21 Jul 2025集誌社#7066
721 六年｜ 721 投訴 廉署：仍在調查 其他反修例懷疑公務員貪污個案 全部不成立
Six years after the Yuen Long attack on 21 July 2019, the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) set up a special investigation team in August 2019 to handle suspected corruption cases related to the anti-extradition bill movement, saying it would seriously follow up on complaints concerning the 721 incident. The Collective has found that the relevant “Special Duties Unit” disappeared from the government telephone directory in mid-2022. The ICAC did not directly answer whether the team had been disbanded, saying only that it reviews staffing from time to time and makes appropriate deployments when necessary. Asked about the progress and outcome of the investigation into the 721 incident, the ICAC said the case was “still under investigation” and that it would not comment, adding that all cases would be handled in accordance with established procedures and the law. As for other suspected corruption cases involving civil servants related to the anti-extradition bill movement, the ICAC said it had “completed the investigations”, indicating that all the allegations lacked substantive supporting evidence. After reporting the matter to the Advisory Committee on the Review of Corruption Complaints, the committee agreed that all the complaints were unsubstantiated.
721 元朗襲擊事件發生六年，廉政公署 2019 年 8 月曾成立特別調查小組，專責處理與反修例有關的懷疑貪污個案，稱會嚴肅跟進 721 事件的投訴。《集誌社》發現，相關「特別職務組」於 2022 年中已從政府電話簿消失。小組到底是否已解散？廉政公署未有正面回覆，僅表示會不時檢討人手，在有需要時作出適當調配。721 事件的調查進度及結果又如何？廉署指個案「仍在調查」，不會作任何評論，廉署會依法按既定程序處理所有個案。至於其他與反修例有關的懷疑公務員貪污個案，廉署則稱「已完成調查」，顯示所有指控均欠缺實質證據支持，經向審查貪污舉報諮詢委員會匯報後，委員會同意投訴全部不成立。
21 Jul 2025集誌社#7067
721 六年｜紅紗布被沒收 女長毛指警稱或違國安法 市民穿黑衫到場「見證」
Today marks six years since the 7.21 incident. At 3:45pm, police deployed tactical buses and riot vehicles outside Yuen Long Station, and separately sent around a dozen uniformed and plain-clothes officers to patrol inside the station. Some residents wearing black shirts printed with the words “It is always the right time to do the right thing” arrived at Yuen Long Station at dusk. While observing events inside the station in the afternoon, a reporter was stopped and questioned by police, and was released after providing registration details.
今日是 721 事件六年，警方於下午 3 時 45 分，在元朗站外部署戰術巴士、衝鋒車，另分別派約十多名軍裝、便衣警員在站內巡邏。有市民身穿印上「做對的事永遠都是時候」字句的黑色衫，在黃昏來到元朗站。記者下午於站內觀察期間，一度被警員截查，登記資料後獲放行。
21 Jul 2025集誌社#7068
721 六年｜伯明翰港人辦街頭展 盼「說真香港故事」連結英國社群
Six years after the Yuen Long 721 attack, Hongkongers overseas organised commemorative gatherings in various places around the world. Unlike previous years, however, no Hongkonger organisations in Manchester or London formally initiated public activities this year. In Birmingham, a central English city, Hongkongers held activities on Sunday afternoon (the 20th) and Monday evening (the 21st), local time. Among them, “a group of Hongkongers opposing authoritarianism and the UK-based Hongkongers’ Prisoners’ Rights Concern Group” organised a “Tell the True Hong Kong Story” street exhibition in the city centre, saying it hoped to “restore a history that has been smeared and awaken the collective conscience”.
元朗 721 襲擊事件 6 年，全球多地都有海外港人發起集會紀念，但有別於以往，英國曼徹斯特及倫敦今年未有港人組織正式發起公眾活動。至於在中部城市伯明翰（Birmingham），則有港人在當時時間周日（20日）下午及周一（21日）傍晚發起活動。其中「一群對抗極權的港人及移英港人囚權關注組」，在當地市中心舉辦「說真香港故事」街頭展覽，指希望「還原被抹黑歷史、喚醒集體良知」。
19 Jul 2025獨媒#7061
工權會出新書 有工傷家屬學習工程與法律知識盼尋真相
The Association for the Rights of Industrial Accident Victims has published a new book, *The Rest of Life — Visible Industrial Tragedy Figures, Unfinished Life Stories*, following its publication earlier this year of *Nine Thousand Feathers — A Chronicle of Hong Kong’s Industrial Tragedy Movement*. The new book, written by veteran journalist Eva Sik Chee Chan, features interviews with families of industrial accident victims. Self-published by the association, it is also available at the Pan-China Distribution booth at the Hong Kong Book Fair.
工業傷亡權益會繼年初出版《九千鴻毛——香港工殤運動紀要》，近日再出版新書《餘生——看得見的工殤數字 未說完的生命故事》，由資深新聞工作者陳惜姿主筆，訪問了工傷者家屬。新書由工權會自資出版，在香港書展泛華發行的攤位亦有售。
18 Jul 2025明報#7057
嶺大：學生會未獲授權使用「嶺南大學」名稱 強調雙方無關係
Lingnan University recently issued a statement saying that the Lingnan University Student Union is an external organisation registered under the Societies Ordinance. It has not been authorised to conduct any activities on campus and is not provided with any sponsorship, venues or facilities by the university. The university stressed that it has no affiliation, relationship or connection with the Student Union. Regarding the union’s use of the name “Lingnan University”, the university said it had not received any support, consent or authorisation.
The university said it had in recent years repeatedly found that the Student Union, members of its executive committee and/or its affiliated bodies, including but not limited to its Editorial Board, had engaged in certain conduct and made certain statements that were inconsistent with Lingnan’s core values, mission, vision, overall purpose and objectives. The statements and conduct had attracted significant concern within the university community, damaged the university’s reputation and might give rise to legal risks.
The university clarified that although the Student Union’s name includes the words “Lingnan University”, it had not been recognised by or affiliated with the university. It hoped to prevent the public from mistakenly believing that any conduct or statements by the union had the university’s endorsement or represented the university’s views and position.
Earlier this year, Lingnan University asked the Student Union to sign the “Lingnan University Student Union Undertaking”, stating that the union and organisations under it must “abide by the law and observe university regulations”, including refraining from conduct that would damage the university’s reputation, failing which they would be prohibited from using the name “Lingnan University”. In April this year, the university said the undertaking had formally taken effect on 20 January and decided to formally cease all negotiations with the Student Union concerning the undertaking with immediate effect. It also required students wishing to establish student societies to apply to the Student Affairs Office and sign the “Student Leaders Charter” in order to gain access to resources provided by the university.
嶺南大學日前發聲明，稱嶺南大學學生會為根據《社團條例》註冊的外部組織，未獲授權於校內進行任何活動，亦不獲校方提供任何贊助、場地或設施，強調校方與學生會無任何隸屬關係，亦不存在任何關係或聯繫。對於學生會使用「嶺南大學」名稱，校方指未獲任何支持、同意或授權。
嶺大於聲明中表示，校方近年多次發現，學生會、其幹事會成員及或其屬下機構，包括但不限於該會編輯委員會，曾作出某些行為及發表某些言論，與嶺大的核心價值、使命、願景及整體宗旨與目標不符，有關言論及行為已引起大學社群高度關注，損害大學聲譽，並可能構成法律風險。
校方澄清，雖然學生會名稱包含「嶺南大學」字樣，其並未獲大學認可或與大學有關聯，期望避免公眾誤以為該會的任何行為或言論獲大學認可，或代表大學的觀點與立場。
嶺大今年較早時曾要求學生會簽署《嶺南大學學生會承諾書》，聲明學生會及其轄下組織須「奉公守法，遵守校規」，包括不作損害校譽行為等，否則禁用「嶺大」名稱等。校方於今年4月指，《承諾書》已於1月20日正式生效，並決定即日起正式停止與學生會進行所有有關承諾書的協商，同時要求有意成立學生社團的學生需向學生事務處申請，並簽署《學生領袖約章》，方可獲得校方所提供的資源使用權。
18 Jul 2025集誌社#7058
無處不閱讀｜「大書展」以外 獨立書商的新書推介 吳靄儀：這小書展特別有意義⋯⋯
The “Reading Everywhere” independent publishing book fair and independent bookstore festival, held at Hunter Bookstore on Ki Lung Street in Sham Shui Po, entered its second day today (18th) in the rain. Footfall at noon was not particularly high, which store manager Wong Man-huen believed was related to the weather. Cartoonist Zunzi and former Legislative Council member Margaret Ng also arrived in succession to show their support. Ng said independent bookstores and publishers should definitely be supported, adding that they are a Hong Kong characteristic. Several bookstores and publishers said sales were good so far.
於深水埗基隆街的獵人書店舉行「無處不閱讀」獨立出版書展暨獨立書店祭今（ 18 日）在雨中進入第二天，中午人流不算多，獵人書店店長黃文萱相信，與天氣有關。漫畫家尊子和前立法會議員吳靄儀亦先後到場支持，吳靄儀說很應該支持獨立書店和出版社，是香港特色。有數間書店和出版社都指，暫時銷情不錯。
17 Jul 2025集誌社#7053
無處不閱讀｜欣賞獨立書店選書視角 參展商：步伐較慢，讀者能靜下來聽介紹書本
The book fair at the Convention and Exhibition Centre opened yesterday (the 16th). Hunter Bookstore, located on Ki Lung Street in Sham Shui Po, was also stepping up preparations, bringing in boxes of books under the scorching sun. At noon, a reporter pointed out that the metal shutter had not yet been fully raised. As shop manager Wong Man-hyun reached out, photographers immediately raised their cameras to capture the moment. Wong turned back awkwardly and said with a laugh, “I’m not tall enough.” She called over another person in charge, Wayne, who gave it a gentle push. The words “Hunter Bookstore” appeared in the sunlight, and the third Independent Book Fair officially opened.
會展的書展昨日（16日）開幕，坐落深水埗基隆街的獵人書店，亦加快腳步，烈日下，運來一箱箱書籍。正午時分，有記者提醒獵人書店，鐵閘還未完整拉起，店長黃文萱伸手之際，攝影記者們立刻舉機捕捉這刻，黃文萱尷尬地回頭，笑說：「我唔夠高添。」她找來另一位負責人Wayne 輕輕一推，「獵人書店」四字展示在日光之下，第三屆獨立書展正式開幕。
今年至少有三間獨立出版社，不獲貿發局批準參加位於灣仔會展的書展，獵人書店則聯同 14 間出版社，一連四日（17日至20日）舉辦「無處不閱讀、獨立出版書展暨獨立書店祭」，全港多間獨立書店亦響應，舉辦新書發布會等活動。
16 Jul 2025Yahoo#7050
WSJ 評論文章質疑不人道覊押黎智英 港府強烈譴責媒體罔顧事實
Mark L. Clifford, author of The Jimmy Lai Story, wrote in yesterday’s (15th) Wall Street Journal commenting on the case in which Next Digital founder Jimmy Lai is charged with “conspiracy to collude with foreign forces”. He described the case as posing a growing danger to the reputation of Hong Kong and China. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government issued a press release today strongly condemning various US and Western institutions and media outlets for once again disregarding the facts and smearing and defaming the SAR Government.
“Various media outlets intend to obstruct judicial fairness”
Clifford, a former editor-in-chief of the South China Morning Post and director of Next Media, and now chairman of the Hong Kong Free Fund Committee, wrote a commentary in the Wall Street Journal titled “The Extremely Dangerous Pressure of the Jimmy Lai Case”. The article said that 77-year-old Jimmy Lai was spending another summer in Hong Kong, and that Hong Kong should seek a way out of a situation posing a growing danger to its own reputation and that of China.
《黎智英傳》作者祁福德 （Mark L. Clifford）在昨日（15 日）的《華爾街日報》撰文，評論壹傳媒創辦人黎智英被控「串謀勾結外國勢力」案件，形容案件已對香港以至中國的聲譽帶來與日俱增的危險。特區政府今日發出新聞稿，強烈譴責美西方不同機構及媒體近日再次罔顧事實、抹黑詆毀特區府。
「不同媒體意圖妨礙司法公正」
曾任《南華日報》總編輯、壹傳媒董事，現為香港自由基金委員會主席的祁福德，在《華爾街日報》撰寫評論文章，題為「黎智英案的極度危險壓力」。文章指，現年 77 歲的黎智英正在香港渡過另一個夏天，香港應該為一個對自已以至中國聲譽帶來與日俱增的危險的境地尋找出路。
15 Jul 2025中央社CAN#7041
中國駐港公署罕見點名外媒 批BBC日經新聞抹黑香港國安法
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs Office of the Commissioner in Hong Kong issued a statement today naming and criticising foreign media including BBC Chinese and Japan’s Nikkei, accusing them of “deliberately smearing the Hong Kong National Security Law” and urging the media concerned “not to fabricate lies”. It also expressed strong condemnation.
The office unusually named BBC Chinese and Nikkei, accusing them of “clinging to ideological prejudice” and, around the fifth anniversary of the promulgation and implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law, publishing “distorted” reports, commentaries or editorials that “deliberately smear the Hong Kong National Security Law and vilify the successful implementation of ‘one country, two systems’ in Hong Kong”.
The office’s spokesperson also urged the media concerned to “respect the facts and not fabricate lies”, “adhere to fairness and not apply double standards”, and “uphold professional ethics and not mislead public opinion”.
中國外交部駐香港特派員公署今天發文點名批評英國BBC中文網和日本經濟新聞等外媒，「蓄意抹黑香港國安法」，並敦促有關媒體「不要捏造謊言」，同時表示強烈譴責。
駐港公署在文中罕見點名BBC中文網和日本經濟新聞，指它們「固守意識形態偏見」，在香港國安法公布實施5週年之際，發表「歪曲性」報導、評論或社論，「蓄意抹黑香港國安法，詆毀『一國兩制』在港成功實踐」。
透過 Google News
追蹤中央社
駐港公署發言人還稱，敦促有關媒體：「要尊重事實，不要捏造謊言」；「要恪守公正，不要雙重標準」；「要秉持操守，不要誤導輿論」。
15 Jul 2025光傳媒#7043
《明報》︱城市大學限制學者受訪 須事前獲大學審批 外國領事人員到校亦要先報備
Local media regularly interview university scholars about social events and current affairs, seeking professional opinions or comprehensive analysis. A Ming Pao column disclosed that City University of Hong Kong began restricting scholars’ media interviews about two years ago, requiring them to notify the university in advance and obtain approval. A campus source said some scholars “fear the trouble” and simply decline media interviews, adding that activities jointly organised with foreign consulates on campus, or the presence of consular personnel, must also be reported to the university in advance. Guang Media reviewed reports relating to City University over the past 18 months and found that more of them focused on international rankings and research achievements, with fewer responses to social news.
本地傳媒不時會就社會事件、時事議題訪問各院校學者，提供專業意見或作全面剖析。《明報》專欄透露，香港城市大學約兩年前開始限制校內學者接受訪問，規定他們須事先通知校方並獲審批。校內消息人士坦言，部分學者「怕麻煩」索性婉拒傳媒採訪，又指若與外國領事館在校園合辦活動或有領事人員出現，均需事前向學校報備。《光傳媒》翻查過去一年半與城大相關的報道，發現較多聚焦在國際排名及研究成果，較少回應社會新聞。
《明報》專欄披露，城大約於兩年前實施新規定，要求學者收到傳媒查詢或採訪邀請，需通知大學傳訊及數據研究處，並向大學提交訪問問題。大學可建議學者拒絕訪問；若獲批准，校方也可就應對傳媒策略提出建議，例如回答問題的方向，或某些問題不要回答等。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
