19 Dec 2025Yahoo#7709
梁振英自爆曾約見《蘋果》廣告客戶 大公報當年指特首「被屈」 引特首辦稱「絕無此事」
Following the court’s conviction of Next Digital founder Jimmy Lai Chee-ying for conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and conspiracy to publish seditious publications, former Chief Executive and Vice-Chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference CY Leung Chun-ying wrote on social media yesterday (18th) that, over a number of years, he had publicly named Apple Daily advertisers and, in his capacity as chief executive, proactively arranged meetings with the newspaper’s major advertisers. He said this ultimately reduced Apple Daily’s full-page and half-page advertising to “close to zero”. Reports show that Apple Daily reported on 28 May 2014 that, in addition to Standard Chartered Group receiving an “order”, Leung had personally, or through his “Leung fans”, explicitly or implicitly indicated to business and tourism-sector figures that they should not advertise in Apple Daily. The following day, the official media outlet Ta Kung Pao said that Apple Daily had “wronged the chief executive” and that the Chief Executive’s Office had stated there was “absolutely no such thing”. Eleven years later, Leung’s article ultimately confirmed the report.
壹傳媒創辦人黎智英被法院裁定串謀勾結外國勢力，以及串謀發布煽動刊物罪成，前特首、全國政協副主席梁振英昨日（18 日）在社交平台撰文，指他以往多年來透過公開點名，又以特首身份主動約見《蘋果日報》的大廣告客戶，最終讓《蘋果》的全版和半版廣告「壓縮到接近零」。翻查報道，《蘋果日報》在 2014 年 5 月 28 日曾經報道，除了渣打集團收到「下令」之外，梁振英曾親自或透過「梁粉」向商界及旅遊界明示或暗示不應在《蘋果》賣廣告。翌日，官媒《大公報》就稱「《蘋果》屈特首」，又指特首辦表明「絕無此事」。十一年過去，梁振英文章最終證實了消息。
6 Nov 2025Yahoo#7495
沙田官小准用簡體字應考︱梁振英指不同背景學生都應學繁體字：「教不嚴，師之惰」
Sha Tin Government Primary School’s decision to allow students to answer internal tests and examinations in simplified Chinese has sparked controversy. Former Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying responded on social media today (the 6th), saying, “Students’ progress and results in learning traditional Chinese are one matter; a school giving up the requirement and abandoning its responsibility to teach is another.” He said that the traditional Chinese characters retained in Hong Kong, Cantonese and a high level of English proficiency are all characteristics of Hong Kong, and considered them necessary. He ultimately described the incident as “If teaching is not strict, it is the teacher’s negligence.”
Asking, “Why not make an effort to learn traditional Chinese?”
Leung said he understood that students from mainland backgrounds or who were accustomed to using simplified Chinese might not initially be used to traditional Chinese after coming to Hong Kong. However, Hong Kong is an SAR that uses traditional Chinese, and he asked, “Why not make an effort to learn traditional Chinese? If you work in Hong Kong in the future, can you do without traditional Chinese?” He stressed that traditional Chinese is used in government documents, foreign-funded, mainland-funded and Hong Kong-funded companies, newspapers and books, as well as in the documents of students from the mainland who come to Hong Kong.
沙田官立小學允許學生在校內測驗及考試使用簡體字作答引起爭議，前行政長官梁振英今日（6 日）在社交平台發文回應，指「學生學習繁體字的進度和成績是一碼事，學校放棄要求，放棄教的責任是另外一碼事。」他又指，香港保留的繁體字、粵語和高水平的英語能力，都是香港的特色，認為是有必要，最後更以「教不嚴，師之惰」形容事件。
反問「為什麼不努力學繁體字？」
梁振英表示，理解有「內地背景或習慣使用簡體字的學生」初來香港未必習慣繁體字，但香港是使用繁體字的特區，反問「為什麼不努力學繁體字？日後在香港工作，可以不用繁體字嗎？」他強調，香港在政府公文、外資中資港資企業、報刊書籍，還有內地來港的學生在香港的證件，無一不用繁體字。
22 Aug 2025BBC#7202
梁振英「警告」法輪功學員 芬蘭外交部：不接受恐嚇行為
Leung Chun-ying, vice-chairman of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference and Hong Kong’s former chief executive, was accused of “publicly warning” Falun Gong practitioners whom he said he would investigate in Helsinki, Finland. The Finnish Foreign Ministry confirmed to BBC Chinese that the incident occurred and said it could not accept any acts of intimidation.
A Falun Gong group released a video alleging that on 13 August, Leung and his wife, Tang Ching-yi, carried out “public verbal intimidation” against Falun Gong practitioners who were practising in Helsinki’s Sibelius Park. Leung, who holds the status of a Chinese state leader, said he would investigate them.
The Finnish Foreign Ministry described the incident as an “unfortunate event”, while an organisation associated with Falun Gong called it the “latest example of the Chinese Communist Party’s transnational repression”.
BBC Chinese sought comment from the office of Hong Kong’s former chief executive in China’s Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, but had not received a reply by Friday the 22nd.
中國全國政協副主席、香港前特首梁振英被指在芬蘭首都赫爾辛基「公開警告」會調查法輪功學員，芬蘭外交部對BBC中文證實該事件發生，並稱不能接受任何恐嚇行為。
法輪功群體發佈影片稱，8月13日，梁振英與妻子唐青儀在赫爾辛基西貝柳斯公園（Sibelius Park）對正在練功的法輪功學員「進行公開的言語恐嚇」。具備中國國家領導人身份的梁振英稱將調查對方。
芬蘭外交部形容這是一起「不幸事件」，法輪功關聯組織稱這是「中共跨國鎮壓的最新例證」。
BBC中文曾向中國香港特區前任行政長官辦公室尋求評論，截至星期五（22日）未獲回覆。
12 Aug 2025獨媒#7153
梁振英再借「雙非」評高才政策 稱社會對內地怨氣或再現
Former Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying has repeatedly commented on Hong Kong’s population policy in recent days, saying mainland talent may “return to the mainland with their entire families after obtaining identity cards”. Secretary for Labour and Welfare Chris Sun Yuk-han subsequently responded on social media without naming him, stressing that talent would sustain Hong Kong’s labour force. Leung posted again for two consecutive days, first questioning the 220,000 applications approved under various talent schemes: “If half of the cases bring their families to settle here, how will Hong Kong cope with education, healthcare and housing? Will we deal with it then?” He also said that high-talent entrants living on the mainland and holding eligibility for Hong Kong permanent residency might later come to Hong Kong to use its education, elderly-care and medical resources, while the government had no legal means to exclude them. He said, “Social resentment towards the mainland will surface again, just as with the doubly non-permanent resident and milk powder issues. We need to talk politics.”
前行政長官梁振英連日多次點評本港人口政策，指內地高才「拿了身分證後全家返回內地」，勞工及福利局局長孫玉菡之後需在社交媒體上不點名回應，強調人才維持香港勞動人口。梁振英再次連續兩日發文，先質疑各類人才計劃已經批出22萬個申請：「如果有一半個案帶同家人來定居，香港的教育、醫療、住屋怎樣應付？到時再算？」他又提到，居於內地、擁有香港永久性居民資格的高才日後或來港使用教育、養老資及醫療資源，政府亦沒有法律手段排除，認為「社會對內地的怨氣會再次出現，一如雙非和奶粉問題，我們要講講政治」。
7 Aug 2025獨媒#7146
梁振英批本港人口政策 內地高才「拿了身分證後全家返回內地」
Former Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying recently posted two messages commenting on Hong Kong’s population policy. He said that many top talents from the mainland came to Hong Kong to register mainly for their children’s education, without plans to work in Hong Kong. Leung also said that although the Hong Kong Government stated that more than 220,000 talents and family members had arrived in Hong Kong under various talent schemes, Rating and Valuation Department figures showed that more than 57,000 units were vacant at the end of last year, while occupancy had changed little over the past five years. This indicated that the vast majority of families had not settled in Hong Kong, but had “returned to the mainland with their entire families after obtaining identity cards”.
The situation of top talents coming to Hong Kong to facilitate their children’s admission to schools has been widely discussed. At the end of July, the Education Bureau announced revisions to the eligibility threshold for subsidised post-secondary places, adding a requirement for applicants to have resided in Hong Kong for at least two years. The requirement will only be fully implemented from the 2028/29 academic year.
Leung first posted on 3 August, describing the Education Bureau’s revisions as a benevolent policy and saying that “the government need not be defensive”. He said a considerable proportion of top talents came to Hong Kong to register solely for their children’s education, without plans to work in Hong Kong, calling this “a widespread and obvious incentive”.
前行政長官梁振英，日前連發兩帖，點評本港人口政策。他提到不少內地的高才來港報到，為的是子女教育，沒有準備在港工作。梁振英又提到，港府雖然指各項人才計劃中，逾22萬名人才及家人已經來港，惟根據餉物業估價署的數字，去年年底空置單位逾5.7萬個，近五年入住量亦沒有多大變化，說明絕大多數家庭沒有落戶香港，而是「拿了身分證後全家返回內地」。
高才來港為便利子女入學，情況已討論多少。教育局在七月底宣布修訂資助專上學額門檻，加入居港年期需滿兩年的規定，惟在2028/29年起才全面實施。
梁振英先在8月3日發帖，形容教育局的修訂是德政「政府不必defensive」。他形容相當一部分高才來港報到，只為子女教育，沒有準備在港工作，是「普遍的、顯而易見的誘因。」
27 May 2025獨媒#6831
梁振英發帖批欠政治常識 張欣宇：平常心看待
The Transport and Logistics Bureau will announce details of the “Guangdong vehicles travelling south” scheme within this year. Legislative Council member Gary Xinyu Zhang proposed setting an asset threshold, drawing repeated posts of criticism from former Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying, who has long promoted the scheme. Leung also said the member lacked basic political common sense. Gary Xinyu Zhang said on a Commercial Radio programme this morning that more than 10 million households in Guangdong own cars, and given Hong Kong’s limited space, it would be difficult to provide equal treatment as with “Hong Kong vehicles travelling north”. The member said proposing views was a Legislative Council member’s responsibility, and that society could offer criticism, which would be taken calmly.
Ming Pao reported on Monday that the scheme could be implemented as early as the end of the year. In the first phase, Guangdong vehicles would only be allowed to park at the Hong Kong Port car park on the artificial island of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge; in the second phase, they would be allowed to drive into urban areas, with quotas imposed. The report said the China Hong Kong Automobile Association was concerned about insufficient parking spaces and differences in driving habits between the two places. It also mentioned that Legislative Council member Gary Xinyu Zhang had proposed setting a threshold to ensure the purchasing power of “Guangdong vehicles”.
運輸及物流局今年內將公布「粵車南下」細節，立法會議員張欣宇倡設資產門檻，引來一直力推「粵車南下」的前行政長官梁振英連番出帖批評，更指對方欠缺基本政治常識。張欣宇今早在《商台》節目指，廣東省有車家庭逾千萬，加上本港空間細小，難以如「港車北上」般給予對等待遇。他指提出意見是立法會議員的責任，社會可以有批評，會以平常心看待。
《明報》周一報導，指「粵車南下」最快年底實施，首階段粵車只可停泊港珠澳大橋人工島香港口岸停車場，第二階段可駛入市區，將設限額。報導中提及中國香港汽車會憂泊位不足及兩地駕駛習慣不同，以及立法會議員張欣宇倡設門檻，確保「粵車」的消費力。
5 Mar 2025獨媒#4595
孫玉菡再回應梁振英質疑 指人才來港要消費「唔會點用我哋福利」
Former Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying has repeatedly questioned the effectiveness of the current government’s talent recruitment policy, suggesting that some mainland parents participate only to arrange for their children to study in Hong Kong and obtain tax concessions, before returning to the mainland after securing visas. Secretary for Labour and Welfare Sun Yuk-han wrote on social media earlier to address these “myths” and said on radio this morning that mainland talent “won’t really use our welfare benefits”; instead, they need to “consume and spend” in Hong Kong, such as on hotel accommodation. He said their expenditure was believed to far exceed the concessions they received. Sun also said that unless highly skilled talent were certain they could renew their visas, he believed they “would not rashly bring their children to Hong Kong to study.”
Regarding the number of highly skilled talent who have renewed their visas after expiry, Sun disclosed in an earlier post that there were currently only 300. He said today that the figure had not been announced because he did not want to rashly publish “such a small base” and give the public a negative impression. He stressed that those who had renewed were from the first batch, and that more details would be released when the number increased.
Leung posted twice on social media last week to question Hong Kong’s talent policy, saying he had encountered many “talents” who returned to the mainland immediately after coming to Hong Kong. He said they had come merely to facilitate travel into and out of Hong Kong, enable their children to attend schools for Hong Kong children in the mainland or schools in Hong Kong, and obtain “Hong Kong people, Hong Kong tax” concessions in the mainland.
On the night of the 3rd, Sun responded on the Labour and Welfare Bureau’s social media account, saying that matching talent was like a romantic relationship: if talent found Hong Kong’s environment suitable, they would naturally stay; if they chose not to remain in Hong Kong, an “amicable breakup” was also entirely normal.
前特首梁振英近日連番質疑現屆政府「搶人才」政策成效，又質疑內地父母只是為了安排子女來港讀書和取得稅務優惠才參加，取得簽證後回內地生活。勞福局長孫玉菡日前在社交媒體撰文解答「迷思」，今早再在電台表示，內地人才「唔會點用我哋嘅福利㗎」，反之他們來港需要「消費和花費」，例如酒店住宿，並認為他們支出遠比獲得的優惠多。孫玉菡又指，除非高才們肯定能夠續簽，否則相信他們「唔會貿然將佢子女攞嚟香港讀書」。
至於現時有多少「高才」在簽證到期後續簽，孫玉菡日前帖文透露目前僅得300人。孫玉菡今日表示，是因為不想貿然公布「咁少嘅基數，畀咗大家一個唔好嘅印象」，他強調目前續簽者屬首批，隨「多咗數目」時會再公布詳情。
前行政長官梁振英上星期兩度在社交媒體發文，質疑香港人才政策，指自己遇上不少來港後馬上返回內地的「人才」，只是為出入香港方便、讓子女報讀內地的港人子弟學校或香港學校，以及為了在內地取得「港人港稅」優惠。
勞工及福利局局長孫玉菡前晚（3日）在勞福局社交媒體回應，稱人才配對就像情侶關係，若人才覺得香港環境適合，自然會留低；相反若人才選擇不留港，「和平分手」亦是平常不過的事。
30 Oct 2024HK01#4188
梁振英再狙擊造地計劃：如果不計成本 是否應該多劃幾個填海區？
Leung Chun-ying, vice-chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference and former chief executive, discussed land and housing supply volumes again today (30th), after posting last week to question whether an excessive land supply would cause an imbalance. He said frankly: “If cost is not a consideration, should we designate several more reclamation sites on the map?”
全國政協副主席、前特首梁振英繼上周發文質疑土地供應過多會失衡後，今日（30日）再談土地和房屋供應量，直言如果不計成本，「是不是應該在地圖上再劃多幾個填海區？」
29 Oct 2024明報#4184
回應梁振英供過於求論 李家超：土地主導權須在政府 「利益藩籬控制」不符利益
National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Vice-Chairman and former Chief Executive CY Leung wrote on Facebook earlier that Hong Kong has an oversupply of land and that continuing to create land could lead to negative-equity problems and increase the government’s financial burden. Chief Executive John Lee said before yesterday’s Executive Council meeting that control over land supply must remain with the government; otherwise, it would fall under the control of “vested interests”, which would not serve the interests of the public or Hong Kong.
Leung said supply is not always better when it is greater and must be scientifically calibrated. In a post titled “Beware of Oversupply” published last Thursday (the 24th), Leung said Hong Kong currently does have a shortage of land and housing supply, but future supply is not necessarily better simply because it is greater, as demand is not limitless. He said future demand should be assessed scientifically and professionally in order to achieve a balance between supply and demand as far as possible. He wrote that “the fiscal revenues and expenditures of the government’s development of new areas cannot be left unbudgeted” and that “building cities and creating land is a scientific and professional exercise; decisions cannot be made on a whim, and the consequences of overcorrection will be serious.” He expected the Northeast New Territories might be the last development area in Hong Kong from which the government could make a profit, with every new area thereafter running at a deficit and requiring government subsidies.
全國政協副主席、前特首梁振英早前在facebook發文，稱本港土地供過於求，持續造地或會衍生負資產問題，加重政府財政負擔。特首李家超昨日出席行政會議前回應稱，土地供應主導權一定要在政府手中，否則主導權會落入「利益藩籬的控制」，不符市民和香港利益。
梁稱供應非愈多愈好 要科學拿揑
梁振英上周四（24日）發表題為「慎防供過於求」的帖文，稱目前香港土地和房屋供應確實短缺，但未來供應量並非愈多愈好，因需求不是無窮無盡，要科學和專業地拿揑好未來的需求量，從而盡量做到供需平衡。他表示「政府開發新區的財政收支不能不預算」，「建城造地是科學和專業的，不能拍腦袋，矯枉過正的後果會很嚴重」。他預料新界東北可能是香港最後一個政府有錢賺的開發區，以後每一個新區都入不敷支，要政府補貼。
28 Mar 2024法庭線#3273
認披露梁振英個人資料 前地勤判社服令 稱憂未能如期返英、官拒接受
A former airport ground staff member allegedly misused HK Express’s boarding system in 2019 to send former Chief Executive CY Leung’s personal data to others. He earlier admitted one count of “accessing a computer with a dishonest intent” and requested a community service order report. Sentencing was adjourned until Thursday (28th) at Kowloon City Magistrates’ Courts.
The defence said the defendant currently could not leave the UK for more than 180 days each year and was worried that he would be unable to return to the UK as scheduled; consequently, the report did not recommend a community service order. Magistrate Brian Chi Fai Chan said the case had a certain degree of seriousness and that the court had earlier refused to deal with it by imposing a fine or a suspended sentence. Although the defendant had personal matters to handle, he also had to bear the consequences of his offence. After confirming the defendant’s intention and considering the overall circumstances, the magistrate sentenced him to 80 hours of community service.
一名機場前地勤人員涉於 2019 年擅用香港快運（HK Express）的登機系統，將前特首梁振英個人資料發送予他人。他早前承認一項「不誠實地獲益而取用電腦」罪，索取社服令報告，押後至周四（28 日）在九龍城裁判法院判刑。
辯方指，被告現時每年不能離開英國超過 180 日，擔心未能如期返回英國，故報告不建議判處社服令。裁判官陳志輝指，本案有一定嚴重性，早前已拒絕以罰款或緩刑處理，即使被告有自身事情要處理，但他亦需承擔犯案的後果。官向被告確認其意向，及考慮整體情況後，終判處 80 小時社服令。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
