4 Jun 2025集誌社#6867
六四36｜ 裝甲車入銅鑼灣 密集搜查「送」走悼念者 警拘兩人扣查十人
The placard-holding Uncle Ng, a person forcibly taken away, the person with palms together Lui Yuk Lin, a man holding a candle, a girl carrying white flowers, and a man who tussled with police were all taken away. On the 36th anniversary of June 4, armoured vehicles and large numbers of police deployed in Causeway Bay, using methods including forcibly “sending away” and taking people back to police stations to ensure suspected commemorators had “no way to stay”. By 11:30 p.m. on June 4, police had arrested two people and detained ten, the youngest aged 15.
舉牌吳伯，被強行送走、合十女長毛，遭帶上警車、亮燭光男子、持白花女生、與警推撞男，都被帶走。六四 36 周年，裝甲車和大量警力進駐銅鑼灣，以強行「送走」、帶返警署等方式，令疑似悼念者「無得留低」。至六四晚上 11 時半，警方拘捕了兩人、扣查十人，最細 15 歲。
4 Jun 2025集誌社#6868
六四 36｜消防、警員、海關巡黃店 陳劍琴「同香會」被海關放蛇檢走貨物
On the eve of the 36th anniversary of June 4, several law enforcement departments, including the Fire Services Department, uniformed police officers and Customs, separately visited several “yellow shops” for “inspections” or “enforcement”. The incense-selling stall “Tung Heung Wui”, run by Kim Kam Chan, who was arrested over Article 23, was visited by Customs on the evening of the 3rd, when officers made an undercover purchase of incense sticks. Customs subsequently seized some of the goods, alleging that the stall had contravened the Consumer Goods Safety Ordinance. The Customs operation lasted more than four hours, with officers leaving close to midnight. During the operation, several plain-clothes men remained nearby and spoke with Customs officers. When a reporter approached to ask questions, one of them photographed the reporter and claimed to be a passer-by who was a “member of the public”.
The Customs operation continued for more than four hours until close to midnight. A plain-clothes man who had left returned, and after Kim Kam Chan repeatedly questioned him, he said: “Actually, you know too; everyone knows ... we all know each other’s identities.” He confirmed that he was a plain-clothes police officer. The five Customs officers did not leave until 11:40 p.m.
六四 36 周年前夕，多個執法部門，包括消防處、軍裝警以及海關，分別到幾間黃店「巡查」或「執法」。其中 23 條被捕者陳劍琴的賣香小檔「同香會」，在 3 日晚上被海關「放蛇」買線香，之後被指涉嫌違反《消費品安全條例》下檢走部分貨物。海關人員執法行動逾四小時，接近午夜才離開；期間一直有數名便裝男士在旁徘徊，又與海關對話，記者上前查詢時，其中一人拍下記者相片，自稱為路過「市民」。
海關執法逾四小時直至近午夜，一度離開的便裝男子再出現，陳劍琴再三追問下，對方稱「其實你都知，大家心知…大家咩身分啦」，確認自己是便衣警員。五名海關職員直至晚上 11 時 40 分才離開。
3 Jun 2025集誌社#6855
六四 36｜消失的六四地標 民主女神像、六四浮雕下落不明 國殤之柱成證物
At the end of 2021, several universities in Hong Kong suddenly removed June 4 landmarks from their campuses, including the Goddess of Democracy, the Pillar of Shame and a June 4 relief. The Pillar of Shame was taken to the University of Hong Kong’s Kadoorie Centre in Yuen Long and was seized by the National Security Department the year before last as evidence in a case of inciting subversion of state power. Lingnan University previously said that the June 4 relief had been properly stored, but did not disclose its location. The Goddess of Democracy remains unaccounted for. The Chinese University of Hong Kong previously said it had instructed legal advisers to determine the next steps concerning its removal with the statue’s owner, Chen Weiming.
Three and a half years on, what has become of the landmarks? Chen Weiming, the artist who created the Goddess of Democracy and the June 4 relief, said he had discussed arrangements for returning the works with the Chinese University and Lingnan University through legal representatives at the time. He agreed to the universities’ conditions, including assuming the risks and costs of transport, not pursuing the matter in future and signing a confidentiality agreement. However, after he asked the universities about the specific transport arrangements, they stopped responding, and the matter came to nothing. The Collective, a Hong Kong media outlet, asked the Chinese University and Lingnan University about the works’ current whereabouts. The Chinese University said it had “no further information to add regarding the incident”, while Lingnan University said, “The university handles items strictly in accordance with Hong Kong law and has no other comment.” Jens Galschiøt, the creator of the Pillar of Shame, said he was considering suing the Hong Kong government.
2021 年末，本港多間大學突然移走校內的六四地標，包括民主女神像、國殤之柱、六四浮雕。其中國殤之柱被運往元朗港大嘉道理中心，前年被國安處檢走為煽動顛覆國家政權案的證物；至於六四浮雕，嶺大曾稱妥為儲存，但未透露地點；民主女神像則至今下落不明，中大曾稱已委託法律顧問，與雕像擁有者陳維明確定移走的後續步驟。
三年半過去，這些地標去向如何？創作民主女神像和六四浮雕的藝術家陳維明表示，當年曾透過法律代表，與中大和嶺大商討作品歸還的安排，並同意校方的條件，包括願意承擔運送的風險和費用、日後不作追究、簽署保密協議等，但當他向校方查詢具體運送安排，校方便再也沒有回覆，事件不了了之。《集誌社》向中大和嶺大查詢作品現時去向，中大指「對相關事件沒有進一步補充」，嶺大則稱「大學嚴格按照香港法律處理物品，並無其他評論」；至於國殤之柱創作者高志活則稱正考慮控告港府。
3 Jun 2025獨媒#6856
【六四36】去年維園外被截查者收警方電話 詢問今年行程
The June 4 vigil in Victoria Park has not taken place in recent years, but some members of the public still go to the area on the day wearing black and lighting candles. Police remain on high alert; last year, several people were stopped, questioned and had their personal details recorded in Causeway Bay on June 4. One person who was stopped last year told InMedia that they received a call from police last week asking about their plans for June 4 this year. Dickson Chau, vice-chairman of the League of Social Democrats, also told InMedia that he had recently received “concern from the powerful departments”: “It seems [the department] is somewhat nervous about whether anyone will take to the streets on June 4.”
維園六四晚會近年不再出現，但仍有市民會於當日到維園一帶穿上黑衣、點起燭光；警方則嚴陣以待，去年有多人在六四當日於銅鑼灣被截查及登記個人資料。有去年被截查者向《獨媒》透露，在上星期收到警方來電，詢問今年6月4日的行程。社民連副主席周嘉發亦向《獨媒》表示，近日他有收到「強力部門的關心」：「睇嚟（部門）對於有冇人喺六四當日上街，都有啲緊張。」
3 Jun 2025集誌社#6857
六四 36｜藝術家陳美彤被警「護送」到港鐵站離開 警銅鑼灣駐守查證件
Today (the 3rd) is the eve of the 36th anniversary of the June 4 Incident. In the afternoon, police officers from the Police Tactical Unit patrolled various locations in Causeway Bay. At around 4pm, artist Chan Mei-tung appeared outside Sogo Department Store, where police searched her. They subsequently “escorted” her to an MTR station and told her to enter the paid area and leave.
今日（3日）是六四事件36周年前夕，下午時份，在銅鑼灣，多處有機動部隊警員巡邏。藝術家陳美彤，約下午四時許，在崇光百貨外出現，被警搜身，及後將她「護送」到港鐵站，要她入閘離開。
3 Jun 2025獨媒#6859
【六四36】US8964車主：車輛已安排運離 不會再在香港行走
The owner, Anthony Chiu, told The Initium that his family had been harassed and threatened by unidentified people over the past year. He had earlier held a farewell car gathering with fellow car enthusiasts he knew. The vehicle bearing the relevant number plate has been arranged to leave Hong Kong and will no longer be driven on the city’s roads.
車主招先生向《獨媒》表示，他的家人在過去一年來受到不明人士的滋擾和恐嚇。他早前已與相熟車友為車輛舉行告別車聚，掛上相關車牌的車輛已安排運離香港，不會再在本港的馬路上行走。
3 Jun 2025獨媒#6861
【六四36】獵人書店拍賣六四書刊：只是商品、不擔心犯法
With June 4 approaching, many bookstores previously sold books and publications on the subject, but such materials have become increasingly hard to find in recent years. Independent bookstore Hunter Bookstore in Sham Shui Po has recently auctioned several out-of-print June 4-related books and publications, including Wen Wei Po’s *A Record of the Bloodbath in Beijing*, Ming Pao’s special publication *The Tragic Democracy Movement*, and the Hong Kong Journalists Association’s *I Am a Reporter—Imprints of June 4*.
Store manager Wong Man-huen told InMedia that this year the police had neither stationed officers outside as they did last year nor copied down the identity cards of people entering and leaving the store, and that the bookstore had not received any “提示”. Wong said the publications were merely merchandise, and that it was “entirely reasonable” for a bookstore to sell merchandise. She was not worried about breaking the law or facing the risk of arrest.
六四將至，過往不少書店會出售相關題材書刊，但近年買少見少。位於深水埗的獨立書店獵人書店，近日在店內拍賣多本已經絕版的六四書藉及刊物，包括文匯報出版的《血洗京華實錄》、明報特刊《悲壯的民運》、記協出版的《我是記者——六四印記》等。
店長黃文萱向《獨媒》表示，今年警方未有如去年一樣駐守門外及抄下出入人士身份證，亦沒有收到任何「提示」。黃指有關書刊只是商品，書店銷售商品是「十分合理」，不擔心會觸犯法例及有被捕風險。
2 Jun 2025集誌社#6850
六四 36｜失去自由 1364 日 鄒幸彤擬連續第四年獄中絕食悼六四
Chow Hang-tung, the former vice-chairwoman of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China who has been accused of “inciting subversion of state power”, published a blog post on Patreon yesterday (June 1), saying she would continue to fast for 36 hours inside prison on June 4 to commemorate June 4 and “reaffirm our commitment”. She also said she believed everyone would have their own ways of remembering. Having been remanded in custody for 1,364 days, Chow will fast in prison to commemorate June 4 for the fourth consecutive year.
In the blog post, Chow also shared her thoughts on the Alliance’s final victory in the case over its refusal to provide information. She said that although the ruling restored justice to those involved, it still fell short of justice because the judgment was “technical” and “lightly let off” the “illegal actions of national security”. She believed the government owed the victims an apology. She reiterated that after learning of the verdict, she shouted in court: “Tell Chris Tang to apologise!” But she said she did not know how long it would take to receive an apology, just as the Tiananmen Mothers had waited 36 years and still had not received one. She stressed that she would pursue the matter to the end.
被指涉「煽動顛覆國家政權」支聯會前副主席鄒幸彤，昨日（6月1日）在 Patreon 發布網誌，指將在 6 月 4 日當年，繼續在牆內絕食 36 小時紀念和「重申我們的承諾」，又指「相信大家也會有各自的方法去銘記」；至今已被還押 1364 日的鄒幸彤，今年是連續第四年在獄中絕食悼念六四。
鄒幸彤網誌亦發表了她就支聯會拒交資料案終極勝訴的感受，指雖還涉事人公道，但仍未達到公義，因判詞「流於技術性」，對「國安的非法行動」「輕輕放過」，認為政府欠受害人一句道歉。她重申當日得悉裁決後，在庭上喊出「叫鄧炳強道歉呀!」，但指不知一句道歉要等多久，就如天安門母親等了 36 年，仍未等到一句道歉，強調會追究到底。
21 May 2025獨媒#6810
家鄉市集連續三年橫跨六四舉行 維園七一期間亦已被租用
In recent years, the Victoria Park candlelight vigil has “disappeared”, replaced by the “Hometown Market Carnival”. This year is no exception: the Federation of Hong Kong Guangdong Community Organisations and several hometown associations have announced that the “Third Hometown Market” will be held from June 1 to 5, with nearly 300 stalls selling specialty products from different provinces and cities.
The Leisure and Cultural Services Department confirmed in response to an inquiry from The Initium that it had received an application from an organisation to use Victoria Park’s hard-surface soccer pitches, central lawn and basketball courts for public activities from May 26 to June 8, with attendance expected to exceed 100,000. Separately, another organisation had applied to use the park’s hard-surface soccer pitches and basketball courts from June 23 to July 5 for activities celebrating the 28th anniversary of the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, with approximately 80,000 participants expected.
近年維園燭光晚會「消失」，取而代之的是「家鄉市集嘉年華」。今年亦不例外，香港廣東社團總會及多個同鄉社團宣布，「第三屆家鄉市集」將在6月1日至5日舉行，近300個攤位會展銷各省市的特色產品。
康文署回覆《獨媒》查詢時確認，署方接獲團體申請於5月26日至6月8日期間，使用維園的硬地足球場、中央草坪及籃球場舉辦公眾活動，預計十多萬人參加；另外，有另一團體申請於6月23日至7月5日期間，使用維園硬地足球場及籃球場舉辦慶祝香港特區成立28周年活動，預計參加人數約八萬。
21 Nov 2024法庭線#4271
2021六四｜「鄭婆婆」被指違口罩令罪名不成立 官指警作供迴避未能接納
On the 32nd anniversary of the June 4 incident on 4 June 2021, Cheng Kit-sheung, known as “Granny Cheng”, was charged by summons with breaching the mask-wearing requirement in Hang Hau. She pleaded not guilty and stood trial. The defence case and the defendant’s testimony were originally scheduled to begin at the Kwun Tong Magistrates’ Courts on Thursday (21st), but the defence said it had decided not to call witnesses or have the defendant testify. Both sides then made their closing submissions that day. After adjourning the case for half a day, Acting Magistrate Tang Tsz-kai ruled that the defendant was not guilty. Outside court, Cheng Kit-sheung described the magistrate as “a judge who sees every detail clearly and cares about people’s livelihoods”.
In his ruling, the magistrate said the evidence of the two police witnesses differed “too greatly” for him to accept it with confidence. Both said they had not activated their body-worn cameras at the time, yet their notebooks contained the words “recording stopped”, which he said was “inexplicable”. The two officers also appeared evasive under cross-examination, prompting him to question whether “there was something they did not want to disclose”. Their conduct made it difficult for the court to accept their evidence. As the prosecution had ultimately failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, the defendant was found not guilty.
2021 年 6 月 4 日「六四事件」32 周年，「鄭婆婆」鄭潔嫦被票控於坑口違口罩令。她不認罪受審，原定周四（21 日）在觀塘裁判法院展開辯方案情、被告親身作供，惟辯方指現決定不傳證人亦不作供，控辯雙方即日結案陳詞。暫委裁判官鄧子楷押後本案半日後，裁定被告罪名不成立。鄭潔嫦在庭外形容裁判官是「明察秋毫，為民生嘅法官」。
官裁決時指，控方兩名警方證人的證供「差異太大」，未能安心接納；二人均稱當時沒啟動隨身攝錄機，惟記事冊有「停止攝錄」字眼，「令人百思不得其解」；兩人面對盤問時又顯迴避，質疑「除非有事件唔想披露」，做法令法庭難以接受，最後基於控方未能舉證至毫無合理疑點，罪名不成立。
Translations are supplied by the source workbook. Consult the original reporting for context.
