HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

Search the archive

Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.

Results JSON

Statistics

1matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
0
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
0
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
0
Apr 23
0
May 23
0
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
0
Aug 23
0
Sep 23
0
Oct 23
0
Nov 23
0
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
0
Feb 24
0
Mar 24
0
Apr 24
0
May 24
0
Jun 24
0
Jul 24
0
Aug 24
0
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
0
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
0
Oct 25
0
Nov 25
1
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

Results 1

擴音器造成的噪音煩擾Clear all
Showing 1-1 of 1 recordsEN
19 Dec 2025法庭線#7714

Tai Hang Sai Estate resident fined for broadcasting demands through loudspeaker loses appeal; High Court refuses certificate for final appeal

擺擴音器播訴求罪成罰款 大坑西邨居民上訴失敗 高院拒發上訴至終院證明書

Tai Hang Sai Estate resident Wong Kwai-keung was accused of placing a loudspeaker in the estate last June and broadcasting demands expressing dissatisfaction with its redevelopment. He was convicted after trial on a summons charge of “noise nuisance caused by a loudspeaker” and fined $1,500. High Court acting judge Chun Man (OIAP) Li dismissed his appeal and, in a judgment handed down on Friday (19th), refused to issue Wong a certificate to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. The judgment said Wong’s grounds of appeal concerned only how the relevant legal principles should be applied, and did not involve “a point of law of great and general importance”. They therefore did not meet the requirements for an appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.

大坑西邨居民黃桂強被指去年 6 月在邨內擺放擴音器、播放不滿重建的訴求,受審後被裁定「擴音器造成的噪音煩擾」傳票罪成,罰款 1,500 元。高院暫委法官李俊文駁回他的上訴,周五(19 日)再頒下判詞,拒絕向黃發出上訴至終審法院證明書。 判詞指,黃的上訴理據只涉如何應用相關法律原則,不屬「具有重大而廣泛重要性的法律論點」,不符合案件上訴至終院的要求。

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.