29 Aug 2025法庭線#7228
男子葵涌廣場與警爭執 被控擾亂秩序、襲警 准保釋10月再訊
A Pakistani man recently had a dispute with police officers at Kwai Chung Plaza. He was charged with disorderly conduct in a public place and assaulting a police officer. The case was first heard at West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts on Friday (29th). Magistrate Gary Man Hon Chu adjourned the case until 24 October for mention, and the man was granted $2,000 bail.
一名巴基斯坦籍男子近日在葵涌廣場與警員爭執。他被控在公眾地方擾亂秩序、襲警兩罪，案件周五（29 日）在西九龍裁判法院首提堂。裁判官朱文瀚押後至 10 月 24 日再訊，男子獲准以 2,000 元保釋。
29 Aug 2025集誌社#7231
葵廣罵警｜警連日洗太平地 派反依托咪酯單張 消防查走火通道 商戶質疑浪費警力
A video circulated on Threads on Wednesday (27th) showing a uniformed police officer enforcing the law at Kwai Chung Plaza being loudly berated by a South Asian man. The remarks included mocking uniformed police as “Yijin boys” and saying that “speaking loudly does not mean being rude”. The man, surnamed Wong, was arrested for “engaging in disorderly conduct in a public place”. He was additionally charged with one count of “assaulting a police officer” and brought before the court this morning (29th). Following the incident, large numbers of uniformed and plain-clothes officers have been deployed to Kwai Chung Plaza for two consecutive days since yesterday (28th), stationed and patrolling across the four-storey shopping centre. The Fire Services Department also attended today to inspect the shopping centre’s fire exits.
社交平台 Threads 周三（27日）流傳一段短片，片中一名軍裝警員在葵涌廣場執法，被一名南亞裔男子高聲斥罵，內容包括諷刺軍裝警為「毅進仔」、又表示「大聲唔代無禮貌」，該名黃姓男子因「在公眾地方作出擾亂秩序行為」被捕。今早（29日）另被起訴多一項「襲警」罪提堂。事發後，警方昨日（28日）起至今一連兩日，派出大批軍裝、便衣警到葵廣「洗太平地」，在四層商場駐守、巡邏；消防處今日也到場檢查商場走火通道。
24 Aug 2025法庭線#7205
陳輝旺死因陪審團倡警車內裝鏡頭 家屬促認真考慮：若果當年有，可否水落石出？
The Coroner’s Court ruled in July this year that taxi driver Chan Fai-wong was unlawfully killed. The jury recommended that police vehicles be fitted with video cameras capable of recording sound to safeguard the safety of arrested people. Chan Fai-wong’s daughter told The Witness that the recommendation was “very specific and clear”, and urged the authorities to respond to and consider it seriously.
The daughter said her father became paralysed from the neck down after a police officer restrained his neck. Fortunately, cameras at the Western Harbour Crossing recorded what happened at the time; otherwise, the cause of his paralysis would have remained unknown. However, he also had more than 20 non-fatal bruises. He said before his death that police officers had beaten him with batons, but there were no cameras in the police vehicle. “The reason my father was covered in bruises remains a mystery.”
She continued: “What exactly happened during those 20 minutes in that confined space after my father’s hands had been handcuffed behind his back and he had been put into the police vehicle? If there had been a camera in the police vehicle then, could what happened during those 20 minutes have come to light?”
She also said members of the public were very concerned about privacy issues arising from the use of cameras. Her father had been refused access to the Western Harbour Crossing footage and was ultimately able to view the footage from that night only after applying through the Coroner’s Court. This showed that, as long as rigorous procedures were established, privacy could be protected while helping society uphold justice and uncover the truth.
死因庭今年 7 月裁定的士司機陳輝旺「非法被殺」，陪審團向警方建議在警車安裝可收音的錄像鏡頭，保障被捕人的安全。陳輝旺的女兒回覆《法庭線》指，建議「非常具體及明確」，促請當局認真回應及考慮。
女兒提及，爸爸因警員箍頸致全身癱瘓，幸好西隧的錄影鏡頭拍攝了當刻情況，否則箍頸致癱的原因只會石沉大海，但爸爸身上亦有 20 多處非致命的瘀傷，他生前指遭警員用警棍毆打，但可惜警車上沒有錄影鏡頭，「我爸滿身瘀傷的原因依然成謎」。
女兒續問，「到底我爸雙手被反鎖、被箍上警車後，在那狹小空間的 20 分鐘裡，發生甚麼事？若果當年警車有錄影鏡頭，這 20 分鐘所發生的事情可否水落石出？」
她又指，作為市民亦非常關注錄影鏡頭衍生的私隱問題，爸爸曾申請西隧片段被拒絕，最後經由死因庭申請才能查看當晚片段，反映只要設立嚴謹程序就能保障私隱，同時有助社會維護公義與揭露真相。
23 Aug 2025明報#7204
網絡巡邏輔數碼法證 新小組助入境處放蛇拘黑工
The Immigration Department established a Cybercrime and Forensic Investigation Group in 2021. Through cyber patrols, the group provides intelligence to frontline officers and uses digital forensic techniques—including the recovery and analysis of electronic data from devices such as smartphones and laptops—to assist in gathering and presenting evidence, strengthening efforts against online immigration-related offences including sham marriages, the sale and purchase of forged documents, and arrangements involving illegal workers. In response to the illegal-worker issue that has attracted attention recently, the group assisted a task force in carrying out six undercover operations over the past year, resulting in the arrest of 21 mainland illegal workers who had come to Hong Kong to work in various sectors, including cleaning, purchasing-agent services, photography and tour guiding.
Six undercover operations in one year result in 21 arrests
Wu Hoi-leung, Assistant Principal Immigration Officer (Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Division) of the Immigration Department, said criminals in recent years had used different electronic devices to communicate and attempted to organise illegal activities on online platforms, including misleading or inducing members of the public to hire illegal workers, arranging sham marriages and trading forged documents. The department therefore established the Cybercrime and Forensic Investigation Group to strengthen efforts against related online immigration offences.
入境處2021年成立網絡罪案及法證調查小組，透過網絡巡邏為前線提供情報，又以數碼法證技術，包括修復及分析智能電話、手提電腦等電子裝置的電子數據，協助蒐證及舉證，加強打擊假結婚、買賣假證件、安排非法勞工等網上入境罪行。就近日引起關注的非法勞工問題，小組過去一年協助特遣隊作6次「放蛇」行動，拘捕21名來港從事清潔、代購、攝影、導遊等不同行業的內地非法勞工。
一年6放蛇拘21人
入境處助理首席入境事務主任（反恐及情報科）吳海量稱，近年犯罪分子利用不同電子裝置溝通，在網上平台試圖組織非法活動，包括誤導或誘使市民聘用非法勞工、假結婚、買賣假證等，故該處成立網絡罪案及法證調查小組，加強打擊相關網上入境罪行。
18 Jun 2025明報#6925
記者法院外遭警員查問及扣起證件 警方：在場助查 司法機構：傳媒可在法院大樓外拍攝
Two inquests are being heard at West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts. A journalist was questioned by police outside the court this Monday (16th) while filming a witness, and one journalist’s identification documents were held by an officer, who asked her to contact other journalists to return and provide their details. Police said yesterday that a woman showed an identity card and that she was “assisting with the inquiry”; the documents were later retrieved from inside the court. The Judiciary said today (18th) that journalists may film outside the court building and in designated press areas inside it, and declined to comment on the police action.
The inquests into the 2012 Lamma ferry disaster and the alleged choking of a taxi driver by a police officer are being heard at West Kowloon Courts. At about 1pm on Monday, witnesses from the Lamma ferry crew union walked out of the court, followed by several journalists filming them. A uniformed police officer approached and asked which media organisations they represented. One journalist’s identification documents were subsequently held by the officer, who asked her to contact the other journalists to return so that the officer could record their details.
In response to an inquiry, police said officers had seen several women filming outside the court’s vehicle entrance and approached to make inquiries. One woman showed the officer a press card and identity card, while the others said their documents had been left inside the court. Police said the woman who was able to show proof of identity was “assisting with the inquiry”. Someone later retrieved the documents from inside the court and showed them to the officers. Police reminded the people concerned to carry identification documents with them.
The Judiciary said that under the Court (Remote Hearing) Ordinance, anyone who records, publishes or broadcasts legal proceedings conducted as physical or remote hearings without authorisation may, upon conviction, be sentenced to up to five years’ imprisonment and fined $100,000. Under the Magistrates Ordinance, anyone who, without lawful authority, deliberately makes a visual or audio recording of court premises or any person in court premises may, upon conviction, be sentenced to up to one year’s imprisonment and fined $50,000.
西九龍裁判法院正審理兩宗死因研訊，有記者本周一（16日）在法院門外拍攝證人，遭警員查問。其中一名記者遭警員扣起證件，要求聯絡其他記者折返登記資料。警方昨回覆查詢稱，一名女子能出示身份證明文件及「在場助查」，其後有人從法院內取回證件。司法機構今（18日）回覆稱，記者可在法院大樓範圍外及法院大樓內指定的記者區拍攝，司法機構不評論警方行動。
2012年南丫海難及的士司機疑遭警員箍頸的死因研訊，正在西九龍法院審理。本周一下午近1時，南丫海難的船員工會證人步出法院門外，多名記者跟隨拍攝，軍裝警員上前查問所屬媒體。其後有一名記者遭警員扣起證件，警員要求她聯絡其他記者折返，供警員記錄資料。
警方回覆查詢稱，警員當時發現數名女子於法院車閘外拍攝，並上前了解，其中一人向警員出示記者證及身份證，其餘人士則指證件遺留法院內。警方指，該名能出示身份證明文件的人「在場助查」，其後有人從法院內取回證件，並向警員出示。警方提醒有關人士應隨身攜帶身份證明文件。
本報向司法機構查詢記者在法庭外拍攝的法律界線。司法機構回覆指，根據《法院（遙距聆訊）條例》，任何人未經授權而記錄、發布和廣播以實體聆訊和遙距聆訊進行的法律程序，一經定罪最高監禁5年及罰款10萬元。另根據《簡易程序治罪條例》，任何人無合法權限而故意對法院處所及在法院處所內的任何人作出影像或語音紀錄，一經定罪最高可被監禁1年及罰款5萬元。
13 Jun 2025集誌社#6907
駐港國安公署首出動 要求港國安警配合約談六人 被指涉嫌勾結外國勢力
The Office for Safeguarding National Security of the Central People’s Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region took action in Hong Kong for the first time, requesting assistance and cooperation from the Hong Kong Police Force’s National Security Department. Hong Kong national security police today arranged “interviews” on behalf of the office with six people suspected of committing “colluding with foreign or external forces to endanger national security”, and searched their homes and an office in Kwai Chung.
駐港國安公署首次在港展開行動，要求香港警方國安處協助、配合，港國安警今日為公署對六名被指涉嫌干犯「勾結外國或者境外勢力危害國家安全」的人士，安排「約談」，及搜查六人住所和葵涌的辦公室。
6 Jun 2025HK01#6875
無人機巡邏｜警方今起首市區試行 油麻地高空巡視三無大廈等區域
The West Kowloon Region of the Police Force launched the “Small Drone Operational Deployment” pilot scheme today (the 6th), conducting test flights to assist patrols along sections of Waterloo Road and Nathan Road in Yau Ma Tei. The patrol area can cover 96,000 square metres, including the rooftops of 34 buildings, 18 scaffolding structures and 28 back alleys.
Each drone patrol flight lasts 25 minutes, at an altitude of at least 60 metres above ground. Police said aerial surveillance of public areas using drones would optimise patrol coverage and the deployment of police manpower, enhance rapid response capabilities, prevent crime and assist in tracking suspects, thereby ensuring community safety.
警方西九龍總區今日（6日）起展開「小型無人機行動調配」先導計劃，在油麻地窩打老道、彌敦道等路段試飛無人機協助巡邏，巡邏範圍可覆蓋9.6萬平方米，可巡邏到34個大廈天台、18個棚架以及28條後巷等。
無人機巡邏每次飛行25分鐘，飛行高度距離地面至少60米，警方指，透過無人機在公共區域進行高空巡視，優化巡邏範圍和警力配置，提升快速應變能力，並且防止罪案發生並協助追蹤疑犯，確保社區安全。
3 Jun 2025獨媒#6856
【六四36】去年維園外被截查者收警方電話 詢問今年行程
The June 4 vigil in Victoria Park has not taken place in recent years, but some members of the public still go to the area on the day wearing black and lighting candles. Police remain on high alert; last year, several people were stopped, questioned and had their personal details recorded in Causeway Bay on June 4. One person who was stopped last year told InMedia that they received a call from police last week asking about their plans for June 4 this year. Dickson Chau, vice-chairman of the League of Social Democrats, also told InMedia that he had recently received “concern from the powerful departments”: “It seems [the department] is somewhat nervous about whether anyone will take to the streets on June 4.”
維園六四晚會近年不再出現，但仍有市民會於當日到維園一帶穿上黑衣、點起燭光；警方則嚴陣以待，去年有多人在六四當日於銅鑼灣被截查及登記個人資料。有去年被截查者向《獨媒》透露，在上星期收到警方來電，詢問今年6月4日的行程。社民連副主席周嘉發亦向《獨媒》表示，近日他有收到「強力部門的關心」：「睇嚟（部門）對於有冇人喺六四當日上街，都有啲緊張。」
8 Jun 2023獨媒#6573
警方再去信記協 稱「一再發表未經查證、以偏概全的說法」
Former Hong Kong Journalists Association chairwoman Mak Yin-ting was taken to a police station and detained for questioning on June 4 while covering the 34th anniversary of the June 4 incident. The association issued a statement the following day accusing police of obstructing reporting work. Police wrote back the same day, demanding that it withdraw the statement. The association replied the day before yesterday (June 6), again urging police to explain the full circumstances. Police wrote back again yesterday (June 7), saying the association had “repeatedly made unverified and sweeping statements” that damaged the image of the police force, and again urging it to withdraw the statement and related assertions.
前記協主席麥燕庭在6月4日正在採訪六四事件34周年時，被警方帶返警署扣查。記協翌日發聲明，批警方阻礙採訪工作。警方即日去信反擊，要求記協撤回聲明。前日（6月6日）記協覆信，再促警方交代來龍去脈。警方昨日（6月7日）再回信，指記協「一再發表未經查證、以偏概全的說法」，損害警隊形象，再促記協撤回有關聲明和論述。
7 Mar 2023法庭線#6131
3在囚者入稟向警方索償 稱在警署遭警員毆打 3人與「口岸爆炸品案」被告同名
Three people who said they were detained at Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre filed a handwritten civil personal-injury claim against the Commissioner of Police on Monday (the 6th), seeking compensation from the Commissioner for physical and psychological injuries allegedly caused by the conduct of individual police officers. In their filings, the three claimed that they were assaulted by police officers at Old Ngau Tau Kok, Tsing Yi and Tsing Shan police stations respectively between 7 and 8 March 2020. One alleged that officers assaulted them to obtain evidence.
A review of records found that the names of the three claimants were the same as those of three defendants in the “port explosives” case. According to information from a police press conference, police arrested a total of 20 people in connection with three explosives cases on 7 and 8 March 2020. The case is scheduled to go to trial in August 2024. Eight people have been charged, seven of whom face an additional charge under the United Nations (Anti-Terrorism Measures) Ordinance of the offence of prohibiting the bombing of prescribed targets, which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment upon conviction.
3 名報稱在囚於荔枝角收押所的市民，周一（6 日）以手寫入稟狀向警務處長提出民事傷亡訴訟，要求處長就個別警員行為，造成他們的身體及精神傷害賠償。3 人於入稟狀中報稱，在 2020 年 3 月 7 至 8 日期間，分別在舊牛頭角、青衣、青山警署遭警員毆打，其中一人報稱警員為索取證據而毆打。
翻查資料，3 名入稟者的姓名與「口岸爆炸品」案當中 3 名被告相同；據警方記者會資料，於 2020 年 3 月 7 日及 8 日，警方共就三宗爆炸品案拘捕 20 人。案件將於 2024 年 8 月開審，共 8 人被落案起訴，其中 7 人被加控《聯合國（反恐怖主義措施）條例》中的「對訂明標的的爆炸的禁制罪」，一旦罪成可判囚終身。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
