20 Aug 2025Points Media#7188
港大科大清華合辦新疆論壇 講者批西方抹黑 絕無強迫勞動或種族滅絕
《棱角》 exclusively found that the University of Hong Kong’s China, Humanities, and Global Studies Research Hub co-hosted “Global Comparative Pespective on Xinjiang” on Wednesday (the 20th) with Tsinghua University’s Institute for Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences and the Division of Social Science at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. The forum criticised claims by “Western politicians and media led by the United States” that there was genocide or authoritarian rule in Xinjiang, and presented counter-narratives challenging Western knowledge production.
The entire forum was understood to have been led by Tsinghua, with participation limited to invitees, and ran from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.
《棱角》 noted that the participating academics and writers echoed the line of China’s official media. Some had previously criticised Hong Kong’s 2019 anti-extradition bill movement as a “colour revolution”, while others had participated in the official non-governmental organisation China Society for Human Rights Studies, led by former Tibet deputy Communist Party secretary Xiangba Pingcuo, and stated at the United Nations Human Rights Council that the West and the United States were smearing China.
A sociologist researching China and Hong Kong criticised these scholars, who adhere to left-wing Marxism, for having become increasingly inclined towards Maoism in recent years and even becoming part of the Chinese Communist Party’s external propaganda effort.
“Hong Kong, as an academic platform for exchanges between Chinese and Western cultures, is a frontline for research on China … Hong Kong can perform the function of the Chinese Communist Party’s ‘white glove’, using concepts from Western left-wing theories to criticise Western colonial rule as filthy, and using this as a fig leaf to conceal, rationalise or beautify the Chinese Communist Party’s totalitarian and repressive rule.”
《棱角》獨家發現，香港大學的中國、人文與全球研究中心（China, Humanities, and Global Studies Research Hub）於周三（20 日）跟清華大學人文與社會科學高等研究所，以及香港科技大學社會科學部合辦「新疆全球比較視野 Global Comparative Pespective on Xinjiang」，批判「美國為首的西方政客及傳媒」聲稱當地有種族滅絕或專制管治，並在論壇提供反抗西方知識生產的反敘述（Counter-narratives）。
據了解，整個論壇由清華主導，僅獲邀者可參與，由早上八時一直開至晚上八時。
《棱角》留意到，與會的學者及作家與中國官方媒體口徑一致，有人曾經批評 2019 年香港反修例運動是「顏色革命」，亦有人參與由前西藏黨委副書記向巴平措領導的官辦非政府組織「中國人權研究會」，在聯合國人權理事會聲言西方及美國抹黑中國。
有研究中國及香港的社會學學者批評，這些信奉左翼馬克思主義的學者，近年越發傾向毛澤東主義，甚至成為中共的大外宣一部分。
「香港作為中西文化交流學術平台，香港在研究中國是前哨 … 香港可以發揮中共「白手套」的功能，以西方的左翼理論概念，批評西方殖民統治是污穢的，作為遮醜布掩飾、合理化或美化中共的極權高壓統治。」
15 Aug 2025集誌社#7161
中大選校董｜至少兩參選校友被 DQ 校方拒覆原因
After the Chinese University of Hong Kong’s 34-member Council was “reformed”, two seats for undergraduate and alumni representatives remain vacant. Nominations for the alumni Council election were held from the 9th to the 22nd of last month, and the Council Secretariat announced the names of two candidates on the 13th. The Collective confirmed through multiple sources that at least two CUHK alumni who had secured enough nominations and registered to stand were disqualified without receiving any inquiries or notification. An unnamed former CUHK Council member criticised the system as unfair and questioned: “On what grounds were they DQ’d?” A CUHK alumnus said the election was “merely a prearranged façade” intended to allow the Council to remain controlled by a small circle.
中大校董會「被改革」後，34 人校董會仍缺本科生及校友代表兩席。校友校董選舉提名上月 9 日至 22 日舉行，校董會秘書處日前（13日）公布兩名候選人名單。《集誌社》從不同消息確認，至少兩名已獲得足夠提名及報名參選的中大校友，在沒接獲任何查詢或通知下，候選資格無故被 DQ。有不願具名的前中大校董批評制度不公，質疑制度不公「憑乜嘢 DQ？」，有中大校友質疑選舉「不過是內定的幌子，志在令校董會繼續把持於小圈子之中」。
《集誌社》向中文大學查詢共幾多人報名參選、未能參選人數和原因等等。中大未有直接回覆，僅指校董會屬下「選舉事務委員會」於 13 日確認「初步獲接受的候選人提名名單」，並將於 9 月 2 日公告最終候選人名單及有關資料。
12 Aug 2025集誌社#7155
雙重學籍｜一諾校長違規收家長 20 萬「建設費」 曾任職漢鼎書院 該校曾拖欠家長債券款項
Private school Yinuo Secondary School (Kowloon Tong) was recently revealed to have allegedly involved students in “dual school enrolment” across Shenzhen and Hong Kong. The secondary school was also involved in promoting a programme jointly organised with a mainland institution, advertised as “studying in Shenzhen to obtain Hong Kong student status”. The incident further revealed disorder in the school’s administration. Principal Kei Man-tik admitted yesterday to improperly collecting 200,000 yuan from parents as “construction fees”. The Education Bureau said the school’s management and finances were “unsatisfactory” and rejected its registration application at the end of last month. The Collective, after reviewing records, found that Kei Man-tik had previously worked at Han Ding College, which had allegedly failed to repay parents more than 10 million yuan in bond payments.
私立學校一諾中學（九龍塘）日前被揭學生疑有深港「雙重學籍」，中學又涉與內地機構合辦課程宣傳「深圳讀書拿香港學籍」。事件進一步揭發學校校政混亂，校長祁文迪昨承認違規收取家長 20 萬「建設費」，教育局指學校管理及財政「不令人滿意」，已於上月底拒絕其註冊申請。《集誌社》翻查資料，發現祈文迪曾任職涉拖欠家長逾千萬債券款項的漢鼎書院。
11 Aug 2025集誌社#7151
雙重學籍｜奪金「港生」身分羅生門 深圳學校：載譽而歸 香港一諾：雙非港人，去年3月轉校
Five Hong Kong students won awards while representing Hong Kong at the 55th International Physics Olympiad in July. However, the status of Fu Sze-man, who won a gold medal and attends Hong Kong private school Yat Nor College, has sparked controversy. After the HKSAR Government issued a press release about the awards on July 25, mainland media reported that Fu was a Secondary 4 student at Shenzhen Senior High School, which also made high-profile publicity about her achievement.
Hong Kong students cannot hold two school registrations at the same time. Yat Nor College principal Kei Man-tai said Fu was a “double non” Hong Kong resident who had studied in Shenzhen and transferred to Yat Nor last March. He said Fu’s parents had told the school that she had withdrawn from the Shenzhen school, and that after Fu won the award, “the Shenzhen [school] asked her to cooperate with its publicity”. Asked whether Fu had attended school in Hong Kong, Kei said, “A little, not much,” adding that the school had allowed her to take extended leave to prepare for the competition and that she spent about half her time in Hong Kong. A teacher at Shenzhen Senior High School, meanwhile, said they did not know that Fu had transferred.
The incident revealed that a mainland institution had jointly organised a programme with Yat Nor, charging annual tuition of HK$188,000 and promoting it with the claim that students could “study in Shenzhen and obtain a Hong Kong school registration”. The programme said students would spend most of their time in Shenzhen and directly advance to Yat Nor for the final two years without interruption, in order to meet the requirements for subsidies for “local students” under recently revised rules. Kei described the publicity as “possibly problematic” and said he had decided to suspend the programme for the time being after Jai Sing was recently exposed for running a school through a “shell” arrangement. The Education Bureau said the school’s management and financial situation were unsatisfactory. It notified the school on July 28 that its registration application had been rejected, and that its provisional registration would not be extended after it expires at the end of September.
五名香港學生 7 月代表香港參與第 55 屆「國際物理奧林匹克」比賽獲獎，不過，其中奪金牌、就讀香港私校一諾中學的傅思敏的身分惹起爭議。特區政府 7 月 25 日發稿公布得獎消息後，內地媒體即報道傅思敏是深圳市高級中學高一班學生，深圳高級中學集團亦高調宣傳。
香港學生不能同時擁有兩個學籍。究竟傅思敏有否在香港讀書？一諾中學校長祁文迪指，傅思敏是「雙非」港人、曾於深圳讀書，去年 3 月轉校至一諾。他指傅的家長稱已在深圳退學，傅奪獎後「深圳(學校)請他配合宣傳」；被問到傅有否在香港上學，祁指「少少，唔多」，又指學校讓他請長假備賽，他約有一半時間在香港。至於深圳高級中學的老師，則指不知道傅有轉學。
事件揭露有內地機構與一諾合辦課程，年學費 18.8 萬，以「深圳讀書拿香港學籍」作招徠，標榜學生大部分時間在深圳，最後兩年直升一諾「無縫銜接」，以符合最近新修訂的「本地生」資助要求。祁形容宣傳「可能有些問題」，近日摘星被揭「借殼」辦學後他決定先暫緩。教育局回覆指，一諾管理及財政狀況不令人滿意, 教育局已於 7 月 28 日通知該校拒絕為其註冊，臨時註冊有效期 9 月底屆滿後亦不會獲得延展。
18 Jul 2025明報#7057
嶺大：學生會未獲授權使用「嶺南大學」名稱 強調雙方無關係
Lingnan University recently issued a statement saying that the Lingnan University Student Union is an external organisation registered under the Societies Ordinance. It has not been authorised to conduct any activities on campus and is not provided with any sponsorship, venues or facilities by the university. The university stressed that it has no affiliation, relationship or connection with the Student Union. Regarding the union’s use of the name “Lingnan University”, the university said it had not received any support, consent or authorisation.
The university said it had in recent years repeatedly found that the Student Union, members of its executive committee and/or its affiliated bodies, including but not limited to its Editorial Board, had engaged in certain conduct and made certain statements that were inconsistent with Lingnan’s core values, mission, vision, overall purpose and objectives. The statements and conduct had attracted significant concern within the university community, damaged the university’s reputation and might give rise to legal risks.
The university clarified that although the Student Union’s name includes the words “Lingnan University”, it had not been recognised by or affiliated with the university. It hoped to prevent the public from mistakenly believing that any conduct or statements by the union had the university’s endorsement or represented the university’s views and position.
Earlier this year, Lingnan University asked the Student Union to sign the “Lingnan University Student Union Undertaking”, stating that the union and organisations under it must “abide by the law and observe university regulations”, including refraining from conduct that would damage the university’s reputation, failing which they would be prohibited from using the name “Lingnan University”. In April this year, the university said the undertaking had formally taken effect on 20 January and decided to formally cease all negotiations with the Student Union concerning the undertaking with immediate effect. It also required students wishing to establish student societies to apply to the Student Affairs Office and sign the “Student Leaders Charter” in order to gain access to resources provided by the university.
嶺南大學日前發聲明，稱嶺南大學學生會為根據《社團條例》註冊的外部組織，未獲授權於校內進行任何活動，亦不獲校方提供任何贊助、場地或設施，強調校方與學生會無任何隸屬關係，亦不存在任何關係或聯繫。對於學生會使用「嶺南大學」名稱，校方指未獲任何支持、同意或授權。
嶺大於聲明中表示，校方近年多次發現，學生會、其幹事會成員及或其屬下機構，包括但不限於該會編輯委員會，曾作出某些行為及發表某些言論，與嶺大的核心價值、使命、願景及整體宗旨與目標不符，有關言論及行為已引起大學社群高度關注，損害大學聲譽，並可能構成法律風險。
校方澄清，雖然學生會名稱包含「嶺南大學」字樣，其並未獲大學認可或與大學有關聯，期望避免公眾誤以為該會的任何行為或言論獲大學認可，或代表大學的觀點與立場。
嶺大今年較早時曾要求學生會簽署《嶺南大學學生會承諾書》，聲明學生會及其轄下組織須「奉公守法，遵守校規」，包括不作損害校譽行為等，否則禁用「嶺大」名稱等。校方於今年4月指，《承諾書》已於1月20日正式生效，並決定即日起正式停止與學生會進行所有有關承諾書的協商，同時要求有意成立學生社團的學生需向學生事務處申請，並簽署《學生領袖約章》，方可獲得校方所提供的資源使用權。
3 Jul 2025集誌社#6986
考評局｜補習導師四度質疑「錯答案」 局方堅持「設題無誤」 學者：題目有缺陷、答案不合理
With the release of the DSE results imminent, a tutor for Business, Accounting and Financial Studies found that the answer to a question in last year’s examination appeared to be wrong. The tutor contacted the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (HKEAA), expressing concern that users might continue to apply an incorrect concept and have their learning affected, and requested a review. The HKEAA initially replied that it did not comment on individual questions and would not consider an appeal. After the teacher raised questions four times, the authority continued to insist that the question had been set correctly, but did not explain its reasoning.
《集誌社》 approached the HKEAA and accounting scholars for comment. The authority said that after receiving the inquiry, it had reviewed the question’s reference answer, which was accepted by the chair of the paper and the markers after review. It stressed that there had been no unusual circumstances during the marking process, but did not repeat that the question had been set without error. Zhaoyang Gu, a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong’s accounting school, described the question as having been set with “flaws” and said the reference answer was unreasonable.
DSE 文憑試放榜在即，有企業、會計與財務概論科目（下稱企會財科）導師發現，去年文憑試一條題目的答案疑出錯，向考評局查詢，表明擔心使用者沿用錯誤概念影響學習、要求局方覆核。局方最初回覆稱「不評論個別題目」、「不考慮上訴」，老師四度質疑下，仍堅持「設題正確無誤」但沒解釋理據。
《集誌社》向考評局和會計學學者查詢。局方指收到查詢後，已檢視題目參考答案，經檢視後獲試卷主席及閱卷員接納，強調閱卷過程未有異常情況，但未有再提「設題無誤」。中大會計學院教授顧朝陽則形容該題目出題「有缺陷」，參考答案不合理。
29 Jun 2025HK01#6965
張沛松中學深圳交流團2女生酒店走廊遭4醉漢騷擾 教育局促交報告
Students from Cheung Pei Shan Memorial College in Tseung Kwan O travelled to Shenzhen on an exchange trip last week. During the trip, two Secondary 5 girls were approached, filmed and harassed in a hotel corridor by four drunk guests staying on the same floor. “The drunk men gradually formed a semicircle around the two girls.” The students immediately called an accompanying teacher for help, but no one answered. Another school’s teacher intervened 15 minutes later and helped them out of the situation. A friend of one of the girls said that, afterwards, teachers “scolded” the girls for talking to strangers, leaving them dissatisfied. The friend hoped the school would explain what happened and make improvements.
The school said it was aware of the incident and was following up. The vice-principal said teachers had provided emotional support that night and advised the students on how to respond to and handle similar incidents.
The Education Bureau said it had contacted the school concerned and the organising body to understand the incident, and had asked the school to follow up further and submit an investigation report.
將軍澳張沛松紀念中學學生上周到深圳交流，期間2名中五女學生在酒店走廊，被4名住同層醉漢住客搭訕並拍片騷擾，「期間，醉酒男子逐漸以半圓形圍住兩名女同學」。她們即時致電向同行老師求助，卻無人接聽，15分鐘後始有另一學校教師介入為她們解圍。一名女學生的朋友透露，事後教師「責駡」女生與陌生人交談，令他們感不滿，冀校方解釋事件及作改善。
校方稱已知悉並跟進事件，副校長表示，當晚教師有作出情緒支援，並提點學生如何面對和處理類似事件。
教育局表示，已聯絡有關學校和承辦機構了解事件，並要求學校進一步跟進事件和提交調查報告。
28 Jun 2025獨媒#6960
中學生辯論比賽被荃新天地取消借場 急向中大借場獲批後再收回許可
The Zhishan Cup—Hong Kong-wide Cantonese Debate Competition for Secondary Students, now in its third edition, was scheduled to hold its grand final and prize presentation ceremony on Saturday (28th). However, Citywalk cancelled the venue booking several days ago, citing “emergency safety maintenance works”. The organising committee then contacted The Chinese University of Hong Kong as an alternative venue and initially obtained the university’s approval to use it. After the university sought further details about the competition, it withdrew the approval, and the grand final will have to be postponed.
已舉行三屆的「至善盃——全港中學生粵語辯論比賽」原定周六（28日）舉行總決賽暨頒獎典禮，但在數日前被荃新天地以「緊急安全維修工程」為由，取消借場。比賽籌委會稱，隨即聯絡中文大學作備選場地，原獲得校方借出場地的許可，然而大學在查詢更多比賽的詳情後，收回場地借出許可，總決賽需延期舉行。
13 Jun 2025集誌社#6909
學聯風波｜會址無人、沒貼解散聲明 賴卓賢：學聯不止一次被冒認
A purported “same-day dissolution statement” issued in the name of the Hong Kong Federation of Students (HKFS) circulated on Wednesday afternoon (11th). It said HKFS Council chairman and Lingnan University Students’ Union member Lai Cheuk-yin, along with Ng Tai-lam and others, had been arrested on charges including theft, and alleged that the two had changed the signatories to the HKFS bank account without authorisation and would dissolve HKFS that day. After the statement was issued, Lai said that evening that the seal on it was forged. The Collective visited HKFS’s former office in Mong Kok on Thursday (12th), but found no one inside. Lai reiterated in an interview that someone had impersonated HKFS in issuing the statement, and that this was not the first time someone had impersonated the federation. He did not rule out reporting the matter to the police. Responding to questions about HKFS’s recognition and legitimacy, he said that, including its response to the fake statement, it was still consulting student organisations at other institutions, and he did not believe HKFS had lost its role or standing.
周三（11日）下午流傳一紙以香港專上學生聯會（學聯）名義發出的「即日解散聲明」，指學聯代表會主席、嶺大學生會賴卓賢、吳泰霖等涉盜竊等罪名被捕，指兩人人未經學聯批准，更改學聯戶口簽名，要即日解散學聯。該聲明發出後，賴卓賢即晚表明，有關聲明印章屬假冒。《集誌社》周四（12日）到訪學聯原本位於旺角的會址，無人在內。賴卓賢受訪時重申，有人假冒學聯發聲明，且非首次有人冒認，不排除報警。他回應學聯認受性問題指，包括今次就假聲明回應在內，仍有諮詢其他院校學生組織意見，不認為學聯已失卻角色地位。
11 Jun 2025Yahoo#6892
教育局更新小學英語課程指引 減少默書操練 加強國安教育
The Education Bureau has updated the Primary English Language Curriculum Guide, with a focus on Values Education. It aims to foster students’ national identity and awareness of national security. The bureau also said schools should regularly review and simplify the frequency and quantity of English dictations, tests and examinations, and that dictation results should account for no more than 10% of the English subject grade.
The updated guide is 290 pages long and sets out key curriculum focuses, including strengthening assessment literacy. The Education Bureau said schools should regularly review and simplify the frequency and quantity of English dictations, tests and examinations, and that dictation results should account for no more than 10% of the English subject grade. It said it did not recommend devoting lessons to dictation or examination drills, as this might not effectively consolidate students’ knowledge. The bureau suggested avoiding paper-and-pencil assessments during the first few months of Primary One to provide a pressure-free environment for learning English, and cancelling or avoiding mechanical English grammar drills for upper primary pupils so as not to affect their interest in learning English.
教育局更新《小學英國語文課程指引》，其中重點包括「價值觀教育」（Values Education），希望培養學生的國民身份認同與國家安全意識。此外，教育局指，校方應定期檢討及簡化英文默書及測考頻率及數量，當中默書成績不應佔逾 10% 英文科成績。
教育局更新《小學英國語文課程指引》，長達 290 頁，列出課程重點，其中包括加強「評估素養」。教育局指，學校應定期檢討及簡化英文默書及測考頻率及數量，當中默書成績不應佔逾 10% 英文科成績。教育局表示，並不建議課堂集中在默書和為考試操練，認為這樣未必能有效鞏固學生知識。教育局認為，小一首幾個月避免紙筆評估，以提供無壓力環境學習英文，並取消或避免高小生機械化操練英文文法，以免影響其學英文的興趣。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
