6 Nov 2025HK01#7492
提名截止35現屆議員棄選 謝偉俊、洪雯「無聲」出局
The nomination period for the Legislative Council election has ended, with 161 people registering to run. Of the 89 incumbent lawmakers, 35 have opted not to seek re-election, with more than half having served only one term. Six of those who opted out waited until the final moment to decide, all from the Election Committee constituency. Jesse Hailong Shang, Yueheng Tan and Yueming (1957) Chen only confirmed that they would not seek re-election about an hour before the deadline for submitting nomination forms. Leung Yuk-wai issued a “farewell declaration” after the nomination deadline, while Paul Tse and Hung Wan have still made no announcement.
立法會選舉提名期結束，共有161人報名參選，現屆89名議員，有35人放棄競逐連任，起過半數只做了一屆議員。棄選議員當中有6人把懸念留到最後時刻，全部來自選委界。其中尚海龍、譚岳衡與陳月明在交表時間截止前一小時左右，才證實不會再選，梁毓偉在提名限期過後發出「告別宣言」，謝偉俊與洪雯則仍未作任何公布。
22 Aug 2025獨媒#7201
歐盟辦酒會聲援烏克蘭 立法會議員僅得謝偉俊出席
With European and American attention focused recently on Russia-Ukraine peace talks and how to safeguard Europe’s security order after the war, the Office of the European Union to Hong Kong and Macao held a reception today to celebrate Ukraine’s Independence Day, which falls on 24 August. In his speech, the head of the EU Office in Hong Kong, Lo Hau-wai, supported Ukraine’s position, saying that no country should use force to change international borders, and that Ukraine itself must decide on its territory and peace: “It cannot be imposed on Ukraine, nor can it be decided without Ukraine.” The reception was attended by consuls general from Sweden, Italy, Germany, Canada and other countries. Among Legislative Council members, only Paul Tse attended.
歐美的目光近日都落在俄烏和談以及戰後如何確保歐洲安全秩序的問題上。8月24日將是烏克蘭獨立日，歐盟駐香港及澳門辦事處今日舉行慶祝獨立酒會，歐盟駐港辦主任盧效偉致辭支持烏克蘭立場，任何國家不得以武力改變國際邊界，烏克蘭的領土及和平必須由烏克蘭自己做決定，「不能強加於烏克蘭，也不能在沒有烏克蘭的情況下決定」。出席酒會的有瑞典、意大利、德國和加拿大等各國駐港總領事；而立法會議員當中，僅謝偉俊出席。
27 Mar 2025獨媒#6625
張宇人不滿被朱國強「騎劫」議案 謝偉俊輕擲《議事規則》批欺凌兼輸打贏要
Liberal Party Legislative Council member Cheung Yu-yan moved a Members’ motion on “reviewing the effectiveness of small-class teaching in primary and secondary schools” at the Legislative Council meeting this morning. However, after outlining the original motion, Cheung said he was unhappy that an amendment proposed by education-sector Kwok Keung (1958) Chu had “hijacked” it, and said he would not move the motion. Another lawmaker, Tse Wai-chun, raised a point of order, questioning how the debate could have begun but “the President alone can say it may be withdrawn”. Legislative Council President Andrew Leung ultimately ruled that, as Cheung had not indicated that he was withdrawing the motion, the Rules of Procedure meant that the President could not allow the Council to continue debating if the member had not moved it, and announced an adjournment. After hearing the ruling, Tse lightly tossed the Rules of Procedure onto his desk. In a social media post this evening, he criticised Cheung for bullying new lawmakers and being a sore loser.
The Legislative Council held a meeting this morning. Before the meeting, Kwok Keung (1958) Chu had already proposed an amendment to Cheung’s motion, changing it to: “The Chief Executive set a target in the 2022 Policy Address to implement small-class teaching in more than 90% of government-funded primary schools in the 2025-26 school year; the Government achieved the target one year early, thereby enhancing the quality of learning and teaching; this Council urges the Government to conduct a comprehensive review of the effectiveness of small-class teaching and, in view of the learning differences and mental health of secondary school students, assess the feasibility of implementing small-class teaching in secondary schools.”
自由黨立法會議員張宇人今早在立法會大會，提出「檢視中小學以小班模式教學的成效」的議員議案。然而，張宇人在講述原議案後，就稱不滿教育界朱國強提出的修正案「騎劫」原議案，表示不會動議議案。另一議員謝偉俊提出規程問題，質疑討論已經展開，不能「主席一個人就話可以撤銷」。立法會主席梁君彥最終裁定，由於張宇人未有表示撤回，指按照《議事規則》議員假如未有動議，主席便不能讓立法會繼續辯論，並宣佈休會。謝偉俊聽罷後輕擲《議事規則》到其檯面，晚上再在社交網站發文，批評張宇人欺凌新議員兼輸打贏要。
立法會今早舉行大會會議，朱國強會前已就張宇人的議案提出修正議案，改為：「行政長官於2022年施政報告中訂定目標，在2025至2026學年於超過九成公營小學實施小班教學；政府已提前一年達標，令學與教質素得以優化；本會促請政府全面檢視小班教學的成效，並因應中學生的學習差異及精神健康，評估中學以小班模式教學的可行性。」
9 May 2024獨媒#3509
謝偉俊：「做惡狗」非香港角色、李家超做警察經驗較多「阿sir你梗係唔可以窒」
Legislative Council member Paul Tse Wai-chun recently gave a radio interview that prompted considerable discussion in political circles. Speaking freely, Tse said the Legislative Council had shifted from a Westminster model to a National People’s Congress model, with too many uniform voices. He said the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government’s current tone was tougher than that of China’s Foreign Ministry, and believed that “acting as the central government’s enforcer” and “playing the bad dog” was not Hong Kong’s role. He also revisited his remark in the Legislative Council earlier this year that the government was “governing Hong Kong through Xiaohongshu”, while saying he understood that Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu had been more tense at the time because it was shortly before the enactment of Article 23 legislation. He said: “I just think that, ultimately, his experience in politics is not as extensive as his experience as a police officer. I always laugh to myself: as a police officer, sir, you obviously can’t talk back to a sir—of course he would be angry if you talked back to him. But those of us in politics are always confronted and criticised to our faces, and we have to accept opinions. We’re used to it. So it doesn’t really matter to me if he scolds me.”
立法會議員謝偉俊日前接受電台訪問，引起政圈不少迴響。謝偉俊在訪問中暢所欲言，指立法會已由西敏寺變成人大模式，亦太多一致性聲音，指特區政府現時口吻較北京外交部更強硬，認為「幫阿爺做打手」、「做惡狗」並非香港的角色。他更重提年初在立法會指政府「小紅書治港」 ，但體諒行政長官李家超當時正值23條立法前夕較緊張：「我只係覺得佢，始終從政嘅經驗係唔夠佢做警察嘅經驗多，我成日心裡面都笑，警察阿sir 你梗係唔可以窒㗎啦，窒阿sir佢梗係嬲你。但我哋從政嘅，永遠都係兜口兜面鬧你，都要接受意見，我哋呢啲慣咗。所以佢鬧我，我又無乜所謂。」
22 Apr 2024獨媒#3405
專頁刪「敏感」內容被問是否「驚」 謝偉俊：僅預防工作
Legislative Council member Paul Tse Wai-chun earlier closed his social media page to review and delete “sensitive” content. He reopened it last Saturday and issued a statement saying that all criticism was intended to raise questions and offer suggestions for improvement, or to advocate policy-making through lawful channels. In an interview this morning on Commercial Radio programme “On a Sunny Day,” host Chan Chi-wan asked him: “Are you afraid? What are you afraid of? Why did you do this?” Tse said that “actually, the word ‘afraid’ cannot be used.” As a lawyer, he said, whenever new legislation is introduced, he reviews whether the actions of individuals, companies and organisations could be affected: “It’s just preventive work, that’s all.”
立法會議員謝偉俊早前關閉社交網站專頁，以審視及刪除「敏感」內容，過去周六重開並發聲明稱，所有批評旨在提出問題及改善意見，或循合法途徑倡議制定政策。謝偉俊今早接受商台節目《在晴朗的一天出發》訪問，主持陳志雲問他：「你驚呀？你驚乜嘢呀？點解會咁做嘅？」謝偉俊就稱「其實唔可以用個驚字」，作為律師每逢有新法例，都會檢視個人、公司及機構所作的事會否有影響：「預防嘅工作咁解啫。」
21 Apr 2024獨媒#3400
謝偉俊專頁重新上架 刪去「敏感」內容
In January, “Red Team” leader and Legislative Council member Paul Tse Wai-chun told John Lee at a Chief Executive’s Question and Answer Session that the Hong Kong government was governing through “legalism, harsh laws and severe penalties” and through Xiaohongshu. Lee criticised his wording, saying it reminded him of “soft resistance” and “reactionary forces” during the 2019 “black violence”. On the 27th of last month, after the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance took effect on the 23rd, Tse took his page offline himself, saying he needed to review and delete “sensitive” content. About a month later, Tse reopened the page yesterday (April 20) and posted a statement saying that all the criticism was intended to raise questions and offer suggestions for improvement, with absolutely no intention of causing anyone to develop hatred, contempt for or disloyalty towards the institutions of the regime.
「紅隊」隊長、立法會議員謝偉俊今年1月，行政長答問大會上向李家超指港府施政「法家治港、嚴刑峻法」，以及「小紅書」治港，遭對方批評其發言用字令他想起2019年「黑暴」時「軟對抗」及「反動力量」。上月27日，即《維護國家安全條例》在23日生效後，謝偉俊自行將專頁下架，稱要審視及刪除「敏感」內容。事隔約一個，謝偉俊昨日（4月20日）重開專頁，並貼出聲明，稱所有批評旨在提出問題及改善建議，絕無意圖令任何人對政權機關產生憎恨、藐視或離叛。
28 Mar 2024RFA#3274
謝偉俊專頁下架憂言論遭舉報 建制議員派「定心丸」：毋須恐慌
Less than a week after Hong Kong’s Safeguarding National Security Ordinance came into force, pro-establishment lawmaker Paul Tse, who voted in support of the bill in the Legislative Council, took his Facebook page offline on Wednesday (27th). He said he was concerned that his earlier remarks about “governing Hong Kong through Xiaohongshu” might be maliciously reported and blown out of proportion by people with ulterior motives. He said he would reopen the page after reviewing and deleting “sensitive content”. Our station’s reporters asked several pro-establishment lawmakers regarded by the public as more outspoken whether the implementation of “Article 23” would narrow the scope for criticising the government; all declined interviews.
香港《維護國家安全條例》生效不足一星期，在立法會投票支持法案的建制派議員謝偉俊，周三（27日）自行將Facebook專頁下架。他稱擔心早前「小紅書治港」言論被有心人上綱上線、惡意舉報，因此暫時下架，審視並刪除「敏感內容」後會再重開專頁。本台記者向多名被外界視為較敢言的建制派議員查詢，「23條」實施後會否收窄批評政府的言論尺度，他們均不接受訪問。
21 Feb 2024獨媒#3012
林素蔚立法會質詢涉抄襲謝偉俊：條嘢喺我嘅會承擔責任
A column in the Hong Kong Economic Journal today said a “senior legislator” had claimed that a newcomer’s oral question involved plagiarism, with 203 of its 225 words matching a question from seven years ago. The column did not name the legislator. A review of records, however, showed that the legislator accused of plagiarism was Lam So-wai, elected for the first time after the electoral system was “improved”, while the question allegedly copied was a written question submitted by Paul Tse in 2016 on preventing diabetes and introducing a sugar tax. The Independent Media asked Lam So-wai about the matter. She said she had always been concerned about a sugar tax, and that some of the content differed from Tse’s question seven years ago, describing it as helping the other party follow up on the issue. Asked whether she had discussed the matter with her legislative assistant, Lam said: “This question is mine, and I will take responsibility. Whatever my colleagues have done, I’m the boss, right? I can’t shirk responsibility.”
《信報》今日專欄指有「資深議員」稱新手的口頭質詢涉抄襲，提問的225字中有203字與七年的質詢相同，專欄未有開名。不過翻查資料，被指抄襲的議員為「完善」後首次當選的林素蔚，被抄襲的則為謝偉俊在2016年的書面質詢，議題為預防糖尿病及開徵糖稅。《獨媒》就此向林素蔚查詢，她指一直關注糖稅，部分內容亦與謝在七年前的提問不同，形容是「幫助」對方跟進。被問到是否曾否與議員助理商討，林素蔚指「呢條嘢喺我嘅，我都承擔責任嘅，同事做成點，我係老闆呀嘛，我唔能夠推卸責任」。
25 Jan 2024獨媒#2871
謝偉俊批評政府「法家治港」高壓執法 李家超：用字令人聯想「黑暴」
Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu attended the Legislative Council’s first Chief Executive Interactive Question-and-Answer Session of the year, discussing “promoting the mega-event economy”.
特首李家超出席立法會今年首次「特首互動交流答問會」，討論「推動盛事經濟
25 Jan 2024獨媒#2872
被李家超訓斥感委屈？ 謝偉俊：大家都係為香港好嘅
The Legislative Council’s Chief Executive’s Interactive Q&A Session got off to a heated start this morning, with Paul Tse becoming the focus after Chief Executive John Lee criticised him for allegedly stoking tensions between districts. Lee described Tse’s remarks and thinking as “old-fashioned and dangerous”, while his choice of words even evoked associations with the “black-clad violence”. The Legislative Council then held a “Food Waste Experience Day”, during which lawmakers sampled lunch boxes made from leftover food. Asked by reporters after the meal whether he felt aggrieved, Tse said that should be left for everyone to judge: “It’s just a matter of viewpoints and perspectives; everyone is working for Hong Kong’s good.”
今早立法會「行政長官互動交流答問會」甫開始便火花四濺，謝偉俊成為主角，被特首李家超批評不應挑撥地方矛盾，指其言論想法「迂腐危險」，用詞甚至令聯想起「黑暴」。立法會緊接舉行「惜食體驗日」，一眾議員品嚐用剩食製作的飯盒，謝偉俊飯後被記者追問會否感到委屈，他表示要留待大家判斷，「觀點同角度啫，大家都係為香港好嘅。」
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
