HONG KONG · NEWS RECORDS

Search the archive

Explore news reporting in English and traditional Chinese.

Results JSON

Statistics

2matching records

of 7107 in this collection

Records over time

Monthly distribution

0
Feb 20
0
Mar 20
0
Apr 20
0
May 20
0
Jun 20
0
Jul 20
0
Aug 20
0
Sep 20
0
Oct 20
0
Nov 20
0
Dec 20
0
Jan 21
0
Feb 21
0
Mar 21
0
Apr 21
0
May 21
0
Jun 21
0
Jul 21
0
Aug 21
0
Sep 21
0
Oct 21
0
Nov 21
0
Dec 21
0
Jan 22
0
Feb 22
0
Mar 22
0
Apr 22
0
May 22
0
Jun 22
0
Jul 22
0
Aug 22
0
Sep 22
0
Oct 22
0
Nov 22
0
Dec 22
0
Jan 23
0
Feb 23
0
Mar 23
0
Apr 23
0
May 23
0
Jun 23
0
Jul 23
0
Aug 23
0
Sep 23
0
Oct 23
0
Nov 23
0
Dec 23
0
Jan 24
0
Feb 24
0
Mar 24
1
Apr 24
0
May 24
0
Jun 24
1
Jul 24
0
Aug 24
0
Sep 24
0
Oct 24
0
Nov 24
0
Dec 24
0
Jan 25
0
Feb 25
0
Mar 25
0
Apr 25
0
May 25
0
Jun 25
0
Jul 25
0
Aug 25
0
Sep 25
0
Oct 25
0
Nov 25
0
Dec 25
About this collection

14 Feb 2020 - 24 Dec 2025

English translations accompany the original Chinese records.

Results 2

檢控Clear all
Showing 1-2 of 2 recordsEN
20 Jul 2024法庭線#3833

Five Years After 7.21 Attack | No New Arrests or Prosecutions in Past Year; One Non-White-Clad Person Convicted, 9 White-Clad People Convicted and 1 Acquitted

721襲擊五年|過去一年沒新拘捕或檢控 至今非白衣1人罪成 白衣人9罪成、1罪脫

As the Yuen Long 7.21 attack reaches its fifth anniversary, police made no new arrests and the Department of Justice brought no new prosecutions in the past year. In response to an inquiry, police said 69 people had been arrested to date, with 22 charged with rioting and other offences—figures unchanged from July last year. One 7.21 case concluded during the year. It was the first in which a non-white-clad person was found guilty of rioting. The judge rejected the defendant’s testimony that he had acted in self-defence and to protect others, saying that “the black-clad side used violence to counter violence, contrary to reason and law”, but considered that the levels of violence on the two sides differed and that their criminal liability was therefore different. On the white-clad side, one more person pleaded guilty, while cases involving five others entered the appeal stage. Across the six court cases to date (see the table in the article), four involved white-clad people, with nine people convicted and one acquitted. Two involved non-white-clad people, with one person convicted. Another case involving seven people, including Lam Cheuk-ting, is still being heard, with closing submissions scheduled for September.

元朗 721 襲擊踏入五周年,最近一年警方沒有作出新拘捕,律政司亦沒有提出新檢控。警方回覆查詢時指,至今拘捕 69 人,有 22 人被控暴動等罪,數字與去年 7 月相同。 這一年有一宗 721 案件審結,該案是首次有非白衣人被裁定暴動罪成,法官拒納被告供稱出於自衛、保護他人,又指「黑衣人一方以暴易暴,違理違法」,但認為雙方暴力程度有別,刑責不同。至於白衣人一方,再多一人認罪,另有 5 人的案件進入上訴階段。 綜合至今 6 宗法庭案件(見內文表),白衣人案佔 4 宗,共 9 人罪成,一人罪脫。非白衣人案佔兩宗,一人罪成,而包括林卓廷等 7 人的另案仍在審理,將於 9 月進行結案陳詞。

25 Apr 2024法庭線#3427

Sedition Offence: Three and a Half Years of Arrests and Prosecutions | 55 Charged Under Old Sedition Law, More Than 70% of Cases Involved Online Speech

煽動罪三年半.拘捕檢控篇|共55人被控舊煽動罪 逾七成案涉網上言論

The National Security Law was implemented in Hong Kong in 2020, and the government also brought prosecutions under the sedition offence in the Crimes Ordinance. This was the first time the offence had been invoked since 1997. In March 2024, the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance was passed, changing the elements required to establish the sedition offence and increasing the penalties. The old provisions were replaced from then on and became history. From the sedition offence being invoked again until its repeal, a period of about three and a half years, 55 people and four companies were charged in 37 cases. Of these, 33 have been concluded, while four cases, including those involving Apple and Stand News, remain at the trial and appeal stages. The 37 cases show how the government used the sedition offence to regulate speech and conduct, while the courts’ rulings also set new boundaries for freedom of speech, the press and publication. The Witness examines the cases in a series of reports, covering the process from prosecution to sentencing. The first article analyses the cases, examining how many involved online speech and what sedition intent the government most frequently cited in prosecutions.

2020 年《國安法》在香港實施,政府並引用《刑事罪行條例》下的煽動罪起訴,是 1997 年後首次引用該罪。至 2024 年 3 月,《維護國安條例》通過,改變煽動罪的定罪元素,並加重罰則,舊條文自此被取代,成為歷史。 舊煽動罪由重新引用至被廢除,歷時大約 3 年半,這段時間共有 55 人及 4 間公司被控,分成 37 宗案件,當中 33 宗已審結,而《蘋果》、《立場》等 4 案則仍處審訊及上訴階段。 這 37 宗案件反映政府如何運用煽動罪規範言行,而法庭的裁決亦為言論、新聞及出版自由定出新的界線。《法庭線》以專題報道,整理由起訴至判刑的情況,第一篇會分析案情,看看有多少宗涉及網上言論,而政府最常引用作起訴的煽動意圖又是甚麼。

Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.