22 Oct 2025明報#7442
成員曾辦學生會 屬會註冊嶺大未批 編委會引消息質疑設黑名單 校方：按程序處理
Lingnan University required student groups this year to apply for registration with the Office of Student Affairs (OSA) by mid-July. A review of the university’s website found that at least 18 student groups had successfully registered, including the Basic Law Society and the Mainland Students and Scholars Association. The Lingnan University Students’ Union editorial board issued a statement the day before yesterday (20th), citing campus sources questioning whether the university had established a “blacklist” to “block” registration applications from groups proposed by people who had participated in the Students’ Union. A Lingnan student told this newspaper yesterday that their affiliated club had submitted an application in July but had still not received approval. The student believed registration had been obstructed because of their previous participation in a Students’ Union organisation, and had now withdrawn from the club in the hope that the university would approve its registration.
Lingnan University said yesterday that “all departments are handling matters according to established procedures”. It did not directly respond to this newspaper’s enquiries about whether a “blacklist” existed, or the reasons and criteria for compiling such a list. The university reiterated that the Students’ Union was an external organisation and had not been authorised to conduct any activities at the university.
In April, Lingnan University announced that student groups formed in the university’s name during the current academic year had to complete the registration process by 13 July.
The Lingnan University Students’ Union editorial board said in an Instagram post the day before yesterday that some student organisations which had previously operated under the Students’ Union and were still operating—including the Drama Society, Music Society, Philosophy Department Association and Translation Department Association—did not appear on the list of successfully registered groups. editorial board said some student organisations had applied to the university for registration before the deadline but had not received a response.
嶺南大學今年要求學生團體7月中前須向學生事務處（OSA）申請註冊。翻查嶺大網頁，校方公告至少18個學生團體成功註冊，包括基本法學會、內地學生學者聯誼會等。嶺大學生會編委會前日（20日）發文，引述校內消息質疑校方設「黑名單」，「封殺」曾參與學生會者所提出的團體註冊申請。有嶺大生昨向本報稱，其屬會7月已交申請至今未獲批，料因自己曾參與學生會組織而註冊受阻滯，現已退出屬會，盼校方批准該會註冊。
嶺大昨稱「各部門均按既定程序處理」。至於本報查詢「黑名單」是否屬實、編名單原因及標準等，未獲正面回應。嶺大重申學生會為外部組織，未獲授權於大學進行任何活動。
嶺大今年4月公布，今學年以嶺大名義組成的學生團體須於7月13日前完成註冊程序。
嶺大學生會編委會前日在Instagram發文稱，部分以往在學生會轄下運作的學生組織並持續運行中的組織，如戲劇學會、音樂學會、哲學系系會及翻譯系系會等，均未見於已成功註冊的名單。編委會稱部分學生組織限期前已向校方申請註冊，至今未獲回覆。
18 Oct 2025集誌社#7436
封殺莊梅岩｜文匯登評論批「軟對抗」 《我們最快樂》被取消 西九：收投訴詆毁香港，獲文體旅支持
The play We Are the Happiest, which was earlier reported to be facing cancellation before apparently receiving the green light to stage performances in West Kowloon, issued a cancellation notice this morning (18th). It said that shortly after 9am, it received written notification from the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority that the performances had been cancelled, but that the authority did not state why they had to be halted. Playwright Candace Chong, who had earlier posted about being “banned”, shared the notice this morning with the words, “The elephant. Is here.” One of the actors, Anthony Wong, wrote that people should “not be sad and not despair”.
The pro-establishment newspaper Wen Wei Po has published two commentaries in recent days accusing Candace Chong of engaging in “soft resistance” and “inciting social confrontation”. In response to enquiries, the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority said it had recently received numerous complaints alleging that We Are the Happiest promoted confrontation and denigrated Hong Kong. “Out of prudence”, it considered the play unsuitable for performance at West Kowloon venues. The authority also said it had consulted the Culture, Sports and Tourism Bureau and cancelled the venue rental with its support and agreement.
早前一度傳出將「被取消」、再獲開「綠燈」於西九演出的舞台劇《我們最快樂》，今早（18日）發「取消公告」，指於今早九時多收到西九文化局書面通知「演出被取消」，對方未有提及演出需中止原因；早前發文揭「被封殺」的編劇莊梅岩今晨分享公告，並寫上 “The elephant. Is here.” 。演員之一黃秋生則發文指「不要難過，不要絕望」。
建制報章《文匯報》近日兩度登評論文章批莊梅岩「搞軟對抗」、「煽動社會對立」。西九文化區管理局回覆查詢指，近日收到不少投訴，「稱舞台劇《我們最快樂》宣揚對抗，詆毁香港」，「慎重起見」認為不適合在西九場地演出；管理局又指經徵詢文化體育及旅遊局並獲支持和同意，而取消場地租賃。
17 Oct 2025追光者#7432
桂民海被擄10周年 90個國際人權組織發聲明指中共違國際法、侵犯瑞典主權
Today (the 17th) marks the 10th anniversary of the “disappearance” of Swedish citizen bookseller and former Causeway Bay Books shareholder Gui Minhai. He was taken away in Thailand in 2015, subsequently brought to China, and sentenced to 10 years in 2020. Reporters Without Borders and 90 press freedom and human rights organisations earlier issued a joint statement calling on the authorities to release him immediately. Amnesty International said the Chinese Communist Party’s abduction and conviction of Gui completely violated international law and served as a chilling warning to anyone who publishes or writes content that does not meet the government’s censorship standards.
Gui Minhai, a former shareholder of Causeway Bay Books, was taken away by Chinese government personnel in Thailand in October 2015 and subsequently detained by the Chinese Communist Party. He once “confessed” on a China Central Television programme. Familiar to Hong Kong people, Causeway Bay Books was known for selling books about Chinese leaders and political scandals involving the Chinese Communist Party. Most of these books were “banned books” in mainland China, and many Chinese readers used to visit the bookstore to buy them.
今天（17日）是瑞典籍書商、銅鑼灣書店前股東桂民海「被失蹤」10周年，2015年他在泰國被帶走，其後被押往中國，2020年被重判10年。無國界記者早前與90個新聞自由及人權組織發表聯合聲明，呼籲當局立即釋放他。國際特赦組織則指出，中共對桂的綁架和定罪，完全違反國際法，對出版或撰寫不符合政府審查標準內容的人而言，是不寒而慄的警示。
銅鑼灣書店前股東桂民海在2015年10月於泰國被中國政府人員帶走，其後遭中共拘禁，曾在中央電視台節目上「認罪」。港人熟悉的銅鑼灣書店以出售有關中國領導人和中共政治醜聞的書籍聞名，這些書在中國境內大部分都是「禁書」，當年不少中國讀者都會到此書店買書。
17 Oct 2025追光者#7433
香港監察報告：高度自治蕩然無存 中國利用香港作白手套
Hong Kong Watch has released a report on China’s use of Hong Kong’s special status under its “high degree of autonomy” to pursue diplomatic and economic interests. It says Hong Kong’s autonomy is “simply no more” under the National Security Law and related “patriotic” institutional reforms, and reveals that Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices have been used to assist China’s transnational repression. Hong Kong Watch urged the international community to reassess whether to continue maintaining Hong Kong’s special treatment and use it as leverage to pressure China to restore its commitments to autonomy.
Hong Kong Watch presented the report, titled “The Limits of Autonomy: a review of Hong Kong’s special status under ‘one country, two systems’,” at the European Parliament. It analyses in detail how China has undermined Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy while manipulating the preferential treatment and special status Hong Kong receives internationally, using it as a front to pursue its own interests.
香港監察（Hong Kong Watch）最新發布一份有關中國利用香港「高度自治」特殊地位謀取外交及經濟利益的報告，指出香港的高度自治在《國安法》及相關的「愛國化」制度改革下已蕩然無存（simply no more），報告更揭露香港經濟貿易辦事處已被利用於協助中國進行跨境鎮壓。香港監察呼籲國際社會重新檢視，是否繼續維持香港的特殊待遇，並以此作為籌碼施壓中國恢復其自治承諾 。
香港監察在歐洲議會發表一份題為《The Limits of Autonomy: a review of Hong Kong’s special status under ‘one country, two systems’》的報告，詳細分析中國如何一面破壞香港的高度自治 ，同時操縱（manipulate）其在國際上獲得的優惠待遇與特殊地位，以其為白手套為自身謀取利益 。
17 Oct 2025集誌社#7435
新聞自由指數｜從歷史低位輕微回升 記協：仍處極低位，傳媒自我審查嚴重
The Hong Kong Journalists Association today (17th) released its 2024 Press Freedom Index. The industry’s score rose slightly from its historic low in 2023 to 28.9, ending a five-year consecutive decline. “Media self-censorship” received the lowest score, reflecting news practitioners’ view that the phenomenon is very widespread and causes the greatest harm to press freedom. The association stressed that the figure remains extremely low and does not indicate any substantive improvement in the current state of press freedom, but only that it has not deteriorated significantly in recent times. It estimated that the rise was related to news practitioners becoming accustomed to working in the current news environment and finding ways to respond to the challenges.
香港記者協會今（17日）公布 2024 年新聞自由指數，業界評分從 2023 年歷史低位，輕微回升至 28.9 分，終止連續五年跌勢，其中「傳媒自我審查」得分最低，反映新聞從業員認為現象相當普遍、對新聞自由構成最大損害。記協強調，數字仍處極低位，不反映新聞自由現況有實質改善，只是近來未顯著惡化，估計回升原因與新聞從業員習慣了在當前新聞環境工作、及尋找方法應對挑戰有關。
16 Oct 2025Yahoo#7429
美國FCC擬撤香港電訊業務許可 指有國安風險 彭博：受長和巴拿馬港口風波牽連
The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced on Wednesday (15th) that it was proposing to revoke the authorisation for HKT, a subsidiary of PCCW, to provide telecommunications services in the United States. It has taken preliminary action by writing to HKT to request reasons why the authorities should not initiate revocation proceedings. The FCC said the move was prompted by its consideration of HKT’s relationship with China Unicom, an entity “controlled by the Chinese Communist Party”, which could pose a national security risk.
The FCC said the aim was to ensure the security of US communications networks.
HKT is currently authorised to operate telecommunications services in the United States, including network connectivity and calls. HKT is a subsidiary of PCCW, owned by Richard Li, the son of Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-shing. China Unicom holds approximately 18% of PCCW, while PCCW holds approximately 52% of HKT.
美國聯邦通訊委員會（FCC）周三（15 日）宣布，擬撤銷電訊盈科旗下香港電訊（HKT） 在美國提供電訊服務業務的許可，已採取初步行動，去信 HKT要求提供當局不應啟動撤銷程序的原因。FCC 指，此舉是考慮到 HKT 與「受中共控制的實體」中國聯通之間的關係，或構成國家安全風險。
FCC：確保美國通訊網路安全
HKT 目前獲準在美國營運電訊業務，包括連接網絡、通話等。HKT 是本港富豪李嘉誠之子李澤楷旗下電訊盈科的子公司，而中國聯通持有約18%電訊盈科；電訊盈科則持有約52%的 HKT。
14 Oct 2025集誌社#7426
港台再下架｜教大發「下架通告」、浸大未能收看、港大館藏「消失」 港台：現沒為機構提供版權豁免
Two years ago, The Collective reported that RTHK’s Podcast One website had removed some programmes, including Headliner and Police Magazine, and had selectively taken down content relating to June 4 and police enforcement. Two years later, the removal campaign has spread further to the holdings of several university libraries. The Education University of Hong Kong recently issued a notice to staff and students stating that, at RTHK’s request, RTHK television programmes in its holdings would be progressively removed and would be “completely removed” by 5 November. The small number of programmes searchable at Hong Kong Baptist University can no longer be viewed, while all the media images in the University of Hong Kong’s digital collections have “disappeared”.
Hong Kong Baptist University said in response to enquiries that its holdings were provided under licences from copyright holders and that, “when the licensing agreement is terminated”, the materials must be removed in accordance with the agreement. It suggested that reporters contact the “relevant copyright holder” for details. In its reply, RTHK did not deny asking universities to remove programmes from their holdings. It also said that its current policy provides programmes from the past 12 months for public catch-up viewing and that it is “currently not providing any institution with a copyright exemption”.
《集誌社》兩年前曾報道，香港電台 Podcast One 網頁下架部分節目如《頭條新聞》、《警訊》等，並選擇性下架部分涉六四、警方執法等節目內容。兩年後，下架潮進一步蔓延至多間大學圖書館的館藏。教育大學日前向師生發通告，指根據港台要求，館藏港台電視節目將逐步下架、須於 11 月 5 日前「全面下架」；浸會大學能搜尋到的少量節目現已未能觀看，至於香港大學數碼典藏的傳媒影像則全數「消失」。
浸大回覆查詢指館藏由版權持有者授權提供，「當授權協議終止」須按協議將資料移除，建議記者向「相關版權持有者」了解。港台回覆時未有否認要求大學下架館藏節目，又指現行政策提供過往 12 個月節目供市民重溫，「現時沒有為任何機構提供版權豁免」。
13 Oct 2025Yahoo#7418
中大揭過百宗懷疑假學歷申請 梁振英質疑有無漏網之魚：香港這鍋粥就這樣壞了
Leung Chun-ying, vice-chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, who has been keen to comment on current affairs since stepping down as chief executive, has again spoken out about students using fake academic qualifications to apply to Hong Kong universities. He said such falsification affects Hong Kong’s reputation and credibility nationwide and internationally, and that the issue of forged documents must be dealt with seriously.
The Chinese University of Hong Kong admitted nearly 900 non-local students in the current academic year. During the application process, it intercepted hundreds of suspected fake-qualification applications, a sharp increase from last year. Wong Ka-chit, director of the university’s Admissions and Student Financial Aid Office, stressed that the university was very cautious in handling such cases and would not consider an application if there were any doubts. Wong said the applicants were all outside Hong Kong and were not Hong Kong residents, so he believed it would also be difficult for police to enforce the law; consequently, the university did not report the cases to police after intercepting them.
卸任特首後熱衷評論時政的全國政協副主席梁振英，再次就學生以假學歷報讀本港大學發聲。他認為，學生造假影響香港在全國乃至在國際社會的聲譽和可信度，必須嚴肅處理假文書問題。
香港中文大學今個學年錄取近 900 名非本地生，在處理申請期間共堵截數百宗懷疑假學歷申請，比去年急增。中大入學及學生資助處處長王家徹強調，大學在處理相關個案時十分謹慎，如有懷疑都不會考慮。王又稱申請人均不在港及非香港居民，相信警方也難以執法，故在堵截後未有報警。
13 Oct 2025HK01#7419
假學歷報大學｜港大接獲數百宗疑持假學歷入讀申請 無個案獲錄取
Hong Kong universities recently saw multiple cases involving non-local students suspected of applying for admission with “fake academic qualifications”. Following the Chinese University of Hong Kong, the University of Hong Kong said today (13th) that it had also received hundreds of cases in the current academic year involving non-local students suspected of applying for admission with false academic qualifications. None of the relevant applicants received offers of admission.
本港大學早前爆出多宗非本地生涉嫌以「假學歷」申請入學的事件。繼中文大學後，香港大學今日（13日）表示，校方在本學年亦接獲數百宗懷疑憑虛假學歷申請入讀的非本地生個案，當中並沒有相關個案獲得錄取通知。
10 Oct 2025光傳媒#7410
聯合國《禁止酷刑公約》報告 港府遲交逾五年 2019年反修例事件卸責
The Hong Kong Government was originally due to submit a report to the United Nations Committee against Torture (CAT) in December 2019 on the implementation of the Convention against Torture in Hong Kong. It submitted the report more than five years late and published its contents today (the 10th). The Government did not explain the delay. In the report, it referred to the 2019 anti-extradition bill movement, stressing that guidelines on police use of force complied with international human rights standards, and claimed that “if members of the public express their views peacefully and lawfully, the police do not need to use any force to maintain public order.”
In November 2015, CAT reviewed the implementation of the Convention in Hong Kong, at a time marking the first anniversary of the end of the 2014 Umbrella Movement. The committee expressed particular concern about the excessive use of tear gas, batons and pepper spray by police during the movement, which resulted in about 500 people being injured. CAT recommended that the Hong Kong Government conduct an independent investigation into allegations of excessive use of force by police, prosecute personnel involved in accordance with the law, and make public the guidelines on police use of force. CAT required the Government to submit a progress report by 9 December 2019, but the Government did not consult the public on the outline of the report until February 2021; during that period, there was no apparent public or Legislative Council discussion of the matter.
香港政府原定於2019年12月向聯合國禁止酷刑委員會（United Nations Committee against Torture, CAT）提交報告，交代《禁止酷刑公約》在香港的實施情況，但港府遲逾5年才向CAT提交報告，並於今日（10日）公布報告內容。港府未有解釋遲交原因，並在報告中提及2019年反修例運動，強調警方武力使用指引符合國際人權規範，聲稱「如果市民以和平守法的方式表達意見，警方無需使用任何武力維持治安」。
2015年11月，CAT曾審查《公約》在港執行情況，當時正值2014年雨傘運動結束一周年。委員會特別關注警方在運動期間過度使用催淚彈、警棍及胡椒噴霧，導致約500人受傷。CAT建議港府就警方過度使用武力的指控進行獨立調查、依法起訴涉事人員，並公開警方使用武力的準則。CAT當時要求港府須於2019年12月9日前提交進度報告，惟港府至2021年2月才就報告大綱諮詢公眾，期間未見公眾或立法會就此事展開討論。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
