HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

Search the archive

Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.

Results JSON

Statistics

2matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
0
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
0
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
0
Apr 23
0
May 23
0
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
0
Aug 23
0
Sep 23
0
Oct 23
0
Nov 23
0
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
1
Feb 24
0
Mar 24
0
Apr 24
0
May 24
0
Jun 24
0
Jul 24
1
Aug 24
0
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
0
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
0
Oct 25
0
Nov 25
0
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

Results 2

李立峯Clear all
Showing 1-2 of 2 recordsEN
30 Aug 2024法庭線#3986

Stand News case|Lee Lap-fung says verdict sets boundaries for media “but does not mean they are clear”; King Wa Fu believes media will be even more cautious in future

《立場》案|李立峯指判決為傳媒定界線「但唔等於好清晰」 傅景華相信傳媒日後更步步為營

In the case in which Stand News was charged with “conspiracy to publish seditious publications”, former editor-in-chief Chung Pui-kuen and former acting editor-in-chief Lam Siu-tung were found guilty on Thursday (29). Judge Kwok Wai-kin ruled that Stand News advocated localism and, amid a heated political atmosphere, published 11 seditious articles with the intention of advocating and inciting the public to oppose the Central Government, among other things. Lee Lap-fung, a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong’s School of Journalism and Communication, said all the articles at issue were strongly critical of the government and regarded as lacking a factual basis. He said their “objective effect was to draw certain boundaries”, but this did not mean the boundaries were clear, as whether an article had a factual basis remained a subjective judgement. The judge’s view that the media should not continue reporting opposing views when public sentiment was surging also differed from the general understanding of the media’s role in reflecting public sentiment. Professor King Wa Fu of the University of Hong Kong’s Centre for Journalism and Media Studies said there was no consensus in academia on Stand News’s political stance and that he “did not quite understand” the basis for the court’s finding that Stand News advocated localism. He also believed that media outlets might have to be more mindful in future of whether their own outlets could be regarded as having a political ideology, and act with greater caution.

《立場新聞》被控「串謀發布煽動刊物」案,前總編輯鍾沛權及前署任總編輯林紹桐,周四(29 日)被裁定罪成。法官郭偉健裁定《立場》主張本土主義,在政治氣氛熾熱之時,發布 11 篇煽動文章,鼓吹和煽惑群眾對抗中央政府等煽動意圖。 中大新聞與傳播學院教授李立峯認為,觸礁的全為強烈批判政府、被視為沒事實基礎的文章,「客觀效果係去劃一啲界線」,但不代表界線清晰,文章何謂有事實基礎,仍是主觀判斷;法官認為傳媒不應在民情洶湧時繼續報道反對意見,亦與一般對傳媒反映民情的理解「有出入」。 港大新聞及傳媒研究中心教授傅景華則關注,學術界對《立場》的政治立場沒定論,「不太明白」法庭裁定《立場》主張本土主義的基礎;他亦相信媒體日後可能要顧及自身媒體會否被視為有政治理念,更步步為營。

28 Feb 2024光傳媒#3063

‘The China Project’ interviews Lee Lap-fung on Article 23 legislation: journalists more concerned about ‘sedition offence’ and ‘fake news law’; watchdog role already in a grey area

「The China Project」李立峰專訪談23條立法:記者更擔心「煽動罪」、「假新聞法」 履行監察政府角色已處於灰色地帶

Lee Lap-fung, a professor at the School of Journalism and Communication of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, recently spoke to The China Project about the impact of Article 23 of the Basic Law on Hong Kong’s media. He said journalists were more concerned about the ‘sedition offence’ and ‘fake news law’, and would find it difficult to stay completely out of grey areas, or might even have to enter them. On media self-censorship, he said this was ethical self-censorship: if sources remained in authoritarian countries, they had to be regarded as vulnerable groups, and journalists might even have to soften their criticism of the government or allow sources to read articles before publication in order to protect the sources or interviewees.

中文大學新聞與傳播學院教授李立峯早前接受The China Project(「中國專案」)專訪,談《基本法》第23條對香港媒體的影響,認為記者更擔憂「煽動罪」和「假新聞法」,亦難以完全遠離灰色地帶,甚至要進入灰色地帶。當提及媒體的自我審查問題時,他指出這是基於道德的自我審查,若消息來源仍身處在威權國家,就必須視之為「弱勢群體」,甚至不得不緩和他們對政府的批評或讓他們在發布前閱讀報道文章,以保護消息來源或被訪者。

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.