17 Sept 2025光傳媒#7320
2019年反修例事件判囚青年出獄 部分無法復學求助《信報》引述議會大黨中人慨嘆：相信佢哋已經洗心革面，但都幫唔到佢哋
As Hong Kong focuses on revitalising the economy and making every effort to attract talent, a legislator has disclosed receiving a number of requests for help from young people released after serving prison sentences for cases related to the 2019 anti-extradition bill events. They reportedly wanted to return to school after their release but were unable to do so, even with assistance from legislators. One legislator lamented: “I believe they have turned over a new leaf, but I still can’t help them.”
The Hong Kong Economic Journal’s current-affairs column reported today (the 17th) that a pro-establishment party and individual legislators are concerned about young people released after serving sentences for their involvement in anti-extradition bill cases, and want to help them reintegrate into society. Citing legislators, the column said some of the young people were still students before they were arrested but were “kicked out of school” because they were involved in anti-extradition bill cases. A source from the major party in the Legislative Council said that after their release, legislators were still unable to help them return to school despite going to considerable lengths and experiencing considerable difficulty, lamenting: “I believe they have turned over a new leaf, but I still can’t help them.”
香港全力拼經濟，招攬人才不遺餘力。有議員向傳媒披露，陸續收到2019年反修例事件判囚青年出獄後的求助個案，坦言獲釋欲重返校園無果，連議員出面協助也無法復學。有議員慨嘆，「相信佢哋已經洗心革面，但都幫唔到佢哋」。
《信報》時事專欄今（17日）報道，有建制派政黨和個別議員關注因反修例事件入獄後刑滿獲釋的青年，想協助他們重投社會。專欄引述議員消息指出，部分青年被捕前仍是學生，但因涉及反修例案件而遭「踢出校」，該議會大黨中人透露，他們出獄後，議員就算大費周章、經歷一番折騰後，仍然無法讓他們重回校園，感慨「相信佢哋已經洗心革面，但都幫唔到佢哋」。
6 Aug 2025光傳媒#7139
《信報》︱地區人士：紀念抗日戰爭勝利80周年屬「國家級任務」必須「交功課」
3 September is the 80th Anniversary of the Victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression. A media outlet learned that the pro-establishment camp is racking its brains to organise activities at district level to promote patriotic education, describing commemorating the victory in the War of Resistance as a “national-level task” for which they must “hand in the assignment”. However, some district figures admitted that if the activities consisted only of repeated visits to sites associated with the history of the Communist Party and the country, it would be difficult to attract residents to sign up. They also worried that organising elderly residents to join “red one-day tours” to meet numerical targets could turn them into little more than community meals and cause them to lose their meaning.
A current-affairs column in the Hong Kong Economic Journal said that on 3 September, the 80th Anniversary of the Victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, it is expected that the Hong Kong government’s principal officials, Hong Kong deputies to the National People’s Congress, Hong Kong members of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference and some Legislative Council members will go to Beijing to attend the Tiananmen military parade. However, many pro-establishment district figures plan to organise local one-day “red tours” around September, arranging for residents to visit Hong Kong sites related to the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression. Some district councillors and Care Teams are even studying the organisation of large-scale activities involving thousands of people, using the respective Care Team neighbourhoods as the units.
下月3日為「中國人民抗日戰爭勝利80周年紀念日」，有傳媒獲悉建制陣營正絞盡腦汁，籌備在地區層面舉辦活動，實踐愛國主義教育，更稱紀念抗戰勝利屬「國家級任務」，必須「交功課」。不過，有地區人士坦言，如果只是不斷參觀紅色景點，較難吸引街坊報名；但如果為「跑數」組織長者參與「紅色一日遊」，則憂淪為街坊聚餐，失去意義。
《信報》時事專欄指出，9月3日「中國人民抗日戰爭勝利80周年紀念日」當天，預計港府主要官員、港區全國人大、政協委員及部分立法會議員都會到北京出席天安門閱兵儀式。然而，不少建制地區人士計劃在9月前後舉辦「紅色之旅」本地一日遊，安排街坊參觀香港的抗日戰爭景點，有區議員和關愛隊甚至研究以關愛隊所屬小區為單位，組織以千人計的大規模活動。
21 Feb 2024獨媒#3012
林素蔚立法會質詢涉抄襲謝偉俊：條嘢喺我嘅會承擔責任
A column in the Hong Kong Economic Journal today said a “senior legislator” had claimed that a newcomer’s oral question involved plagiarism, with 203 of its 225 words matching a question from seven years ago. The column did not name the legislator. A review of records, however, showed that the legislator accused of plagiarism was Lam So-wai, elected for the first time after the electoral system was “improved”, while the question allegedly copied was a written question submitted by Paul Tse in 2016 on preventing diabetes and introducing a sugar tax. The Independent Media asked Lam So-wai about the matter. She said she had always been concerned about a sugar tax, and that some of the content differed from Tse’s question seven years ago, describing it as helping the other party follow up on the issue. Asked whether she had discussed the matter with her legislative assistant, Lam said: “This question is mine, and I will take responsibility. Whatever my colleagues have done, I’m the boss, right? I can’t shirk responsibility.”
《信報》今日專欄指有「資深議員」稱新手的口頭質詢涉抄襲，提問的225字中有203字與七年的質詢相同，專欄未有開名。不過翻查資料，被指抄襲的議員為「完善」後首次當選的林素蔚，被抄襲的則為謝偉俊在2016年的書面質詢，議題為預防糖尿病及開徵糖稅。《獨媒》就此向林素蔚查詢，她指一直關注糖稅，部分內容亦與謝在七年前的提問不同，形容是「幫助」對方跟進。被問到是否曾否與議員助理商討，林素蔚指「呢條嘢喺我嘅，我都承擔責任嘅，同事做成點，我係老闆呀嘛，我唔能夠推卸責任」。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
