覆查詢證實，灣仔警署9月19日接獲一學校職員報案，指收到一封懷疑涉及恐嚇內容的電郵，案件列作刑事恐嚇跟進，暫未有人被捕。
22 Sept 2025Yahoo#7346
中大校董選戰｜兩校友被DQ 禁自行網上拉票 候選人後援會：公開選舉走向弔詭沉寂
The Chinese University of Hong Kong is holding the election for a member of the Alumni Constituency of the University Council, with one alumni trustee to be elected. Electronic voting begins today (22nd). The election has been beset by a series of controversies, including the suspected introduction of a “good service to CUHK” threshold, which resulted in prospective alumni candidates being disqualified (DQ), and a new rule prohibiting candidates from promoting themselves online independently, requiring them to use the university’s official channels. The support group of qualified candidate Timothy Tin Lok Tam posted a statement questioning why an election that should be open had, oddly, become quiet. CUHK told Yahoo News that candidates may conduct campaign activities on “multiple election platforms of the university”.
中文大學舉行「大學校董會校友評議會成員選舉」，選出一位校友校董，今（22日）起進行電子投票。今次選舉接連發生風波，包括疑新增「良好服務中大」門檻，有意參選的校友被取消參選資格（DQ）；又增設規則禁止候選人自行網絡宣傳，必須透過校方官方渠道。成功入閘候選人譚天樂的後援會發文質疑，本應公開的選舉，弔詭地走向沉寂。中大校方向《Yahoo新聞》覆稱，候選人可在「校方多個選舉平台」進行競選宣傳活動。
19 Sept 2025獨媒#7336
嶺大要求學生組織與學生會「割蓆」 表明不認同後者立場和理念
On the day of Lingnan University’s opening ceremony this year, members of the Lingnan University Students’ Union and editorial board Association distributed copies of their publication “Ying San Zi Nam” outside the campus. University security confiscated the publication, saying that its contents were inaccurate and that it could not be brought onto campus. The Lingnan University Students’ Union editorial board Association later uploaded an electronic version of “Zi Nam” online. The university subsequently twice asked student organisations to withdraw advertisements published in “Zi Nam” and to write emails stating that they did not agree with the Students’ Union’s positions and ideals.
今年嶺南大學開學禮當日，有嶺大學生會與編委會成員在校外派發其出版的刊物《迎新紙南》，但就被大學保安沒收，稱內容不正確及不准帶進校園。嶺大學生會編委會之後於網上上載《紙南》電子版，但校方兩求度要求各學生組織撤回刊登在《紙南》上的廣告，並要撰寫電郵，表明該組織不認同學生會的立場和理念。
15 Sept 2025獨媒#7306
莊梅岩劇作教材去年於網頁「消失」 教育局：適時檢視並更新資料
The page Education Sting also found that teaching materials for renowned playwright Candace Chong’s classic play ‘Staying Behind in the Mortuary’ had already ‘disappeared’ from the Education Bureau’s website last year. In response to an inquiry from InMedia, the Education Bureau said it has continued to review online learning and teaching resources and update the relevant information or content as appropriate, while continuing to produce new learning and teaching resources to meet curriculum development and learning and teaching needs.
專頁《教育刺針》更發現，知名劇作家莊梅岩的經典劇作《留守太平間》的教材資料，早於去年已在教育局網頁「消失」。教育局回覆《獨媒》查詢時稱，一直適時檢視網上學與教資源，並更新資料或內容，同時持續製作新的學與教資源，以配合課程發展及學與教需要。
13 Sept 2025集誌社#7303
中大藝墟｜聯書院學生會名稱「消失」 場刊「開天窗」 召集人：多了外部壓力
On the final day of CUHK’s start-of-term Arts Fair (12th), members of the Joint College Student Unions Working Group’s preparatory committee and volunteers held flags of the various college student unions and the CUHK Student Union for a group photo in front of a stage backdrop bearing the words “Humanistic Care”, “College Spirit”, “Mountain City” and “Do It Again”, drawing a close to what they described as a “successfully completed” event.
Since the CUHK Student Union disbanded in 2021, the large-scale Arts Fair, which allows different student societies to promote themselves and recruit committee members, has been organised by the working group. As it entered its fourth year, the preparatory committee said it clearly felt that there was “more external pressure” and had at one point discussed “whether to continue organising it”. Working group convener Sin Cheuk-yin said the group had earlier received a “reminder” from the university that the event’s backdrop and programme booklet could not carry the name and introduction of the Joint College Student Unions, or content related to the CUHK Student Union, otherwise the event might not be held as scheduled. Some content in the programme booklet was consequently left blank, and its final page could no longer list the names of the various college student unions as in previous years; instead, it was printed with the words: “Respectfully from a group of students still working to rebuild the CUHK Student Union.”
中大開學活動「藝墟」最後一日（12日），聯書院學生會工作小組籌委和義工，手持各書院學生會和中大學生會的旗幟，在印上「人文關懷」、「書院精神」、「山城」、「再嚟一次」等字句的舞台佈景版前大合照，為「順利完成」的活動劃下句號。
自 2021 年中大學生會解散後，這個讓不同學會宣傳和「招莊」的大型藝墟，一直由小組接手籌辦。踏入第四年，籌委說明顯感到「多了外部的壓力」，更曾一度討論「仲搞唔搞」。小組召集人冼卓言說，早前接獲校方「提醒」，活動佈景板、場刊都不能刊登聯書院學生會的名稱和介紹、以及與中大學生會相關內容，否則或不能如期舉辦；在部分內容要留白「開天窗」的場刊，最後一頁亦未能如以往列出各書院學生會名稱，改印「一群仍在努力重建中大學生會的同學敬上」。
10 Sept 2025獨媒#7284
樂善堂轄屬中學校服惹爭議 舊生批校方「零回應」促撤回並啟動公投
Do students like their school uniforms? Have they ever imagined wearing uniforms they designed themselves? In 2019, Kowloon Lok Sin Tong held a “Uniform Design Competition for Affiliated Schools” to standardise the uniforms of its five primary and six secondary schools. The competition received more than 100 submissions. However, when Lok Sin Tong began standardising and replacing the secondary-school uniforms in 2021, it did not use the winning designs. The new uniforms were also criticised for having overly thin material and provoking ridicule.
Since the uniforms were changed, the social media page “lstss.secrect”, managed by former students and students of Lok Sin Tong-affiliated secondary schools, has continued to receive students’ views opposing and questioning the uniform design. In July this year, “lstss.secrect” issued an open letter and collected nearly 1,000 signatures, hoping that Lok Sin Tong would withdraw the new uniforms and initiate a “uniform referendum” to allow students to participate in the uniform decision-making process.
作為學生的你，喜歡自己的校服嗎？有沒有想像過可以穿上自己設計的校服？2019年，九龍樂善堂為統一轄下5間小學及6間中學的校服，舉辦「轄屬學校校服設計比賽」。比賽共收到過百份作品投稿，然而樂善堂在2021年起統一更換中學校服時，未按照得獎作品作設計，新校服更被指有質料透簿、惹來嘲笑等情況。
自換校服以來，由樂善堂轄屬中學舊生及學生管理的社交媒體專頁「lstss.secrect」一直收到學生意見，對校服設計表示反對及質疑。今年7月，「lstss.secrect」先後發出公開信和收集近千個聯署，盼樂善堂能撤回新校服，啟動「校服公投」，讓學生能夠參與校服決策程序。
4 Sept 2025明報#7256
學校響應直播閱兵 學生：強軍才能國安
Last month, the Education Bureau issued a circular to all primary and secondary schools in Hong Kong encouraging them to hold flag-raising ceremonies, sing the national anthem and watch a live broadcast of the military parade yesterday. Various schools responded. Acting Secretary for Education Jeff Chun Fai Sze said the parade was the best national security education and hoped students would carry on the patriotic spirit. Participating students said that a strong country and military were necessary for national security, and some said they would join the disciplined services in future to contribute to the country.
Several schools held flag-raising ceremonies and arranged for students to watch the live broadcast, including CCC Heep Woh Primary School (Cheung Sha Wan) and HKFEW Wong Cho Bau Secondary School. Hong Kong College of Technology also invited students and teachers to provide commentary on the broadcast, explaining China’s military equipment to 200 teachers and students. Student commentator Shuai Binhua said history must not be forgotten or repeated, and that only if China’s influence continued to grow would it be able to reshape the rules of future wars and safeguard world peace. He said, “A strong military ensures national security.”
Jeff Chun Fai Sze attended a Victory Day of the War of Resistance commemorative ceremony at the Patriotic Education Support Centre yesterday. He thanked the education sector for actively responding to the bureau’s appeal, saying the parade was the best national security and patriotic education and that “history is the best textbook”. He also said Hong Kong had played an important role during the War of Resistance, demonstrating an unyielding patriotic spirit.
He added that the country’s progress towards prosperity had enabled its people to live and work in peace and contentment and had given it considerable weight on the international stage. These achievements had not come easily, and he hoped students would cherish and carry on the patriotic feelings of those who came before them, equip themselves well and contribute to the country’s future development.
教育局上月向全港中小學發通函，鼓勵學校昨日舉行升國旗儀式及唱國歌，以及收看閱兵儀式直播，昨日有不同學校響應。署理教育局長施俊輝表示，閱兵儀式是最好的國安教育，冀學生可傳承愛國情懷。有參與的學生認為國強才能國安，將來會投身紀律部隊貢獻國家。
施俊輝：歷史是最好教科書
昨日多間學校舉行升旗禮，並安排學生觀看閱兵直播，包括中華基督教會協和小學（長沙灣）及香港教育工作者聯會黃楚標中學等。香港專業進修學校更邀請同學及老師為直播旁述，向200名師生講解中國軍備。負責旁述的學生帥斌華表示，歷史不能遺忘及重演，認為只有中國的影響力日漸強大，對未來戰爭規則才有改寫的能力，世界和平才有保障，「強軍才能國安」。
施俊輝昨到愛國教育支援中心出席抗戰勝利紀念日儀式，席上他感謝學界積極響應局方號召，認為閱兵儀式是最好的國家安全及愛國主義教育，「歷史是最好的教科書」，又稱香港在抗戰期間擔當重要角色，展現出不屈不撓的愛國精神。
他又說，國家能走上繁榮昌盛的道路使人民安居樂業，並在國際舞台上舉足輕重，這些成果均得來不易，冀學生珍惜並傳承先烈的愛國之情，好好裝備自己，為國家未來發展作貢獻。
1 Sept 2025獨媒#7237
嶺大學生會突被取消營地 兩機構未回覆查詢
The Lingnan University Students’ Union had planned to hold a three-day orientation camp from August 29, but the venues it had booked at two non-profit organisations—the Hong Kong PHAB Association Jockey Club PHAB Camp and Po Leung Kuk Pak Tam Chung Holiday Camp—cancelled the bookings, citing “flooding caused by black rain” and “emergency repairs” respectively. When 《獨媒》 contacted the two organisations last Thursday (August 28) to enquire about bookings for Saturday and Sunday, it was told that all accommodation places were full. When it visited the sites again the day before (August 30), repairs were being carried out at the entrance to the PHAB Camp, with no one seen entering or leaving, while people were using the Po Leung Kuk holiday camp. A student taking part in the orientation camp told the reporter that a repair notice had been posted at one of the camp lodges. Neither camp responded to 《獨媒》’s enquiries.
The Lingnan University Students’ Union had planned to hold its orientation camp from August 29 to 31. It first booked the Hong Kong PHAB Association Jockey Club PHAB Camp in Pok Fu Lam in mid-April, but was told on August 8 that the booking had to be cancelled because flooding caused by black rain had occurred. The Students’ Union then rented the Po Leung Kuk Pak Tam Chung Holiday Camp in Sai Kung in mid-August, successfully booking 11 group camps for 10 people, two family camps for six people and one family camp for eight people, and had paid a deposit. However, it was suddenly informed on August 22 that the camp site required emergency repairs and could not be provided.
嶺南大學學生會原定8月29日起一連三日舉辦迎新營，惟已預約的兩間非牟利機構場地，包括香港傷健協會賽馬會傷健營及保良局北潭涌度假營，分別以「黑雨水浸」及「緊急維修」為由取消預約。《獨媒》上周四（8月28日）向兩間機構查詢周六日預約，均被告之宿位已滿，至前日（8月30日）再到訪現場，傷健營大門正進行維修，未見有人進出，北潭涌度假營內則有人使用，有正參與迎新營的學生向記者表示，有營舍貼有維修通告。兩個營地皆未回覆《獨媒》查詢。
嶺南大學學生會原定8月29至31日舉行迎新營，今年4月中先向薄扶林的香港傷健協會賽馬會傷健營預訂營地，惟至8月8日被告知黑雨致水浸需取消。學生會遂於8月中租用西貢的保良局北潭涌度假營，成功租用11間10人團體營、2間6人家庭營及1間8人家庭營，並已交付訂金。然而至8月22日突然被通知營場須緊急維修，無法提供場地。
27 Aug 2025明報#7216
科大用電子告示板惹疑 校方澄清「唔取代實體」
Publicity materials from student societies are commonly seen around university campuses and are a major means of promotion for student organisations. The HKUST Students’ Union editorial board said on Instagram two days ago that HKUST’s Media Technology and Publishing Centre (MTPC) would use electronic noticeboards to replace physical noticeboards from the new academic year. It reminded student organisations that they would need to submit applications to the Dean of Students’ Office for approval in advance if they wished to use the electronic boards. Their content would also have to be rotated with publicity from other HKUST departments, with each display lasting 30 seconds. The arrangement prompted student dissatisfaction, with the HKUST Students’ Union saying it had been introduced without warning, lacked consultation and caused inconvenience.
The HKUST Students’ Union collected joint endorsements from 29 affiliated clubs or student organisations and put forward five demands, including immediately suspending the replacement plan and providing dedicated electronic noticeboards and airtime for affiliated clubs. It also said that if HKUST did not respond by tomorrow, it would not rule out taking further action to “defend the rights and interests of student organisations”.
大學校園角落唔難見到學會「文宣」，係各類學生組織嘅主要宣傳途徑。科大學生會編委會前日喺Instagram話，科大媒體科技及出版中心（MTPC）新學年起用電子告示板取代實體告示板，提醒學生組織如果想用電子板，要提早交畀學務長辦公室審批；內容亦要與科大其他部門嘅宣傳「輪播」，每次展示30秒。措施引發學生不滿，科大學生會話安排「無預警推出」、欠缺諮詢，亦造成不便。
科大學生會蒐集29個屬會或學生組織聯署，提出5項要求，包括立即暫緩更換計劃、增設屬會專用電子告示板同播放時間等，又話如果科大聽日前無回應，唔排除採取進一步行動「捍衛學生組織權益」
26 Aug 2025集誌社#7215
嶺大學生會｜成員稱派迎新刊物遇警搜查、保安沒收 嶺大：未獲授權進行活動
Lingnan University held its opening ceremony yesterday (25th). A Students’ Union member said that members were stopped and searched by police while distributing orientation publications outside the university, and that campus security confiscated publications held by students and reminded freshmen that the “content was not entirely accurate”. The acting editor-in-chief of the interim editorial board said they were angry and puzzled by the incident, questioned whether the university had the authority to take away publications issued by editorial board, and feared the incident would create a chilling effect, silencing other student organisations. Separately, the Lingnan University Students’ Union announced last night that its orientation camp, originally scheduled for the end of August, could not be held as planned because of “force majeure factors” at the venue.
In its response, Lingnan University did not address whether the university had reported the matter to police or why the publications had been confiscated. It merely repeated a statement issued last month, saying that the Students’ Union was an externally registered society and had not been authorised to conduct any activities on campus. The Collective向警方查詢 whether the university had reported the matter to police and the reasons for the action, and was still awaiting a response.
嶺南大學昨（25日）舉行開學禮，有學生會成員稱在大學門外派發迎新刊物期間被警員截查，校園保安亦沒收同學手持刊物、提醒新生「內容不盡正確」。嶺大臨時編委署理總編輯表示對事件感到憤怒和不解，質疑校方是否有權力收走編委出版刊物，擔心事件會造成寒蟬效應，令其他學生組織噤聲。另外，嶺大學生會晚上宣布原定於 8 月尾舉行的迎新營，因場地方「不可抗力因素」無法按計劃舉行。
嶺大回覆時未有回應校方是否報警、為何要沒收刊物等，僅重複上月發出的聲明，指學生會為外部註冊社團，未獲授權於校內進行任何活動。《集誌社》向警方查詢是否接獲校方報案、基於甚麼理由行動等，仍候回覆。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
