19 Aug 2024追新聞#3915
反送中5周年・專訪｜ 港府追討170萬＋兩傷警索償 7.14沙田暴動罪出獄手足赴台求生
Leung Pak-tin, a protester who admitted rioting during the police-civilian clashes at Sha Tin’s New Town Plaza in the 2019 Anti-Extradition Movement, received a demand in mid-May 2024—one year after completing his four-year sentence—from the Department of Justice, acting on behalf of the Commissioner of Police, seeking more than HK$1.7 million in sick leave and other employee compensation for two plainclothes officers injured in the case. He was given two weeks to repay the sum, or Leung would have to bear legal responsibility. On the fifth anniversary of the June 12 million-person march during the Anti-Extradition Movement, Leung travelled to Taiwan and is currently seeking to remain there.
“I would rather sleep on the streets in Taiwan than be in Hong Kong, which has reached such a sad state. Sleeping on the streets in Taiwan is still more comfortable than being in Hong Kong.”
2019年反送中運動沙田新城市廣場警民衝突中承認暴動的抗爭者梁柏添，2024年5月中即他完成4年刑期後1年，收到律政司代表警務處長開出的「罰單」，向他追討案中兩名受傷便衣警員的病假等僱員賠償，金額逾170萬港元，限時兩星期清還，否則梁須承擔法律責任。反送中6.12百萬人遊行5周年，梁離港赴台旅行，目前尋求留台。
「我寧願係台灣瞓街，我也唔想係香港，去到一個咁悲哀嘅地步。係台灣瞓街仲舒服過係香港。」
16 Nov 2023集誌社#8653
大學衝突四年｜整合近 200 份判案書 盤點 327 名中大理大暴動案被告現況
Four years ago in November, clashes between police and protesters erupted at several universities during the anti-extradition bill movement. The clashes at CUHK and PolyU were the most intense, and more than 1,400 people were arrested at the two institutions combined. Four years on, how many of those arrested have been prosecuted or convicted? The police declined to provide the latest figures.
《集誌社》reviewed nearly 200 court judgments and collated media reports, finding that at least 327 people were charged with rioting in connection with the clashes at the two universities: 317 in relation to the PolyU clashes and 10 in relation to the CUHK clashes. Of the 327 defendants charged with rioting, 221 were convicted after trial or pleaded guilty; the longest sentence was 68 months. At least 23 of them were under 18 at the time of the incidents, and four were sentenced to between 30 and 60 months in prison.
四年前 11 月，反修例運動期間多間大學爆發警民衝突；其中，中大和理大衝突最激烈，兩所院校合共逾 1400 人被捕。四年過去，被捕的 1400 人中多少人被檢控、被定罪？警方拒提供最新數字。
《集誌社》翻查近 200 份法庭判案書、綜合傳媒報道，統計到兩間大學衝突中，最少 327 人被控暴動，其中 317 人涉理大衝突、另外 10 人涉中大衝突。327 名被告暴動人士中，221 人經審訊後罪成或認罪，最長被判刑 68 個月；而當中最少 23 人案發時 不足 18 歲，其中四人被判囚 30 至 60 個月。
13 Jul 2023法庭線#7978
7.1立會｜《熱血時報》記者指警方預告清場後離開大樓 王宗堯料周五作供
The trial of the July 1 Legislative Council riot case continued on Thursday (the 13th) at the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts, temporarily serving as the District Court, entering its 26th day, with online media reporter Ma Kai-chung giving evidence. Ma said he was a programme producer for Passion Times at the time of the incident and had been assigned to livestream and film around the Legislative Council that night. He entered the Legislative Council to cover the incident with the company’s permission. After police announced that they would clear the area, Ma decided to leave the building for his own safety and to avoid being caught between protesters and police.
七一立法會暴動案續審，周四（13 日）在西九龍裁判法院（暫代區院）踏入第 26 天審訊，由網媒記者馬啟聰作供。馬供稱案發時為《熱血時報》節目監製，當晚被指派到立法會一帶做直播和拍攝，經公司許可後進入立法會採訪。警方預告清場後，馬為保障自身安全，避免夾在示威者和警方之間，決定離開大樓。
27 Apr 2023法庭線#6368
「私了」的士司機案 32歲男子認暴動原囚3年 律政司刑期覆核得直加監13月
On the day after the anti-mask law took effect in October 2019, demonstrations and protests broke out across the districts. A taxi drove onto a footpath in Sham Shui Po and hit a crowd of protesters, after which the driver was subjected to “mob justice”. A 32-year-old man, accused of stepping on the driver and assaulting him with a long hard object, pleaded guilty to rioting and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. The Department of Justice, dissatisfied that the sentence was too lenient, applied for a review. The High Court’s Court of Appeal earlier allowed the application and increased the sentence to four years and one month.
2019 年 10 月，《禁蒙面法》實施翌日，各區爆發遊行抗議。一輛的士在深水埗剷上行人路，並撞向示威人群，司機其後遭「私了」。32 歲男子被指腳踩司機及用長形硬物毆打事主，承認暴動罪被判監禁 3 年。律政司不滿刑期過輕提出覆核，高院上訴庭早前批准申請，加刑至 4 年 1 個月。
上訴庭周四（27 日）頒下判詞指，雖然沒證據顯示本案涉精密計劃，但在當時背景下，「暴力的爆發是絕對可以預見」。法官指，本案有一定程度的預謀，並非完全偶發，暴力程度非常嚴重，沒導致事主永久傷殘，純屬僥倖。法官續指，原審忽略了本案私自處決不同背景或立場人士，比襲警更嚴重，原審判刑明顯過輕、原則犯錯。
27 Sept 2022法庭線#2516
警員 10.1 屯門驅示威者遭腐蝕液體擊中 入稟索償指警務處長錯判形勢
On October 1, 2019, police rejected the Civil Human Rights Front’s application to hold a march, and members of the public instead staged protests across multiple districts. During the dispersal of protesters at Tuen Mun Town Hall, some protesters threw corrosive liquid at police. An officer on duty at the time filed a claim in the District Court on Monday (the 26th), about three years later, alleging that the Commissioner of Police had misjudged the situation, leaving him and his colleagues outnumbered. He was splashed with corrosive liquid on his left forearm and chest and is seeking compensation. The claim did not specify an amount.
2019 年 10 月 1 日，警方拒絕民陣遊行申請，市民改在多區「遍地開花」。其中屯門大會堂有示威者被驅散時，向警方投擲腐蝕液體。一名當時執勤的警員，事隔約 3 年後，周一（26 日）入稟區域法院，指警務處處長當日錯判形勢，令他和同袍寡不敵眾，自己被腐液濺中左前臂及胸口，要求賠償，入稟狀未提及具體金額。
27 Sept 2022法庭線#2522
10.1 屯門驅示威者遭腐蝕液體擊中 再多一警入稟索償 兩人同指警方錯判形勢
About three years later, two police officers who were on duty at the time separately filed claims at the District Court and the High Court on Monday (26) and Tuesday (27), respectively. They said the Commissioner of Police had misjudged the situation that day, leaving them and their colleagues outnumbered and injured after being splashed by corrosive liquid, and sought compensation. Police said they would not comment because the cases had entered judicial proceedings.
事隔約 3 年後，兩名當時執勤警員，先後在周一（26 日）及周二（27 日），分別入稟區域法院及高等法院，指警務處處長當日錯判形勢，令二人和同袍寡不敵眾，被腐液濺中身體受傷，要求賠償。警方回覆指，由於案件已進入司法程序，不作評論。
2 Sept 2022法庭線#2405
10.13 觀塘｜中六生認 APM 外刀割警員右頸 警入稟區院索償
A Form Six student allegedly used a utility knife to stab a police officer in the neck outside Kwun Tong MTR Station three years ago. He pleaded guilty at the High Court in January to wounding with intent and was sentenced to 7 years and 9 months’ imprisonment. The injured officer filed a claim against the defendant in the District Court yesterday (the 1st), but the writ did not specify the amount sought.
中六生涉於三年前在觀塘港鐵站外，被指用鎅刀刺向一名警員的頸部。他今年一月在高等法院承認有意圖而傷人罪，遭判囚 7 年 9 個月。涉案受傷警員昨（1 日）入稟區域法院向被告索償，惟入稟狀未有列明所索金額。
2 Sept 2022法庭線#2406
運輸工被指太子站襲警無罪 入稟稱被捕後遭警施襲 向警務處處長索償
On 1 October 2019, clashes broke out in multiple districts across Hong Kong. A 42-year-old transport worker was charged with assaulting police outside Prince Edward station and was acquitted after trial. Three years later, on Thursday (1st), he filed a claim in the District Court, alleging that police officers assaulted him while he was in police custody, and seeking civil damages from the police.
2019 年 10 月 1 日，全港多區爆發衝突，42 歲運輸工被控於太子站外襲警，經審訊後獲判無罪。事隔三年，他周四（1 日）入稟區域法院，稱在警員制服及看管期間遭警員施襲，向警務處傷民事索償。
1 Sept 2022法庭線#2404
831 事件後太子向警喊「良心去咗邊？」 男生遭制服受傷 入稟指遭警傷害索償
On 2 September 2019, members of the public held a flower-laying event at Prince Edward station in response to the 831 Prince Edward station incident, which escalated into clashes between police and protesters. Nearly three years later, a man filed a claim in the District Court on Wednesday (31), alleging that he was injured by police in Prince Edward that day and seeking damages from the government. The claim did not specify an amount.
2019 年 9 月 2 日，市民因應 831 太子站事件，發起太子站獻花活動，演變成警民衝突。事隔近 3 年，一名市民周三（31 日）入稟區域法院，指當日在太子遭警員傷害，向政府索償，惟入稟狀未列明金額。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
