HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

Search the archive

Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.

Results JSON

Statistics

1matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
0
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
0
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
0
Apr 23
0
May 23
0
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
0
Aug 23
1
Sep 23
0
Oct 23
0
Nov 23
0
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
0
Feb 24
0
Mar 24
0
Apr 24
0
May 24
0
Jun 24
0
Jul 24
0
Aug 24
0
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
0
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
0
Oct 25
0
Nov 25
0
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

Results 1

匿名Clear all
Showing 1-1 of 1 recordsEN
19 Sept 2023獨媒#8383

Clinic Hit by Tear Gas in 2019; Doctor Seeks Over HK$6.72 Million from Police as High Court Rejects Anonymity for Three Officers

2019年診所受催淚彈波及 醫生向警索償逾672萬 高院拒批准3名涉事警員匿名

On November 18, 2019, during a police operation to surround Polytechnic University, police fired tear gas. An ear, nose and throat doctor at a clinic in Tsim Sha Tsui alleged that officers mistakenly fired a tear-gas canister into the premises, causing a fire and damage to equipment. The doctor filed a claim against the Commissioner of Police in the High Court the year before last, seeking more than HK$6.72 million in damages. The Department of Justice applied for anonymity orders for the three officers involved. In a decision handed down by the High Court on Tuesday (19th), the court said the claim concerned allegations that the officers had abused their powers, making their ranks, identification numbers, duties at the time and orders relevant to the case. It also said existing laws, including injunctions against doxxing police officers and the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, were sufficient to protect the officers from doxxing, and ultimately refused to grant anonymity.

2019年11月18日,警方在圍堵理大行動期間發射催淚彈,尖沙咀一間診所的耳鼻喉科醫生指稱警員誤將催淚彈射進其單位,導致起火及設備損毁,前年入稟高院向警務處長索償逾672萬元。律政司替3名涉事警員申請匿名令,高院周二(19日)頒下決定,指是次申索關乎他們被指控濫用權力,因此警員職級、編號、當時職務及指令於本案而言是重要,加上現行法律包括針對「起底」警員的禁制令及個人資料私隱條例,已足夠保護涉事警員免受「起底」,最終拒絕批准匿名。

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.