22 Apr 2024獨媒#3405
專頁刪「敏感」內容被問是否「驚」 謝偉俊：僅預防工作
Legislative Council member Paul Tse Wai-chun earlier closed his social media page to review and delete “sensitive” content. He reopened it last Saturday and issued a statement saying that all criticism was intended to raise questions and offer suggestions for improvement, or to advocate policy-making through lawful channels. In an interview this morning on Commercial Radio programme “On a Sunny Day,” host Chan Chi-wan asked him: “Are you afraid? What are you afraid of? Why did you do this?” Tse said that “actually, the word ‘afraid’ cannot be used.” As a lawyer, he said, whenever new legislation is introduced, he reviews whether the actions of individuals, companies and organisations could be affected: “It’s just preventive work, that’s all.”
立法會議員謝偉俊早前關閉社交網站專頁，以審視及刪除「敏感」內容，過去周六重開並發聲明稱，所有批評旨在提出問題及改善意見，或循合法途徑倡議制定政策。謝偉俊今早接受商台節目《在晴朗的一天出發》訪問，主持陳志雲問他：「你驚呀？你驚乜嘢呀？點解會咁做嘅？」謝偉俊就稱「其實唔可以用個驚字」，作為律師每逢有新法例，都會檢視個人、公司及機構所作的事會否有影響：「預防嘅工作咁解啫。」
21 Apr 2024獨媒#3400
謝偉俊專頁重新上架 刪去「敏感」內容
In January, “Red Team” leader and Legislative Council member Paul Tse Wai-chun told John Lee at a Chief Executive’s Question and Answer Session that the Hong Kong government was governing through “legalism, harsh laws and severe penalties” and through Xiaohongshu. Lee criticised his wording, saying it reminded him of “soft resistance” and “reactionary forces” during the 2019 “black violence”. On the 27th of last month, after the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance took effect on the 23rd, Tse took his page offline himself, saying he needed to review and delete “sensitive” content. About a month later, Tse reopened the page yesterday (April 20) and posted a statement saying that all the criticism was intended to raise questions and offer suggestions for improvement, with absolutely no intention of causing anyone to develop hatred, contempt for or disloyalty towards the institutions of the regime.
「紅隊」隊長、立法會議員謝偉俊今年1月，行政長答問大會上向李家超指港府施政「法家治港、嚴刑峻法」，以及「小紅書」治港，遭對方批評其發言用字令他想起2019年「黑暴」時「軟對抗」及「反動力量」。上月27日，即《維護國家安全條例》在23日生效後，謝偉俊自行將專頁下架，稱要審視及刪除「敏感」內容。事隔約一個，謝偉俊昨日（4月20日）重開專頁，並貼出聲明，稱所有批評旨在提出問題及改善建議，絕無意圖令任何人對政權機關產生憎恨、藐視或離叛。
4 Aug 2023光傳媒#8146
陳慶偉以為Fb「專頁」為「專業」 法官行為指引：對社交媒體缺乏認識或予人脫節觀感
In the case involving 47 pro-democracy primary election defendants, when defendant Chan Chi-chuen referred to a Facebook page, the court interpreter rendered 專頁 as “page”. Judge Andrew Hing Wai Chan corrected this to “professional”, meaning 專業. Chan Chi-chuen clarified that he meant “page” as in a page of a book, not “professional”. Judge Chan’s unfamiliarity with Facebook pages sparked heated online discussion. The Judicial Conduct Guide, updated last year, states that a lack of basic understanding of social media may give the impression that a judge is out of touch with modern society.
民主派47人初選案中，被告陳志全提到Facebook專頁時，法庭傳譯員將「專頁」譯作「page」，法官陳慶偉就糾正是「professional，專業」，陳志全澄清是「一頁書的『頁』」，而非「專業」。陳官不識Facebook專頁引起網上熱議，翻查去年更新的《法官行為指引》，註明對社交媒體缺乏基本認識，或會予人法官與現代社會脫節的觀感。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
